วีดีโอ

You people still can't present a single shred of evidence of any gods. This is how atheism wins. "In a civilized setting the man of God could hold his own easily against the shouting doubter." Then show the evidence. btw. Atheists do not claim there is no god. We simply reject your claims of your god for the lack of evidence. Definition of faith "strong belief in God or in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof." “Where there is evidence , no one speaks of " faith " . We do not speak of faith that two and two are four or that the earth is round . We only speak of faith when we wish to substitute emotion for evidence .” ― Bertrand Russell

Jesus did not say anything. Dr. Price is correct. The existence of Christ is a myth. You should listen to Bible scholars Dr. Richard C. Miller PhD, Dr. Kipp Davis Ph.D., and Dr. Dennis R. MacDonald. on their discoveries about Christianity while studying other religions. It seems more and more that Christianity is fake and Christians are just a bunch of thieves.

You cant fathom anything beyond what your ape made atheist brain will let you. Black women make up the largest demographic of christians throughout the world. Your new age atheism is nothing but a weak and lazy cult.

Nobody has proven any omniperfect creator of the universe exists in the first place.

@@The_Alchemist_007 Well, a God (a singular outside creation source, that created us by design) of some sort is certainly real, based on following the objective science of the laws of physics, to their logical conclusion . Those laws of physics in particular being, "the 1st/2nd law of thermodynamics", "the law of conversation of energy(/mass)", and "the law of cause and effect" (which i will explain in more details down below). Than, you can even narrow down what God is correct, since God is singular (as no initial chaos or randomness in the universe exists), if there is a religion that is correct, that just leaves Islam/Judaism /Christianity as valid search targets. So in short, since out of them, Christianity is the only religion that has a fully testable, repeatable, method, of getting right with God (salvation), that actually works as a result of said testing, to confirm that it is from God, and thus, that the Christian God (JEHOVAH/YHWH/ JAH) is the correct God. With said method being both posted above and at the end of this post if you are curious about it. However, to go over the laws of physics in more detail, in order to prove a God exists first , starting with the 1st law of thermodynamics, that states; "every energy transfer involving some loss of energy into an unusable form". than the 2nd law of thermodynamics also states; "that as energy is transferred or transformed, more and more of it is wasted" Meaning, that there is a net loss of heat from energy (how things get energy/are energized) as it transfers (that happens in everything in the universe with energy in it), "resulting in a more disordered system" (less order/more chaos/disorder, via a lack of useable energy) over time. So every time energy is goes from one thing to another, or is transformed/ changed, the energy turns into a less useable, less heated state, as it does so. Making the total useable energy in the known universe ultimately finite/limited, for how long it is useable/heated/useful for. Since all non creation theories need all energy as is to be looped infinitely, with there being no loss of useable heat in energy in order to be fully looped as is, shows that any/all non creational theories are 100% scientifically impossible. Next up, the law of conversation of energy(/mass) states; "that energy(/matter) respectively can neither be created nor destroyed inside of our (known) universe, only being able to be converted from one form to another from inside of the (known) universe". With the law of conservation of energy(/mass) also stating; "that the total amount of energy(/matter) (not what is lost in the heat transfer of energy) of an isolated system (our known universe) remains constant." This is even when the energy is conserved (remains the same), transferred (moved), or transformed/changed over time. Also meaning, that the law of conservation of energy shows that the amount of total energy in the entire known universe remains the exact same, even when what is there is less useable over time (following the 2nd law of thermodynamics). Also showing that there is no new energy is entering the known universe at random to replace lost energy (showing it to be finite). Thus, since energy and matter can not be created or destroyed in the known universe, and due to the total amount of energy that is there remaining the same (just being less heated/useful over time), also shows that internal creation (creation from nothing inside the universe) is 100% scientifically impossible. Of course we than have the universal law of cause and effect that everything in the universe follows, that states; "that for every effect there is a definite cause, likewise for every cause, there is a definite effect". Which just means that everything in the known universe requires some sort of cause ( a reason for it to exist). Thus, even with all internal or non creation theories being scientifically impossible for energy being in the universe, it still needs to have a cause for why energy exists here. Considering all of that, and with what we have left when you remove the impossible (non creation/self creation), all you have left therefore must be true. Meaning that what we have left is that the universe was created from the outside. Of course since our creation is from the outside, with all energy coming from a outside source, and all while there is no new energy coming into the universe from the outside ( as is shown from the law of conservation of energy), shows that there is also some kind of stopgap now in place. One that prevents new energy from entering into universe, after it has already happened. Which a stopgap like that, implies some kind of design to this outside creation process (to how God works). We also only have one set of ,laws of physics in our universe , not many sets of rules that contradict each other (gravity does not stop working on Tuesdays, for example). This shows that in us having only one series of laws (not several sets of contradicting ones or randomness in how they work), also implies there being only one singular creation source for our creation (one creator, one God). Leading to our creation in total, being due to a singular (one) outside creation source, that created us(energy/matter) by design. Which is by all definitions we can consider, is a God, and with a God existing/creating us, does make looking into the validity of the one God religions (Islam/Judaism/ Christianity) as very well worth it. Thankfully again, salvation from the King James Bible, is a great place to find out which singular God or religion is correct. Seeing as salvation from the King James Bible, is the only religion that again, has a fully testable, fully repeatable, method of getting right with God that works fully as a result off said testing (in short, it fully follows the scientific method of testing). Making salvation from it a great place to start, in looking for what exact God is the correct God, after knowing that a God of some sort certainly is (salvation is in more detail above, or Romans 3: 10+23, 5: 8-9, 10: 9-10+13, 6: 23,Revelation 21: 8 near the end of this post/my first post above in more detail). Not to mention that salvation from the King James is thankfully not through the cancer of organized religion (works that never save/confirm anything) or from works of any kind of our end, on that note. All due to salvation being a freely given gift, that is fully received upfront, all from genuinely accepting it from God in prayer (inwardly or outwardly, just genuinely). That gift is, that God loved us enough, to allow his only begotten Son, Jesus Christ, to live a sinless life in your place and shed his blood on the cross, all to pay the full price for your sins (imperfections /wickedness). This was so we would not go to hell forever for our sins after our life ends (Revelation 21: 8, Romans 6: 23,shown at the end of this post), by God forgiving the sins of whosoever genuinely accepts this freely given gift from him, even just once. :) So there are zero reasons for you not to test out this free gift of salvation, if you are curious about it. ;) Romans 3: 10+23 (KJB) 10. "As it is written, *_There is none righteous, no, not one:_* " 23. “ *_For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God._* ” Romans 5: 8-9 (KJB) 8. “But *_God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us._* " 9." *_Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him._* " Romans 10: 9-10+13 (KJB) 9. “ *_That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved._* ” 10."For *_with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation._* " 13." *_For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved._* " Revelation 21: 8 (KJB) " *_But the fearful,_* and *_unbelieving,_* and *_the abominable,_* and *_murderers,_* and *_whoremongers,_* and *_sorcerers,_* and *_idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death._* ” Romans 6: 23 (KJB) “ *_For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord._* ”

@@crossvinburn831 You don't have to type that long. Just put your argument in syllogistic form, then I can analyse it.

@@The_Alchemist_007 Ill try to shorten it (at least into shorter sentences), as explaining how the laws of physics work inside the known observable universe, is the bulk of that (and this) post. To start with, 1st law of thermodynamics directly states that " *_every energy transfer involving some loss of energy into an unusable form_* ", and than, the 2nd law of thermodynamics directly states " *_that as energy is transferred or transformed, more and more of it is wasted_* ". This means that energy goes into a worse, less energized/heated state over time, eventually leading to the total heat death of all energy (the total heat death of the universe). Which alongside the law of conservation of energy that directly stating " *_that energy respectively can neither be created nor destroyed, only being able to be converted from one form to another_* ", shows that all energy is 100% finite, and unable to be self created in the known observable universe. With all that being said, you also have to factor in the law of cause and effect, which states "that every event that happens is the result of a specific cause", shows that even with energy being finite and unable to self create, energy still needs some sort of a cause , in order to exist. So in total, this shows that all forms of non creation are 100% scientifically impossible (as they need all energy to loop in the same state, to not have to be created/come from a external source) and that all forms of self creation in the known universe are also 100% scientifically impossible (as it is impossible for energy to self create itself in the known universe, based on the law of conservation of energy alone). Thus, since there is also no randomness or contradictions in how the laws of physics of our universe works (a lack of randomness or contradictions favors a singular creation source), than in still needing a cause for energy to be able to exist, we are only left with energy being created(/coming from) a singular external creation source (best defined as "a God") , as the only scientifically possible way for energy to be able to exist. If that is not the case, and if anything i am saying here is not 100% scientifically correct (it is based on my study of it), than i hope you explain where or why i am scientifically incorrect (1 Timothy 6: 20-21) as a fair rebuke to me (Proverbs 9: 8). ;) After all, if what i am saying is scientifically incorrect, and thus 100% wrong, it should not be too hard to actually prove what i said to be wrong. :[) Proverbs 9: 8 (KJB) "Reprove not a scorner, lest he hate thee: *_rebuke a wise man, and he will love thee._* " 1 Timothy 6: 20-21 (KJB) 20."O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, *_avoiding profane and vain babblings,_* and *_oppositions of science falsely so called:_* " 21." *_Which some professing have erred concerning the faith._* Grace be with thee. Amen."

@@crossvinburn831 Conservation of energy implies energy is 100% finite, BUT only in AMOUNT, not in TIME. Conservation of energy logically implies energy should be INFINITE in TIME, but FINITE in AMOUNT, thereby implying energy should be uncreated and eternal, thereby implying it is causeless. What you did is called 'false equivalence fallacy' when you equate finiteness of AMOUNT with that of TIME. Another thing is that even if it is created, saying the creator of energy to be omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent, immaterial, timeless, etc... is unnecessary and incoherent. Therefore even if it is created, it still doesn't have to be a god. But now I already showed that energy should be eternal, implied by conservation of energy, creation of energy is far from possibility.