![Justin Jarvis](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 77
- 223 960
Justin Jarvis
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2011
วีดีโอ
Ch 19B: Gross Domestic Product and Measurement
มุมมอง 4054 ปีที่แล้ว
Ch 19B: Gross Domestic Product and Measurement
Difference in Differences and Matching techniques for Impact Evaluation
มุมมอง 9K4 ปีที่แล้ว
D in D video 1: th-cam.com/video/J7q2H8aB8bQ/w-d-xo.html D in D video 2: th-cam.com/video/RKZXKMcsXqg/w-d-xo.html Alaska Permanent fund: arizona-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1h28lag/TN_proquest2006684733
Ch12 b Monopolistic Competition
มุมมอง 2994 ปีที่แล้ว
Here is the hugs video I mentioned: th-cam.com/video/wJfYAJJYMqg/w-d-xo.html
Ch 10b Monopoly
มุมมอง 3034 ปีที่แล้ว
Check out office clip here: economicsoftheoffice.com/all/?jel=D42
Ch 22 [macro]: Inflation and Unemployment in the Short Run
มุมมอง 2.6K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Ch 22 [macro]: Inflation and Unemployment in the Short Run
Ch 21 [macro]: Policy and the AS-AD Model
มุมมอง 6K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Ch 21 [macro]: Policy and the AS-AD Model
Ch 19 [macro]: General Theory of the Open Economy
มุมมอง 18K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Ch 19 [macro]: General Theory of the Open Economy
Ch 17 [macro]:Monetary Policy and Inflation
มุมมอง 12K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Ch 17 [macro]:Monetary Policy and Inflation
what are you doing now sir? Still teaching economics?
@@vd9570 yup! I am at university of Arizona
@@justinjarvis5681 Awesome!
GOAT!!!!
Sir you helped me to pass my economics class with an A. Just because of your lectures. Thank you so much
@@vd9570 woot good job 👍
mkay
Awesome econs. videos. Tq.
madloba
hello
Thank you so much
This has helped me so much for my exams.Thank you so much ❤
I don't understand why C's answer is movement along the AD curve, I thought that when people perceive prices to be lower then they are more willing to spend money for g&s's, raising consumption
Great question! I assume you're talking about 7:30 in the video. The key is that PRICES are changing. The change in P does in fact increase consumption. And we model this by moving down along the AD curve. Because of the way it is constructed, a change is price ALWAYS is modeled by a movement along the AD curve. Anything else that changes, except price, shifts the curve itself.
you've done an amazing job! have a macro paper on friday and this is just what i need
nice. Good luck :)
Macro final tomorrow. Good Luck people!
thank you sir😊
Appreciate your knowledge and your kind manner sir, Greetings from Turkey/Bogazici University
Wonderful! Glad to help
thx for this vid
Awesome!
I had just discovered your channel and I had to say that you explained better than anyone in YT in such an awesome way of delivering information. Thank you so much for saving me.
Thanku🎉 Sir
Thank you so much
THANK U SO MUCH SIR...............👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍YOUR HARDWORK AND KNOWLEDGE DESERVES MORE VIEWS AND LIKES ON ALL YOUR VIDEOS🏆
found a perfect account 2 before my finals that got the exact same slides I have to go thru man hats off to u...
Great video, learned a lot from it.
wouldn't more reserves means decrease the money supply? Why at 20:15, it says the opposite?
Great question. When I say "increase reserves", I do NOT mean that the bank pulls money out of circulation (from loans, deposits, etc.) to store it in reserves. That WOULD DECREASE the money supply. Instead, what I mean here is that the Fed is paying the banks for the bonds they just bought from the banks. They pay by inserting "printed" money into their reserve accounts. Thus, the banks feel richer, and then in turn make more loans, and increase the monetary supply.
Nice sir❤❤❤❤
thank you
hey lums student
Hello there lol 😂
thank you. 🙂
Thank you!! Fantastic teacher!!
You're very welcome!
hi from sdsb
This is like physics actually
👍
I love how you teaching and explaining the information, you are the great presenter I ever seen in TH-cam! Your videos are helping me preparing for my econ quiz and tests.
Awesome and good luck!!
hello from lums 😉
Professor Jarvis, thank you so much for these videos you uploaded. They are extremely helpful to my learning and thanks to you, you helped me get a 90 on my midterm exam!! Which is my first ever highest score in an Econ class! Thank you so much once again!!
Woot woot! Congrats. That is awesome :)
Ha throw a little twink lol
macro exam is this friday i'm worried but this was helpful-omw to watch the rest😭
Good luck! You can do it!!
thank you!! these are super helpful@@justinjarvis5681
I GOT A 96% ON MY MIDTERM!! Thank you so much!! @@justinjarvis5681
your videos helps me a lot with my studies... i noticed its an old video and no comments at all... I just wanted to tell you what you did 9 years back, it's helping me enormously. Keep up the good work and just know that you helped someone!
Awesome! Thanks
Same here
I appreciate your efforts and your hard work I loved your teaching style absolutely amazing ❤🎉
Thank you!!
3:24 double axis diagram 8:50 velocity of money 9:50 velocity exercise 11:24 velocity exercise 2
thank you so much for your useful videos
9:46 math 15:40 19:00 policy 1
I think the math looks ok at 9:46. What were your other two questions??
Hi codes and data please.
Hi! This doesn't make sense so me, so I won't be able to do it! Sorry about that.
@@justinjarvis5681 not a problem, thanks for the awesome content and your efforts.
Thank you SO MUCH! I'm currently enrolled in an accelerated macro summer course and these later chapters are like navigating a maze. You make it so clear and interesting. Great teacher.
Awesome! I'm glad to hear these are helpful. Good luck on your summer course!
@Justin Jarvis I thought you'd like to know I finished strong with an A-. I wouldn't have done this well if it weren't for your videos and your knack for teaching. Thanks again sir, hope you have an amazing Summer ☀️
@@Tommynyp33 woot that's great. I hope you also learned to love some econ as well 😎
I cannot find the full lecture of this video. someone please help I have my final tomorrow
You know, I don't think I have it anymore. Sorry 😔
you really slipped "Homelessness" in there quite a few times lmaoo
it is fast, i can't understand it
sir, Your explanation is very good, but I am an international student. Can you turn on subtitles for this video, it is very helpful for me to understand. think you very much!
Thanks a lot for your nice explanations. My question is, can we compare between 2 treatment groups, one group subjected to specific treatment and the second group subjected to another treatment instead if placebo or control as it is unethical to leave second group without treatment and we want to compare between the impacts of both treatments to know which one is better. Please need urgent answer. Thanks in advance
You sure could compare between treatment 1 and treatment 2 (no control) in theory. The design will still have internal validity. However, the problem with this is that it will likely lack external validity. This means that you will be picking up the differences between treatment1 and treatment 2....you won't be picking up the effect of treatment 1 all by itself. Usually, in these sorts of situations, where it is unethical to not offer treatment, what is done is a staggered implementation approach. Apply the treatment in 2-3 waves, perhaps 1 year apart (depending on what the treatment is), and then use the later waves as control groups for the earlier waves. Make sure that subjects are assigned randomly to the waves, however.
@Justin Jarvis thanks a lot for your valuable answer. Regarding the external validity, I designed a pre- & post test for each treatment , starting from an equal point as both groups comparable at baseline and then allocating subjects to 2 different treatments and then bivaruate statistics taking in my consideration evaluation for pre- test and post-test for both groups and for each and comparing the difference (pre value - post value) between both groups to figurout the improvement difference. Is a pre-post- test for each group not enough to evaluate the effect of each treatment ? As the durability of study is time (4 months apart), limited
@@fadhilfp6 Hello again. I might be misunderstanding your question. Since you were discussing the allocation of individuals to certain groups, I had assumed you were talking about an RCT-like design. Are you talking instead about a DinD design? The Differences in Differences technique is usually used when we CANNOT assign individuals to groups; that is, for some reason the data we have is generated by individuals who voluntarily signed up for the program. If we are able to assign, the RCT design will be cleaner, and as I said before, the later waves can be used as the control for the earlier waves. However, if you are thinking about a DinD design, with individuals assigned to two different treatment groups, this can be done (since you have pre and post data for each group). However, the alpha (coefficient of interest) you will calculate will not be the effectiveness of a treatment, rather it will be the (marginal) casual difference of treatment 1 as compared to treatment 2. This might yield useful data, depending on the context, but it will not yield information as to the effectiveness of treatment 1 (or treatment 2 for that matter) over the counterfactual. This is because there is no counterfactual generated.
@Justin Jarvis I am so thankful for your answer, Sir. I appreciated it.
thanks so much, you were great!
Thank u best vidio sir