วีดีโอ

True personality read will come from the TTI DISC and Motivator assessment, Both in your true personality and in your mindset on the job. Many disc assessments after the original patent time ran up copycat them, but they’re not as accurate Because they copy terms and Validity matters. Though very well marketed worldwide, MB is more of a mood ring. It can be accurate, but not for all, so it isnt reliable. I know I can change anytime I take it. It lacks validity studies. You can be an extrovert and an introvert. Some people are one or the other, some are both. You can also mature from restrictive parents and blossom laden life. It didn’t mean your personality changed. It meant it wasn’t allowed at a younger age. As you go through life transitions, your court trade on the disk is not likely to ever change. Your secondary traits may shift a little as you adapt through your transitions. Further, though your core personality will not likely change in your life, you will adapt through different environments of work, motherhood, driving, ball, games, etc., but your portrait didn’t change that’s why the true disc captures both your true nature and your environmental settings. Glad to help if you have questions.

Nu ma interesează oricum nu am castigat ni i un ban de la nimeni nu mia dat nimeni nimic si nu ma bagat in seamă nimeni de la guvern ,nu ma sunat nimeni degeaba cu analiza voastra cu tot de-aia zic ca u o sa.amcnkcj un succes in viața mea pe nicăieri din ce vad astept degeaba ca nu zice nimeni nimic asts observ

He means Ron Westrum I am pretty sure. He was a sociologist at Eastern Michigan University. He wrote the papers the Case for Meteors, and the case for UFOs, Social intelligence about hidden events, amongst a few others. Excellent papers that are must reads for anyone in this topic. Long time CUFOS consultant.

Yes, all points of view are important to CONSIDER. However, I believe there are certain critical elements that need to be agreed to by all parties that will ensure Democracy is preserved. To me, the main thing people involved in the discussion need is to demonstrate is that they have the necessary elements of character. This includes: honesty, accountability, responsibility, empathy, self-control, courtesy, tolerance, respect for others, and respect for authority and the law. Without this you do not have a democracy, you have autocracy,

Very delayed in posting my own comment, but it was a joy to speak with you both! Pandas Playing Cello is a fantastic resource; in fact, the reason I'm poking around the channel today is to signpost my next batch of students to your videos!

Wish they had not removed the music at the end! I guess it was copyrighted?

David recently added me on linkedin... all around cool guy.

Great interview! I have been interacting with Katy's work since the Metaphysical Christian FB page first came about (now Soul Forge). Thank you for having her on, and thank you, Katy, for sharing this - I have subscribed to this channel and look forward to watching past and future episodes of Pandas Playing Cello!

I knew this would be fire, and it did not disappoint!

Wow, this is fascinating and informative! Thank you so much! The part about Aphrodite turning up in Katy's work when that's not part of her tradition was very useful for me, as I've had a very similar experience myself (with Hermes and Artemis - I am in NO WAY Greek). Glad it's not just me lol.

Love it, again! Thanks ladies!

“ the intellectual elite” as one of less than 5% of women on earth in permanent collections and the owner of the largest locally sourced Devonian fossil collection in the entire North Shore I certainly find that relatable.

At least we should take it to Space (past Earth's orbits)

It is a simple process that is avoided by greed

I wouldn't have thought that different viewpoints & expertise, especially in regards to breadth or scope, are as crucial as what particular spheres / regions are imminently crucial. Otherwise, you could make your scope just too vast. I think a programmer analyst would be a good fit, especially if they were an INTJ personality type in the MBTI. They would bring both intuition and logic to the table, and they are naturally geared to narrow down or drill down to "pertinent" information. This would be more important in situations where the data collected tended to be vast.

Know yourself before you step. 2 “ J. VETERANS’ ORGANIZATIONS ”- Berkovsky, Lieber and Barrett. 1999 - ( www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopicj99.pdf ) 3 " Self-interest and Altruism: Pluralism as a Basis for Leadership in Business "- Joseph University of South Australia. 2015 ( redfame.com/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/921/873 ) 4 " How to Speak by Patrick Winston"- Winston, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2018 ( th-cam.com/video/Unzc731iCUY/w-d-xo.html ) Page 3 VLHA® Global Charitable Giving Guidelines July 15, 2021 Funding Priorities: VLHA focuses its charitable giving, specifically to: Post-war Veteran Foundations and other diverse communities. VLHA focuses on public entities and qualifying 501(c) nonprofit entities. VLHA operates by expressing unique support, and promote American Heritage in ethical, economic values, goals, social morale, and recreational engagements in preservation and conservation practices. This potentially includes

We have to !

I love this. I may not agree with you but I will still consider how you might be right. ♥️

I'm very interested in developing the cards / multi-person event approach into something that could maybe be done on Zoom with applying negotiation strategies based on figuring out what's important to a number of people (Robert Mnookin, Principle Voss) with 'organizational trauma and healing', 'triage trauma and moral distress'/moral injury theme (including naming and figuring out Take a Third Option to loss-based tradeoffs or avoidance, to transforming actual situations with lives on the line. People are dying by the hour in the US seeking and often posting for help with complex situations where institutions are increasingly withdrawing support, referring to each other, and full of morally distressed / traumatized workers who often can't think outside of narrow categories, and/or will be fired if they actually help people beyond narrow constraints, or if they do, it quickly becomes many people in life and death situations, often due to financial precarity or being harassed/intimidated/hurt by people where law enforcement can't really help and simply angers people basically trying to avoid getting in trouble in the first place. This description applies to so many situations playing out in realtime where what happens will depend on when more people especially from the increasingly private-sector and open source intelligence community can come to terms with actually working on this and helping people looking for things to do to learn how to think more flexibly and figure out some protocols for communicating about these things with appropriate privacy, deconflicting the power struggles involved, and so on. One example of this is health insurance which is increasingly using any excuse to not fund survival needs including caregiving; for example I was being paid as a 24/7 caregiver and doing safety supervision and then a major injurer acquired the Medicaid-funded nonprofit MCO that was paying me and stopped paying me and many other people. However for the most part courts have declared insurance companies immune from accountability for this. These companies have billions of dollars of valuation and can do 'risk management' and lobbying to keep the profits rolling in. So, the question comes up of how to coordinate survival for people being left to die. This seems to me like a national security issue because millions of people being abandoned to die statistically there's also violence, vulnerability to recruitment by traffickers and other bad actors whose proceeds flow who knows where, and so on. However it's extremely complicated to find anyone willing to talk through figuring out methodologies for addressing actual live situations, which often drag on with many opportunities to figure out better until they don't. Meanwhile though I'm seeing more and more people talking about both the problems and many people talking about ways to make sense of and figure things out, it's just strewn across many youtube channels and articles, most with very few views, some with a lot of views if it overlaps with whoever decides what narratives get views. It seems to me that things are at a point where some efforts in this could be anointed by Powers That Be and/or people could just gather to work on it but then it's also a little complicated bridging different kinds of expertise. I find however that highly intuitive people can often learn across disciplines and I think methods like using cards and creating new ones, visual layouts and so on can help with this and working on live situations is a really good way to learn. As a reference point, I made this video in 2012 thinking through some of this as well as a lot of other figuring out but the only people who will talk to me about this so far are highly intuitive people in highly distressed situations, or professionals who 'don't know what to do.' I believe I know how to figure out more ways to figure out what to do and the cards and collaborative figuring out approach could help a lot. th-cam.com/video/lYYERkM5VhE/w-d-xo.html I think the situation of the Thai soccer players and their coach stuck in a cave stuck in a cave and the world coming together to care about what happened despite it being uncertain whether they'd live or die is one precedent for figuring something like this out, which could be done both in more limited audience ways and as public learning facilitation dialogues bringing together various people whose videos really deserve to have more views, like these. One of the benefits of doing any form of this is it could help more people have hope who are currently struggling with despair. Likewise, it could help people stuck in narrow optimism or pessimism modes like your 2019 Diversity of Thought talk regarding predicted what would happen in South Africa. It seems to me current times are a lot more interactive with people figuring out what to do in part based on what content and skills they find to help them figure it out -- and many people are spending a lot of time like me scouring a lot of content but then finding collaborators can be complicated, which divide and rule of course but this is really not working well these days the way I see it. Thoughts on that?

"well i don't know what to do with this" These kinds of moments and also the confusion i call "intuitive confusion" where the facts/observations may make sense individually but something about the overall situation elicits confusion/wonder, I've studied a lot including by repeatedly encountering these situations. I notice often people get uncomfortable or angry or avoid these experiences but meta reflection on them and related research in lyrics, TV Tropes, academic articles, body language analysis and interviews has transformed this for me into insights i think could he applied to actual developing guidance including in the intelligence community especially around deconfliction. On that note i think deconfliction is a valuable term for some of the psychological tangles involved in figuring out complex situations, and when it comes to interactions and relationships between people and groups, i think a lot of benefit can be generated looking at this through as lens of creating opportunities and coordinating needs and aspirations better by identifying what's important to people, beyond "the crisis of the moment." Somewhat related on the AI front, I've sent well over 1000 hours interacting with Anthropic's Claude LLM, pouring in reference quotes and articles, describing the situations I'm trying to coordinate and my backstory, and it's remarkably capable of weaving together all of this and taking feedback and showing insight many people don't have time for, but it's still a one on one interaction and Claude hasn't managed to introduce me to anyone at Anthropic to work on applying AI to assisting with human collaboration to avert blinking red light disasters, and basically points back to people needing to work together. So i think that's a key space to figure out, how to invite and connect people with capacity and interest to working on situations where people are seeking help including being boot stomped by asynchronous warfare and so on that could be better resolved by figuring out what people actually want. Clearly a lot of that comes down to money but then money comes down to what it can accomplish in this historical transition period.

"well i don't know what to do with this" These kinds of moments and also the confusion i call "intuitive confusion" where the facts/observations may make sense individually but something about the overall situation elicits confusion/wonder, I've studied a lot including by repeatedly encountering these situations. I notice often people get uncomfortable or angry or avoid these experiences but meta reflection on them and related research in lyrics, TV Tropes, academic articles, body language analysis and interviews has transformed this for me into insights i think could he applied to actual developing guidance including in the intelligence community especially around deconfliction. On that note i think deconfliction is a valuable term for some of the psychological tangles involved in figuring out complex situations, and when it comes to interactions and relationships between people and groups, i think a lot of benefit can be generated looking at this through as lens of creating opportunities and coordinating needs and aspirations better by identifying what's important to people, beyond "the crisis of the moment." Somewhat related on the AI front, I've sent well over 1000 hours interacting with Anthropic's Claude LLM, pouring in reference quotes and articles, describing the situations I'm trying to coordinate and my backstory, and it's remarkably capable of weaving together all of this and taking feedback and showing insight many people don't have time for, but it's still a one on one interaction and Claude hasn't managed to introduce me to anyone at Anthropic to work on applying AI to assisting with human collaboration to avert blinking red light disasters, and basically points back to people needing to work together. So i think that's a key space to figure out, how to invite and connect people with capacity and interest to working on situations where people are seeking help including being boot stomped by asynchronous warfare and so on that could be better resolved by figuring out what people actually want. Clearly a lot of that comes down to money but then money comes down to what it can accomplish in this historical transition period.

On the theology and history theme, Phyllis Tickle's historical cycle model of 500 year periods of Christianity currently at transition point strikes me as a helpful lens. I see this as an epistemic transformation -- people's brains are changing dynamically in interaction with a more narratively complex environment, overlapping with the distinction between "ego drama and theo drama" where in various ways people are in a position of playing God with each other, and yet to do that generatively often requires more complex collaboration in order to coordinate needs and aspirations one person or organization often can't manage alone, resulting in triage-loss sacrifice including by deprivation of needs humans really could be better coordinating these days. However many people are still focused on their individual or organizational functioning, or collaborating basically in criminal/corruption oriented ways increasingly breaking down into public sharing and betrayal pileups, trust breakdown from conventional codes having contradictions and so on. So i see this as opportunity space to negotiate better but it's complicated in part the boundaries theme. Realistically, many people view their boundaries as including owning or coercive/manipulative authority over other people, with human trafficking being one term for some of this. So what's happening with so much empowerment of individual autonomy and boundaries is people can try to stay safe from other people but if they don't have access to survival resources, allies, and respect, much better resourced people can harrass, intimidate, harm and try to kill people trying to stay safe from them, hire other people to do this, use corruption and blackmail to maintain impunity -- but then more and more of this is becoming public, but actually coordinating safety and survival for people seems to be getting increasingly complicated with so many people avoiding complexity and the opportunity to participate in a larger story at this time in history. I also find the following excerpt form my library relevant: Living the Story: Implicit Epistemology in Paul's Letters macsphere.mcmaster.ca/bitstream/11375/13631/1/fulltext.pdf "Paul... assumes in his letters that human reason, with the aid of the Spirit, can achieve genuine religious knowledge. The specific kind of reason... has a distinctly narrative shape. Paul's theological knowledge is structured as a story within which he and his converts interpret their own lives. Ethical reasoning is a matter of "emplotting" oneself within this theological narrative and asking what fate lies ahead in the story for one who acts in certain ways... Paul is primarily arguing there for a re-configuration of Israel's theological narrative. The Apostle understands new events as further episodes in the one over-arching story... just as later chapters in a book can surprise readers and force them to re-consider what they read early on, so new experiences can open up interpretive "gaps" in Israel's theological story and force its adherents to construe the traditional narrative in new ways. Paul argues that both the cross of Christ and the Galatians' experience of the Spirit force just this kind of re-interpretation of the story, and his central argument in Galatians is an attempt to show that his own construal of the narrative is more coherent than those of his competitors. This kind of narrative, hermeneutical logic in Paul's argument... may also offer a useful epistemological model for..." TV Tropes: Fridge Brilliance / Fridge Horror (wondering and realizations while pausing to make another decision) tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FridgeBrilliance

So much in this conversation resonates with what I've been working on. When i was 21-22 (early 2000s) I basically intuited/anticipated these themes, with my dad being an anthropologist and seeing cultural collapse, and i knew i needed to seek out friends/collaborators beyond the siloed professions and academia and thst "knowledge is needed" beyond what it seeked like anyone had pieced together at the time. It took a lot of years but i found a lot more coming together around 2011-2012, and the past years I've worked on transforming education and mental health care but these still seemed soloed and I started finding a lot more key insights from intelligence community and military background and theology people in addition to trafficking survivors, basically highly intuitive people generally who are "living liminally." And i agree Gen Z especially really needs these skills for survival in many cases, especially when so many people are leaving and getting burnout/moral distress in conventional siloed professions. I've found the book Epistemic Fluency and Professional Education by Peter Goodyear and Lina Murkauskaite very helpful for outlining related interdisciplinary skils and Asta Raami's articles about combining intuition and thinking like Toward Solving the Impossible Problems very helpful. Also these quotes: Here are the quotes from the layout adjacent to your photo at age 14, under the caption "who am I, right?": 1. The Miseducation of Ms. M by Melanie Robinson: "How do you navigate charted waters with an out-dated map? Not only can you get lost, but you'll find that the environment has changed enough that you might need a new or better mode of transportation. I bumbled my way through my adolescence. Millions of people have walked that journey before me yet no one could give me updated directions." 2. 1991: Who we were and Who we need to be - Aug 5th, 2011 by Prof Wesch: "A post in honor of the 20th Anniversary of the public launch of the World Wide Web. Every year at this time I do a little soul-searching. I ponder the semester to come - the 400+ young minds I will encounter - and wonder, 'What do they really need to learn?' I try to look beyond the textbooks and standard curriculum (i.e., 'what am I supposed to teach?') and think deeply about what students really need to be significant, intelligent participants in today's world. It does not take any miraculous feat of reflexive speculation to find that the question pertains to me as much as it does to them. And so I'm really sitting here wondering, what do *I* need to learn, and indeed, what do *any of us* need to learn in order to lead happier, healthier, richer, more ethical, and more meaningful lives." ChatGPT summary: "These excerpts reflect the search for personal identity and purpose, and the challenge of finding direction in a rapidly changing world, emphasizing the need for education to be more than just academic learning but a guide to living a full and meaningful life."

I agree that curiosity is so important, along with the sense of wonder and wondering about things, along with reflection and embracing "not knowing yet" and the complexity of partial knowing and not knowing, and figuring things out when confused or feeling dissonance and "edge emotions" like fear, shame, anger and so on. I think there are all abilities people can recover and develop even though widely suppressed including my school and various media influences over the past decades and of course earlier in history. However I really notice a rather widespread shifting toward more people embracing these things. What's often missing is the relational aspect and people learning to more deeply understand themselves and each other, including and especially when there's conflict including perceived enemies and villains. By applying this way of seeing and knowing people can learn to shift out of fear, shame, anger, demoralization, and excessive doubt/skepticism, I think a lot of the seemingly intractable conflicts can be transformed into better collaboration and more generative forms of conflict like games and seeing history as an interactive participatory story. Related quotes from my notes, I'd write a dissertation but most people can't read much these days and I'm thinking how to gather more people thinking along these lines and shifting to more generative future for humanity to address live life and death situations where people are seeking help but existing professions and institutions avoid complexity and figuring out. [ Analyzing causal chains including people’s knowledge and decisions: ] (1) Carmen Medina, Survival Heuristics talk: “"I pulled the analyst in and I said, "What do you mean by the fact that this thing happened by chance?" And the analyst was hemming and hawing…and I realized that when we use the phrase,‘something happened by chance,’ what we're actually saying is that we do not understand the causality chain that led to this event, right? So, when you say ‘something happens by chance,’ you're saying, "Well, there's no way I coulda known, therefore I'm not responsible to try to figure out how I could know." If you replace that with, "I do not yet understand the causality chain," then in fact, you are much more likely to work on trying to figure out why things that you didn't think were gonna happen, or that completely surprised you, in fact did happen." ] (2) Elina Ruiz - Structural Trauma excerpt “In “Tragedy: A Curious Art Form” (2006), the classicist Anne Carson writes: “Why does tragedy exist? Because you are full of rage. Why are you full of rage? Because you are full of grief”. This grief comes from an injury, a wound (troma), that bereavement tries to suture closed. What is lost in this tragedy-rage-grief causal triad is the direct link from rage to the causes of incidence… This triad is no accident. The ancient Greeks were experts at depoliticizing grief and creating a new form of public art to regulate the shifting emotional boundaries between public and private life... The very meaning of tragedy comes from these plays-tragoidia, from tragos, meaning goat, as in the human-goat satyrs that performed between acts, and oide, or public performance of song. Tragedy arose in the west as a public mechanism to contain social forces and resistance to violence through a) internalizing conflicts and b) depoliticizing violence by portraying it as a naturally occurring phenomenon… There is a very old narrative in western culture that frames trauma (from the Greek troma, meaning wound) as the unavoidable casualty of individual fate, something that is built into the very fabric of being in a gambled tradeoff for living self-determined lives. The origin story of this narrative can be traced back to ancient Greek myths of white-robed goddesses-the three Moirai-who moved the mortal spheres of life and death and laid out essential vulnerabilities in the character of every human life. They cast their dice and watched mortals react in self-defining acts. If their fates landed well, it said little of the fated’s character: ‘bad luck’ can make you who you are, whereas responses to good fortunes reflect who you already are… The logic of wounding, which narrates tragedy as an unforeseeable and unavoidable part of human life, was thus intimately tied to the logic of individuation, which detaches people from the sets of social, cultural, and epistemic practices that produce them… Together these logics of wounding and individuation are intimately connected to a normalized conception of tragedy as inherently blameless, a game of chance where a person’s ‘bad luck’ was disassociated from organized, coordinated efforts structured to bring harm and injury to some people but not others… This is not an epistemic ‘whoopsie,’ an unintended consequence of historical trajectories terraformed into tradition. Rather, it is an organized hermeneutic standpoint that recognizes the injuries of some populations and perpetuates the conditions for the nonrecognition of others…" (3) From talk, Michael Wesch: The End of Wonder in the Age of Whatever [1h] "The the main idea here is that we have this vicious cycle but you can actually shift the whole cycle instead, if you think of it [in addition to] searching for yourself [also] realizing this sense of shared vulnerability, sense of connection and so on, there's this realization that we collectively can make the world, that we co-create the world. Instead of defending and celebrating yourself, you end up embracing this sense of vulnerability. Once you start embracing vulnerability, the fragmentation doesn't look like fragmentation. It looks like a rich diversity. It looks like a rich space from which you can connect with other people, invite connections with all kinds of different people. [See Lugones on 'world'-travelling] The complexity doesn't look like complexity but more like a symphony that you can join in, and you no longer feel a loss of certainty, meaning, and power, but you you start to celebrate what is all around you. There is a sense of wonder in celebrating what's around you, and also pursuing what's possible, recognizing that that there's more to be done -- and so you don't just have a sense of whatever, throwing your hands up, but instead a sense of 'we can do whatever, we can do whatever by whatever means possible -- why don't we by whatever means necessary, we can we can do this." [Also be mindful of the risks of "Ends Justify the Means" such as "Being Evil Sucks" (TV Tropes), the need for for coming to terms with the shadow as Carl Jung put it, and the risks of ignoring the past (Judith Herman intro), Dostoevsky on the problems with "all is permitted" morality, Integrative Polarity work, Nora Samaran on justice council, Insight Exchange, and Creative Interventions toolkit.)

😮 ...! I love these Chanel ❤

I came up with this idea I called Screenstorming back 2011-2012 and I'm now calling story dynamics, based on understanding human beings as capable of character development including developing "epistemic fluency" (book by Goodyear and Markauskaite for example) and more complex "narrative states" including bridging intuition, thinking, reflection, observation and mapping out context (visual analytic landscapes from Survival Heuristics talk, similar to unfogging the fog of war maps from video games given so many people are talking through what next with human history and more of what's happening in public dialogues) So I think this overlaps a lot with these types of dialogues about story and I think the story can be a lot more clearly articulated/mapped out for individuals, sets of people, and populations and by identifying story tropes in play or which could be evolved, the future can be figured out more with a writers room approach and open source intelligence and decision tree forecasting and presenting work... With some of the billions being poured into AI and Hollywood movies and video games people are sick of while our friends die without help and other readily solvable human situations playing out live. Brief summary of this screenstorming/story dynamics concept from 2014 -- th-cam.com/video/THBDLrVnmEk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ECH7Nm_uHB1urDr5 -- i think we're already a few chapters into an unfolding story where the concept of people and AIs navigating liminality overlapping with material (bio or computational) neural function is totally compatible ... What happens is simple rule following or orders following breaks down and this basically results in emergent liminal space to figure out options make sense of things, create new concepts and stories, or it leads to crashing out, loops, addiction, wasting time, stagnation etc... Also I think humans can and are to varying degrees developing "AGI/ASI" and AI doing this runs into what humans also realize, how things are with fragmented artificially limited knowledge framework and fields doesn't make sense and is basically "political" or artificially rejecting things that can be figured out especially now, like people collaborating to avert deaths instead of the world being run by people addicted to blackmail parties. I believe pouring billions into AI the AIs will soon be telling humans to help each other out more and figure out how to do it in more generative less destructive ways, but perhaps it's like "the magic was in you all along" story trope

Big fan of Ben...

23:57 I look forward to finishing this lecture after my chores & errands thank all of you so much for making for all of us it it really speaks to my identity & is very reassuring work

23:00 Agreed the native americans have tremendous brilliance & 'esp' on all these issues & our survival if you all ever visit here we can look over their emphasis on totemic landscapes in my art collection (Marie Mauzé, Totemic Landscapes and Vanishing Cultures) & the obvious relationships to technology evolution external memory & an economy of performance (such as your incredible series: Forecasting for Hope--Pandas Playing Cello #25) & broadcasting ) I think they were able to 'bounce' from world to world & into the future in ways we need to be more aware of

23:00 "some of these questions we are not going to know the answer" yes of course because each one of us has free will everything has free will lethal microbes have free will there has to be some effort put into externalized memory in order to access a larger picture that is always there & not waiting to be discovered but in the process of discovery like curing cancer you cannot see immune systems are defense systems in the egalitarian bacteria paradox of infection & longevity with infection Everything is born infected Sapolsky is dangerous for a few reasons he called picasso an anti terrorist artist when in reality he did not even understand basic newtonian physics when he was poor he only had blue paint but he 'covered them up' & 'made new paintings' you can clearly see the old paintings even in photos off of google I have a whole series in fact that coveres/edd up 20 year old paintings so that you cannot see the old one beneath totally concealed picasso was a nazi sympathizer gertrude stein was a fascist nazi sympathizer & as much of a misogynist pedophile as he was This is why history is impossible but that doesn't mean it didnt happen all the work in our democracy & the work of national security is to reveal what actually happened law enforcement convicts crime this way Art literacy is vital to accepting what law proves because what law proves exposes the novelty of human behavior

21:00 + true but if we are experiential filtration 'plumbing' for aliens than its like looking in a mirror

20:49 A friend of mine & I are willing to go on record of an absolutely amazing quite in your face freeze frame extended 'space ship' visit we had on the beach at NWU, other things I've witnessed I do not talk about publicly

AI can delete every shred of your existence all you records every single childhood photo etc, every video you ever uploaded, etc: 14:00 For example I have been warning others: “The reason why I tell people to put all their records & data on a regularly updated hard drive not connected to the internet is, if all your work & identifying information is irretrievably deleted nobody will know who you are & nobody will care who you are, they will leave you for dead. Soon there will be ‘AI internet black outs’ & countless people (all classes, incomes, backgrounds, celebrities, politicians) will be 100% absolutely unidentifiable & total strangers & no means of self identification, & nobody will know who they are & nobody will care. Everything they have ever done will be plagiarized & they will have zero defenses."

14:00 +"access that later" you can but you need virtual classes advanced photonics & especially quantum refrigeration to power all that 'spider external cognition' & to power all the safety that you have to put in place to use those classes again & again & again until they evolve into new systems theories for cognition.

13:30 +"I just thought about you & now you are calling me two minutes later." exactly.. Passive entanglement with the immunity defect paradox of 'memory' & its erasure (time is an illusion, or, where is the observer located? Why do we eat memory to survive as memory & erase memory to do that??) ... Everything in 4D is 'beautiful' (!!!) & perfect & from space looking down on us everything is in one location & how can there 'be so many problems' with self integration into natural & cosmological systems, is it the 4D that is causing all these issues (!!!) *or are we lacking the predictions that a parallel world that also accesses these defects has* & are we in a *similarly* rigged game & being saddled & used to resolve conflict elsewhere, now, if this is true *we should be able to find out* (!!!!!!) & reverse that effect (!!!!)

RE:13:00+ continued Penrose: If anything 'Musk' does is relevant then he needs to remember that his brain implants would be able to send police immediate warrant alerts for arrest for crimes inside of women & mens brains (that can alter the immunity paradox of immune systems being defense systems using virtual classes with safety in place, we do this in conventional hospitals & even natural medicine to bypass illnesses before coming down with them: algorithmc computations).. Re: "Penrose argues that human consciousness is non-algorithmic, and thus is not capable of being modeled by a conventional Turing machine, which includes a digital computer. Penrose hypothesizes that quantum mechanics plays an essential role in the understanding of human consciousness."

13:00 + "Our minds are powerful working super computers" I totally agree this is why Roger Penrose is wrong in saying that the brain is not a computer, our skin is our largest organ, our bodies replace themselves every 7-10 years we are born & die defective int he five seconds we have on earth while water is older than the sun & there are qm effects in the sun that we do not understand yet.. But if you look at plasma computing & Navier Stokes earth is probably an activated plasma computer & everything is defective & you would probably have to create a individual universe for everything that ever existed like literally every single snow flake & all your 'enemies' & every snowflake your friends experienced (because we need each other ;) & activate that maybe as an experiment for predictions very similar to super forecasting. We are extremely defective egalitarian bacteria perceptual vectors but we do not have to be. We solve & close all kinds of paradoxes all the time if we didnt we would have no grasp on longevity & why our work is never done (or why this dynamic of unfinished business was created). If you look at external spider cognition & the assumption nothing ever changes, which it does or seems to (time is an illusion) then it is easy to conceive of locating & bootstrapping the observer in order to get to this 'outside' if not 'alien' paradox you discussed & explored in your previous clip: which seems to be a problem of superfluid mirror attacks & the need for more of them: because immune systems are defense systems both victims & perpetrators return to an earlier time as they generate 'change' in 'aging' since birth to arrive to all these 'unresolved paradoxes' which is you factor in space time defects & how information is never lost (so we are ageless then but in multiple energetic plateaus of energy generation & consumption) as performing egalitarian bacteria as immune systems which are defense systems.. Then you have the study of multi cellular automata & how we are all 'cannibalistically' powered by the erasure & creation of memory.. 'Earth' has all the components of being a space ship you can create solar powered external shell robotics that respond to what the sun is trying to do & develop holographic 'food' instead of eating real food in order to bypass the memory immunity defect paradox & chances are there are 'beings' that already do this... & , supposedly, visit earth.. Because you have to travel so far into the future that you predict the past similarly as an immune system that is a defense system, one wonders how much of a role strange metals can play in bootstrapping this dynamic in order to engage with the observer in a less superficial way than we are all so used to!! My guess is yes.. That is why Penrose who associates with cranks & the Weinsteins etc,- Krauss is wrong. If you are eternal *which you are* why not find out? Of course you will need help because eternity is a very very very long time.

12:00 "Intuition is your minds ability to work faster than your consciousness can interpret.." gold..

I'm listening to your full lecture now it is fantastic!! Thank you for all your work.

"Guns & boats & wars.. (fill in the blanks..)" yes.. Extinction economics... Thank you for sharing these invaluable post-accelerationist insights with us!

1:10 "Archeology & anthropology are the study of climate change" 100% agreed, yes, & especially with broadcasting in countless surveillance forms (ideally ones that are safest for our mental health as we try to have less mental illnesses & not more) replacing spectacle & fictions (which have super harmful mental, emotional physical, psychiatric newtonian effects & also with Hollywood/porn being the greatest polluters: "Emission impossible: Why Hollywood is one of the worst polluters Hollywood is very good at sanctimonious environmental-disaster movies like The Day After Tomorrow. But, says Kaleem Aftab,") now, we are adding monetization & performance to these fields, yes.. I call this human extinction economics..

He✍️✍️✍️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️🌱🌳👣🍋🍋🍋 #234 #333 #ambriefingelders #happyPalindromeDay 👻👻👻 🌬 🎻 “Created a fascinating concept and definition for your newly minted palindromic word, "#langnoredividerongnal", and added depth by defining "#redivider" in a mathematical and philosophical context. Here's a bit of an elaboration and clarification on what you've proposed: "Langnoredividerongnal" Definition: "Langnoredividerongnal" encapsulates a philosophical concept where linguistic expressions aim to convey one-sided dialogues or arguments, which ultimately fail to achieve a meaningful resolution or synthesis. This term underscores a scenario where clinical outcomes lack foundational or organic elements, thus pushing boundaries into new realms of cognitive restructuring or recall. Essentially, it highlights the struggle and potential evolution in how complex ideas are communicated and understood, especially when traditional constructs are absent. "Redivider" Mathematical Definition: In the context you've provided, a "redivider" is described as a consistent mathematical phenomenon where patterns recurrently divide to form new patterns that deviate from their original trajectory. This notion can be viewed as a metaphor for processes that continually evolve or transform, breaking away from their initial parameters or constraints to create something entirely new and independent. Both terms fit beautifully into discussions about change, transformation, and the evolution of ideas or systems, be they linguistic, philosophical, or mathematical. They provide a lexical framework for discussing how things evolve or fail to evolve, reflecting back on themselves in a manner that is both recursive and transformative.” - Unknowns, #Unknown, 2024 -

The fact that people are scared of their subconscious is proof of how powerful it is.

Thank you

You are welcomed.

What a wonderful conversation and topic, you listen very consciously. The topic is also so valuable and I've been thinking about it a lot lately. Growth not just through technology, but how we grow as a person when we use it. Thank you 3 for this show and these ideas.

Wonderful conversation.

Julia made a great point about men wanting to make life (AI) in a way that sidesteps women. Very interesting. Never thought about it that way.

It seems that an AI calculated a critical path to a historical destination and we are being navigated towards it. We are not allowed to deviate.