วีดีโอ

By panicking a whole lot and spotting the food thanks to ADHD 😂

@@ShiningSion Oh! I didn't know 😅 I even googled to see of there are and only got guides for how to sing

@@TheOtherAtom2212 Thanks!

the trolley problems aren't meant to prove anything, it's just to explore someone's moral system. in the original problem, it essentially asks someone if saving the lives of 5 people morally outweighs the murder of one person. most people say to switch tracks because they view the nebulous concept of accountability less morally relevant than reducing the number of casualties. In this scenario, on average one person will die on either track. presumably it is meant to ask if reducing the chance of death is worth risking the lives of more people, but if that doesn't influence your decision making, i can see how accountability can take preference in this case.

It's a philosophical question and your answer to it is your own self-preservation, ignoring the question to not become involved. If it's just you pulling the lever, 10% is the best choice, because you're very likely to save everyone, but if their were an infinite number of people pulling it wouldn't matter which one you chose because they both result in the same theoitical number of people killed.

@@MARTINGOLDING96 Go watch the original video. Maybe it should help clarify what the Absurd Trolley Problems is about

@@stephenwaldron2748 That's one way to.... Think out of the box Ba dum tss

@@malicholson5767 Part of, kinda😅

@@snaukball8764 Yup!

Ah so that's a different situation about accountability wherein you have the ability to act but you have the decision to either do it... or do nothing. That is now up to your morals (and maybe the majority's)

@@Brokerrs I don't think that's the case though. I mean, if we take away the number of people inside, it's 50% against 10%. Though... saying that, I think mine wasn't enough since all I did was weighex them in a mini graph. I hope someone out there can come up with a graph and consider it's a 50% vs 10%

@@pimage7809 The number of people is the original foundation of the trolley problem, though. Imagine this setup but x1,000,000. You can pull _one_ lever, or not, and it will affect them all. What do you do? Whatever you want, because the odds are 1,000,000 die either way.

@@pimage7809 To connect it to what you drew up in the video, imagine resizing the boxes according to their probability. (A) 50% on / 10% on - 5% area (B) 50% on / 10% off - 45% area (C) 50% off / 10% on - 5% area (D) 50% off / 10% off - 45% area Factor in how many people are in the "on" boxes and you get (A) Nothing: 0.1 expected kills (5% chance to kill 2) / Lever: 0.5 expected kills (5% chance to kill 10) and (B) Nothing: 0.9 e.k. / Lever: 0 e.k. (C) Nothing: 0 e.k. / Lever: 0.5 e.k. (D) Nothing: 0 e.k. / Lever: 0 e.k. 1 expected kill total for either choice.

@@pimage7809 As SirRebrl said, there is always one guaranteed expected kills in each choice you make. So it always comes down into a 50/50. Expected kills are basically covering all of the cases.

Thanks!

Thanks!