วีดีโอ

We can simply factorise 899 to get factors ,this is so mind boggling 😊

That was very nice. However, I was hoping to see an example which had complex roots. Oh well, I guess I know how I’ll be spending my evening. ;-) Thanks much.

“That’s why I was invented”, says Prof Loh… ;-)

That was really slick. Thank you.

Ok,and I have a question: apply this theorem to a complex plane@then to the Minkowski space-time! What will YoU(dumbed physicists) get? The space-time distance does NOT (!) depend on the...path of a "travelling (mythical) object"! Why did the mathematician,H. Minkowski, NOT see it??? Move you, dumb f.cken scientist sick heads while chasing the divine molecule CO2? Open any textbook@look until exhaustion and mortal desperation for an ...answer or try to use your H.Spirit@ you will find ...easily the answer!

Still making guesses … but educated ones 😅

Unbelievably it came back to me 50 years after college.

I tried to use this technique with different quadratic equations, and it kind of worked for me. I say "kind of", because I tried it with : 8x^2 - 18x -5 = 0, and I found the solution to be x1= -5/2 and x2 = 1/4, when the solution are -1/4 and 5/2. I tried with another similar equation... and the result is the same : the solutions are almost correct, except for the fact that the minus sign is not with the correct x ! I suppose that I missed something, but I don't know what it is. Is it because c is negative ? Because b is negative ? I am not at all good at this, I am trying to learn maths again on my own after leaving high school almost a decade ago, so I really am stuck here.

Cool! but is this method as fast as using the quadratic formula?

It's easy to figure out the answer quickly because the denominator is sin^2x which like all trig functions is periodical and doesn't go anywhere. Therefore the limit can not exist

I don’t think i could have started this video without pictures in my head from 3blue1brown. But this presentation definitely gave me more understanding than that by itself.

What about odd numbers as sums? That won't translate to the difference of squares.

To factor any quadratic equation you can just simply apply this formula when the equation is ax²+bx+c then x = (-b+-√b²-4ac)/2à

Please tell, what is the use of these quadratic equations or even calculas to a common man in his daily life ?

What garbage!!!!! This we learn in stsndar-6 in India

What a guy!!!❤

Great now I can be a speedometer.

In India, this is "middle term split", taught in 6th and 7th grade

This channel is so good, are you guys still active?

okay i have a real concerning doubt here , What if the coefficient of x is not an even number like 30, 24 et which can be laved to be written as 15+u and 15-u IMAGINE WRITING it for a number like 17 -- 8.5 +u and 8.5-u ?????????? plss someone tell if im right or wrong

Avg. IIT JEE aspirant watching and laughing in the corner

It's easy to state that integration is simply the reverse of differentiation. The way it feels to me is differentiation is like squeezing the toothpaste out of the tube and integration is "simply" putting the toothpaste back in.

👇 are you still confuesd?

I’m still confused 😢

How do I like this video a 1000 times?

What kind of paper was that?

Mathematical computational management.both man+ machine. Tele communication system Borrowed

This is taking me back to my college days. Weren't those "hops" called Riemann squares or something like that?

I still don't get it.

S=9dfretheta

A=dr

*# Proof of this method -- Let Sponges the quadratic equation - ax^²+bx+c =0 By using the Sridharacharya method - {-b±√[b^²-4ac]}\2a According to sir -( a =1 and also divided by 2a separately , like I do in next step) then the equation will be - {(-b/a)±√[(b/2)^² - c } The conclusion is that -1)make x^² Coefficient is 1 . 2) divided by 2 in the equation and in which coefficient of x is [ ] ±√[( )^² -c]....(3)eq. placed in vacate coloum. 3) in the 3 eq. C is c/2 . Basically sir did to make coefficient x^² =1 in shidharacharya method and divided by 2 .. that is very simple for any mathematical teacher and student

how to do the same thing in odd numbers????????

Thank you! Honestly, I just enjoyed watching this video because you're just so enjoyable to listen to. You can just tell you love math, and as someone who also has loved math for as long as I can remember, it just feels so great to listen to someone with a common passion. 😊

If u^2=1 then doesn't u=√1 ??

Why does this guy remind me of Tam from Young Sheldon😅😅😅😅

nice writing, and use of the fountain pens, but all 'blah blah' to me, eg. at 6:48, why not just calculate the area simply?, it approximates a triangle, and if one side is 1-0 (1), then all you need is to find the y value for x=1, and then the hypotenuse is an easy coordinate subtraction!, and area is a simple triangular area-the area of the curve (assuming the curve is straight line of best fit, of the coordinates, then take away the area of the segment). minimal algebra and unsolvable shit.

It woyld help a lot, if you would put the writing board upeight in the camera while explaining

Wow this was beautiful

Excellent 😀👍

woah this is so amazing

These videos and channel are highly underrated

If coefficient of x is odd?

bro ... this is splitting the middle term.... I'm a math tutor.... Factorisation is a topic I have to teach my students everytime... and this splitting always surprises and excites my students interest in maths... btw... one of my students now only likes to study maths now ....

what happens when the co-efficient of is an odd number how do break it down?

Thank you for this clear explanation. Like several of you in the comments, I do not consider myself good at math either, but I discovered that what is more important is your drive to understand.

3:56 that's what bro was invented for

good trick thanks

Nice, nice trick

We have learnt this in class 8.