วีดีโอ

The vast beautiful mystery of space ❤

“The authority of daimyo rested on successful conflict, and this proved the way to retain the support of vassals. The idea that the latter should be loyal to daimyo who inherited their position meant little if the daimyo could not win victory and the lands and prestige that came with it. The need for such success helped ensure that betrayal was central to the politics of daimyo conflict; and, as a result, treachery played an important role in both battles and the seizure of fortresses. Operations were partly designed so as to display strength, and thus induce surrender and deter treachery.” -Jeremy Black Do daimyo conflicts remind you of anything? Does conflict still follow the same physics? How has it transformed into our modern age?

“There is an acceptance in many circles that we now conduct operations rather than wars, but we still expect them to deliver a definitive military victory in its own right that will resolve a political problem, rather than one that contributes and supports the resolution of the matter by other means. There is no understanding that we live in a condition of continuous confrontation and conflict, and that therefore these operations are conflicts derived from political confrontations, and that even if military action is on a big scale, and even if it is successful, the confrontation will remain, to be resolved by other means and levers of power.” -General Sir Rupert Smith Do you agree with Sir Rupert Smith? Is this why our conflicts seem timeless and unending, or are there other unspoken reasons?

“In argument he never tried to overbear or overwhelm the opponent by intellectual bludgeoning. He made the opponent a fellow seeker after truth. The aim always was to convert, never to coerce or suppress. The opponent never smarted under the humiliation of defeat but shared in full the thrill and joy of the discovery of truth which he was made to feel was as much his as Gandhiji’s…By harboring the disloyal, he dispelled their disloyalty.” -Louis Fischer, on Gandhi Is Gandhi's strategy of satyagraha-soul force-still applicable in today's world? Or has the social context shifted so much that Truth is no longer the way to effect change? What do you think of this passage?

“War will not again be displayed in its original form…war is no longer even war but rather coming to grips on the Internet, and matching the mass media, assault and defense in forward exchange transactions, along with other things which we had never viewed as war, now possibly causing us all to drop our eyeglasses… The enemy will possibly not be the originally significant enemy, the weapons will possibly not be the original weapons, and the battlefield will also possibly not be the original battlefield. Nothing is definite…The game has already changed, and what we need to continue is ascertaining a new type of fighting method within various uncertainties.” -Unrestricted Warfare Is this quote about war prescient, nonsense, or just plain common sense? Sound off in the comments.

“It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.” -Theodore (Teddy) Roosevelt, 26th President of the United States (1901-1909) Are you in the arena?

“The primary means of recognizing whether you are in confrontation or conflict rests with recognizing whether the objective is to change intentions or to destroy, and at what level this destructive act is to take place…. Each level of war is set within the context of its superior level-and so each conflict nests within a confrontation from which it derives. In this way, the lower the level at which conflict is taking place, the more must the factors that contribute to winning the confrontation-of which the military measures may only be a supporting part-be taken into account by the headquarters directing the military action.” Do you agree or disagree with Sir Rupert Smith? What can we learn from this quote today?

“The gradual return to the status quo ante of the Middle Ages is best described as neomedievalism, a non-state-centric and multipolar world order characterized by overlapping authorities and allegiances. It is a metaphor for a global phenomenon and is not intended to be Eurocentric. Nor does it imply worldwide atavism. States will not disappear, but they will matter less than they did a century ago. Nor does neomedievalism connote chaos and anarchy; like the medieval world, the global system will persist in a durable disorder that contains rather than solves problems.” -Sean McFate Agree or disagree with Dr. McFate? What will the future of States and War look like?

“War belongs not to the province of arts and sciences, but to the province of social life. It is a conflict of great interests which is settled by bloodshed…It would be better, instead of comparing it with any art, to liken it to business competition…and it is still more like state policy….State policy is the womb in which war is developed, in which its outlines lie hidden in a rudimentary state.” -Carl von Clausewitz Is Clausewitz right in his line of thinking? Is War more like business and policy than arts or sciences? Have you read On War? Comment below-and subscribe.

“The leader says ‘come on,’ while the commander says ‘go on.’ As long as those being led trust the leader’s competence to find the way, recognize the end, and look after them, they follow. The commander has a more difficult task: the people he sends out must trust that they know the way and recognize the end, and are capable of looking after themselves along the way-but equally that they will be supported on the way, and that the end is of value. The selection of those to send, and achieving this level of trust, are the primary duties of the commander.” -General Sir Rupert Smith Do you agree with the General? Have you read The Utility of Force? Sound off in the comments.

“The smaller the sacrifice we demand from our opponent, the smaller, it may be expected, will be the means of resistance which he will employ; but the smaller his preparation, the smaller will ours require to be. Further, the smaller our political object, the less value shall we set upon it, and the more easily shall we be induced to give it up altogether…the political object, as the original motive of the war, will be the standard for determining both the aim of the military force and also the amount of effort to be made.” -Carl von Clausewitz Thoughts, reactions, questions?

“...the way men live is so far removed from the way they ought to live, that anyone who abandons what is for what should be pursues his downfall rather than his preservation, for a man who strives after goodness in all his acts is sure to come to ruin, since there are so many men who are not good… It is necessary that a prince who is interested in his survival learn to be other than good, making use of this capacity or refraining from it according to need.” Do you agree or disagree with Machiavelli?

"Power needs no justification, being inherent in the very existence of political communities; what it does need is legitimacy… Power springs up whenever people get together and act in concert, but it derives its legitimacy from the initial getting together rather than from any action that then may follow. Legitimacy, when challenged, bases itself on an appeal to the past, while justification relates to an end that lies in the future. Violence can be justifiable, but it will never be legitimate." -Hannah Arendt

"The word ‘defense’ in war involves two ideas….There is defense pure and simple, which strengthens itself and awaits attack. This may be called passive defense. On the other hand, there is a view of defense which asserts that safety for one’s self, the real object of defensive preparation, is best secured by attacking the enemy. In the matter of sea-coast defense, the former method is exemplified by stationary fortifications, submarine mines, and generally all immobile works destined simply to stop an enemy if he tries to enter. The second method comprises all those means and weapons which do not wait for attack, but go to meet the enemy’s fleet, whether it be…a few miles, or whether to his own shores. Such a defense may seem to be…offensive war, but it is not; it becomes offensive only when its object of attack is changed from the enemy’s fleet to the enemy’s country." -A.T. Mahan

Your vedio help me a lot thank uuuuuuu. 😂❤😊😊😊😊

Thanks.. just what i was looking for.

Ain't no sahrawi people or Mauritania claims the land , Morocco been since 1200 years on the name of Morocco from tangier to the senegal river at the maximum of the country , when the colonisation starts Morocco lost hella lands from Algeria because of France and lost all Mauritania land cause France pressed them people who lives there to not renew the loyalty to the king and then after that the Sahara been a problem cause of Algeria and France that they want to Morocco to stay always with a problem and not let it have a world in the region .

Hey John, hope this isn’t an annoying question to you, but have you thought about re uploading that Seinfeld blooper dvd but using some ai upscaling software and maybe trying to improve the color a little bit? Just a suggestion. I’ve been getting into archival videos and restoration a little bit recently and there’s tons of tools available now

what's the deal with the Seinfeld bloopers?

Thank you

After watching I realize how ignorant I really am!!! Just an awesome video!!!! I would love to see more like this

The Amazon rainforest would bounce back I think, if we stopped. It's crazy to see the damage, we're like a disease. The desertification is a bad thing for sure, but at the same time they're saying the earth is getting greener in the area's that it is green. More vegetation because of the increased CO2. I wonder what everything is going to look like in 20 or 40 years. I wonder what things would look like if we weren't chopping down the forests at all, but also still releasing the same CO2 that we have been. You have to think what kind of an effect all that forest loss is also having, it could be making things so much worse.

They are happy to be british because they expelled the natives to settle down their own. It's called domination through settlement.

Feminism will stop all of this easy peasy, depopulation has started also we made houses and cars to expensive for next gen so they won't procreate with all soft kills implemented

This video should be played everywhere, honest and straightforward

why would anyone go there?

Thanks for the Seinfeld blooper upload!

marocco-sahara 4ever ❤️💪

see how life works..whatever you was trying to spread didn't work cuz the video was shit..try again clown... certified clown..🤣🤣🤣

😂😂😂😂 how does ur mom run a nonprofit organization in a corrupt country? you guys must be corrupt as well?

its ppl like you that's why Africa can't grow..how u talking about TZ and the ppl are broke there bt you and family are in TZ running a nonprofit organization.. something isn't right here..

shut up

nose bout red asl LMFOAOAOAOAOAO BOMBOCLART

the moorish of usa left morocco sins 17AC .thy re the truely moroccans they still carry moroccan flag sins 1777 AC untell now then polisario mafia group made by rusia and kadafi and algeria in 1971 lives in tindouf in algeria teretory create new flag what never exist.

Turn on comments for the seinfeld video, so weird not to.....

The skies are so clear, suck a wonderful long view out there.

yo wassup mr lott

free Western Sahara 🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭

You omitted Algeria. Algeria as it stands is at great odds with Morocco and they will support Polisario directly or indirectly. Perhaps they might even intervene directly.

You are not white. You are pink.

Thanks a lot for making these videos. Highly appreciated

it s only algerians armee who made this film 90 % of shraoui lives in morocco 10% giuded by algeriens armee shara has flag 🇲🇦🇲🇦 sins 1777 AC the prouve is usa-moorish who lives now in texas who lived before in morocco sahara polisario made by Russe and kadafi and algeriens and spain spain who still inveted two town in north morocco souta and mallila please make new document about colonialisation of spain 2 towns in north of morocco this documenf is payed by algeriens

Morocco won. Your extreme leftist propaganda failed miserably.

Thank you Jon, Appreciate your work

That was a wonderful and concise description of the straits in the Mediterranean

That was a wonderful video with clarity of explanation and high quality visuals-- I have seen some but this one is special

" blood and blood" american documentary about Western Sahara th-cam.com/video/evAxkDEbeBc/w-d-xo.html

heck out this : th-cam.com/video/og_2uc-DvHU/w-d-xo.html...... ITS JUST LIKE YOURS BUT ORIGINAL

What before spanish colonisation ?

Freedom for people of the Polisario Great ppl who fight for their land