วีดีโอ

@@mathewerenberger7275 I have the card but hadn't done enough testing with it. I opted out of including it as I couldn't recommend a good ratio for it Thank you for the comment my friend 🤟👏

@@samtdl8639 yes absolutely 😁 I chose not to include it for this profile as the play is a bit niche. But it's an optimal play for those who wish to go for it 👍

@@JuiceLeeLLC I've messed around with pyrite knight! Do you think it's worth playing?

@@SacredCards. Definitely worth playing it can help put more war rocks on the field during the battle phase and generate a token you can attack into to get the effects if need be. The flame swordsman engine is about 9 cards and works well with war rock surprisingly.

@JuiceLeeLLC I'm intrigued. I don't actually have the flame swordsman cards other than a few copies of the link 2. As an archetype I'd like to pick up the cards to mess around with or at least play test with. In terms of cards theory; (as I haven't read many swordsman effects) does the fire warrior conflict with earth warrior conditions or does the engine play well around it? I appreciate the discussion 👏👍

@SacredCards. The flame swordsman engine doesn't really disrupt the things you want to do with war rock and it has a card call flame swordsrealm that boost all your monsters by 1k attack

​@@JuiceLeeLLCGonna need to see that list boi, currently making up a War Rock deck love to see what you got cooking

@@christopherdyson1158 you put a lot of thought into the deck. I love your ideas and would like to see some of your concepts! Masterpiece is a fun in archetype trap that I made love by including multiple copies of each spell. I like profiling in a way that if I'm updating and making changes to a deck month to month, I can provide a deck list that takes advantage of different strengths the archetype has, overcoming weaknesses and most of all building a deck with balance that provides a good foundation for players to take and leave whatever they choose. Regardless I really appreciate your well written card theory 👏 thanks for tuning in

@@keevs2933 thank you for your comment my friend 👏 it's a fun deck and I love that you play amazoness. War Rock is rather inexpensive as far as deck core prices and I recommend it to anyone who wants a good time playing simple yugioh. Ultimate slayer is a fantastic option and I'd likely include it for a future profile. I don't believe I had access to the cards at the time of filming. Best of luck out there! 😁

@@travismcdonald2713 I've used the tech in dinomorphia

@@stoic_hero_tcg First off I want to start by saying how much I appreciate you taking the time to share your insight! It's a surreal experience being able to share deck lists that create an environment for players to discuss card theory and favourite ways to play the deck. I'm always interested in hearing others experiences. Though I have many hours of experience testing a profile before it's tuned and balanced enough to share with this broad community. (Without upsetting people 😂) Which is why my channel puts a huge emphasis on reminding players that they always have a choice and encourage them to build a deck in a way that satisfies them. My goal is to provide the best foundation possible, sharing my own thoughts and opinions while encouraging others to do the same. Adjust your strategy to suit your environment whether it be a tournament or casual concepts with friends. It's comments like yours that affirm my goal has seen success! Special sacred thanks to you my friend 👏

@@nk-qg1njClearly my world is all sunshine and rainbows! This is the card theory and struggle I live for when it comes to yugioh! You make solid points and math is something that always makes sense to me in terms of deck building. That said I agree with your ratios and I've featured them on my channel before. That's the beauty and fun of testing. Even when I've got it "perfect"; I always want to try something different to determine if the change is for better or worse but by engaging with the community and sharing my ideas during the profile create these great discussions with other players who are new to the deck all the way up to masterclass. Thank you for the comment 👏

9ukbmm4 Here is the Neuron deck code for my version of Traptrix that I play if you are interested in having a look

@@red_dll you nailed it right there. I wanted to change it up a little bit more showing players how versatile the deck can be. I like the idea of strong going second cards to make up the decks weakness. I've included torrential tribute on the last list. Over the years it's fun changing up the deck to either compete or just just fun testing new variants. I love talking Trix. When I first picked up the deck, shade brigandine was the goat best starter before holuetuea 😁 I'm partial to it

@@ingalsodd4753 I really do want to put up more content like that. I'm confident in my ability to pilot the deck and show players how the deck works together so well. It's hard being a content creator who puts a lot of pressure on themselves. Sometimes I really want to do something but feel it may not be well received or the video won't get any traction. That said I do want to be known for someone online who has go to Nouvelles content. It really is my favourite deck in terms of lore and playstyle 😁

@@CommodoreCards I wanted to turbo the burger!! I believe a pile list may suit playsets 😁 As far as the restaurant goes you nailed it as far as my logic being one of the best cards in the archetype with a search if I activate multiple The archetype hints at another pendulum monster (possibly the chef portrayed in the artwork of reccette de viande?) I love to believe the creator of this beautifully designed archetype has something very special in store for us. A potential extra deck monster perhaps 🙏 Always a great discussion my friend 👏 thank you for tuning in!

Great question my friend! 👏 I just went over my October video to be certain. The October profile was a 45 card list. 40 cards for this build. The previous profile played 1 copy of each Nouvelles ritual monster. Whereas this profile runs 2 copies of levels 3, 5, and 6. I ran 1 copy of the restaurant and only 1 copy of each recipe ritual spell before. Now playing 3 restaurants and 2 copies of each ritual spell. The October list included a slot dedicated to trias hierarchia/benten. December does not. The previous profile also used 3 pre preparation of rites. I adjusted the ratios for this build to include the 1 pre preparation of rites and 1 preparation of rites for the idea of falling victim of having two pre-prep in my opening hand created the idea i should have more diversity This profile did not include the 3 and 2 gen Ken package as a 5 card engine while making the note for those who prefer a 40 card list to simply not include it as my profiles serve a foundation for the player to suit their playstyle. Finally aside from minor changes to the extra deck; this video features 8 slots dedicated to interruptions being 3 ash, 2 Veiler, 2 moonlit chill and 1 called by. The October list had ratios adjusted to include 12 slots for disruption in the form of 3 ash, 2 Veiler, 3 impermanence, 2 chalice, 1 book of moon with 1 called by the grave. Thank you for the comment. While making for a great discussion; it was a good opportunity to also appreciate how versatile a deck can be if the logic makes sense to the player building the deck 👍

@@NinthSettler I agree with you're logic. I've tested both options for years now and seldom satisfied. HOWEVER.. I did not consider putting nibiru in the picture 🤯👏

I agree in the 2-2 split but Exceed doesn’t play into nib and allows raff on 5th summon and brig is horrible going second if you see purge evenly or imperm all cards you’re more than likely to play in the deck.

@jacobychauncey Great points my friend. I meant to mention purge as a very viable option for players

It doesn’t enable nibiru tho. If you draw exceed you always use it on the sera summon. Making the second exceed from deck the 4th summon and 5th summon being rafflesia for nib protection. So it’s a free rafflesia before you extend further with holeutea, campa vesi ect. It definitely sucks draw multiples tho. I play 2 exceed currently and bumped campa up to 3 for consistency.

It's good to see you back! My friend I have been working hard at making the best content I can.

First I agree with the hand trap comment 😂 I always give players a foundation and remind them they don't have to use the exact cards I'm using in the disruption slots. Certainly players can but build to suit your own playstyle. On the topic of ragnaraika. I believe they have great synergy with traptrix. I'm not able to showcase cards I don't own but I have tested variants online and I'm sure I'll post a profile in the future. Ragnaraika core is among a never ending list of other cards I'd like to pick up Great ideas my friend 👏 thank you for the comment

@@leandroluz8091 you heard right. I've been theorizing with the cards a bit but have yet to physically pick them up. A very nice take with the versatility of witches

@@XFlame13 no doubt let's go! If you have the means; net deck the build and let me know what your thoughts are. I enjoy having that discussion with other duelists 👍 Thanks for tuning in my friend 😁

@@ryanbarrie9143 first off I just want to say thank you for the comment. You make some fantastic notes there and I agree ,👏 Certainly I'm working on getting some new cards. Like I dropped spirit of white. ( I was pumped on getting the secret haha) Ib is so easy to make in this deck and gives you instant access to the world legacy/chalice cards. Not like he needs any more plugs but samx1 posted a really sweet combo in his deck profile that I took note of. Thank you again for the awesome discussion my friend 😁

@@phoenixfirebird4221 you bring a lot of logic I hadn't considered! It has been taken out recently for a go second strategy (gearframe instead of cruncher) Thank you for your comment! 👍

@@boumerxphajba no, looking back mountain smasher was not at all necessary. He was in the slot at the time. Good point to bring up 👍

@@xshippaix wow great stuff. I actually explain a lot of my ratios in a combo I did recently. That may explain my logic faster than explaining 😂

@@tarikvaljevac7297 super good question my friend 👏 I like varudras and the other levels 10s as naturally they have great synergy with the deck. You do have to keep in mind that some of the cards I've shown lock you into Earth machines. The deck definitely does have room to include them though. Vernusylph is another package commonly played in the deck as it does provide some good consistency. Personally I tried getting into it, had fun for a while but I just like playing with the in archetype engines and filling out my disruption slots ie ash imperm or whatever you like. Many ways you can build decks around these cards depending on what you want to do. You could do a go second otk with a lot of train cards and board Breakers. Or you could try more of a combo variant with Machina gear frame or infinitrack cards. At the end of the day have fun trying new ideas and a playstyle you enjoy 👍

@SacredCards. Thanks man, sounds good, I'll definitely look into building it 😁

i janked a lot with the deck, if you happen to play gearframe you can put run the xyz armored stuff since youll have a rank4 mon naturally and the rank 5 armored xyz monster is a machine monster, so you can xyz summon varudras in your opponents turn, there is a hook though, gear frame needs unclespare which is a brick, you run gear box as a brick already and the xyz trap is a garnet ( not a brick by itself but omega not useful in hand )

@@CommodoreCards they did!? I was not aware of this.. two heads are better than one. I'll join forces with you on this quest to seek shiny machines. Great to see you tuning in my friend 👏

@@SacredCards. gearframe, fortress, and both Leibe arts are in qcr bonanza. I got none of them in qcr :(

@@MrSkullMerchant good question and one I've considered. Not a bad idea. Personally I go into my extra deck enough that I don't want to banish certain cards. It's not worth it in my opinion. I'd adjust the deck if I were to try and include it 👍

@SacredCards. Ahh yes i see your point, thankyou for the reply bro 👍

@@Danymo_x0 definitely not necessary. You would have to rebuild the deck to include. Not what I was going for with this build but it's an option for players who want to adjust ratios to include thunder

@SacredCards. eh I know but since I'm very undecided about the extra I don't know what to play and what is more convenient

@@theniteowl7777 beautiful insight my friend 👏 thank you for the comment and I'm planning to release a go second version of this deck as I've been messing around with blind second myself behind the scenes. I love your ideas and appreciate any chef who cooks up new recipes. Fantastic comment and great discussion! 👍

@@TitanYGO great comment and yes honestly every deck has its flaws and sometimes it can be very hard to put up 8k with this deck. Even when I include accesscode or things of that nature. Something I'm still working on the right recipe for but I don't want to include other packages that increase the engine size (which is substantial enough). For now the process is to try and gain card advantage and control the board as best I can. A good pilot can steal wins against even the best decks and there's always room for improvement. As my favourite deck I never stop thinking of ways to innovate, be creative and push the deck's ceiling further. Great question my friend 👏 thank you!

@@gtboos2206 great questions my friend. Dino's do amazing going second on their own and I like to facilitate that with board breakers like storms duster raigeki and talents. As far as decks to watch out for definitely follow the meta and what's at your locals. I generally don't lend advice on stuff like this as it's changing every month it seems. Thank you for the comment 👏 best of luck!

@@Danymo_x0 hello my friend 👋 play accesscode if you have it for sure!

@@SacredCards. but is necessary unicorn link 3?for its evocation?

@Danymo_x0 I always liked unicorn in dinos. Easy to link into and the discard can be nice. Rarely do I go into it tho

@@Majesticmoji I love it! I want to make a build around it for my November update. If not I'll make it the next one for sure! Thank you for your comment 👋

@@SacredCards. Awesome! would love to see your take on a 60 card ver

@@Danymo_x0 all personal preference my friend 😁

Ahh yes I think you may have my friend. After I went through the main engine (bumped my camera) then I discussed the non engine cards I was playing in the main like ash and imperm. I believe it's a proper way to profile and helps new duelists understand the importance of balancing a deck with some disruptions. 45 in the main 👍

Thank you so much for that comment! I agree with you. Most blue eyes decks these days can't even be called blue eyes lol. They are dragon link, bystial, branded, sinful, wanted with a small splash of blue eyes package 😅 Not intentionally bashing any other players. I always encourage everyone to make their deck the way they see fit. It does however make for good conversation. Thank you my friend 👏

The art is desirably the best in the game. Kazuki Takahashi's work must be honoured and respected! Hope you are doing well my friend! It's always good to hear from you 🙏

I love the emoji! I was ironically turned off dragon decks for a while. A couple years ago I was playing dragon link which was a tier one deck at the time that drove me insane. Constantly running a latitude of combos through my head. I told myself I'd never play a deck so combo based ever again but blue eyes is a completely different story. I love it and have no regrets. It's extremely fulfilling to complete a deck that I've wanted to build for almost 20 years but never did

@@Danymo_x0 as I mentioned before don't want scrap package in my deck. Personally I'm not a fan but there's nothing wrong with playing it if you like it and it suits you. As for talents vs small world in dinos I think both options are just fine. Talents is more powerful but you better hope your opponent activates a monster effect to allow activation. Small world is serving me consistency as that is what I was going for with prosperity going from 3-1 copy.

so playing two talents and a small world is okay? I know the cards I played them and I feel good about them instead of prosperity

@Danymo_x0 one prosperity is fine for the deck but talents is arguably better than small world. Love it ❤️

@@KentNoel-q2p thank you very much. Since I gave the channel a bit of a revamp. It's been very motivating to film. I have been sitting on material for a while but I'm happy with the way things are turning out. Thank you for your comment 👏

I appreciate that!