วีดีโอ

The Eurosport was mostly the 2.8 as the 3.1 didn't come out until '89.

Or the Wagon Queen Family Truckster without the wood paneling.

I just bought an 87’ ES Wagon less than 130,000

Untouched n running

Duhh

Well....yeah

it was the impression of being in a sporty car

Very disappointing. They could have at least offered AWD as Pontiac did for their 6000 STE and S/E models.

The Celebrity was a nice car for its time shame that GM never kept it in production for more than 1 generation. They sold well and were everywhere throughout the 80s and even used ones were still around throughout the 90s as well. My Dad had a 1986 grey metallic sedan with matching grey cloth interior was the base car with the 2.8 V6 and the Chevy metal hubcaps was a nice car. He bought it used in 1990 and had it until 1997. Was the older style with the sealed beam headlights unfortunately even being garage kept always the rust belt ohio weather eventually got to it.

They arent bad? They were really cheap nee

That's pretty cool. I've got an 86 Celebrity conv made by Hess and Eisenhardt as well. It's still got the carb in it though...

@@F-ZERO awesome they are great cars

😂😂

LOL

😂😂😂

When Chevy tried to out-Pontiac Pontiac.

Well, that was close.. 😄 th-cam.com/users/shortsXHSXw6cvV08?feature=share

I almost dookied my pants!!!!

t payton Not always either. This is a common myth and pure ignorance. Any car can last over 300k miles if properly taken care of. I've seen Volvo's, Honda's, Yota's hit 100k and fall apart due to poor ownership. I've had a Celebrity with 350k miles that was always taken care of and well documented when repaired or had oil changes/tune ups. It's all in how you take care of it.

Jack Creason thats true to an extent.. but a lot of cars especially AMERICAN cars were purposely designed to break down early so that you can either pay the dealer shop to fix it ( very expensive) .. or you have to buy another car from them (money and greed was there motive)..a very clever scheme that most dont see..this was the case in the 80's american cars..pontiacs, fords, mercury and others were straight garbage..theres a reason why honda was the best selling car in america..truth be told there cars was getting double, or triple the mileage than American cars..america woke up after the auto industry in Detroit collapsed due to very low sale..foreign sales exploded, while the motor city suffered.. so bad that obama had to bail gmc and others out in order to keep them afloat..i think they learned there lesson. The American people will not settle for purposely built garbage. American cars are much more reliable now, and last longer than the garbage that used to roll of the assembly lines..

Again it all falls on how you take car of it. Even a cheaply made car can be taken care of and used way longer than it's intended life span. I got a friend who has a Yugo with 400k miles on it. Only owner. Does oil changes every 3500 miles and tune ups every year. Yugo's were made with the cheapest parts possible granted not american. I've got another friend who still drives his dads Citation. I agree that cars are built to fail like new TV's are but unlike TV's you can easily fix cars and their issues.

Jack Creason yes you can easily fix cars and there issues..but who wants to go through that? Especially when it could be avoided or minimized by purchasing a more reliable vehicle. U can fix a car with a blown motor also, but again who wants to go through that? I would rather drive a honda accord that will get 300 k with normal or very little repair issues.. chrysler 300 4 and 6 cyl. Has a very bad rep for premature break downs..especially the 4 cyl. Motor trend described the car as a very unreliable box on wheels.. i love these cars because of the body design, shape, etc..but once again there engines are very weak and cheap..in this case this is not about proper maintenance keep up .this is about very poorly built cars, maybe this is the reason Chrysler went under..because buyers started getting tired of the American garbage rolling off the assembly line..dont get me wrong, im not saying that America doesn't have the technology to build super tuff, long lasting cars, because they do, they've done it in the past..what i am saying is that they prefer not to..why sell one car every 15 years when we can increase the turn over rate by selling one every 4-7 years..wich boils down to more money..i would rather sell one good car every 10-15 years and have dedicated customers and a good name, than to sell lots of cheap cars every 5 years with unreliable, uncommitted customers any day. .thats why Chrysler went under..greed my friend..

Not really. Just because they're Honda's or Toyota's doesn't mean they'll automatically make it to those miles. You ask any owner that has had one get to 250k or higher and I'll bet money they took care of it. I'll bet money they took care of it. Even a little bit of TLC is enough. IF you want I had a Honda that barely went over 125k before it died due to lack of care. Or a Yota that died as well before 175k. Both weren't well taken care of before me and sorta with me.

maybe back in the 80's otherwise no.

armymatt83 the 80's 90's and there getting a little better now.. because they realized that people arent going to buy a piece of junk american car when they can buy a volvo, or toyota, or honda that will get 2-300k miles with no problem when cheap american cars break down at 100k

85timotheus In case nobody told you, a volvo is a piece of crap. There are no European cars with the exception of BMW and Mercedes that will put up with American roads. Our states are like European countries. In Europe, 30 miles is considered a long trip. Any car will last forever. It is when you decide to stop putting money in them. All you have to do is look at an Audi or a Volvo with 150,000 miles on one and see how they DON'T stack up against Toyota and Honda. BMW's and Mercedes parts cost a fortune, so even if you get longevity, the cost per mile is outrageous. I spent my whole adult life in the auto business. I am retired now but still buy and sell a couple cars a month to supplement my income. Trust me, it is Toyota, Honda,Subaru, Hundaii, Kia,a very distant Nissan, then everything else. Honda and Toyota are so much better for total cost of ownership, nobody really comes close. When you take the cost of the vehicle add what it costs to drive and maintain it for 200,000 miles, then subtact what you sell it for, that gives you a true cost of ownership. Volvo and Volkswagen owners are mostly one time buyers. Almost all buy into some type of either Volvo safety or German Engineering crap, then they find out they bought crap.

C moore U MUST BE INSANE, VOLVO IS VERY RELIABLE AND GET 300K MILES LIKE NOTHING..AS A MATTER OF FACT THE VOLVO IS IN THE GUINESS BOOK OF RECORDS AS THE HIGHEST MILEAGE ACCUMALATED ON A VEHICLE..1MILLION MILES TO BE EXACT..DONT EVER LET THAT COME OUT OF YOUR MOUTH..

Actually, I have spent my whole life in the car business. I have earned a living doing it. Volvo is a typical european car. They will not stand up to the abuse that americans put them through. In europe, 50 miles is a trip. In the US, many people drive that far one way to work every day. Go to any used car lot in the united states and look for a good Volvo with over 100,000 miles. You will be looking a very long time. Parts are very expensive and the parts network is nothing near what the japanese manufacturers have. There quality is nowhere near what the quality of a honda or toyota. You , my friend are not the expert in this field. I have lived cars 24/7 for over 60 years and can take one apart and put it together in my sleep.

Miguel Gil it is the 1988 models. The '87 was a concept car and way more rare. they made 600 of the 2-door, 1250 of the wagon, and 3500 Sedans in 88

I think 1988 or 1989

Ahhh....You want me to kiss it to feel better???