วีดีโอ

Hi! We already have one on metaphysical realism; please check it out. 🙂

Sure! 🙂

Thank you so much for watching! ❤️

Thank you so much for watching! ❤️

Thank you so much for watching! ❤️

Thank you so much for watching! ❤️

Sorry about that. We're afraid our listeners would get distracted by our strong accent and poor audio quality.

That's nice! 🙂

Thank you! 😊

I think we're already in it.

​@@languageandideas For a while now.

Yes, but only the voiceover. The rest: text (research and writing), PPT, video, etc. were made by us, college teachers. 🙂

Interesting... Why wouldn't Jung invite you to his lectures?

@@languageandideas,,,well as we know from reading CG's bios, and seminar's, he could get annoyed if confronted w a Q or opinion which might challenge his ideas, ,,,he just might get a bit defensive. CG had a powerful and very developed intellect.. = That said, CG also most loved speakoing with friends who could rise to his level of insights,, CG once said , the only bk he would not edit is Answer to Job,,,, It is this bk I have most criticisms of,, ,,, I like to be challenged in all my ideas,, and alos give back criticisms where/when needed, In this sense I say CG might not like to see me at his seminars,, It was not so easy to get invited,,,,CG really liked only supporters, CG 's life is deep and complex,, He says some things in his letters that i will never geta answer ,,,,,CG was under some censures for many reasons.. = He had to keep soime sort ofa **reputation** His wife's family tree was of high society in Switzerland. CG knew his boundaries when criticizing christianity,, But he went too far,, He fliped floped. Its a long story,, answers we will never get unless we go to Zurich and find people who really knows the answers,, But CG's surviving family are not speaking much,,I would loved to ask Bair these Q's about CG's relation to christianity/protestantism. In one of his letters he say **WE protestants** Mind blowing,, and **I am not gnostic I am agnostic** , 2 untruths. ...CG was very complex and we will never get the answers to his opinions about christianity being a major part of antichrist.

If you like Plato and Jung….Husserl is on a whole different level. Not saying it’s better or worse , it’s just insanely hard to understand his actual writing. Honestly I would just put all of that effort into understanding Heidegger and studying Being and Time. He takes Husserl’s project and flips parts of it. It’s more comprehensible once you get the language down. Husserl will just make you want to pull you hair out. Also, how old are you ? You’re talking like you’re one of Jung’s contemporaries. He literally died in the 60’s.

I agree @@Whocares1987 ! I also had that question in mind. 😅

@@Whocares1987 I am 68.months away from 69,, but decades behind in moral/intellectual developments,, as both my parents were sons of satan,, Heidegger is a no go for me, as ae most every of the so called philosophers,, DELEUZE and his co partner a very famous book discussed on YT,, I ordered and immediaetly threw in the trash can....I am extremely selective,, at my age, old and near blind,,vision severe stigmatism,, at birth,,, ,,I just order 3 books1 Hurssel as author, the 2nd commentary on Hurssel anda 3rd,, essays' on the topic of Intuition etc ,, its from the CAMBRIDGE Series, massive 800 pages,,another book in my Ebay basket dealing with Decision making in INTUITIONS,, Skimmed through it online,, Most of the material is not much of use NOW,, however it will help me in my bible studies and studies in CG Jung,,, You see what we read might not have immediate value,, but will break open the ground so the lava of new thoughts can break through into consciousness. YOu see I am gnostic,,I partake of all , Hurssel will be wonderful,,,as i am a phenomenologist, intuitive/forensic/emiricist/Platonic(]I avoid all things Aristotle/Realist/Universalist,,but am nota mystic,, I do not like mysticism,, I much perfer the language of The PARADOX....Yeshua was a Paradox,,,,,,, Jung would ALWAYS say **I am a empiricist*** But he was also much more and also had limitations due to maintaining a **reputation** CG was extremely complex phenomenon,,, Q 's that will never be fully answered as most of his closest family/friends are all gone . Hurssel will prove to be super enlightening. Nice Day Paul

I agree, neocolonialism's definition needs to be updated. Illegal migration is indeed happening more and more these days.

Thank you so much! 😊

You're welcome, and thank you for watching! 😊

Yes, but the content was researched and written by us. 🙂

Yes, that's according to cultural relativists... and you don't have to agree with them.

Exactly!

Thank you! 😊

You're welcome! 😊

To be honest, I'm not so sure. Can you please elaborate?

You're spot on

Well in essence, republic/conservatism wants there to be a strict system with clear absolute rules and for winners and losers to exist, whereas democracy/liberalism loves blurring and mixing in the grey so that everyone can win. Modernism implicitly said the a priori rule that it would be better if things were easier/convenient. Postmodernism is realizing materialism isn't fulfilling and to screw off with mainstream rules and to find our own philosophy which is unique to each of us just as we are absurd in our own idiosyncratic way. From what i see, both search for something that mythologies of the past already offer us. And frankly, there have been real prophets who've already predicted such movements way back in late 1800s, such as dostoevsky's argument against paradise from Notes From Underground. This is a tremendous simplification with a lot of details left out, but i can tell more context if you'd like.

And i mean honestly, i recently watched Fight Club, and the more i think about it, isn't it based on the same fundamental premise of postmodernism vs modernism? Modernism(jack) is missing something in his soul and postmodernism(tyler) fulfills it to the brim but is expedient and degenerative/anti-life, and you need a bit of both since they're like 2 opposite ends on a spectrum (akin to the political spectrum and how the right position to be isn't some fixed place but constantly changing and only obtainable through dialogue and truth-searching) as having only one of each isn't life-agreeing because they're missing an adhesive that can't be found by science (rationale) simply because science can't explain the entirety of one's experience, it only provides models for our empirical interpretations and completely neglects an entire other field in the dynamism of human life: emotion, morality, and consciousness (fun fact: neuroscience still knows nothing about consciousness, hence no human robots yet [look up the Frame Problem by Daniel Dennet]). In fact, just as our models of the world is nested inside a framework of science, our philosophy and reasoning for science is nested inside a framework of morality, a framework of foundation which the western world has left to decay (aka the framework of the Hero/Pioneer Story [which manifests most patriotically through the history of the Founding Fathers], which roughly only ever existed in America and nowhere else in any culture in history), an example of which many other eastern countries are hastily copying, such as the Japanese. This spiritual flaw of democracy/modernism is prolly what churchill partly meant in his famous quote abt democracy.

​@@unkorichie2029also thanks for reminding me to reply to this comment

Thank you! 😊

Yes, of course! 🤫

Thank you! 🙂

You're welcome! 🙂

I guess the postmodern philosophers won't. 😁

Thank you! 🙂

That's true. 😔

What "both" do you mean?

You're welcome! 😊

PowerPoint Presentation

Thank you so much! 😊

Thank you so much! 😊

You're welcome, and thank you for watching! 😊

Thank you so much! 😊

I hope you liked our video. Thank you for watching! 😊

Sorry about that @gretamariotti3261. As of now we use free AI voiceovers because we're on a tight budget: we don't have the money to hire an audio editor nor to buy a sophisticated audio recording device. Rest assured the video's content was carefully researched and written by us, college instructors. 🙂 To help us improve our channel, please consider supporting us at Buy Me a Coffee (link in the video description). Thank you and all the best!

Thank you! 🙂

😆

No, sorry, I don't think every thinker said what is found in the slide he appears.

Yes, but the content is 100% human and researched. 🙂

😄

Thank you! 😊

Yes, among others.