วีดีโอ

Are you crazy Sultan Abdul Hamid 2 very great rular

Sultan Abdul hamid 2 is very best🎉🎉🎉🎉

Did u day Sultan Abdul Hamid II was bad? He literally did whatever he could yo keep yhe empire going and payed off the debts!

To classify Sultan Abdul Hameed ll as bad is an attack on reason. But it is not surprise, because you are doing this acording to your (biased ) western centrism ...

bad

Thank you very much. This video helps us get to know the Roman emperors better and know what their position is, but from my point of view, Septimius Severus should have been very good.

Why tf is Abdulhamid bad, I think you need to learn more about him

You have to get Antiochus VIII the very bad emperor because he did nothing for the Seleucid Empire, his reign is parties, he was also an incompetent emperor. And you have to get Antiochus IV the bad emperor because he was an incompetent emperor, he lost some lands of Selecid Empire.

Constantinus III not bad, bro. He tried to prevent the revolt of Jovinus, but he failed. You have to get he the medium emperor.

Bro, said jhon v was a good emperor💀

Murad IV should be "Great"

why are almost all the kings so mediocre

People who have watched the series "Payitaht Abdul Hamid" know how great Abdul Hamid II was as an Ottoman Sultan and as a Leader of the Muslim world...

Abdul Hamid II bad?

bad because he died? you have a strange look Henry II inflicted great losses on the Mongols and tried to unite Poland he was a very good ruler, you made mamy misstakes

Mieszko II was good

It is safe to say Auster2333 and his channel faded In and out of existence just like how The Western roman Empire faded out of history

Thank you ❤❤❤ This is good video Please change the ranking of parthian kings

When I had a lesson of history in Polish school, teacher told us about Charles IX, that he was very good king in French History!

By ranking sultan Abdul Hamid Khan 2 itself am doubtful that in what basis you are featuring videos.....Abdul Hamid is muslim khalifa and good hearted person rest Allah knows

Peter III was the absolute worst lol. He couldn’t stand his wife, he was allegedly immature, he was overall incompetent compared to Germany during his reign. Glad he got overthrown.

On Caligula: The people of Rome at the time would have begged to differ on your assessment. Also, we really don't know how much of what we know about Caligula was distorted or propaganda. The writers themselves were of the aristocratic class, people Caligula had come to loathe and with good reason. Also, most of these writers were not contemporaries of the man.

Darius III was ok/good till Alexander conquests

dostum abdulaziz ve abdulmecid nitelik olarak yer değiştirmeli.

Alexis II medium

Interesting. Not particularly accurate to the text, but interesting.

my opinions Selim II as Good Ahmed I medium/good abdulmejid I as very good helped irish during the famine and managed to reach ireland

very good video! but as russian, I would personnaly disagree with Alexander I ranked as "great" because of his weakness and cancelling liberal reforms and with Alexis I ranked as "medium" because he defeated Stepan Razin uprising and started reforms that was developed and ended by his son Peter

What happened to this channel?

İ think: Beyazid İİ: Bad (The weakest sultan in the first 250 years of the Ottoman Empire) Mehmet İİİ: Bad Mehmet İV: Bad (Ruled for 40 years and no there is no step forward. Absolutely wasted years, and Vienna war...) Abdulmajid: Normal (He did many reforms, its good but he ruined Ottoman economy) Mehmed Vİ: Very bad (Tratior, Collaboration with the invaders)

Granting Charles VIII a "medium" is more generous a rating than any other historian has given his reign. Had Louis XIV died in 1680 there would be no doubt of his greatness. Because of his later reign failures and ridiculous expenditures on Marly during the middle of war, I can only give him the same as Napoleon: very good. Louis XV as very bad? His reign was no worse for France than that of his incompetent grandson, unless a case is made that anything positive in his reign was due to others like Choiseul and even Pompadour, much like the personally ineffective Louis XIII's "very good" rating was because of Richelieu and Mazarin. Better not tell Balzac about the rating for Louis Philippe! (Unless this is confined to the king's exit.) John I, Napoleon II and Louis XIX get ratings? Where's Henry V and Louis Philippe II?

Khosrow Parviz was great. They betrayed him

Peroz was Great so was Balash.

Liked seeing the appreciation for Constans and of course Constantine the GREAT 👍

Constantine THE GREAT was simply one of the best. What he did and how his empire from Constantinople kept the Easter Roman Empire going for 1000 years speaks volumes.

"Wherefore art thou?"

The Polish Crown lost Moldova only in 1497. After Jan Olbracht's unsuccessful expedition.

napoleon sucked lmao

You should be ashmed of ranking the best sultan of ottomans bad Great Caliph Sultan Abdul Hamid 2

‏‪4:02 Abdulhamid II is very respected in the east for his stance on Palestine.

GOODBYE MY FRIEND LAST DAY BYZANTINE EMPERORS I SEE YOU… In the heaven :)

Day 8 oh this again… byzantine emperors

We need a godly tier for Marcus, Aurelius and Augustus

You know one thing, I've been following you for 4 years because I loved the story but when I met you you were one of my favorite TH-camrs and I always watched you until two years ago and I found you and I think it's incredible. How much you grew! I hope you come back please because I will always be your fan until the end.

Day 7 byzantine emperors Only i WILL wait,i will wait…

Day 6 byzantine emperors

Day 5 byzantine emperors

Yeah men YEAAAAH I LOVE THIS POWER BYZANTINE EASTEARN ROME AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Day 4 byzantine emperors

What id propose Caligula is medium + he was kind to the people - he bankrupted the empire Nero very good +His rain was stable +He rebuilt Rome after the great fire +he stopped the death penalty +won the war with the partians +he was assassinated Nerva is bad +adopted Trajan as his heir -bankrupted the empire while in a good position in terms of of economic advancement -his reign was short