วีดีโอ

Garcia Edward Harris Sarah Clark Joseph

Hall Donald Hall Angela Robinson Sarah

Jones Brian Lopez Deborah Garcia Anthony

Johnson Sharon Allen Kimberly Lewis Laura

9:00 wallerstein begins

Fantastic!

Здравствуйте. Возможно у Вас в университете ❤создать рабочую группу вовлекая студентов❤, работать с новым экспериментом? Сами понимаете, одного ума и человека мало. (за 119 лет), *все эксперименты* включая опыты Майкельсона-Морли, для определения константы скорости света - являются косвенно неполными. Если бы эксперимент Майкельсона-Морли проводился в автотранспорте или самолете и использовался в них, для определения скорости. только тогда этот опыт будет прямым. Поэтому Эйнштейн не полагается на эксперимент Майкельсона-Морли. Вопрос к Вам: Есть ли у вас пример такого непосредственного опыта? Есть же возможности, школьникам и студентам, самим измерять большой взрыв Вселенной её тёмную энергию, чёрные дыры, … Соберём учебно/практические пособия? «лазерную рулетку *+опорное расстояние* в 1000000 м» и «Майкельсон Морли ГИБРИДНЫЙ гироскоп». (мы, не ищем эфир, Мы *увидим* как работает квантовая гравитация) Обращаюсь к Вам с предложением на совместное изобретения ГИБРИД гироскопа ИЗ НЕКРУГЛЫХ, двух катушек с новым типом оптического волокна с «полой сердцевиной из фотоно-замещенной вакуумной зоной или (NANF)», где - свет в каждом *плече* проходит по 250000 (в дальномере «+» опорных 1000000) метров при этом, не превышает параметры 84/84/84 см., и вес - 24кг. Предприятия по выпуску "Волоконно - оптических гироскопов" может выпускать ГИБРИД гироскопы и дальномеры, для учебно практического применения в школах и высших учебных заведений. Эйнштейна мечтал измерить скорость самолёта; 200, 300, 400, 500 м/сек - через опыт Майкельсона Морли 1881/2024 г., и только тогда, опыт будет прямой для СТО. И это возможно выполнить с помощью оптоволоконного ГИБРИД гироскопа. Вот исходя из выполненного более 70% опыта Майкельсона, возможно будет увидеть доказательства постулат: Свет - это упорядоченная вибрация гравитационных квантов и доминантные гравитационные поля корректируют скорость света в вакууме. Думаю, получится совершать научные открытия; по астрономии, астрофизике, космологии, высшей теоретической физике,.. В итоге *увидите* теорию всего в простых учебных устройствах.

Please end this tradition of having 19 damn introductory speakers, we have the attention span of gnats.

Awesome, I thought this was Edith Hamilton for a sec, but Hall is cool as well.

In her opinion multiverse is very solid hypothesis. Even Alan Guth wouldn't go so far with his own hypothesis. She said "the guy can't be wrong". Nothing in her talk was even slightly original. Perhaps I am demanding too much from 30 years of PHD production in chain, better known as "shut up and calculate". Most of them by now struggling to swallow current observations from JW telescope. I am referring to Black holes with billion time mass of the sun, already in the dawn of their prefered model of the universe started from the scratch 13.8 billion years ago.

This human tendency to "seek beyond the appearance" is both what gives subjects delusions of what they see in the rosharch test and gives psychologists the delusions that the test is a valid projective test. Might it be that we prefer delusions to truth? Is this why religion is more attractive than science? Why radical ideology is preferable to pragmatism? How can we tell if a belief emerges from falsehood preference?

wow the Hippocampus memory doesn't start till age 5!! Fascinating.

Gregory Bateson's book "Mind and Nature" compliments this talk also.

this talk compliments Erich Jarvis' research on bird speech

MAGA apologist: "The premise of The Handmaid's Tale (ending reproductive choice to save the economy) is total nonsense. That would never happen, and no one is calling for it." Mike Johnson: “Roe v. Wade ... the implications of that on the economy. We’re all struggling here to cover ... Social Security ... all the rest. If we had all those able-bodied workers in the economy...”

such a good talk, but Jesus! The constant cacophony of coughing from the audience! Should have thrown them away.

- Why am I recommended this - ... Russian and East European Studies ... - Aha, got it (If serious, clicked it because interested in the topic, but the fact makes it even more interesting)

I loved how Achebe's magnum opus was recited. Beautifully rendered by Professor George Abosede.

Dr. Hayles is one of the most important thinkers of the century. The number of views and likes is upsetting.

Her distinction Between Cognition and consciousness is fascinating

Fantastic presentation.

thank you for uploading this!!!!!

Woh

Great Talk! Thank you. I would love to find out why he's not a fan of memetic theory. He's a great mind, but memetics makes too much sense.

starts at 8:00

24:51 knees don't have concepts!

Who did zizek said the survivor in the beginning jorje semprun?

Thank you, David for your dedication, rigour, integrity and hard work you have gifted us with!

Thanks a lot for uploading this excellent lecture!

I LOVE Stuart Kauffman! He is the most consequential thinker I have encountered since Gregory Bateson, James Lovelock, or Bill Mollison--a Gaian, through and through.

Zizek ways heavily inspired/influenced by Baudrillard here.

And gender ideology isnt politicized? And so on account of bad science?

All government granted political propaganda , like this need to have mandatory warning disclosures, so that people understand where it's actually coming from and not think it's real science.

Save Our Planet Now

"It makes no sense to ask, What's outside of space-time." Time is in the universe. The universe is not in time. Existence exists and nature is its character.

Immanuel Wallerstein was a truly monumental, world-historical great.

Holy sh2t How much of an introduction do these clowns need. Are they trying to justify their predictions by past accolades. Where’s Climate gate. Ps the hockey stick is crap talk and bs data.. Look at the Dansgaurd oeschger oscillations and tye beryllium 10 solar proxy’s if ye want truth. Look at the paleo records of co2 versus earth’s temperature and note that there is no correlation.. the dogs in the street can see it..

When machinery have threatened human labour,this is where engels written

Mann is such a fraud. He spent almost his whole presentation attacking the reputations of people that don't except his worthless authority.

Anyone live in Australia, Canada or near California in the USA? How are the Forrest fires going compared to 20 years ago? Are they more frequent, more intense than they used to be? How about the air pollution from those fires? The evidence is pretty much right under our feet and noses currently, sticking our heads in the sand will not save us, we need courage and change or there will be no human civilization in 200 to 300 years.

On a positive note,... We can now "FLY" a Planet,... we should prbly get started on the flight controls tho,...

Talk about unhinged.

TH-cam censors decided this post should not be seen by the general public so they deleted it. They are worried the truth might upset their agenda. TH-cam needs to be broken up: Here is my "dangerous" comment, as in national socialist Germany truth is dying in the USA: NOAA maintains a network of 114 state-of-the art climate monitoring stations across the continental USA as well as Alaska and Hawaii. These stations are geographically evenly dispersed and located in places far removed from the urban heat islands (airports,, furnaces, air conditioning, auto and truck traffic, roads, parking lots, etc) that have formed a larger share of the highly inaccurate historical record that has been challenged by skeptics of climate doom. These 114 stations monitor not simply presumed temperature daily highs and lows divided by two to establish a mean "average" ( a ridiculous proposition), but a full array of climate data including temperature, humidity, pressure, wind speed and direction etc. These sensors are triple-redundant where erroneous or spurious sensor data is automatically detected and rejected. They are scrupulously maintained to the highest standards of regimented calibration. They report by satellite link to a data collection network EVERY 5 Minutes. (No more ridiculous daily high+low divided by two regimen to represent a "daily average" but instead a fully integrated data to establish correct daily means as well as extremes This network is referred to as the USCRN (United States Climate Reference Network) and has been in operation since 2005 (nearly 19 years) The calculated results of a reliable climate data collection network (the world standand) 1) Absolutely no trend of increasing US temperatures: Only a statisically meaningless slight decrease in average temperature over the entire period of data collection. 2) Absolutely no trend of extreme climate events that could ever challenge those of the 1930s even with today's vast and ever increasing use of 'fossil' fuels. The climate extremes of the decade of the 1930s have not yet been matched. This is in contrast to the hysteric claims of hottest or coldest year/month/day etc ever recorded in the USA! The USA climate data collection is now the best in the world. If the USA climate has not changed at all, how come its exempt from Mann-made "climate change? " Riddle me this climate cultists!

The only people who attack science are the climate zealots who ignore any and all science that they don't like.

NOAA maintains a network of 114 state-of-the art climate monitoring stations across the continental USA as well as Alaska and Hawaii. These stations are geographically evenly dispersed and located in places far removed from the urban heat islands (airports,, furnaces, air conditioning, auto and truck traffic, roads, parking lots, etc) that have formed a larger share of the highly inaccurate historical record that has been challenged by skeptics of climate doom. These 114 stations monitor not simply presumed temperature daily highs and lows divided by two to establish a mean "average" ( a ridiculous proposition), but a full array of climate data including temperature, humidity, pressure, wind speed and direction etc. These sensors are triple-redundant where erroneous or spurious sensor data is automatically detected and rejected. They are scrupulously maintained to the highest standards of regimented calibration. They report by satellite link to a data collection network EVERY 5 Minutes. (No more ridiculous daily high+low divided by two regimen to represent a "daily average" but instead a fully integrated data to establish correct daily means as well as extremes This network is referred to as the USCRN (United States Climate Reference Network) and has been in operation since 2005 (nearly 19 years) The calculated results of a reliable climate data collection network (the world standand) 1) Absolutely no trend of increasing US temperatures: Only a statisically meaningless slight decrease in average temperature over the entire period of data collection. 2) Absolutely no trend of extreme climate events that could ever challenge those of the 1930s even with today's vast and ever increasing use of 'fossil' fuels. The climate extremes of the decade of the 1930s have not yet been matched. This is in contrast to the hysteric claims of hottest or coldest year/month/day etc ever recorded in the USA! The USA climate data collection is now the best in the world. If the USA climate has not changed at all, how come its exempt from Mann-made "climate change? " Riddle me this climate cultists!

Warning: substantive comments rebutting the misinformation being shoveled out here will be removed by TH-cam censors in order for viewers to see only glowing endorsements of this climate doom nonsense.

Climate wars is it? That sounds a lot like violence to me. Are we being threatened by the authors of this huge pile of misinformation? Here is my rebuttal to this declaration of war on skeptics of their doomsday cult: Here is how the "narrative" (story telling) of the climate harangue works: 1) "We are "scientists" (activist hacks with a self-serving agenda) and are therefore far more clever than you - you therefore must "believe us" 2) We need to alarm children and (gullible) adults that they must pay we pied pipers of climate doom to rid them of this make believe menace. 3) In order to swindle these gullible adults and the children they prey upon, we need to equate bad weather and other man made disasters (which have and always will exist) such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts, wild fires, infestation, disease etc. with a change, not in your own climate, but in the "worlds climate" which does not exist by definition. Climate is always local. Florida has a few climates and so does Minnesota. They do not aggregate to "a climate" 4) Our proof that our fictitious "world" climate is changing (and always for the worse) is some graphs that we plot from made up numbers that we fraudulently claim represent the "worlds average surface temperature record???? " (accurate to +/- 0.01 degrees K from 1850 to the present no less) . No such record has or will ever exist. In order to "record" anything one must "observe" that thing, either through our senses or by instrumentation. Computer models that spit numbers out that their authors want them to spit out are not "records." No instrument has ever been created to measure the "world's average surface temperature." They are not "records," they are a fraud. 5) The villain in this Punch and Judy show is your liberty. They seek to seize it and jail it through something that they call "climate policy." These hucksters maintain that the colorless odorless gas, carbon dioxide, that also happens to be the base of the of the food chain for all life on the planet is vanishingly rare owning only to the ravenous appetite of plants for this fundamental food that it constitutes only 1/25 of one percent of the atmosphere essential to all life. It seems that your activities (but not theirs....they are exempt) make this wonderful clean and life giving substance somehow "dirty" (not "clean") because your activities and only yours make it so. Currently 70,000 climate hucksters are jetting off for another annual climate orgy at another exotic vacation destination to swill in these "carbon emitting" luxuries we taxpaying serfs must underwrite with our wallets. 6) There is absolutely no data whatsoever that our activities have any effect on our own climate, let alone the fictitious "world climate" The seas, the land, the average weather conditions where we live have not materially changed since Christopher Columbus discovered the Western continents for Europe. 7) Their narrative contains no real data. Their "presenters" such as the ignoramuses droning on in this piece of silly propaganda are scientifically illiterate. Even if the planet's entire volume of oceans were "warming" (there is absolutely no evidence of this) this fool is so ignorant of basic physics he cannot seem to grasp the fact that thermal expansion of sea water affects "column height" and cannot cause the lateral expansion of sea waters required to inundate shorelines. Ughhh! Further the oceans are not and cannot "go acid" by carbon dioxide. Further It is impossible to measure the aggregate "logarithmic" pH value of the slightly alkaline oceans. The soda water we cannot seem to drink enough of is 10,000 times "more acidic" than sea water. The pH of sea water varies widely by air temperature, sea temperature, ocean depth, latitude, cloudiness, moon phase, wind and waves, time of day, time of year, sea life, shore effluence, and too many other factors to mention. In the seas, as on the land, it is carbon dioxide that forms the base of the food pyramid for all oceanic life from krill to whales. This is too painful to continue, the only way the nation could be made ignorant enough to buy this garbage is through public government education indoctrination. As always I welcome any literate rebuttal to my commentary. Oddly no one reading these commentaries ever offers any.

I love that it seems to take place in a twin peaks episode.

I am optimistic about the future of renewable energy. I believe that we will be able to transition away from fossil fuels in the relatively near future. However, it is important to be realistic about the timeframe for this transition. It will not happen overnight. I also agree that ending fossil fuels too quickly would only result in a Mad Max world. We need to transition away from fossil fuels in a way that is orderly and sustainable. We need to make sure that everyone has access to affordable energy, and we need to protect the environment. I believe that we can achieve a smooth and equitable energy transition if we work together. We need to invest in renewable energy, develop new energy storage technologies, and upgrade our energy infrastructure. We also need to develop policies that support the transition to clean energy.

The big bang fairy tale