วีดีโอ

The embedding can also contain URLs and other data types

@@simosme i work with n8n, and i cannot do this. Do you use n8n ?

@@nusquama Ah sorry about that - Yes I use n8n

Try to rerun the source module of the mapping. Sometimes the mapping shows blank if there is no data in the task picked up by Make in the latest run

Yes, very valid points - thank you for sharing them here

Not sure exactly the details of the question, but the answer is probably yes. Here is a video where I explain how to trigger webhooks from Notion: th-cam.com/video/HQX4GlCPxEI/w-d-xo.html

Hey, what are you referring to?

Thank you, you can find all automation-related videos in this playlist: th-cam.com/play/PLvmzMeUzkWbTCnM583inVfWMZ96Wcl9il.html

Thank you, I decided to not delve into too many details on the automations or the video would become even longer. If you have any specific questions, you can contact me: bit.ly/contact-simo

Yes that's right - here is the video: th-cam.com/video/EkYT8X6wpJI/w-d-xo.html&pp=ygUidGltZSBtYW5hZ2VtZW50IGZvciBtb3J0YWxzIG5vdGlvbg%3D%3D Ah that's unfortunate - what's not working?

Objectives = "what to achieve" That can be considered a synonym of Goals, as far as I can tell. Do you have anything else in mind?

I am not aware of any plan limitations regarding this - how does it not work for you?

In order for Flowise to work with retrieving data from your Supabase table, you will need these columns in Supabase: metadata (JSONB) embedding (vector, make sure the vector size matches the size of the OpenAI embedding model you use) Here is a relevant post about this: supabase.com/blog/openai-embeddings-postgres-vector The reason why there are two embeddings is this: 1) In Flowise, the embedding is the first node that turns the user message into an embedding, which can then be searched in Supabase 2) In Make, the OpenAI embedding API call turns the data in the row into an embedding that will be searched in Flowise to find relevant answers Both embeddings in Flowise and Make use the same embedding model (size)

muito obrigado!

Hi, you can use folk for deal tracking without any issues. Notion would provide you with more customizability. Be aware that this video is 2 years old, and folk has likely evolved since then

Thank you!

The plan of the workspace used in the video is Enterprise

@@simosme The advanced page analytics is pretty useless, isn't it?

@@Josh-i6ijosh I see your point - it looks like it's still a rough version and the same as the basic analytics functionality included in the free plan (besides viewing page editors)

Thank you! Yes your finding is correct - dynamic URL parameters are only possible on database pages currently

Fantastic, thanks for sharing

Yes, good point!

Yes right - the "Source" filter is only available in "Home", within the "My tasks" widget, under the filter options In order for Tasks to appear there, make sure to turn the desired database(s) into a Task database: www.notion.so/help/guides/give-your-to-dos-a-home-with-task-databases

You can use the "map()" function inside the "add()" function, so that you map all the IDs in the relation property

Thread where we resolve this question for anyone interested in the same thing: community.make.com/t/how-to-add-more-than-one-relation-to-a-notion-database-item/47055/4

What type of filter would you llike to implement in relation property types? Could you share a duplicable version of your setup and a bit more details on what you would like to filter on? This way, I can see if there is a way

​@@simosme Thanks for the reply! im currently trying to us this filter, however 'Status' is not a Status property type, it is a Relation property type. 'Status' is its own Database with 'Done' being one of the Database entry names: filter(Tasks, current.Status!="Done") It is important to note im trying to use this Formula in a different DB that has a relation to Tasks DB. But have also tried using it in the context of Sub Items & Dependencies within the Tasks DB itself, wanting to only show the Sub or Dependent tasks that are not Done EX: filter(SubTasks, current.Status!="Done") I know i could just make it a different property type that would work but I have a very complex but automated system and Status being a DB as well as most of my other properties serves my system perfectly(I barely use select or multiselect as most ppl do) Thank you in advance for any help this would be of such use to me!

Hi, thank you for asking - I think the "List page content" Notion module in Make could help you with this use case. It retrieves the content of a page (not the properties). Then, you could aggregate the output (if they are separate bundles) using an Array or Text Aggregator. And then map the aggregated output into the final page C. If that's helpful, this is the API documentation for the endpoint to retrieve content ("block children"): developers.notion.com/reference/get-block-children This is to append block children (i.e., add content to a page, or any other block): developers.notion.com/reference/patch-block-children

@@simosme Okay, I think both "List page content" and "Retrive Block Children work". Althought the second is better cause it allows up to 100 children blocks. My question is: how do you convert the output to a JSON file that can be modified and then put back to "Append block Children"?

Hi, I can make a video about this and share it with you here (as currently I don't have any public resource to share with you on this point). To understand a bit more details, why do you think the employee end of notion differs? Is it in terms of what they can access? Or their permission settings (e.g., viewing, editing, commenting)? Or anything else? It would be great if you can provide some of these details, so I can make a valuable video that addresses this question properly

@@simosme hey that would be great thanks!! I haven’t gotten super deep into it yet so I’m not able to answer your question as well as I’d like to. But from what I can imagine, they of course have different access and abilities, and the Home Screen and how the information is presented is different versus how it’s shown to the account owners like how you presented in this video. Because this video presents as a tutorial for the account owner to build out for the organization, but i think it would help to show also as a tutorial, how an employee would interact with notion in the areas they’d have access to in an already built out organization, so that you’d be able to present that video as part of an onboarding process, so that when it comes time to do a group training session on how to utilize it in a given organization, they’ve already had the opportunity to review it, take some notes and be able to more easily apply it to the real organization in question, or reference back to when they need to.

@@LaExtranPerra Sounds good - I will share more details here in the upcoming days

I have recorded a video overview of access levels for The Great CEO. I added it to the template guidebook as well - www.loom.com/share/f654a24abd0c459182140eb2d1b69758?sid=b4e8b836-4fe5-4d23-b19b-a639c9dfb812