- 60
- 47 966
Think Culture
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 18 ส.ค. 2018
20921f76c65502bd
Progressive Handmaids of Capital Pt 7: The End of the Nation-State
Progressive Handmaids of Capital Pt 7: The End of the Nation-State
มุมมอง: 94
วีดีโอ
Progressive Handmaids of Capital Pt 6: Providing Intellectual/Moral Cover
มุมมอง 98หลายเดือนก่อน
6:38 - How the Corporate World Enforces Progressive Ideology in Universities
Progressive Handmaids of Capital Pt 5: Following the Money II
มุมมอง 89หลายเดือนก่อน
Progressive Handmaids of Capital Pt 5: Following the Money II
Progressive Handmaids of Capital Pt 4: Following the Money I
มุมมอง 92หลายเดือนก่อน
Progressive Handmaids of Capital Pt 4: Following the Money I
Progressive Handmaids of Capital Pt 3: Open Borders is Great for Business
มุมมอง 99หลายเดือนก่อน
Progressive Handmaids of Capital Pt 3: Open Borders is Great for Business
Progressive Handmaids of Capital Pt 2: Weapons of Mass Migration
มุมมอง 78หลายเดือนก่อน
Progressive Handmaids of Capital Pt 2: Weapons of Mass Migration
Progressive Handmaids of Capital Pt 1: Liquid Modernity and Migration
มุมมอง 145หลายเดือนก่อน
First part of a series the episodes of which will be something like (Episodes 4 and 5 will be CRUCIAL if you only watch part of the series watch those): 1. Liquid Modernity and Immigration. 2. Weaponized Migrations - Passive and Active Weapon 3. The Basic Economics of Migration (how the Elites benefit) 4. Breakdown of the Different Actors and Flow of Money I 5. Breakdown of the Different Actors...
BSing: Race, Black Crime, and Men in General.
มุมมอง 122หลายเดือนก่อน
More casual, off-the-cuff series discussion of things related to race and crime. Intro: 0:00 - 2:38 Spengler and Culture Cycle: 2:39 - 7:29 Men, Thymos, Institutions: 7:31 - Thymos, Race, Criminality
Best Overview of Nominalism on the Internet--An Intellectual History
มุมมอง 1472 หลายเดือนก่อน
In this video I talk about Nominalism: What it is, types of nominalism, types of realism, Platonic and Aristotelian Realism, Christian Realism, Ockham's Nominalism, the Crisis that it causes, attempts to resolve that crisis and how the failed, arguments for and against nominalism, and where we are today. There's actually like a decent introduction to various thinkers in here, like Kant, but yea...
Theory Brief: What is Nominalism?
มุมมอง 1042 หลายเดือนก่อน
This video, part of the Brief series, is a brief description of Nominalism. I try to just give a basic explanation of what Nominalism means. Within the next couple of days a long-form video that goes much more into the meaning and significance of nominalism will be coming out. This one is just a primer on the concept for anyone, and if you're interested you might want to check that video out as...
How Did Western Culture Become Pornified?
มุมมอง 2122 หลายเดือนก่อน
In this video I talk about the the intellectual background for our modern porno culture. How did we get to a point where this was acceptable, where sexuality and the body were so 'destigmatized', etc., that this could become so pervasive and mainstream? We get answers! Like, Comment, and Subscribe!
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 9: Bubbles Ch 5 and Excursus 5 (Primal Companion and Black Plantation)
มุมมอง 1482 หลายเดือนก่อน
In this video I sort of reintroduce myself after a long hiatus, briefly discuss some plans, and then get into the material. I plan to post at least two videos a week now. One will be a continuation of this series, and the other will be something else. This is an intriguing chapter, so I hope you enjoy. Like, comment, subscribe!
Eugenics: History, Theory, Contemporary Issues
มุมมอง 253ปีที่แล้ว
Eugenics: History, Theory, Contemporary Issues
More In-Depth Exploration Of And Reaction to Comments On My Video About Trans Issues
มุมมอง 195ปีที่แล้ว
I talk about the change in psychoanalytic orientation to this issue and in general, I talk about the psychoanalytic understanding of psychosis and why trans identification fits it, and what the impact is on individuals and society at large.
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 8: Bubbles Excurses 3 and 4: The Egg Principle, and Heidegger on Place
มุมมอง 205ปีที่แล้ว
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 8: Bubbles Excurses 3 and 4: The Egg Principle, and Heidegger on Place
On the Prevailing Form of Social Control--Technocratic Managerial Panopticism; Liquid Disciplinarity
มุมมอง 254ปีที่แล้ว
On the Prevailing Form of Social Control Technocratic Managerial Panopticism; Liquid Disciplinarity
Brief Description of Stakeholder Capitalism: ESG, and 'Go Woke Go Broke'
มุมมอง 208ปีที่แล้ว
Brief Description of Stakeholder Capitalism: ESG, and 'Go Woke Go Broke'
On Social Order, Pathology, and the Iron Law of Slippery Slope
มุมมอง 185ปีที่แล้ว
On Social Order, Pathology, and the Iron Law of Slippery Slope
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 7: Bubbles Excursus 2: Nobjects and Un-Relationships
มุมมอง 289ปีที่แล้ว
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 7: Bubbles Excursus 2: Nobjects and Un-Relationships
Children's Entertainment, Culture Industry, and Horror Movies
มุมมอง 251ปีที่แล้ว
Children's Entertainment, Culture Industry, and Horror Movies
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 6: Bubbles Chapter 4 on the Groundwork for a Negative Gynecology
มุมมอง 2812 ปีที่แล้ว
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 6: Bubbles Chapter 4 on the Groundwork for a Negative Gynecology
Casual Chat: Gender, Transsexuality, Psychoanalysis, "What is a Woman?"
มุมมอง 4192 ปีที่แล้ว
Casual Chat: Gender, Transsexuality, Psychoanalysis, "What is a Woman?"
Christophe Guilluy's Twilight of the Elites
มุมมอง 3172 ปีที่แล้ว
Christophe Guilluy's Twilight of the Elites
Casual Chat: Family, its Political and Ideological Significance, Abolition, and Abortion
มุมมอง 2232 ปีที่แล้ว
Casual Chat: Family, its Political and Ideological Significance, Abolition, and Abortion
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 5: Bubbles Excursus 1: Thought Transmission
มุมมอง 2742 ปีที่แล้ว
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 5: Bubbles Excursus 1: Thought Transmission
Paul Hazard's The Crisis of the European Mind: 1680-1715
มุมมอง 5142 ปีที่แล้ว
Paul Hazard's The Crisis of the European Mind: 1680-1715
Casual Chat: Saying, Understanding, Distinction, and what is Essential
มุมมอง 2022 ปีที่แล้ว
Casual Chat: Saying, Understanding, Distinction, and what is Essential
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 4: Bubbles Chapter 3: Humans in the Magic Circle
มุมมอง 2982 ปีที่แล้ว
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 4: Bubbles Chapter 3: Humans in the Magic Circle
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 3: Bubbles Chapter 2: Between Faces (Interfaciality)
มุมมอง 4302 ปีที่แล้ว
Sloterdijk's Spheres Part 3: Bubbles Chapter 2: Between Faces (Interfaciality)
Catching Up With Giorgio Agamben on Coronavirus Pt.2
มุมมอง 2942 ปีที่แล้ว
Catching Up With Giorgio Agamben on Coronavirus Pt.2
So happy to discover this series. I’m almost done with Bubbles and excited to move on to Globes. I haven’t been this sucked into a book of philosophy since Being and Time and The Poetics of Space.
So... he see's everyone from early modernist thinkers like spinoza to late post-modern thinkers such as Foucault as continuations of this unfolding experience of "cynical reason"?
Another Melburnian here. Watching this in November 2024. Fantastic video to this day. Big fan of Agamben. Wonderful courage. I had bought State of Exception years before 2020. I can't remember why, but I think it was Baudrillard's influence. Anyway, by March 2020 I realised the time had come to read the book. I still recommend reading this book as a priority. It is a book that should be read with one eye on COVID the whole time. I can only imagine that by December 2019, when the COVID circus had started in Bergamo, Italy, that Agamben knew the score. Likely all too well.
Really enjoying the series. In general, I like how you bring thinkers from both the Right and Left to bear on the current political climate
this mass immigration in the west is the greatest biological weapon - of the worlds most invasive species. the divide is wild. mass migration was never a valid idea for the human species - only the destruction of it. - thank you for the clarity on this and the transparency and critical thought in all your works. would love to connect in some format as this is increasingly a part of my writing/research.
Deeply appreciated, both commentary and giggles.
Thank you! Good time to start, because the series is ongoing and I'm pickin' up the pace here shortly.
from esthetical perspective , its very artificial to call immigrants weapons! but what`s your point between the lines, are you saying Israel is using Gazans as immigration weapons to threat neighbor countries or Eu
What machine is running in the background? Sounds like a taffy puller
lol it was the sprinkler I think. Now that I think of it, I hope we didn't lose it in the move. It was one of those old tractor sprinklers. With the spikey wheels that drives around the lawn? I love those things, I had to go out and find one. In the current place we have an underground system, though.
Can you expand on what you mean by H1B being the tech equivalent of cheap labor?
It's skilled vs. unskilled, but it works the same way basically. If we focus on importation--Google will lobby for more H1-B visas, Blackrock will reward them, their ESG score will grow, they attract more invest, hire more foreign workers, etc. They're coming legally, but we're still talking wage suppression, because the visas are tied to the employers this gives the corporations more leverage, they might be hired on as independent contractors and so not get the benefits packages. So, similar to the low-skilled workers--these H1-B visa holders are being exploited for corporate profits, and the process also hurts American workers. So, the domestic and foreign workers both are hurt, but the corporation benefits. As is the case with *all* labor arbitrage. I think a lot of people hear people complaining about the effect on American workers and think it's racist or something, that we're upset someone else benefits while we lose out, or whatever, but actually the foreign workers are suffering too, and those nations who are losing the skilled labor are suffering. Everyone suffers but Google and Blackrock.
@ yes and no. I’m currently on H1B. I got my education in the US (masters & PhD), from what I can tell, my employer provides me the same compensation & benefits that my American counterparts get. There’s definitely instability in my status since my work visa is tied to my employer, I can’t afford to lose my job. I think independent contractors suffer more in H1B category.
Another great video John
Thank you! Was hard to be brief, took several reshoots lol.
Flexible Citizenship so even more porous borders Could this be gaseous modernity I wonder 🤔 Gaseous Modernity could also be someone getting work on their hour to hour or day to day and living in a different apartment every week - public washing machines for clothes and public bathrooms A rootless nomadic life promoted as a cool freedom
This horror unfortunately seems fairly plausible. 😬
Really appreciate this clear introduction to Bauman's concept of liquid modernity. The explanation of how global capitalism and individualization have dissolved traditional social bonds and institutions is spot-on. However, I think it's worth adding an important nuance to Bauman's perspective: while he powerfully diagnosed the problems of liquid modernity (insecurity, anxiety, atomization), he wasn't advocating for a return to 'solid' modernity, which he recognized had its own forms of oppression and dehumanization (rigid hierarchies, authoritarian tendencies, systematic exclusion of many groups). Instead, his project was more forward-looking - he wanted to understand our current situation to help think through what new forms of solidarity and social protection might be possible without returning to the rigidity of the past. This makes his analysis even more relevant for thinking about contemporary solutions. Still, great video for introducing these key concepts!
How i contact you
CIA leave him alone
There's an e-mail address attached to this youtube account--it should be visible through the profile or something I'd think?
lol for sure. I used to think all the "CIA are everywhere," "Everything is an op" type stuff was ridiculous, but in the last couple years I have... sure learned a lot of things that indicates to me that it is not ridiculous at all, actually.
@@thinkculture6106 No email attached please update your email
It's unfair your channel doesn't have more views. Always very interesting and well-researched.
If only leftist could listen to this…
Liberals are not Leftists
I’m right here
This is sort of a complex issue. I think it's actually one of the themes of this series. But, yeah, there are people on the left, somebody like Chris Cutrone for example (a Marxist who has written stuff like 'Why not Trump?'), or in the world of punditry maybe somebody like Jimmy Dore, who are... honest old-school leftists, who are, like, populists, who support the working class, opposed to technocratic managerialism, opposed to the developing censorship industrial complex, etc. Somebody like RFK Jr, even. And these guys are our allies within this political realignment and I like them and agree with them quite a bit, wherein the Democratic Party has become really the party of neoliberal global capitalism, and so everybody opposed to that project to any degree are sort of all in terms of partisan politics on the other side of that. But I think this version of the left is unfortunately fairly small? I'm not super sure. But for sure the sort of.. Democratic coalition, they're, and this includes people who style themselves as radical left-wing marxist types or whatever, like Judith Butler, Noam Chomsky (although I have heard him say some interesting things in recent years too), basically *all* of academia, of course people like TYT and the Squad and stuff, etc., they are just comprador intelligentsia of global capital. And that makes sense because guess what?--Marx was correct and the dominant ideology is the ideology of the dominant class. Marx was write about *a lot* IMO. But that's I think overwhelming majority on the Left. Ultimately I think these outcomes are... destined, from the outset, by what the Left is *in essence*, and that opposition to this regime sort of essentially belongs on the Right. But then I would say, for example, there are right-wing elements in the thought of Marx, for example. So, if you have a serious Marxist, of the Left, that's someone that I'm going to agree with on a great many things, actually. I'll probably try to dig into this stuff more in a video some time... But, yeah, I think that for the people who think they're challenging Power, they're fighting for the working class, they're for the little guy, they oppose capitalism, etc., and then they turn around and support open borders, they are anti-family, they want to deconstruct all of our norms and traditions and institutions, etc., that person would be very confused. And needs to seriously think about why it is that the richest congressional districts in the country, the biggest centers of power and the concentration of wealth in America, they're blue.
@@thinkculture6106 I consider myself a Marxist, a serious one even. Though I am not an academic I am a bus service planner. And I am here listening because when Marx’s said all that is solid melts into air I knew he meant my relationship to my friends and family, and not just the relationship between knights and their vassals. I agree with a lot of what you say. Though to enter a leftist space and say much of what you do what have you slandered as “another white pos” in my case but… a lot of my comrades miss the forest for the trees.
@@KingPhilipsRidesharethey are not Marxists then They are race reductionists so are useful idiots for the Bourgy
Damn bro, this is a good ass video...Me likes
Thank you! I expected it to do better. I sort of think it's the best video on the channel. But it doesn't seem to be a fan favorite. Not sure why.
Wow! Eyeopening
Thank you for the effort you’re putting into this tremendously insightful project. On a side note, what can we expect for the future of the spheres series? It has been an invaluable review and supplement for me and I’d love to see its completion!
Thank you for the feedback! Spheres is still going! I'll have the next episode out as quickly as tomorrow possibly. Sometime this week for sure.
Looked forward to this all day
Great vids John - you’re right about the liberal left who provide a principled intellectual gloss over global capitalism
Man, where you got these nice Meta Orion AR glasses from?
lol dude, I prefer my Jeffrey Dahmer glasses from a while back. My wife hated them and I promised her I'd get new ones at my next prescription change. She likes these better. I might go back, but the prescription is a bit off. Some guy posted a really funny comment about the Dahmer ones, but I think youtube deleted his comment. I got another super funny comment recently on a Sloterdijk episode that sadly got removed too. IDK what the deal is, but when I comment on videos, I constantly have my comments removed too. Just, like, automatically. I used to think people were deleting them, but somehow I think it's just algorithmic. Really sucks.
Three great books I got from John 1. Liquid Modernity 2. Bubbles 3. We The Elites
That's awesome! That's a good set I think, actually. Read those three and you have a great understanding of the world we live in. I'm about to put this channel in hyperdrive though so the list of books I've discussed, at least, is going to explode.
"Everything great that civilization has ever done is a product of this male energy""...What a foolish statement when women are the ones who have raised these males. Now that women are no longer traded as property they are demonstrating their great capabibilites not only as those who have directly raised every successfully generation but on their own where they now have autonomy and are not required to marry physically abusive men whom they are not sexually attracted to. Women are excelling since emancipation and you cannot stand it. Your statement is antagonistic and counterproductive. Meanwhile women will excel further because of ignorant men like you. If you have any capacity, go thank your mother who is the cornerstone of everything. But no you probably won't because you are focused on kissing male arses, especially black ones as evidenced by this video. Good luck.
Hey that was offensive. It was also worth consideration.
Hey, I appreciate it! I actually forgot to mention a couple things I had intended to, which might have mitigated the offensiveness a bit more. But that's what happens lol. Like for example I wanted to address a likely response from the white nationalist types (who I think are woefully wrong in a lot of other ways too), which would be 'okay so, we should send black people away because they don't belong here'. I don't remember the numbers, but like 90% or something of black Americans have ancestry here going back to the 18th century or earlier. For white Americans it's reversed--only like 10% (my family has been here since the 1630, but that's very rare I guess). So these people definitely have a strong claim, a strong tie, on this country. They're not people who just came over here as foreigners and needing to assimilate to their newly chosen nation. They've been here for many generations. They're as American as anybody. There were a couple other things too but I shouldn't write 10,000 lines of comment on my own video probably. lol. The issue is our institutions are bankrupt. And, yeah, I think fixing them entails the same thing, the same fixes, for everyone. Everyone would benefit from the same interventions. So, no antagonism there. But anyway, I really appreciate it!
I always think of an old good friend of mine (who was black) complaining about how blacks are always lumped in with gays and women. It's like, that's the phrase 'women, lgbtq, and black'. It gets tossed around a lot. And he was like, 'Don't lump me in with them! I'm black so that makes me like, gay? Or womanly? Hell no.' And then there's the 'put the black celebrity in a dress' sort of phenomenon. There's a massive push at feminizing black culture. A war is being waged in the dark. And it's not good.
@@thinkculture61061630 is “killed by Indians” gravestone era. I’d be interested after hearing all this what you think of the 20th centuries dramatic shift regarding child discipline, or the end of what we now know to have been egregious but socially acceptable abuse in the West. Are we soft? Or are we simply no longer traumatized as the norm. I think about this a lot, being a dad. The “spankings” I issue are like a peacocks feather falling across my kids. Whereas I was struck with a belt. And my dad was just beaten, likely molested by priests. It’s hard to know how much of what happens at school usurps what happens at home (my dad gotta beaten at both places) I thought the “aggressiveness is not a negative trait” was refreshing and something I reflect on a lot. I remember feeling and being browbeaten for my “vitality” as a young man. Frustrated by my own inability to sit still… I would have been a local hero if I had lived at a time I had to thresh wheat with a scythe but I was born when you were commanded to sit for 7 hours at a time.. luck of the cosmic draw
@@thinkculture6106 SNL had Kenan Thompson dress as a woman instead of just hiring a black woman for skits for like… idk 12 years.
@@thinkculture6106I guess TH-cam deleted my comment about the “end of socially acceptable child abuse” regarding the change in discipline in the West. But I do wonder if we are “soft” or simply no longer traumatized as a starting place, and thus less predisposed, not to violence as a species, but as “violence as a bridge through frustration” which is something many low income, often black, households are yet to be freed from.
Shit, I had comments off accidentally, sorry guys! Tried to turn moderation off and set it all to off I guess.
Not the best vid you've made, as its quite sweeping in scope. Nonetheless I do recommend you do a vid series on Heidegger.
Thanks! It is actually also super hard to do a video like this and make it not seem just like boring, rambling, and unfocused... lol Do you think I should stick to short videos? Like 5-10 minutes? There's like 30 topics in this video I could impromptu talk for longer than that about. So, that also means easier/quicker to produce content for sure.
@@thinkculture6106 By "sweeping" I meant your reading of the history of philosophy as just nominalism, which borders on the edge of indefensibility. I actually do appreciate long-form content rather than short ones.
@@galek75 Oh, wow. I don't think it's indefensible. Unorthodox. Like I said about Aristotle. But I would not say the entire history of philosophy is just about nominalism. Do you think metaphysics is fundamental, or no? The Problem of Universals is a central, perennial issue in metaphysics. I think the nominalism is a key through-line in the development of western philosophy, but I don't think it's everything. But if somebody wants to argue, like, we'd get the Reformation, British Empiricism, Hobbes, etc., without nominalism I think that's just plain wrong. And if you want to understand how we got where we are I think that should be understood. If you want to maybe do an episode with me and we can discuss it I think that might be really cool and I'd be up for it! But yeah it's unorthodox. But I don't think I'm wrong.
Thank you for the in depth analysis of Nominalism, which is inarguably the most pertinent issue of our time. Have a great day!:)
Thank you! Glad you appreciate it--I think it went fairly well. It's really hard to just talk alone at a camera for an hour and try to remain organized and coherent. lol. But there is some stuff that's really good in here I think. I did forget to do several arguments I wanted to go through though, upon reflection. But it's okay. If anyone wants to talk more about them they can ask.
Language gets in the way is what Nominalists might say I have read and enjoyed two books that have been recommended on this channel - War of the Elites aaaaand Bubbles 1 Great content John 👍
The ability to abstract concepts from our sensory input is a core feature of the mind and/or brain, likely due to evolving pattern recognition. As you pointed out, we see a bunch of particulars that have a similar shape, and are then able to abstract just the shared shape of those particulars into a subjective concept and give a name to that subjectively constructed concept. Since most humans share broadly similarly equipped brains, many of our subjectively constructed concepts will be so similar that we can use language to communicate about them intelligibly.
👏
God bless you for having to put up with Nick. I always get a kick out of watching him and Destiny go at it with one another.
What do you do for a living?
I feel like I probably shouldn't answer that lol
@@thinkculture6106 that’s fair, I guess I really wanted to know how you were occupying a lot of your time (besides being a dad which takes up a lot) , I find my old job let me read so much, my new job almost nothing at all.
@@KingPhilipsRideshare Dude, it's rough. I spend a lot of time with the kids. I haven't really been able to read anything long in a long time except via audiobooks (while mowing, driving, etc). I have two boys and they're constantly wanting me to play with them and do things with them and I try not to ever say no, so even outside of work, yeah, really very little time.
@@thinkculture6106I have two; 5, and 3, I know how it goes.
I should have been more clear that this is not an exhaustive list--I could have added Hobbes, Hume, Voltaire, Sartre, De Beauvior, tons of people. That ARE part of this process. But as far as a broad outline I think this is okay. What's clear though is that this is definitely a development *within* western culture, not some foreign imposition. In fact I told Nick if he really wants to talk shit, he could make a stronger case for basically the opposite--saying that actually Jews have contributed almost nothing original to this development at all, or even to intellectual history in general. Freud rips off Nietzsche and Havelock, Derrida rips off Heidegger, Marx rips off Locke, etc.
Hell yeah
Been a while . Welcome back ! That bit about babies faces " developed" to appeal to mothers would imply that over the millenia, in all cultures, babies with 'ugly' faces created revulsion in mothers, leading to them being discarded and therefore selectively maintaining lineage of individuals with 'attractive' faces as babies, which is simply not true. Maternal love transcends the attractiveness of the infant and is more physiological, more so possibly dependent on the process of bonding with breastfeeding. Add to that the visual of the infants diminutive body but larger face, proportionately adult eyes (our eyes stay nore or less the same size from birth to old age) with small nose and mouth , it seems that we (mammals in general) have evolved to adore baby features rather than the other way round.
Hell yeah! Welcome back!
Thank you! I just looked over at your channel too and I think there's a lot I want to listen to over there also.
Yeh Bubbles was a great book - I’ll be on the second one soon Appreciate the videos John 👏
Awesome, you're welcome! Hopefully we'll overlap some with Globes.
How was the hiatus?
Pretty busy with kids and all, but overall good. Stressful, but good. I hope that I can keep this going now. I think I've figured out how that's possible. So, crossing fingers!
Gonna tell the GF that she'll never be as good as my placenta
So happy you’re back! Can’t wait until we get to Foams 🤩
Thanks! Good to be back--I am going to keep it goin'.
Very good John 👏
Nice job.
Thanks!
I hope nothing happened to you. It’s been some time.
I return.
@@thinkculture6106 excellent news
I love you man you rock
There was a Burger King ad in the middle of this video admonishing me to have it me way. My individuality; my duty.
Agamben a truly courageous and intelligent philosopher today. Unlike so many of those other cowardly philosophical lightweights.
est-ce Istanbul qu'on entend/voit en background? :D
lol naw, that's the George Washington Bridge in NYC
@@thinkculture6106 lol... i made a typo
Great work thank you
Thank you!
You do the Marvel Explained channek right?
lol naw, I look like the guy or something?