![m valued](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 6
- 191 161
m valued
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 14 พ.ค. 2007
Air Rifle Lewis Clark girandoni Part 1.mpg
Air Rifle Lewis Clark girandoni
www.americanrifleman.org
www.americanrifleman.org
มุมมอง: 76 886
วีดีโอ
Air Rifle Lewis Clark girandoni Part2.mpg
มุมมอง 56K14 ปีที่แล้ว
Lewis Clark Historical Expedition www.americanrifleman.org
Man...impressive technology. I want one of these.
placing music destroys the concentration! I can handle just listening without heart throb rock.
finally
this is why police and military train you to NEVER under any circumstances point the muzzle of your weapon at friendlies.
Sad that Gus died, but his mother is at fault, guns fail, all brands, all types, they get worn out, they get old. Always point the gun in a safe direction, guns have never killed anyone.
All Remington 700s have been recalled made from 2006-2014. Just announced 3 days ago.
what the hell have these guys been eating ?
Some things I have an issue with: #1 Rolled and riveted steel is NOT air or even water tight. The original tanks were dipped in molten copper or brass to achieve "airtightness" #2 Lewis knew that his airgun was 'Big Medicine', and he used the superstitions of the indian tribes to his and the expeditions advantage. They were safe because they were respected for their 'medicine'. #3 800 psi is not 'extremely high pressure'. Wonder what the pressure in their SCUBA or SCBA tank was, hmm?
The gun didn't kill Gus. Guns are inanimate objects. His mother didn't kill him. Know your target, and what is BEYOND it
This investigation lied to you. Multiple times. And omitted a lot of stuff that doesn't fit what they want to show you. Please watch the rebuttal.
OK now when all these deaths and accidents happened please help me to understand how the rifle was orientated in such a way it could physically send a projectile towards another human? Your telling me it was a manufacturer's fault? THESE PEOPLE USED THEIR OWN TWO HANDS TO POINT A RIFLE WHICH THEY KNEW TO BE LOADED AT ANOTHER PERSON.
I have a 700bdl bought in 1979 has gone off by itself 4 times. I never never carry a bullet in the chamber. Rem should pay for trigger recall I have also seen 2 other BDLs fire without finger anywhere near trigger.one was a guy fell while hunting safety on gun fired extremely dangerous.
does this happen to other rifle company like winchester ruger savage i like to know
Can't even hear a word your saying, please fix
Bruce Wayne is correct
You people are stupid , the company settles a lot of the time. The company acknowledges it. A friends mother was one of the lawyers in the Texas case. There's a lot of cases that were kept under wraps. They don't use very high quality metals
Theses guns are horribly made.
i call bull shit
I hate gun control advocates but this gun malfunctioned on the witness stand for gods sake. It is a legitimate and dangerous problem in out of the box guns that have been unaltered.
I am as pro 2a as you can get but this is a legit defect with these guns, I watched a new one do it yesterday on a repeatable level and it had not been modified. They are dangerous and I am trying to find the easiest way to fix mine. I couldn't sell it to anyone in good conscience with it doing that. Correct, she should have been paying attention to the muzzle of the gun but I can easily believe that she didn't touch the trigger.
Those "modern" big bore air guns typically are not Rifled they are smooth bores and suck at 50 yards.
I love the Remington 700, :)
what they dont tell you is after the military made it policy to not mess with the trigger it never happened ever again. people mess with the gun and blame the manufacturer for it. if you replace the transmission on your car and it explodes is it the car companies fault?
why was the gun pointed at your kid you dumb bitch
Back in the forties 5 and half cents was a decent amount of money and with thousands of rifles already have been produced it would cost a lot
I recently was takin my rifle out and when I flipped it off it set the gun off been tryin but it hasn't occurred again
Who the hell hands someone a loaded gun? who the hell hands someone a loaded gun and have them unload it? who the hell unloads a gun pointed at his foot? who the hell unloads a gun that is pointed at his wife's abdomen? who the hell points a loaded gun in an unsafe direction? Oh, I know who does, stupid untrained maggots!!!
Who the hell hands someone a loaded gun? who the hell hands someone a loaded gun and have them unload it? who the hell unloads a gun pointed at his foot? who the hell unloads a gun that is pointed at his wife's abdomen? who the hell points a loaded gun in an unsafe direction? Oh, I know who does, stupid untrained maggots!!!
there is a vide on this subject about how messing with the trigger mechanism and taking it off safe can fire the gun, don't mess with it and you'll be fine
You unlaoad a gun in a safe direction. I dont consider my wifes gut a safe direction....unless Im unloading...well you know... Hundreds of acres of open farmland she points the rifle at a shed which she doesn't know whats behind. Gun saftey 101 Know your target, and what is beyond your target. Keep telling yourself you didn't touch the trigger hun. Ill point the gun at only what I plan on destroying loaded or unloaded.
Are there really this many stupid people in the country. They keep talking about all these people who have lost limbs or loved ones. My question is why do you have a loaded fire arm pointing at your wifes abdomen, your own foot or your sons hand? A ricochet slam fire thats Remington fault. A slam fire where you shoot your wife in the gut should be manslaughter. Dude hands his wife a loaded gun and she shoots his son. Thats dudes fault for handing her a loaded rifle. He should have unloaded it.
Anybody that is going to give me off range firearms advice while fingering a trigger like a 16 year old cheerleader in a high school football locker room is going to go in one ear and straight out the other. Seems like the first thing Democrats do when they pick up a gun is squeeze the trigger. Really? Haven't you guys had enough people accidentally shot like this.
Can't hear the dialog w/ the background drum track. Do away w/the background track.
yes very good point, in that case why pick up a gun? if you cant even touch the safety without it going off.... i ve shot a few different shot guns. 12 and 20 guage, ive shot rifles .22 , .30-30.... non of the guns i used were remington, non of the guns i used discharged with out me PULLING THE TRIGGER.
where is your foot? because mine is usually on the ground, where you re supposed to point the weapon while disarming. the gun WAS malfunctioning and when remington did that bullshit job of "trying to right" the problem it did nothing. the shame is what forced remington to change the design weather they let the public know or not is all on their ego. i am safe, which is why i would never purchase any remington. let alone a 700 hundred series.
NEVER POINT THE GUN AT ANYTHING YOU DON'T INTEND TO DESTROY. That is one of the four rules. It doesn't matter what direction shes turning towards, she obviously had the muzzle directed at the trailer. Did she intend to destroy her trailer? No, of course not. She violated a fundamental tenant of safe gun handling. The boar hunter obviously didn't have his weapon pointed in a safe direction if a discharge (albeit brought on by mechanical failure) blew off his foot. Be safe.
no target, she was disarming the gun. the woman didnt point the gun to the trailer she turned toward it, to disarm then place the gun down, (you ve shot before right?). the gun being damaged has little to do with it, they tested the gun and it didnt go off . funny how that worked out (someone at remington wasnt thinking) the boar hunter shot his own foot off, pointing the gun at the ground in a safe manner. they havent a leg to stand on.
She clearly didn't know her target. Part of knowing your target is knowing what is in front of it and what is behind it (should it not be sufficient to stop a bullet). A rifle bullet has the potential to go through a thin metal trailer wall and kill a person who could possibly be behind it. This is exactly what happened. This woman should not have pointed her rifle at the trailer. Also consider that her Remington 700 may not have been properly cared for. This may not be Remington's fault.
sir, the lady wasnt being a moron, she pointed the gun away form her husband who was nearest to her, if she knew the gun was defective im sure she wouldn't be using the thing. thats where remington is wrong. the bullet went through a trailer before hitting the kid, its not like she knew he was there, and she turned herself towards the trailer, im sure going to use it as a place to lay the gun down after unloading it.
I've had the same experience, but it's still not a good reason to violate one of the four rules. Would you feel comfortable pointing a loaded gun to your head while you took the safety off or extracted a chambered round? If we're not going to use common sense when handling firearms, we're only going to give the anti's more favorable statistics in their crusade to deprive us of our firearms.
the only reliable safety is the one between your ears
i have to ask, what do you do when theres a hang fire? cuz he barely touched the bolt and it went off.
ya kinda like at your feet? funny how the boar hunter lost his leg ass hat. the gun is defective, and it wasnt until this video, that remington was shamed into doing something.
lol disengaged many safeties , but the gun didnt shoot till i pulled the trigger.
Purchased a model 700 in 223 back in November . The first time I took it to the range the 4th round it started to not eject. I am waiting on a part from remington now . Rep. Says it sounds like an ejection issues and says it needs a new ejector. Just 4 or five shots it needs a NEW part, the rep. Says things happen .
if you're about to unload the firearm why would you not have it pointing in a SAFE direction? If you had a firearm that you use and get familiar with; and let's say it was unsafe..... when it misfires noone would get hurt firstly and secondly you could then never buy one ever again. I don't understand how unlucky you would be to have it go off at the exact moment it's not pointing in a safe direction. Probably have a better chance of winning the lottery.
sound sucks sooooooooooooooooooooooooo bad cant watch have to crank my sound system up so much just to barely hear it the whine is over powering from it bye bye
bought a vls 700 and my mate bought a vssf 700 id never have 1 again there over rated
I have one, a lot of my friends have one nothing like this has ever happened.
If the updated Walker design really only cost 5 cents extra per rifle, as suggested in the video, I find it hard to believe that an economic analysis would halt the change, especially seen as they just spent 20 million as you suggest. It would be in there interest to make the rifle safer and not have to fork out 20 million every decade or so.