- 148
- 275 524
Paul Cartie
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2017
วีดีโอ
HW Help 5.5 & 5.6
มุมมอง 742 ปีที่แล้ว
This project was created with Explain Everything™ Interactive Whiteboard for iPad.
7.4 - The Singular Value Decomposition.mp4
มุมมอง 2.7K3 ปีที่แล้ว
This project was created with Explain Everything™ Interactive Whiteboard for iPad.
7.5 - Conic Sections copy.mp4
มุมมอง 483 ปีที่แล้ว
This project was created with Explain Everything™ Interactive Whiteboard for iPad.
3.2 and 3.3 Assignment.mp4
มุมมอง 1013 ปีที่แล้ว
This project was created with Explain Everything™ Interactive Whiteboard for iPad.
6.5 - Physical Applications.mp4
มุมมอง 683 ปีที่แล้ว
This project was created with Explain Everything™ Interactive Whiteboard for iPad.
6.4 - Arc Length of a Curve and Surface Area.mp4
มุมมอง 1703 ปีที่แล้ว
This project was created with Explain Everything™ Interactive Whiteboard for iPad.
6.3 - Volumes of Revolution - Cylindrical Shells.mp4
มุมมอง 1263 ปีที่แล้ว
This project was created with Explain Everything™ Interactive Whiteboard for iPad.
6.2 - Determining Volumes by Slicing.mp4
มุมมอง 1433 ปีที่แล้ว
This project was created with Explain Everything™ Interactive Whiteboard for iPad.
6.1 - Areas Between Curves.mp4
มุมมอง 1573 ปีที่แล้ว
This project was created with Explain Everything™ Interactive Whiteboard for iPad.
5.6 -Integrals Involving Exponential and Logarithmic Functions.mp4
มุมมอง 1703 ปีที่แล้ว
This project was created with Explain Everything™ Interactive Whiteboard for iPad.
5.5 - Substitution.mp4
มุมมอง 1003 ปีที่แล้ว
This project was created with Explain Everything™ Interactive Whiteboard for iPad.
5.3 Follow-up.mp4
มุมมอง 653 ปีที่แล้ว
This project was created with Explain Everything™ Interactive Whiteboard for iPad.
5.3 - The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.mp4
มุมมอง 1343 ปีที่แล้ว
5.3 - The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.mp4
4.6 - Limits at Infinity & Asymptotes.mp4
มุมมอง 2123 ปีที่แล้ว
4.6 - Limits at Infinity & Asymptotes.mp4
4.5 - Derivatives and the Shape of a Graph.mp4
มุมมอง 2453 ปีที่แล้ว
4.5 - Derivatives and the Shape of a Graph.mp4
4.2 - Linear Approximations and Differentials.mp4
มุมมอง 1863 ปีที่แล้ว
4.2 - Linear Approximations and Differentials.mp4
3.9 - Derivatives of Exponential and Logarithmic Functions
มุมมอง 1903 ปีที่แล้ว
3.9 - Derivatives of Exponential and Logarithmic Functions
:D
thanks sir
You saved me, thanks a lot
Glad to help.
Is this from Friedberg insel and spence?
No, the text is Linear Algebra and its Applications by Lay.
I’m slightly confused on why the last example has a unique solution, while example 2 had a nontrivial solution
So the row reduction that takes place in example 2 leads to a row of zeros and a free variable, hence the nontrivial solutions. In the last example, we didn't use the A^T*A process since the columns were orthogonal, but if we did, there would not be a row of zeros; we would get the unique solution found using the formula. Thanks for your question.
@ i appreciate that. Ended up getting a B-! Couldn’t have done it without your help. Thank you!
Is ky solve questions chahiye plzzzz 4.1 ky
Great vid
thank you markiplier
Thank you, this has helped me fill in the blanks that my statistic teacher was not able to explain during class. :)
that’s so funny, I watch this channel and 3brown1blue
That is truly an honor to be used in the same sentence at 3B1B! Thank you. I have my students watch his videos in companion with my instruction.
@@paulcartie7095 yes, his videos are great for comprehension. But don’t count yourself out man I’ve learned a lot from your videos
you have a nice voice, easy to listen to
Thanks - I appreciate the compliment.
Where’s 2.4?
Good question - on my campus that section is optional, and I choose not to cover it. So I don't have a video for it - sorry!
very good video. helped alot. thank you for sharing
You're welcome - thank you for your comment.
I could be wrong but at 13:44, I think he forgot to put in a -1. I don't see any reason why he didn't carry over the row 1,2,-1 during the row operation, so I'm pretty sure he mistakenly wrote 1 2 1 in the determinant. Could be wrong but lmk if anyone else agrees. Love the videos btw!!!
This would then make the determinant 30, because the 5 in the row 0 0 5 should be 0 0 -5.
You are correct that I did not include the '-' in front of the 1, but I was basing my calculation on the previous line of work -3*R1+R2 does in fact put a positive 5 in that entry. (-3)(-1)+(2)=5. So good catch on the mistake, but fortunately it did not impact the answer. Thank you for the feedback on my videos!
thank you
these videos are so clutch
Thanks for the helpful video, you explained very well in 24 minutes what my professor couldn't in 1.5 hours. Again, thank you.
Glad it helped!
"when i said 4, i meant 3" had me dead ngl 😂😂
Glad you enjoy my humor!
@@paulcartie7095 love it ❤️
U r my prof
I'm taking applied linear algebra in the summer and we have 5 weeks to learn everything. I was going to drop but it was a day later before I could. Test every week and 2 quizzes every week. This is such a horrible way to learn math...
i love u <3333
Let M and x0 be as in Example 3. a. Compute the population vectors xk for k = 1,2,...20. Discuss what you find. b. Repeat part (a) with an initial population of 350,000 in the city and 650,000 in the suburbs. What do you find? Help me pls
Hi - what questions do you have about this? Keep multiplying your migration matrix by the previous vector to get the population distribution for the next year. Do this all 20 times (that sounds like a lot). Then for part b, change the first vector to the one given. After a bunch of multiplications, you should find the population distribution actually starts to look like your answers to part a.
this is hard to understand for non math majors. im an engineering major and i had a really hard time understanding this.
gectin mi lineeri devrim
@ Byle gectim kanka ama bu adamdan izleme
i appreciate your work thank you so much :)
This makes my brain hurt but it makes me feel smart
Yeah everything really is just linear algebra, all of algebra calc ect is just…linear algebra.
This video helped a lot, always been kinda bad with diagonalzation this semester
This kinda reminds me of my circuits class
This section seems challenging because of all the work involved and a lot of going back and forth between the steps to find the solution.
i was told that pivot doesn’t necessary have to be 1 it can be any non zero number so why didn’t u consider column 3 for basis for col A?
If you're talking about example 2, then column 3 does not have a leading entry in it. It might be that my -2 looks a little too low and is dipping down into the row below it. But it belongs in row 2. The -4 in the column 4 is a leading nonzero entry and therefore a pivot position. I hope this helps.
@@paulcartie7095 ohhhhh my bad i just noticed i thought 2 was in the row below it. thanks
In my opinion, Linear Algebra is just a deeper explanation of what we already know.
Video 3 completed for rewatching all the videos for this unit
Video 2 completed for rewatching them all
One video down for rewatching them all
Its interesting that you can take pretty much use any polynomial equation to essentially find the scalars for that polynomial using this set up. I might try this in other settings as well in the future if I get the chance.
Hey in example 3 you wrote sigma originally with 6sqr(10) and 3sqr(10) but then in the final answer you wrote them both as being divided by the square root of 10 instead. was that on purpose?
You're the first person to catch that mistake! Good attention to detail. I was so used to writing fractions in the other matrices, I just followed along blindly. It should be 6sqrt(10) and 3sqrt(10).
Looking at the way we computed X^TAx made me realize that it is very similar to the way some of us are taught to form equations instead of techniques like foil. It makes me think that if I only knew linear algebra as a baby I would've conquered the world.
I've recently come to the conclusion that rather than learning anything new, we are actually learning what we already know from a deeper perspective and developing a greater understanding of its applications.
Thank you so much for these videos ! *2
Visual representation is always helpful
I appreciate using past knowledge and techniques to new topics. Specially since I took Calc 3, using projections and orthogonality are both a lot more interesting. Are there past chapters where we could simplify things if we knew about symmetric matrices?
Appreciated the visual representation of what the definition means and breaking down the problems to illustrate the concepts. It made the material much easier to understand.
in the least-squares error problem you said any other point would be further than 9.2, but our definition says the least-squares solution is less than or equal to any other point. How does that work?
Pictorial representation really helps me understand the topic better. It helps in visualizing the problems and solutions.
I found the procedure to be super straightforward, I really like this. I think it is pretty interesting to create orthogonal sets, what type of applications will we have for this? Does an orthogonal set basically give us a new set of axis we can follow?
The best approximation theorem simplifies complex problems by providing a clear path to finding optimal solutions