- 22
- 169 137
Mike Jesch
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 13 ต.ค. 2011
Captain Mike Jesch plies the skies of the Pacific Ocean as the Captain of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner by night, but by day he owns and flies a Cessna 182Q based at Fullerton airport (KFUL) in Southern California. He earned his PPL at age 17 while still in high school, and is now an ATP with six type ratings. He became a CFI in 1983, and started airline flying in 1985. Since then, he's accrued some 25,000 hours of flight time. He is a two-time Master CFI and the Western Pacific Region FAASTeam Rep Of The Year for 2021.
He speaks to pilot groups on a range of topics, including: Airspace; Flight Instruments; EFBs; ATC Communications; Emergencies; and more. With all the instrument flying experience he's gathered, though, his favorite subjects are in that realm, including IFR flight planning, regulations, charts, navigation equipment, and more.
He speaks to pilot groups on a range of topics, including: Airspace; Flight Instruments; EFBs; ATC Communications; Emergencies; and more. With all the instrument flying experience he's gathered, though, his favorite subjects are in that realm, including IFR flight planning, regulations, charts, navigation equipment, and more.
2023 Pacific Air Show LA Area Pilot Briefing
The Great Pacific Air Show will once again grace the skies of Huntington Beach over the weekend from September 29th to October 1st. This is the largest air show in the world, and in one of the most crowded, complex flying areas in the entire United States. Airport operations at some local airports will be affected and some airspace closures will be in effect as well. Local pilots need to know how best to avoid, or operate in the area, and this will be the best opportunity to get all the details.
Guest speakers will include personnel from Airshow Operations, Air Traffic Control, Airport Operations, and local FAA Air Safety Inspectors.
Guest speakers will include personnel from Airshow Operations, Air Traffic Control, Airport Operations, and local FAA Air Safety Inspectors.
มุมมอง: 295
วีดีโอ
GNS 430/530 Part 9 Finale
มุมมอง 2.7Kปีที่แล้ว
This will be the final episode of our series on the Garmin GNS430/530 navigators. We'll look through the mail bag, chat, and Q&A from the previous programs and investigate those answers, and talk a little about things we've learned and some suggestions on how best to go about learning and flying with these powerful navigators.
GNS Part 8 - In Flight
มุมมอง 5K2 ปีที่แล้ว
In Part 8 of our continuing series on the GNS430/530 navigators, we take a look at in-flight use of ADS-B in weather resources in real time decision making on some recent long cross-country trips. In comparing what we see on the GNS screen with what we see on an iPad and out the window, we can think about how best to use these resources. Then, we'll revisit a few techniques around instrument ap...
VNY PCF 18Apr2022
มุมมอง 1242 ปีที่แล้ว
VNY Airport Pilot/Controller Forum as prelude to the VNY RSAT meeting on 19Apr2022
SoCal TRACON Pilot-Controller Forum webinar on 1 June 2022
มุมมอง 1.8K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Hosted by the Long Beach FSDO FAA Safety Team, this program features Air Traffic Controller and Pilot Outreach Manager Rob Reddeg, along with a couple of his colleagues, discussing current issues and best practices for operating in the airspace from Burbank to San Diego and Catalina to Palm Springs.
GNS Part 7 VNAV
มุมมอง 5K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Though they are now somewhat dated, the Garmin GNS530 and 430 remain ubiquitous in the GA fleet. These powerful navigation devices remain somewhat mysterious to many aviators, so Cap'n Mike will demystify the basics of this very capable equipment. Whether you've had one for years, found a used one on eBay last week, or recently bought an airplane that came with one of these installed, you're su...
GNS Part VI SIDs and STARs
มุมมอง 8K2 ปีที่แล้ว
In this part 6 of our series covering the Garmin GNS 430 and 530 GPS navigators, we dive in to how to fly Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs) and Standard Terminal Arrival Routes (STARs). These time-saving tools can simplify your IFR routing into and out of many airports. But, if you're not sure about how to do them, or not aware of a couple major issues with the way they're implemented in th...
GNS Part V Instrument Approaches
มุมมอง 25K3 ปีที่แล้ว
In this fifth episode of our Reintroduction to the Garmin GNS430 and 530 navigators, Mike takes a deep dive into what it takes to use these navigators to execute Instrument Approach Procedures. We'll take a quick look at the different types of GPS Approaches and their minimums; look at how to select an airport and the desired approach and transition; how to quickly select another airport; wheth...
GNS Part IV Holding Patterns
มุมมอง 12K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Continuing our series on features of the dated, but very popular Garmin GNS 430/530 GPS navigators, this program will do a deep dive on one of the most often asked questions from the previous programs: How can I use this box to do a holding pattern? We're now well into the "300-level" functionality of these units, and some of these techniques are nearing graduate-level work. But, exploring diff...
GNS 320 Extra Section on FPL Catalog
มุมมอง 5K3 ปีที่แล้ว
A shorter-format deep dive into the use of the Flight Plan Catalog feature, with a follow on side dish of integration with the Flight Stream 210 and transferring flight plans from an iPad running ForeFlight into the GNS530W. This program covers the details that went missing in the gap we lost in the 301 program, plus a little extra. It was not presented as a full-on live webinar, but as a solo ...
SBs and ADs and ICAs, Oh My!
มุมมอง 4883 ปีที่แล้ว
This is Part 2 of a 3-part series on maintenance issues for the Southern California Pilots Association, in which I discuss the differences between Service Bulletins, Airworthiness Directives and Instructions for Continued Airworthiness documents. Plus a couple others. Note that I am not a Mechanic! Just an airplane owner. But, I am involved in the upkeep of my airplane, and part of that is a pa...
GNS430/530 Part III - The One About the FPL Button
มุมมอง 30K3 ปีที่แล้ว
The most frequently asked questions we receive from participants in our earlier programs relate to the Flight Plan feature - the FPL button. So, in this program, we'll take a deep dive on this. Everything from Creating, Saving, Recalling, Deleting, and Transferring flight plans, to inserting and deleting waypoints; bypassing fixes and intercepting legs; adding, removing, changing procedures, an...
FAPA February 2021: The Amazing SkewT/LogP
มุมมอง 1.1K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Fullerton Airport Pilot Association February 2021 safety webinar. This month, we featured local area Flight Instructor Garry Felker, who showed us the ins and outs of the amazing SkewT/LogP weather sounding chart.
GNS 201 Pregame Show
มุมมอง 3703 ปีที่แล้ว
Some folks have really enjoyed the slide show we play for the 15 minutes or so before the main presentation, so I decided to put that up as a standalone. The pictures are stuff I've found laying around the internet in various locations, that I thought were clever, funny, beautiful, or pertinent to GPS. The music for this edition comes from the AOPA Top 100 Aviation Songs playlist, which they ju...
Reintroduction to the Garmin GNS 430/530, Part I
มุมมอง 47K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Reintroduction to the Garmin GNS 430/530, Part I
EAA Chapter 14 2020/12/19 ForeFlight Open Season
มุมมอง 9473 ปีที่แล้ว
EAA Chapter 14 2020/12/19 ForeFlight Open Season
Private pilot
I am new to gps, following your lead
Great information, thank you
How do you set the time, nav group, position page.
Three years ago. What doing now, three years later?😅
If $6000 is a song sure they are available. Since this was posted Garmin announced end of life of product and parts phase out, like screens.
Can I see any of the Nexrad weather data on the 430W?
Wow! Good stuff!
Hello! Have you found a solution for LPV approaches with Reality XP? If so, could you please inform us so that we can address it? Thank you !
I just bought a Mooney M20J with a GNS 530W and was recommended this video as a place to start to learn it. Fantastic information and thoughtfully laid out. I have learned a ton and will be watching the rest of the series.
I love my Mooney too but most training videos go too fast and I need muscle memory and reviews, repetition 😅
The first time I saw a turbo encabrilator video I worked at Hughes Aircraft and thought is was real for about 90 seconds. Just long enough to get a laugh out of the new collage grad engineer.
Please the link, for download de garmin simulator.???
Excelente.
Excelente.
Excelente.
One comment on flight simulators, there is another option for xplane realityXP uses the Garmin trainer and integrates the "real" GNS and GTN into the simulator.
One thing I don't understand. Why is it that when you were headed to ZENAP and you set your altitude to 12000 the VSR was still decrementing? If you had attained the target altitude of 12000, shouldn't it zero-out?
Once you're at the programmed altitude, yes. In this case, I was still climbing, so it showed me the VSR from my current altitude. The simulator has some climb rate it uses, so an altitude change is not instantaneous. At about 29:00, once the simulator gets to 12,000, the VSR is indeed zeroed out. Thanks for the question!
One of the best instructors I've had the privilege to watch, what a great video. THANK YOU
Mike, you frequently mention the simulator data base. I use X-Plane 11 , and even that data base I did not renew my database subscription and its out of date with numerous charts in a year or so. I had to pay a monthly subscription of 15 Euros to get it back up to date for practicing with current charts. For your videos, I simply place X-Plane 11 at you departure and duplicate your entries into the Garmin 530. I use a Stand Alone Garmin 530 so I twist knobs and press buttons exactly as its done in a real cockpit. Those twists and presses are essential to get your brain into gear thru time and repetition.
Im trying to fit my brain around how these garmins work for sim flights in mfs2020...its fun still😅
This is priceless. Thank you for taking the time to put this together!
What a great information ❤
You mentioned a little about other flight simulators; I am looking to do this but am looking at all of the options out there they are numerous; and it is difficult to pick one to choose; do you have a preference or guidance in this area? Great video!!! Thanks
Whatever you can get set up the easiest! I use MSFSX, but it requires a plug-in. I'm not certain that plug in is still available, but I know there's something that folks are using. It works a little more transparently with FS2020 or XPlane 11, but I haven't used either of those enough yet to have much experience with it. Both require a pretty modern video card and LOTS of memory. So, it kind of depends on your ultimate aim. My aim is mostly to use this in a classroom environment to teach in-flight techniques hands-on, so something simple and portable works well, and for me, that's MSFSX. I have both FS2020 and X11 on my desktop computer, but I find that I'm so busy with other projects at home that I don't have much time to work with it.
I have had mine for years; gns 430, and I am also guilty of the direct to; that is what I have used the most
I believe this is the last one; I have watched all of them ; tremendous job; I learned a whole lot on the GNS series, and this will definitely help me in the plane. I will be going back to them for reference many times I am sure; I am going to re-watch the one on Holds, and Approaches in particular. I know it was a lot o hard work making these videos. THANKS!!!
There is one more after this one... Part 9: The Finale. There's also an "extra section" program, that wasn't a live broadcast. I went out to my plane and shot a little video of transferring flight plans to and from my iPad to my GNS530W through the FlightStream210. But, very glad you've enjoyed the series. Thanks!
Great Video: I learned a lot as usual
Another great training video!!!!, as always I learned a lot. Thanks
Another totally outstanding class; I learned a lot, and will definitely watch all of these in the series; THANKS!!!! this is very very valuable training!!!
Very cool concept and content! Best of luck with the show!!!
Please update the description of the airshow.
57:46 - Great tip and walkthrough. This is something I've been looking into and your video is the most detailed explanation on it! Thank you!
Glad it was helpful!
@@CapnMikeCFI Thanks again, Captain! Subscribed!
Too wordy. Must be used to being paid by the hour.
That's why they invented the Fast Play button!
36:51 -What a great video series! This is so helpful for finding your nearest airport and loading its frequency. Thank you!!!
At 30:37 There was nothing indicating 260. How did it track to 260?
Sorry for the delay... I was on vacation out of the country when you wrote in. I believe you're talking about when I manually set the desired inbound course to the waypoint to 260º. I did this by first pressing the OBS button to put the navigator in the OBS mode. This allows me to manually set the desired inbound course. In the airplane, you would twist the OBS knob on your navigation indicator, or turn the course selector on your HSI. In the Garmin simulator, do this by clicking on the course pointer knob (at the lower left corner of the HSI, and moving the mouse pointer to the left or right until the course pointer is set where you want it. Hopefully this answers your question.
Thank you very much guys for share with all of us!
Awesome videos
Can we still get wings credit for doing the TH-cam videos?
Yep, just follow the directions in the video, and allow me a few days or sometimes even a week or two, to get a chance to do it.
Hey Mike, thank you so much for uploading your Webinars, it's very vell presented and helps tremendously.
Awesome Review
Mike, Which model flight stream do you have and which iPad app do you use to put airways in to the 530? I appreciate your detailed explanations!
Hi Mark, our airplane has a FlightStream 210, and I mostly use ForeFlight as my EFB. One of my partners uses Garmin Pilot on an Android tablet, and the other uses FltPlanGO on an iPad, and all are able to transfer back and forth to the GNS530W in our plane just fine.
How can I sign up for future classes like the ForeFlight series you mentioned?
Hi Ryan, good question. We usually put in an announcement using the FAA SPANS program, and we'll likely use that for future programs too. So, if you're not already, get signed up on the FAA's WIngs page (faasafety.gov) and you should receive notifications.
I find the use of VNAV on the 430/530 to be an onerous, clunky process…and the 430/530 VNAV won’t interface with the GNC 500 autopilot. The newer GTN’s will. I just use five times the required altitude to lose (and use field elevation for a buffer) for descent planning, remembering that the typical 300’/mile is the desired slot when close to destination. At the airline I saw so many depend on the FMS VNAV and then have to use the speed brakes to compensate and correct for the poor profile. You could always tell who were the ex-DC-8 pilots when they did the descent planning. There were no speed brakes on the DC-8, so you had to plan it properly or use the inboard reversers, which most operators prohibited except for emergency descents.
Hah! Yes, I remember as a newly minted IFR pilot back in the day, and a private pilot before that, I didn't get much training on descent planning. At the time, I was flying slow enough airplanes that never went high enough for it really to be much of an issue. As I got into faster and higher-flying equipment, it certainly does become more critical. I use the 3* the altitude rule, and back up the VNAV "guidance" (that word is doing a lot of work in the context of a GNSx30W navigator!) with some mental math. And I absolutely agree that the x30 interface is clunky and onerous. I call all the knob twisting and pushing the "Twist and shout" data entry method!
Thanks, Mike. Missed it live on Thursday, so watched the recording.
Thanks!
Hi Mike, not sure how else to contact you so - just commenting on this... Regarding the final Part 9 episode. Here's an idea - "from the mailbag". Activating an approach. What does that mean exactly? Not much. It simply means that you have an active waypoint that is "below the banner". There is no need to push an activate button, but rather just a need to ensure you have an active WPT that is on the approach - either through direct-to or active leg. I think that understanding this is helpful because, as we know, using the activate button takes you directly to a fix now. That's likely NOT what you want to do, since you are likely on vectors at that point. So, I think it's actually better to get in the habit of activating a leg, or proceeding direct WHEN YOU ARE CLEARED, rather than prior to that. Thanks for this great series, which really applies to other Garmin navigators too - just because of the Garmin logic. Roger (a fellow AA guy - retired)
Hi Roger, I mention my email addresses a couple times in the later programs in this series. But I like your mailbag idea. That's certainly a possibility on an occasional basis if I get enough that we think we can do another follow-on episode. I hadn't thought of the "Below the banner" concept, but it's a good one. The point being, anything below the approach name in the flight plan is a part of the approach, and if you go direct to such a fix down there (but not directly to the FAF), the approach will automatically activate once the FAF becomes the active waypoint and you're within 45º of the FAC. And yes, all your points about approaches are spot on, and I make them repeatedly throughout the series, but particularly in the program on approaches.
Hello, Mike! I was surprised to "see" you at our Tucson IMC zoom meeting last night! I was the guy sitting on the couch to the left. I don't have a 530 or 430, but enjoy watching your videos. Maybe sometime you could do a short presentation for our Tucson IMC meetings?
Sure! I think some of the folks over there know how to get a hold of me; I know Lee does.
Great presentation. Thanks, Capt'n Mike
Are the SoCal TRACON controllers familiar with the Land Use Agreements for the airports that they are directing traffic to, when it comes to approaches before hand off? We have a problem with VFR jet pilots exceeding maximum speed and deviating from approaches that are zoned and set up for their safety in case of an emergency (flying where if they did come down it would be worst case scenario for everyone involved). In some cases, they are coming in too fast under minimum safe altitude outside the area of the airport, over homes and some are coming in so hot, they are having to go around instead of land their first try at the runway. It leaves it up to the community to file complaints that are often ignored by the FSDO. We also have flight schools and flight clubs flying under minimum safe altitude, sometime their entire trip from one airport to another. Again, over homes, schools, stadiums with events, etc. leaving it up to citizens to complain about safety, pilots not using the areas zoned for their safety and at altitudes prescribed by the FAA. Compliants ignored by the FSDO. The local airport says that this is a TRACON issue since it is outside the area of the airport. Is there anything that can be done proactively to make safety and compliance as much, if not more, of a priority as density of traffic? The same document that places important on promoting commerce also says, "(3). Does not derogate safety or adversely affect the safe and efficient use of airspace;" My local airport (KCRQ) ATC manager says that they are so busy that they cannot guide pilots in at the handoff (only order them in and out) because they don't have the training, bandwidth and/or system to support the increase in traffic. Pilots have stated that it has turned into a, "Try not to get hit," scenario with this amount of unguided traffic all flying VFR randomly combined with excess speed, intersecting flight paths, proximity to military operations, etc. This seems like a major gap in ATC that is a danger to pilots, passenger and public. Can you please address this with the FAA and SOCAL TRACON? I am also actively lobbying Congress for an upgrade to our local tower but in the mean time, can TRACON work with municipal airports to comply with sending jets on approach that would align with the safe path (keeping them in compliance with their Land Use Agreement and their agreement with the federal government to provide a safe air space, keeping the pilot in compliance with FAA regulations for speed and altitude) to the airport at the time of handoff to increase safety and reduce community compliants? Also can TRACON better watch the airspace outside of airports that are heavy with flight training where these problemed altitudes exist/altitude violations. Part of the problem is that student pilots are flying at minimum safe altitude but then the land elevation changes to much higher than the airport and now that otherwise legal altitude becomes an unlawful altitude. Common sense says that the flight instructors would correct this but they aren't so it become's the public's problem (not cool). Can it be encouraged by ATC to have those students fly at an optimal altitude instead of minimum so the 'mistakes' that they are making gives them a better buffer to not compromise safety and again, reduce public complaints. That would go a long way in creating better balance between the aviation community and the community that has air traffic over it.
Sorry for the delay in response. I've been busy with other projects and have been contemplating how I might best respond. In short, I think most of your issues are beyond the scope of what was discussed in this program. If you have problems with the way a particular flight school or other aircraft operator operates, it's best to contact them directly. The FSDO probably does not get involved because the operations you're asking about are within the legal bounds of the regulations that guide air traffic, and if there is no violation of those regulations, they have no reason to get involved. Land use agreements generally don't deal with air traffic routes, because those agreements deal with Land Use - not Air Use, and only the FAA has jurisdiction in that realm.
Did you read the disclosures declaration when you purchased your home in Carlsbad?
@@PrestigeWorldWide777 I'm not in the city of Carlsbad. I'm outside of the NINA boundary, outside the 3NM radius. There is no avigation easement on our property that would allow for aircraft to be below minimum safe altitude or impact the use of our property as a home. We are getting hit non-stop by flight path deviations that aren't in compliance with FAA regulations (too far from the airport). We need ATC's help to better instruct pilots when ordering them in and out. In a day and age of GPS, there is no excuse, especially since the worst offenders are the local pilots. There are pilots as low as 600 AGL over the high school in session (outside the 3NM boundary) in class D airspace within Tower's jurisdiction where no one (other than a helicopter or drone) should be below 1500 MSL which is 1,000 feet AGL. They are descending waaaaaay too early and there are rolling hills that are at an elevation that is above the airport by 100-200+ feet. It is a safety issue for everyone involved. They are starting their approach as low as 1200 feet MSL north of the 78 freeway (7-10 miles from the runway) which means there are a lot of people who get buzzed who aren't in the area of the airport. They should be at that altitude until they are as far south as Faraday when they are facing the runway. Tower points the finger at TRACON, TRACON points the finger back. I just want the ATC gap to be filled to increase safety and balance. The City of Vista is getting brutalized by pilots using excessive speed (jets approaching the coast/land too low too fast -speeds reserved for over 10K feet at under 4K feet) and/or low altitudes. Please help. We're giving up our free time filing complaints and that's not what we want. We want ATC to advise pilots to stay in compliance so we can live happily ever after in balance with each other.
@@tiki_t Aircraft transitioning the area are required to follow 14 CFR Part 91.119. This doesn’t necessarily apply to aircraft taking off or landing (obviously). Pilots flying into CRQ shooting the approach on the ILS or RNAV Y are required to remain on the 3.2° glide path. This is approximately 106.22’ of altitude gained per NM. VFR approaches should be maintaining a similar path when flying the guidance of the PAPI. As far as speed restrictions are, the legal limits are 250 knots below 10,000’ and in class B, 200 knots below class B and in C or D, or in unique cases: 140 knots (LA SFRA).
@@PrestigeWorldWide777 I agree but that is not what is happening. When you ask tower and TRACON for help, there is finger pointing at each other. Meanwhile the public is left to give up their free time filing complaints. Who is the best person to contact to restore better ATC coverage of this region to cut down on the speed and altitude violations through ATC guidance? I'd rather that the FAA/ATC take a proactive approach than the public having to take a reactive approach to the issue.
I finally had to stop watching these on the fifth one. 75 percent of the viewers use the 430 yet the 430 simulator was shut down within the first 10 minutes or so and the 530 was started up and was used for the vast majority. This has happened in all the videos i've watched up through the fifth one. Sorry just cant take it anymore
All of the features I describe for the GNS530W also work for the 430W. There are just a couple things that are slightly different: Nav page 1 is very different between the two units, and the VNAV page is in a menu on the 430 versus using a button on the 530. There are a few other fairly minor differences, and I point those out when they come up. I mostly use the 530 simply because the screen is a little bigger, and therefore the menus are larger and easier to see and move around on.
I wish someone would update this, and/or do a better job replicating it in MSFS and Xplane. Every time I try to do what I've learned on the real thing or on this box it's really annoying when it doesn't work in MSFS
You mean update the simulator? I don't disagree with you. However, realistically, these units are out of production now and have been for years. Garmin's efforts are focused on current-generation equipment (which is pretty amazing, if you ask me! - I'm contemplating putting a GTN750 in my airplane). I don't expect to see any updates on any of this software from them. Simulator implementations are even worse, because the simulator companies don't have and won't get access to the code from Garmin. Therefore, they're left with reverse-engineering the capabilities and implementing their best guess on some features. They're in the same zip code as the original gear, but lacking in many respects. I've only used the MSFS X version, not the Xplane, and even the RedBird version is only a close approximation, and even for the G1000 simulators. Any of these is enough to kind of learn the broad strokes, but Garmin's simulator is the closest I've come to the installed equipment.