วีดีโอ

The topography of the universe over time and how it changes nothing but our perceptions of time and distance. If dark matter changes states between a liquid and gaseous state then there would have been a time where almost all of the dark matter cooled, condensed and collapsed. This liquid state contraction could possibly have led to direct collapse black holes and galaxies. The condensing of dark matter may have also contributed to that uniformity of temperature. If the dark matter was in its liquid state then baryonic and dark matter would have been much more concentrated. This would have resulted in deeper gravity wells. The time in these gravity wells to us would seem to be moving slower to us. But due to dark matter condensing the baryonic matter would also have been cooled and rushing together. Once stars were formed and black holes became active the ratio of liquid to gaseous dark matter would have decreased over time thus affecting the evolution of particle masses. And making the gravity wells progressively shallower and larger in diameter over time. Galaxy clusters would have evaporated almost all of their liquid dark matter resulting in the shallowest part of the gravity well being near the canter of the cluster. Also part of redshift is due to the difference depth of the average gravity well at that point in time compared to now. The slope of that line would also have decreased over time. Light red shifts as it climbs out of a gravity well. Thus the further you go back in time the more light is redshifted. This would leave everything the same with the exception of our perception that the universe is expanding. Also if a big portion of the redshift is from climbing out of a deeper gravity well then we are not looking as far into the past as we think. Phase transitioning dark matter could also answer several of the biggest questions in cosmology. Spacetime is flat but has the equivalent of topography due to the cumulative effect of gravity on the passage of light through spacetime. It is probably more due to the time portion of spacetime than the actual speed of light. Light slows down in different materials I believe that the concentration of dark matter affects the speed of light. In the Virgo cluster there is a 6 degree area that has over a hundred blueshifted galaxies most of which I believe are actually in a filament that climbs into the void behind where they appear to be. This could be the key to figuring out the distance to DM concentration ratio. The early universe was much denser and the gravity wells much deeper. Light red shifts as it climbs out of a gravity well so part of our distance and time perception is due to light climbing out of the deeper gravity wells. The cosmic web was formed by condensing dark matter across spacetime. Once stars began fusion and black holes became active the dark matter began to evaporate. Resulting in progressively shallower gravity wells since then. Redshift minus gravity well depth actually equals actual distance. This may be proven by over a hundred blue shifted galaxies that are located within a 6 degree area of the Virgo cluster. I believe these are in a filament rising out of the other side of the cluster into a void area. Because the filament is rising gravitationally toward a void the increasing blueshift makes these galaxies look like the are in the Virgo cluster.

when will open application for winter-2025 intake?

HA, HA, HA! For my fellow academics, do I really need to point out that ice melts as it absorbs heat energy? 1.2 trillion tons of global ice is now melting annually, 3.3 billion tons per day, as it absorbs 144 BTUs/pound of ice. You do the math, my computer just went up in flames! Polymath Eliot Jacobson calculates that we are generating the heat energy equivalent of 12 Hiroshima yield nuclear bomb blasts PER SECOND, or 1,036.800 PER DAY, where each one releases 63 trillion BTUs into our environment. In spite of our natural AC being turned on "High", we are setting temp increase records daily and for the past 11 mo's. We are well on the way to a full blown climate collapse, but still insist on burning 8 billion tons of coal per day, and 100 million barrels of oil per day, some of which is from the Alberta tar sands mining.

When can we expect decisions to be made for fall (September) applicants?

- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago - I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010. Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us 1000 years to the past of the universe. Today April 22, 2024 the state of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 96 thousand years ago. On october 13, 2026 the state of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past. On june 04, 2051 the state of our universe will be at the point 15 million years in the past. On june 28, 2092 the state of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past. On april 02, 2147 the state of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past. The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago. Mohamed BOUHAMIDA

- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago - I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010. Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us one thousand years to the past of the universe. Today April 10, 2024 the state of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 84 thousand years ago. On october 13, 2026 the state of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past. On june 04, 2051 the state of our universe will be at the point 15 million in the past. On june 28, 2092 the state of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past. On april 02, 2147 the state of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past. The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago. Mohamed BOUHAMIDA.

Fascinating! Antarctica is melting at a temperature of -10°C to -70° C. Who'd a thunk it ?

Starting the description with "it is widely known" LMAO - it's wrong. You know it's wrong - making it a LIE. That's why you don't reference the claim.

From Thailand , we could use some cooler weather .

Sea level rise is measured in millimeters per year. Each year sea level has been rising about one fourth the rate that your fingernails grow.

All I see is hype and hot air.Yeah and why now??? All the evidence SHOWS global cooling.

The planet will decide our fate for us.

total bu-llshit

Considering all the whos who of politics and govt for decades of the us have been taken their to gander on the undisclosed findings there, it may be. The field trips thereay have been to show these things before they are transferred or destroyed to keep them under wraps..i have not researchednany of it, but have heard a couple things about what military pilots that have taken top officials there for said field trips have said, but who knows..considering we have not enough records (data) of earths temperatures and trends for them to say climate change global warming and have it feet to stand on .they are either guessing at best, or pushing the agenda for the greedy, rich, and elite..i could care less what phds what who when, people can and have been paid off, killed, disapreared in the past over new tech they figured out..nasa has for or had for a few yrs said ice was growing steadily. We are finding things underwater that at one time were not, some things already exposed..so has earth not went through this before and will over and over..save the planet,,...slow down...save the trees before getting ahead of yourself..the planet will survive and be here long after us as it was long before us..

Because it’s summer in the southern hemisphere????

The warm water from below the west Antarctic sheet is from the intense volcanic fault zone activity below the ocean. The last few decades has been a time of excess volcanic activity under the Thwaites and pine island glacier. The upwelling is actually from the volcanic activity below no the currents. There’s no data whatsoever supporting the idea that CO2 is causing the warming in Antarctica. The climate model errors are so enormous no conclusions whatsoever can be drawn from the output. Most people don’t know that the climate models track the past because manual parameters (fudge factors) were added to the models to make it match the past, so any future estimates are just pie in the sky estimates. The large ice shelfs in west Antarctica such as the Ross ice shelf could completely melt and the ocean would not raise because it is floating ice. Most climate scientists also forget to look at ice addition from precipitation when they warn about ice melt scenarios.

Good example of a life's work wasted on indoctrinated political science beneficial to nothing but motive misinformation

Your presentation is very inaccurate and flawed Disinformation at best

Where is the geothermal data relating to the water warming from below the surface? Antarctica has many active underwater volcanoes Where’s this data and information because it is affecting the ice sheets and glaciers melting

Ok the future predictions of temperature warming are based on models not on data That assumes that the model information is accurate Not basing the predictions on data is flawed and incorrect let alone inaccurate

Hi, my name is JD Santiago. I’m an amateur scientist. I love science side, love, climatology, volcanology, and everything that has to do with the Earth and however, works and stuff like that and your presentation and your show your slideshow was amazing. It was very well thought out written, and for whom whom ever of those out there that are nonbelievers if they can’t see the writing in the wall, I don’t know what to say but you did an amazing job you and your team and all the people there Were involved in this project and I just wanted to say thank you thank you so much. It was was the best hour and a half of my life well spent I am truly grateful. Amen and thank you guys for your work

Another long winded intro 😔 Get the fuck on with it ✝️🇺🇸🤨

Antarctica is melting Now, because it's time for it to do so 🙂 Now the fun is going to start,so Hang on to your Ass'es ✝️🇺🇸🙂

Today is 2024 but since 30 years ago germany speaker on climate change gas ozone and Extraction oil minerals gas Inside Earth

I sure would like to merge this with humans 😊

It's eating it 😢

But they show record gains in ice? Ice sheets Calv That's what they do!

The depression of the melting point of fresh water ice, you mentioned, is about one degree C per km of depth in the sea. WAIS is grounded as deep as 2m below sea level. If we get to the point where the circumpolar salty water has excavated the ice down to that depth, even if this water cooled to pre-industrial levels, it would still continue to erode the ice.

Hihihihiii Cockburn island hihihihiii

In HTML we say: Important!;

Climate chaos has all ready begun.

Interesting and well presented. Thanks for posting this talk.

I don't even know why you have comments up because all you get are trolls, bots, infected brain people that don't understand science or think they do. Thank you for your presentation🌎👍

The whole of East and West Antarctica is cooling, and has been for 40 years. East Antarctica has cooled by an impressive 0.7°C per decade. Resulting in an overall substantial and statistically significant decline of 2.8°C since 1980. So much for "Global" warming. I am referring to a paper by Zhu et al (2021) that looked at the reanalysed ERA5 satellite dataset. Check out table 4. Furthermore, the Antarctic Peninsula ice has since been shown to be on the increase “The eastern Antarctic Peninsula Ice Sheet has grown in area over the last 20 years, due to changing wind and sea ice patterns.” (University of Cambridge, May, 2022.) In reality, "there have been statistically significant positive trends in total Antarctic sea ice extent since 1979." (Fogt et al, 2022. Published in Nature) "since 1979 is the only time all four seasons demonstrate significant increases in total Antarctic sea ice in the context of the twentieth century". A study of Antarctic ice shelves from 1980 to 2021 (Banwell et al, 2023) showed meltwater volume dropped with "decreasing trend in both annual melt days and meltwater production volume over the 41 years.” "Overall, the Antarctic ice shelf area has grown by 5305 km² since 2009, with 18 ice shelves retreating and 16 larger shelves growing in area. Our observations show that Antarctic ice shelves gained 661 Gt of ice mass over the past decade." (Andreasen et al, 2023). It is from a paper entitled "Change in Antarctic Ice Shelf Area from 2009 to 2019". They use MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) satellite data to measure the change in ice shelf calving front position and area on 34 ice shelves in Antarctica from 2009 to 2019. Also, as the mass gain (661Gt) was given, you could calculate the volume of the ice gained using the formula: Volume = Mass ÷ Density (assume Density of glacier ice 0.9167 Gt/km³). This would give you (well not you obviously) an Ice Gain Volume ≈721km³. That's how much extra of the lovely white stuff there is around Antarctica. Imagine standing in the centre of this extra ice. It would stretch beyond the horizon in all directions and would be 45 storeys high.

The Antarctic Doomsday glaciers have lost their doom. “No numerical modeling work has shown that Thwaites Glacier is currently undergoing an irreversible retreat.” - Gudmundsson et al., 2023. "Removing TWIS [Thwaite's Ice Shelf] causes a modification in modelled SLR [Sea Level Rise] of 1-2mm SLR equivalent over the first 50 years." That's risibly tiny and described as "negligibly small" by the authors. The removal of the ice shelf "will have almost no discernable effect on the future mass loss of the glacier." Antarctica is not warming, it's cooling, with the evidence showing it has been doing so for at least 40 years, maybe more than 70 (Singh and Polvani, 2020; Bello et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2022; Zhu et al, 2021). So no "global" warming, and no polar amplification - at least not at the South Pole. Therefore man-made climate change cannot be causing any change in the melt rate of WAIS including Thwaites.

Save Our Planet Now!

O.M.G. More of Canada and Siberia will become livable. We can't have that now can we.

The presentation starts at 10:11…

All "green" initiatives are frauds. With the poles currently having larger ice extents in comparison to many years previously and Antarctica having the largest since 2017 what is the panic?. ALL of the supposed climate mitigation efforts and trillions spent so far have not made any difference to the claimed rises in CO2 in the atmosphere and yet we have many "scientists" talking about the benefits of atmospheric aerosol climate mitigation which everyone can see in the skies practically every day now, even though most alarmists deny it as being harmless ice crystals that somehow stay all day in an atmosphere some say is warming and blocking the sun. But is it really warming? Recently a Nobel physicist explained how the captured agencies trick people with their climate models by showing how they do not account for cloud cover in their climate models and using nasa's own images of the planet since 1979 he showed there is much more cloud cover over the land masses and oceans that cool the surface below the clouds negating the supposed warming effect caused by rising CO2 and methane supposedly trapping low level radiation. Nobel Laureate John Clauser notes that climate models miss a key variable and here is a link to him explaining his findings - www. youtube. com/watch?v=CvqIqy8d UvA A simplified explanation is computer models do not account for cloud cover. If sunlight fails to reach the surface it can not create the low level radiation claimed to be warming the atmosphere with CO2 "trapping" it and creating a "blanketing effect" but no models account for cloud cover and they have not adjusted the models to use the correct albedo forcing data using nasa'a own imagery for reference which a genuine scientist would to adjust their data prior to publishing, lessening the chances releasing baseless alarmist "findings". So any reliance on any computer models for accuracy in predictions is highly questionable and highlights why none of the many alarmist predictions have ever materialised in the real world. How are we supposed to trust their reinterpretations of the past climate data when the methods they use are so flawed. Tony Heller shows how agencies manipulate and change data over time to support the current scare stories they collectively push. The fact that worldwide governmental policies which are one of the biggest scams in human history and solely based on computer models not fit for purpose is disgusting and those fraudulent models that are being used to drastically damage our ways of life worldwide need to be condemned to the toilet because that is where they belong along with all "green" policies. The carbon they want to reduce is you and your loved ones and most living things. Any party or person STILL buying the climate frauds is either hard of thinking or very deceitful and are putting peoples lives at risk over a baseless ideology. A thing cults are well known for.

Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols - Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate Abstract. Effects on the global temperature of large increases in carbon dioxide and aerosol densities in the atmosphere of Earth have been computed. It is found that, although the addition of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere does increase the surface temperature, the rate of temperature increase diminishes with increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. For aerosols, however, the net effect of increase in density is to reduce the surface temperature of Earth. Because of the exponential dependence of the backscattering, the rate of temperature decrease is augmented with increasing aerosol content. An increase by only a factor of 4 in global aerosol background concentration may be sufficient to reduce the surface temperature by as much as 3.5°K. If sustained over a period of several years, such a temperature decrease over the whole globe is believed to be sufficient to trigger an ice age. S. I. RASOOL S. H. SCHNEIDER Institute for Space Studies, Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, New York 10025.

Excellent presentation. As a budding environmental scientist down in Aus (in the tropics) I love to see stuff like this as it shows how interconnected we are. And I can attest that el niño here sucks. Its been a brutal summer... would love to take a trip to antarctica rn!

total BS

Dr Hazen's 36 or so lecture series on mineralogy in the Great Courses was great! Lots of wow moments!

Hi, I would love to have contact with the professor and team about this tool for education. Is there a way to get in contact with them? I am also a teacher and we use also hololenses in education. Hope to contact you..

𝕡𝐫ｏ𝕄ｏ𝔰𝓶

Awesome talk, juicy detail, great series & looking forward to more!

For a pgdm course data science the tuition fees for international students is 33000 cad?

Nice work 👍

The Earth is cooler with the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer. To perform as advertised the GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible. No greenhouse effect, no GHG warming, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming. Version 1.0 031022

Program duration of MS in Data science??