วีดีโอ

We're standing on the tracks as a runaway train barrels toward us with increasing speed, yet we seem frozen in place and unable and/or unwilling to comprehend what will happen to us in a very short time. It's already too late to minimize the destruction that is taking place and that will increase incrementally. Already today, an increase in new pathogens, illness, wars, starvation. In a word, we're toast. I guess we had a good run.

So how much have the oceans risen so far. There are records going back over 100 years.

Why haven't all of these climate changers pushed governments to cut fuel burning by forcing manufacturers to build hybrid vehicles like 30% better fuel economy? Because they're not serious about global warming.

Uncertainty is always your enemy. It means you have to pay more to prepare for all the outcomes that might happen. It means you have to explain the difference between uncertainty and nescience. It means we can act as if we absolutely know for certain what our best inference tells, but must be aware the worst extreme could also come about.

And according to a geologist I watched said sea level varies by about 300 feet in geologic history

And this video is called science. Her first statement (she goes over very quickly) is that the sea level has been rising since we started measuring. That is correct. However, to be more precise, we started measuring in the latter half of the 19th century. As it happens that was the official end of the 'little ice age' which had lasted for 500 years. In fact, REAL science...that is to say actual data...show that sea levels rose about 400 feet from the initial melting of ice 12,000 years ago, and then for the past 10,000 years, sea levels have been rising...very steadily. When she talks about the 'sharp' increase in sea level rise....I don't know where she is getting that data from. REAL science...that is to say data...show no such thing. In fact there is a site that has tide gauge data from around the world. Some of it goes back more than 100 years. According to the data, the sea level rise for almost all tide gauges is very linear. Indeed, the sea levels are shrinking in Scandenavia.. (here is a link to that tide gauge data psmsl.org/) The 'studies' she refers to are all based off computer models. She openly states how difficult it is to make accurate models, then she tells us to worry because those models show a faster rate of sea level rise than expected. The problem with trying to guess the future using computer models is we are talking about very complex systems and our models are no where near sophisticated enough. The speaker seems to know that, yet she is using computer models to try to scare us. As for the Antarctica/Greenland ice melting. Here is another example of REAL science...that is to say data...that says the opposite. (climateataglance.com/climate-at-a-glance-antarctic-ice-melt/). NASA has just confirmed that Greenland's largest glacier, Jakobshavn, has been growing for the past 3 years. Moreover, NASA reports that for the last 30 years sea levels have risen at a rate of 1.2 inches per decade....and that has been happening for centuries. The person in this video needs to stop following scientists who rely solely on computer models. If you're not aware there are more than 100 climate models used in one fashion or another by the IPCC. Not one of them....let me say that again...NOT ONE of them aligns with annual observations. ALL of them are high. Mostly because models use the worse-case scenario for Earth's sensitivity when constructing the models. In short, the models start off with an assumption. Let's stop using models as much as we do, and let's start using actual observations.

That's why madatory flood insurance in a non flood zone, here. Fl

At this point nuclear energy should be the main energy source we are using for our power grids. Then use our other alternative energy sources across the world in collaboration with that. This power source is the best option to improve our environment & it will really help lower our emissions. The only things holding us back is legislation and the ways fear mongering has effected people. The more I've learned about our power grid, the more I've learned that modern nuclear energy options is our best option. Molten salt reactors, LFTRs, Thorium Reactors, Small form reactors. Utilizing our advanced technology, Improved engineering & material science. Utilizing our greater understanding of safety & well made designs. We have so much more advanced computer technology & robotics that can be used. It feels like even tho tons of advancement has occurred with engineering designs, safety measures, etc. It still doesn't matter to most people. It's like most people are ingrained with a natural negative response when talking about nuclear energy. It's a bummer because i truly believe that our best option for our future is to start utilizing Modern advanced nuclear energy options in our electrical grid. It's just proving to be challenging to get politicians to get on board. It will really allow places to be much more energy independent. Less reliant on fossil fuels. They'll have efficient, stable electrical grids and the rest of the grid could experiment with alternative power sources, power desalination plants, etc. We need to heal from the trauma of our past. See & learn that those things only happened solely from Us not understanding what we were doing when it came to nuclear energy at the time. We didn't have advanced enough technology, material science, engineering, safety measures, understanding of how to go about everything, etc. This source of energy will greatly help the world improve towards the future and lowering emissions. More than anything else could, while also providing a very stable electrical grid system. Currently we have alternative energy options but the majority of our grid is powered off of fossil fuels and emission producing sources of energy. We will be so much better going forward commiting to modern advanced nuclear energy options. Did they outlaw electricity or oil, coal when things went wrong in the early days of those fields? No! They kept going and understood things usually are bumpy and difficult in the beginning and kept going even tho those sources negatively impacted our environment. A huge issue is government BLOCKING any sort of progression from happening. We'd be lucky to see the slightest projects approved or finished with-in the next 100 years.. It's very annoying to see how much we have gotten in our own way when it comes to improving or advancing certain things. Instead we let fear, money, man made "required legal processes" Stop us from doing anything other than wind, solar, oil, natural gas, damming our rivers, mining for minerals... It's very frustrating because we should be able to use all these options in collaboration. If we actually wanted to improve anything. That's what we need to do and stop letting so much potential get blocked from ever occurring in the first place.. It's really irritating. I wish certain people didn't make this so "complicated and difficult" Why would any reasonable person want to block progression? In my opinion it's been irritating that our society has taken this "it's up to each individual person to make a difference" approach. When that just plays off of people's emotions. This issue is so much bigger than individual people. We need countries/states to get on board. It's the only way we can make even the Slightest difference. We've already waited too long. Everyday is a day wasted & we haven't even made a dent in improving our situation. The fact that Desalination is so energy intensive but fresh water is so important.. What If we dedicated nuclear energy to be the main energy option to run these energy hungry desalination plants?? Idk why we aren't already doing this anywhere we could...? Seriously think about it.. Nuclear power produces no green house gas emissions. It's extremely energy efficient. The list goes on. So why are we not utilizing this... We are being extremely too slow, too reserved, too cautious, too inactive to even make the smallest dent into our climate issue and our energy issues. It's holding back progression across the board in many different area's.. It's honestly getting really frustrating. I thought we would be more motivated than this. More active than this....?

Hi, given the plot you showed at 1:03, can you tell me why the NOAA tide gauges show a mean sea level rise of 1.47mm/year not the 3.36 that your graph shows? You can get the data at the link below. tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/mslGlobalTrendsTable.html It seems somebody has got their measurement wrong since they are supposedly measuring the same thing. Thanks, Brian

thank you

Climate change is caused by politicians!

Here in Canberra, Oz, our mean max temp over the last 16 years for August is 14c. It’s headed for 17c based on month-to-date and forecast for the next week !

It was fun to watch too, well except for the scary bits! Well Done again. Love your videos. Thank you.

I like how every little thing we learn have not only been left out of climate models but easily forseeable and "scientists" are super surprised that things like convecting warm air or water actually happens unlike the ice cube in a calm beaker they imagined represents the real world.

Wow, and now I know the origin of the Italian word for "hairdryer" 😁 👍🏼 I've been wondering about it since I first learned and it's always struck me as a bit odd & misplaced. But I wasn't quite curious enough to research it. Of course, the Italicized version is: fon Which is indistinguishable from an Italian saying "phone". A bit perplexing & odd...

I feel the physics weren't really explained here. So I know that precipitation of water dissolved in air is exothermic -- it *adds* heat into the system pushing the air back above the dew point. So the air must be continually cooled to keep removing water. As the air moved up the side of the mountain, it expanded due to having less atmospheric pressure pushing down on it, but it probably also had to move faster due to being displaced by the mountain and lost even more pressure via the Bernoulli principle. So as this expansion cooled it, the precipitation of water put heat *_back into_* the system. And much like a heat pump, once the air was compressed again at the other side of the mountain, it came out hotter and drier than it started. It had the exact same enthalpy; we just traded hydration for heat. Anyone well versed in the physics, please, pretty please, correct any of this that I got wrong! I love learning! Thanks! (PS: not an invitation for people who _don't_ understand the physics to "incorrect me"! 😁 )

A few days ago i experienced 28°C with 80% humidity at the shore of the north sea and the monsoon rain which followed. Climate change is allready here...

While I have no doubt we are heading for big climate problems, we still have to deal with the misinformation and disinformation from organizations like the Heartland Institute. In the following video, they minimize and outright dismiss concerns related to Antarctica: th-cam.com/video/lpefuE8jA9M/w-d-xo.htmlsi=DghANCAw0m_Fp5jE It’s really tough to keep ahead of well funded organizations like this! Keep your videos coming! Thanks.

In Canada, it's called a chinook. Usually happens in February on the Prairies.

Well, that's brilliant news. Let's hope Trump and his 2025 project fail.

Note to denizens of Florida, New York City, Bangladesh, and just anywhere beachside homes with inflated prices are sold to you: Buy higher boots, SOON. (by the way, I am NOT, like some Wicked Witch of the West, sloshed by fresh buckets of Larsen shelf water - See prescient "Wizard of Oz" forecasting 1939, et alia - As i sit here on a higher coast famed for its wettish cool barely comfortable in a winter jacket in August. Slightly too cool for unclad humans, so do not entertain ideas of seeking comfort here. Humans die from exposure at 10-13 C, 10-13F, especially when wet. Not quite cool enough to carve igloo snow into 1C bedroom walls, here is merely a predicted anomaly of global heating , accurately predicted by the 1960s, although consensus agreement on this reality occurred only by 1990 or so. Thus, post-it notes have been redundant for half a sybaritic human lifetime.

Beauty and brains, kudos great channel 👍 ,and tipping my hat to your amazing " hotness , that can melt the whole of Antarctic 😂

Thank you for explaining about how this type of wind is having these dire effects. Great video too.

Yeah it's time to realize cutting SO2 emissions makes the planet warmer. The ipcc even says so. Some even blame Panama drought and ocean boiling event on SO2 cuts.

The antarctic is the largest desert on the planet. And the southern hemisphere a year ago was the closest it gets to the sun.

I rather liked this :) In Norway, we have a lot of föhn winds, so say you have a strong weather system hitting the west coast, say Bergen, it comes in with a lot of air (mostly n2), but with water (h2o). Since h2o is rather light at 18.01528 g/mol and n2 rather heavier at 28.01340 g/mol, the air pressure will be low, hence a low temperature. As the air is pressed over the mountains immediately east of Bergen, unfortanetly for the people there, it starts to snow (although most of it falls as rain, since it's generally quite warm there), turning Bergen into Europe's wettest city wit about 2,250 millimetres/year (and probably rising, as it's already getting warmer). When this happens, large areas several hundred kilometers eastwards receive the föhn wind left over from whatever bad weather they got in Bergen. The "same" air, but without all the water, follows and with the extra weight, the pressure will be higheter and temperatures higher as well, which is good for "the rest of us" in places like Oslo, 550km away ;) So if you want to see a nice place with lots of people that may even be nice on a nice day and the day may perhaps be sunny for an hour or two during a few weeks, go on! The local dialect sounds like everyone screaming loudly to get heard over the wind - which is probably just a fact ;)

Become a big fan of ozone layer 👏 Quite complex interaction with climate. Suits me if make more on theme 🍻

My main takeaways:😈 1) you visited Berlin. 2) Föhn is a German word for hairdrier, but this was not hard, in Czech (where I am from) it is kind a similar, just different spelling - fén. 3) you have the best sunglasses I have ever seen, my daughter wants them too. We have to visit Berlin. 4) you said few things about some snow & ice, but the sunglasses! Thnx for video and all information you presented!👍

All praise the algo gods and so the world learns about föhn winds!

That energy transition you mentioned is underway. It's not fast enough for some of us, but it's happening, and I dare to think it will speed up as it progresses. I wasn't aware that Antarctica gets Chinook winds, but I suppose I shouldn't be surprised either. Thanks for a lovely factual video.

Thanks good context and info🏞

Now I want a Doener.

You did not mention the effect of Latent Heat of Vaporisation, but perhaps it might be a bit too deep a dive. When you have wet skin and wind blows across your skin, you feel cold. This is because the moisture on your skin is absorbing heat from your body to allow it to vapourise, and this heat removal mechanism is exaggerated by the wind. Energy cannot be unmade, so when water vapor condenses (as that moist air stream does when it is forced to rise over a mountain range and the pressure reduction and cooling induces it to rain) then that latent heat is released and warms the air. This warming adds to the heating effect you mentioned when the air is forced downward on the far side of the mountain range. We get Fohn winds in both the North and South Islands of New Zealand. Sometimes it is like standing in front of a fan-forced oven with it's door open.

Scientist understand numbers but 🚫 human nature , smokers 🚬 will 🚫 smoking till gets cancer

My moniker says it all. It is starting to cook here in the Rockies. Sad to see habitat collapse and along with it all the life it supports. Vote Blue.

That's some flamboyant glasses. Sadly, they were not enough to distract me from the worrying informative content.

that's right, I gotta take my fen (blowdryer in all ex Yugoslavia languages) to get it fixed.

Hello thank you. I invented new method energy from sea "This Machine Power is 150Megawatt hours/hours produce Electricity and 20000 M3 pure Water and Fertilizer, useful Minerals with Zero pollution 50% reduce fossil fuel that I mention in my profile.

Wind is crazy. I got an ice cream cone in Arizona and was doing fine until the wind came and literally melted the entire top and it all dripped onto my pants and the ground in like 5 seconds. It is WILD 😂

Love this video!

Volkswagen cars reversely nothing to do with winds or oceans currents, car brands are named after winds. Golf = Gulf Stream; Polo = Polar winds; Jetta = Jet Stream; Scirocco = Hurricane in Africa. Passat = "trade wind". VW Föhn with umlaut was not catchy name.

What excellent cosplay we're seeing today.

Why are tipping points described as high impact, low likelihood and then later in the video described as inevitable? I worry about Methane pushing us over the threshold of these tipping points and then tipping points cascading tipping other tipping points.

Rain Shadow side of mountain ranges.

someone is on the Fõhn for you,.....

Why aren't you discussing Deep Ocean Heat?

After the DENIAL of CLIMATE CHANGE, will come the PANIC, as the horrible effects of RAPID CLIMATE CHANGE become more common!

😂 That "Föhn like Döner without the sauce" made me drop my phone! Please more and "mit alles" of course so that your vids may never get dry!

Pretty funny... you had all the garb to do your kinda Goth-hippy, but not anything better then a bic pen for a cigarette... Thanks for the video... I always had trouble describing how fohn winds work... This helped a lot...

What a wonderful metaphor! Climate change leftists blowdrying their hair to save the planet.