- 34
- 30 545
Ace the Flying Aardvark
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 9 ก.ย. 2019
I'm Ace. I used to fly Prowlers in the Marine Corps. Now when I fly, it’s around the Pacific Northwest with my friends in our Vans RVs. We started a group we call The Flying Aardvarks. I think the name started as a joke...it might still be a joke... not sure. This channel is a place for me to collect some of the stuff I think is fun, and maybe give a view into another side of general aviation, RV aviation, and the community in the PNW. Get out there and fly!
G3X Secrets pt II: Using Synthetic Vision on an Instrument Approach for better SA
Using Garmin's G3X on an instrument approach and why it is awesome.#g3x #velocityvector #Garmin
มุมมอง: 2 922
วีดีโอ
The Awesome Secret of the Garmin G3X
มุมมอง 6K9 หลายเดือนก่อน
The best feature of the Garmin G3X you've don't use everyday, but should.
Is your ACTUAL glide ratio wrong?
มุมมอง 1.3Kปีที่แล้ว
Engine out glide is hotly debated. I tested my plane with the engine OFF to get my real-world performance numbers. Your glide ratio is critical if you have a real-world engine failure, in particular if you are using something like glide advisor in foreflight. My results were WAY off the 10, 11, or even 12 to one some people reported they were using for a vans RV aircraft.
RNAV 16R to Paine Field - Second boringist video I've ever done
มุมมอง 1.1Kปีที่แล้ว
IFR RNAV Approach to 16R at Paine Field. Pretty Boring. It's an RV6A with a G3X and GTN650. #G3X #GTN650 #vansrv #gamrin
The Madera Formation Clinic
มุมมอง 446ปีที่แล้ว
This is a voiceover for a previous video showing the Varks heading to the Madera Formation Clinic in 2019. The last video was just a bunch of tunes and flying, here I talk about what you saw there.
Buy a Tactical Jet or a Homebuilt Plane?
มุมมอง 1.3Kปีที่แล้ว
Which is better to own: A Marine Corps Attach Jet or a Vans RV experimental aircraft? #vansrv #aviation #flying
Formation in Vans RVs
มุมมอง 3552 ปีที่แล้ว
A few Vans RVs flying formation near Electric City in Washington. This is just an excerpt from another video but just the best part.
Broken Plane in the Alvord Desert
มุมมอง 8802 ปีที่แล้ว
We planned for a nice, relaxing day to fly to the Alvord Desert Playa. Then disaster struck! Ok, it wasn't that bad, but certainly not how we planned to spend the day. 4 Vans RV experimental planes. 1 flat tire. 1,000,000,000 bees. And one good time had by all.
Formation Short: This is how to do it. 3-ship RV formation rendezvous.
มุมมอง 1442 ปีที่แล้ว
This is an example of a nearly text-book formation join-up. Both aircraft do a really good job staying in bearing line, making appropriate corrections, controlling airspeed and altitude. The join-up is smooth, and both planes get to the right position for their join.
Boring. Using the G3X and GTN650 for an RNAV to minimums at KPLU
มุมมอง 1832 ปีที่แล้ว
This is just what it says. a Vans RV6A doing an RNAV approach to mins. If you are expecting the normal Flying Aardvark excitement, you will certainly be disappointed. #IR #VansRV
Flying in RVs. Electric City for almost 2 nights to kick of the season.
มุมมอง 3633 ปีที่แล้ว
The Flying Aardvarks are back, with a trip to Electric City for some formation refresh. Lots of formation takeoffs, rejoins, and all that good stuff. We even got a 4 ship departure in. #vansrv #theflyingaardvarks #plancamping
Trip to Bend in experimental plane: FAIL
มุมมอง 9384 ปีที่แล้ว
We thought it would be a great day for a trip to Bend, to go get some meats from Sister's Smokehouse. Weather forecast was beautiful, the day looked great....what could possibly go wrong?!?!?! Sure, we would need to fly VFR over the top, but that's easy enough. Weather at Sisters and in Bend was forecast to be BEAUTIFUL. WHAT. COULD. GO. WRONG?!?!?!
Is that plane on fire? Smokin' Planes to the Willapa Fly-in. Buckle up.
มุมมอง 4684 ปีที่แล้ว
The good folks at Willapa (2S9) sent out the signal, and many answered the call. Oysters, burgers, and hot dogs on the grill. Formation flight of RVs arriving. This is about as PNW as it gets for flying. #PNWAF #VANSRV #Willapa
Oshkosh 2020 Part V: Fini. Final Leg back to Seattle
มุมมอง 2984 ปีที่แล้ว
The final installment of the Oshkosh 2020 replacement trip. Just a couple of RVs flying across the country and back even though Oshkosh was cancelled. In this last let we leave Sioux Falls, fly low over the Badlands, then on to KRAP, Bozeman, Spokane, and home to Seattle. This was an awesome trip. The places we saw, people we met, things we did…all of it such a great time. If you ever have the ...
Oshkosh 2020 - IV. Formation approaches? ASR into Sioux Falls.
มุมมอง 1814 ปีที่แล้ว
Oshkosh 2020 - IV. Formation approaches? ASR into Sioux Falls.
Oshkosh 2020 III - Crosswind landings in Duluth Sky Harbor
มุมมอง 6304 ปีที่แล้ว
Oshkosh 2020 III - Crosswind landings in Duluth Sky Harbor
Oshkosh 2020 Part II - Formation over Yellowstone.
มุมมอง 3584 ปีที่แล้ว
Oshkosh 2020 Part II - Formation over Yellowstone.
Oshkosh 2020 Part I - RVs to OSH 2020 (4K)
มุมมอง 2K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Oshkosh 2020 Part I - RVs to OSH 2020 (4K)
Flying to Sisters, Oregon. We have the MEATS
มุมมอง 2904 ปีที่แล้ว
Flying to Sisters, Oregon. We have the MEATS
SEATAC said no, but Tacoma said yes. 3 experimental planes over Seattle.
มุมมอง 3134 ปีที่แล้ว
SEATAC said no, but Tacoma said yes. 3 experimental planes over Seattle.
Airsick Passenger in Small Plane - What NOT to do
มุมมอง 4.4K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Airsick Passenger in Small Plane - What NOT to do
Bremerton with my special lady friend. We're getting the band together!
มุมมอง 1794 ปีที่แล้ว
Bremerton with my special lady friend. We're getting the band together!
Vans RV flight to Astoria from Seattle...in a Socially Distant COVID-19 Compliant Formation
มุมมอง 2014 ปีที่แล้ว
Vans RV flight to Astoria from Seattle...in a Socially Distant COVID-19 Compliant Formation
The BEST holiday! Daylights Savings. Pie at the Spruce Goose Cafe at Jeffco and RV Formation Flying
มุมมอง 2684 ปีที่แล้ว
The BEST holiday! Daylights Savings. Pie at the Spruce Goose Cafe at Jeffco and RV Formation Flying
Finally a nice day in 2020! Darrington (1S2) and Bellingham, burger at Northwater.
มุมมอง 2.2K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Finally a nice day in 2020! Darrington (1S2) and Bellingham, burger at Northwater.
I think she hates my flying. New Year’s Day flight.
มุมมอง 4645 ปีที่แล้ว
I think she hates my flying. New Year’s Day flight.
Kitty Hawk Anniversary and Low Oil Pressure Indications- RV flying in the PNW
มุมมอง 2525 ปีที่แล้ว
Kitty Hawk Anniversary and Low Oil Pressure Indications- RV flying in the PNW
Single Vans RV flying around the greater Paine (Seattle) area after Thanksgiving.
มุมมอง 1285 ปีที่แล้ว
Single Vans RV flying around the greater Paine (Seattle) area after Thanksgiving.
Probably the best video I have ever seen!
Especially that purple plane
I had no idea about this. Thanks. I am getting some screens put in and starting to get fired up about it.
I loved the change to the G3X even more than I thought I would. Stoked for ya!!!
I'm sorry, man.Your probably a really nice guy, but you also look like an alien.
I like your video and I'm going to do more testing, but there are 2 points where I disagree. The way I have been adjusting my glide ring is totally different. Please let me know if you disagree. The way I do it is to go up to a reasonable altitude with my GR set on Foreflight and fly to a point where the green circle is just to the edge of an airport, and then I pull the power and see if I can make the airport. If I don't make it then I adjust the GR and try again. I care about the green ring, I don't care about the number. One question I have is how are you determining your horizontal distance with any degree of accuracy? I am sure your trig is very accurate, but that horizontal distance could be way off. The second point is that having the green ring set too close is just as bad as having it set too far. If I am flying over the Cascades and my engine quits then I'm going to immediately turn to an airport that I can make based on the green ring, but it would be even worse if I turned away from an airport that I could have made because it's just outside of my green ring because it was set too conservatively. I don't want to aim for a mountain snowfield if I could have made an airport. One additional point is that I have a Sling tsi and it has a CS prop which can fully feather. I need 2 glide rings, one with the engine windmilling and the other with a dead engine and the prop fully feathered. What I do is set my ForeFlight glide ring with it fully feathered, and the G3X glide ring set for the windmilling distance. My only problem is I don't really know what my feathered glide ring is because I'm too chicken to completely stop my engine to test it. Let me know what you think.
Hey, thanks. The horizontal distance is relatively easy with GPS. I am flying a straight track line (track not heading) direct to a gps point. I also did it both ways to account for wing.
You have me rethinking my use of 'pathways.' I disabled it because of clutter, but may try it again. Why do you prefer the dual-cue command bars over the single cue (bars and cross, rather than chevrons) on the PFD? Most folks seem to use the single cue, but I assume you have a reason. Last - when you refer to the glide path angle in degrees, I assume you are simply reading the VV location on the pitch bars, is this correct? Or is there a vertical angle callout I'm missing somewhere?
I keep pathways disabled for clutter, too 😎 You are right on for VV (degrees on the vector) in terms of the G3X display, and you can see it on the chart in terms of the designed approach glideslope.
So, love the G3X in my RV-7. Not only the vv, but much of the rest of it is ground breaking as well. Folks don't quite understand when I go, "Oh, the G1000... that's kind of old and clunky!" Glad I found your channel. Thoughts on formation and acro training?
In favor on both. Tough to find, though. For formation I’d find a local group that does a clinic. FFI is a good place to start, but candidly I think (unfortunately) word of mouth is still king.
Thanks!
Thanks! Nice Y explained, clearly I wasn’t using this to its full capability
Well done! So many features on the G3X but you're right this one is really useful. Subscribed.
Thanks much-love this feedback.
Thanks for this interesting video. Just FYI Garmin call what you say is the "velocity vector" the "flight path marker". It had me confused for a little bit. Cheers
It can glide directly to the crash site, every time….
Takeoffs are optional, landings are mandatory…
The 3 degree velocity vector check is a great tip. Thanks….
Nice Q-1 shirt.
Yessir!
You're obviously also assuming a straight line glide. Having to make a turn would affect your 'safe gliding distance'-no?
It would for sure
how to get rid of this feeling, when I get motion sickness the whole day is fed and it cuts the fun time pretty fast
Great vid, working on my IFR in my RV10 with Garmin panel.
RV10 is such a great plane.
Great video. The G3X is such a powerful system. Really improves SA. I think the most compelling data point was at the end of the video where you show the approach into KPAE. In IMC, VV on the approach end of the runway with synthetic vision, and then you break out. Boom! Right where you need to be.
Their is a real need for real flying while using the G3X system! I would love some sort of checklist line item that goes into detail on using the G3X with the GFC500 on different approaches. Your multi screen set up in the videos is great!! Thanks N494R
I had the same thought when I started using the autopilot, there’s all these little “gotchyas” that are so hard to figure out.
First!
The channel clearly appeals to ATP pilots
@@flyingaardvarks1133 Can confirm that I passed my ATP by only studying this channel.
This is a great cheat code in IFR training.
Excitedly waiting for part II. 🙂
Just published! th-cam.com/video/kEnVALM4FTM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=395uZ60taSuqmkVE
Great video. Excited to start using the velocity vector. And I like the comparison between high and off terrain alerts. How do the low alerts compare as well?
Low is a bit less sensitive. I can’t remember the exact parameters but from a non-technical perspective, it just gives you a slightly lower margin. Honestly, for most people if you aren’t flying around in terrain often, but do occasionally fly though ravines and stuff low is probably a good setting. It’s nice that it gives you the option.
brilliant. I keep my eye on it (on my dynon) occasionally but haven't really flown using it as a primary instrument. your examples of slow flight and of level flight during steep turns were light bulb moments.
Thanks! I LOVE this feature
Nice....and so useful. I knew the function, but I still learned something. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks! Super happy it was useful.
Cool video. Thanks
Maybe show in the next video how to use it to aim for the runway threshold?
Great idea-I’ll do a part ii
Have to say. You left out my favorite use of the Velocity Vector... Park it on the numbers of the runway within synthetic vision and nail your crosswind correction and decent rate for an approach to landing.
Part II
@@flyingaardvarks1133 1:41
I’m here for you… th-cam.com/video/kEnVALM4FTM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=395uZ60taSuqmkVE
FIRST! Morning, Ace!
Velocity velocity vector
This was fantastic! Thanks for putting this together.
Thanks Ryan!
I’m not IFR rated, but will probably start it the near future. This is a great visualization of the process, so thanks for posting the video. Liked it!
Thank you!
hoping you'll see this, I'd love to tag along if you are headed to Alvord this year. I'm comfortable with places like Cpalis Beach (S16) and Tieton (4S6). I'm just nervous about going and not knowing if I'm going to get stuck. I don't even have to bother you or fly with you, just land when you're there and can tell me it's okay.
Alvord is a bit easier than those other two IMO. You can also sort of land near(ish) other people on the playa, or closer to the road…but I’d definitely recommend going in a small group given my experience. Not likely we will go back this year. It is a LOT of dust to clean up!
@@flyingaardvarks1133 thanks. it's good to know the 'difficulty level'. Now I just need to find a group going :)
Great to show how hard it is to break the bead without a bead breaker. More talc is always good!
Maybe I missed it but do you run a constant speed prop? My RV-7A got similar glide results but when I pulled the prop control the glide ratio went way up! I too did it with engine off. Nice work
Yup-CS prop. Going to test it in also (next) with the prop way back. But I will still keep my glide ration at 7.5 so I know “worst case” ie no pitch control.
I took a Cessna 172B over on my airplane channel - and heavily modified the wings: STOL cuff, VGs, and wing extensions of 3 extra feet in length. I know my glide ratio changed, and I've been testing it but I haven't yet got a solid number. So I've kept a very conservative stock 172 ratio in Foreflight until I can finish testing.
I haven't stopped the prop yet, but I have a SLSA with an absurdly conservative number in the POH. I did a series of tests, using autopilot to reduce the human factor, and I also tested reflex (negative) flap settings and zero. It's hard to test with winds though! I guess I'll have to go up when there's either a perfect crosswind in my test valley or find a time when the wind is near zero. I feel like I'm missing an obvious correction for wind speed so my numbers are still valid, I have the wind data since I'm pulling logs out of my panel anyhow.
Reflex? Wow--What are you flying?
@@flyingaardvarks1133 nothing exotic, just a Flight Design LSA. I know Pipistrels and Maules have reflex, RV10 does, and something like the Columbia or Lancair does as well.
Thank you for this! Awesome job. Companies should be forced to provide "correct glide ratios", It may matter to the extent of life or death! Guys and Gals... this deserves a thumbs up!
Thanks, Robert!
Great video. Looking forward to the follow up with a stopped propeller.
👍Nice post. I tested this in my RV-7A also. There are two scenarios for an engine failure: Fuel starvation=wind-milling prop... and engine seizure=prop stopped. Wind-milling produces more drag than stopped. I tested mine both ways and found slightly better glide performance with the prop stopped. To get my Hartzell constant speed two bladed prop to stop (after engine shutdown), the airspeed had to be decreased to just above stall speed. Eventually, it flops to a stop. Your test results are reasonable for a side-by-side nose-dragger. I'm sure a taildragger tandem seat RV would have way LESS aerodynamic drag than mine... and better glide performance. Another useful number to determine is Minimum Sink speed....assuming you've glided to overhead a landing field and have lots of altitude remaining to work your problem. Well... A lot of this is splitting hairs with the glide performance numbers. HOW you fly your airplane in the first minutes of a sudden engine failure is more crucial. Obviously, turning immediately toward the nearest airport or landing area is important. I always have NRST airport displayed on my RNAV unit even on local flights. Energy conservation: If you're cruising at 130 knots when the engine quits, the best technique is to pitch up, trading speed for altitude until reaching best glide speed (80 kts) & THEN TRIM to stay there. That will stretch your overall glide distance much better than staying at altitude and bleeding energy due to drag. Practicing "Power Off 180's" in the pattern is also great practice for energy management. That is the most failed item on a Commercial Pilot checkride. Another tool is mastering the "Forward Slip to Landing".... That takes practice. Thanks for a great post, Flying Aardvark... Waldo
Interesting video but you neglected a very important factor - the windmilling propeller. There are two basic types of engine failures with two different glide ratios. Let's call the first, Type 1 - Engine isn't producing power but prop is windmilling. Type 2 - Engine seizes, prop stops. Type 2 has a significantly better glide ratio. You might consider a re-do where you pull the mixture then pull the nose up enough to stop the prop. If you do, I think you'll be amazed at the difference. I've tried it in a Citabria, huge difference, felt like I was in an early, low performance sailplane, gobs of time to glide to the ground. Thanks for the video but please address this important variable. John McClanahan, Atlanta
Sounds like a good “part 2.” Will give it a try and see how different it is.
Glide "radio"? Really? At least proofread the title..
Ha-thanks. Fixed it.
Thanks for the info. I’ve also noticed that some of the glide ratios posted elsewhere in the interwebs seemed a bit optimistic. As a 6A owner I appreciate your test. I’d prefer to err on the side of caution running 7.5:1 as you did. I wasn’t going to kill the engine in flight as you did to find out so thanks for that too!
When I did my, I got around 7.5. That was a lot less than I though it would be in a RV7a. Great vid Ace.
One more piece to the puzzle... The prop is still spinning during the engine-out descent. This is causing additional drag that would bring different numbers if you were able to get it to stop. I would think that at idle, the engine isn't producing "thrust" as much as it is assisting overcoming some of the drag that is created with the windmill pumping losses... Would be interesting to see how much it improves the results, with the prop stopped.
A part II?!?!?!
Great video, honestly made me reconsider my glide performance settings in FF. I’m sure this will help a lot of pilots, thx!!
Thanks, and it sure was an eye opener for me!
I'm here :) thanks for posting. In the absolute soup there. Just flew into Copalis last weekend for the first time.
Great instructional aid.
Great vid! I also like keeping the speed up on approaches - I fly 95 knots in my 9A, way faster than I fly a VFR final. The airplane feels super stable, the autopilot likes it better, I’m only shooting real life low approaches to long runways, and it’s easy enough to slow down (especially with a CS prop). As my instrument instructor once pointed out, a lot of people flying approaches screw up by hitting the ground short of the runway, but almost nobody goes off the far end. :) I’ve also decided on a 1000 foot ceiling (forecasted to be stable or improving) personal minimum, so real life is strictly “gentleman’s IFR” for me.
i have the same minimums after a recent IFR ticket - no lower than MVFR, and I'm assuming that the AP or will quit at the worst possible time and I would need to hand fly the approach. Still looking for an RV.. :)
In the RV-9A, I want to be stabilized at 80 knots about 10 seconds before minimums. (When there are airliners behind me, I've flown final as fast as 150 kt before slowing down at the last second.) 80 knots makes the go around easier, and I have the go around pitch attitude set low so that the plane doesn't lose speed changing attitude when I push TOGA. This way, there's plenty of time to get the flaps up and get some speed before selecting a climb mode. Then again, my personal IFR en route minimums are 1,000 foot ceiling so in case the engine goes poop, I've got options. (Got that idea from a Gulfstream test pilot who uses those minimums in his A36.) Of course, I always practice to published minimums. I've got G3X with the larger screens, so I put flight instruments in one half and the approach plate in the other, at least until established on final.
There are some things that are best when they're boring. IFR approaches definitely qualify, the less excitement the better. The autopilot is not cheating, providing you always know what it's doing, it frees you up to pay attention to everything else.
Great video! Thanks for doing the set up work to see out the window and all your screens on the approach. Maybe one day in my RV6