JP Jakonen
JP Jakonen
  • 11
  • 5 645
Dr. JP | What IS "spiritual progress", anyway?
Spiritual progress is hard to define, as is "spirituality". In this episode I offer a working definition for both. I also suggest that nondual spirituality DOES include, in its integral version, notions of evolution, progress and other relative phenomena.
www.jpjakonen.com
มุมมอง: 82

วีดีโอ

Dr. JP | Horizontal Life Balance
มุมมอง 66ปีที่แล้ว
Horizontal Life Balance is quite simple. For us to have what is usually termed "work/life balance", we need to be active in three dimensions of our lives. These dimensions are Work, Play and Growth. All three are aspects of who we are. To exclude one of these dimensions leads to being emotionally, intellectually, socially and spiritually shortsighted. We need to Work, Play and Grow to have a tr...
Dr. JP | The ONE thing needed to UNDERSTAND our times | Stages of Development
มุมมอง 93ปีที่แล้ว
It's amazing that we understand each other at all. Stages of consciousness development is a basic tenet in psychology. It is, however, often left out of the equation when discussing topics like polarization, understanding each other and political debate. I have used an analogy of a multi-story building to convey the essence of developmental models. From the first floor we are able to see our ow...
Dr. JP | Integral Awakening - How to Combine Perspectives with True Nature
มุมมอง 93ปีที่แล้ว
A common misconception in spirituality is bypassing perspectives. In the freedom that we truly are, all perspectives arise. These very human capabilities - the ability to see things from I-perspective, We-perspective and It-perspective - need to be integrated in awakening to our true nature. This is paradoxical to logical mind. We can still use our intellect to understand this, and rest as both...
Dr. JP | Less time for doing stupid shit
มุมมอง 140ปีที่แล้ว
This is an interview done when one of my books, The Stress-Free Entrepreneur, first came out. It was filmed on the island where I live. www.jpjakonen.com
Dr. JP | Losing Ourselves with Dr. Jay Garfield
มุมมอง 610ปีที่แล้ว
Dr. Jay Garfield suggests that you don’t have a self-and that’s a good thing. In his new book Losing Ourselves (Princeton University Press, 2022) Jay Garfield, a leading expert on Buddhist philosophy, offers a brief and radically clear account of an idea that at first might seem frightening but that promises to liberate us and improve our lives, our relationships, and the world. Drawing on Indi...
Dr. JP | Living Reality with James Braha
มุมมอง 3.1Kปีที่แล้ว
James Braha was the man who invited "Sailor" Bob Adamson to his house. For five weeks in the summer of 2004, Bob and his wife stayed with the Braha family at their home in Florida. Spiritual talk with arguably the greatest non-duality teacher alive continued from morning till night, as James’ dearest friends and spiritualists from around the country joined the investigations into the truth of r...
Dr. JP | What's Wrong with Right Now Unless You Think About It with Sailor Bob Adamson
มุมมอง 1.2Kปีที่แล้ว
Australian teacher of direct experience, Sailor Bob Adamson, talks with Dr. JP about true nature of our being-in-the-world. True nature is presence awareness, and there is nothing wrong with that - until we start thinking about it. The potential to recognize this simplicity of presence awareness is here now, it lays right in front of us, under the veil of ever changing, passing thoughts. These ...
Dr. JP | When the Buddha Needs Therapy with Keith Martin-Smith
มุมมอง 125ปีที่แล้ว
Zen priest and author Keith Martin-Smith talks about his book "When the Buddha Needs Therapy". It explores the idea that it is possible to be liberated from the suffering of this world, but that the path is a paradoxical one of embracing your ego even as you let it go. www.jpjakonen.com www.keithmartinsmith.com
Dr. JP's Chart | The Phenomenology of Suffering and Emancipation
มุมมอง 72ปีที่แล้ว
Get the chart: awakeningclaritynow.com/phenomonology-of-psychological-suffering/
Integral Foresight Finland intro
มุมมอง 486 ปีที่แล้ว
Integral Foresight Finland intro

ความคิดเห็น

  • @kpinfo9714
    @kpinfo9714 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great interview - thank you

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! 🙏

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! 🙏

  • @williamcallahan5218
    @williamcallahan5218 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a gift. Thanx. So many gold nuggets in this video. "spandrels" indeed. Love JGarfield

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you, William! He is such a wise teacher!

  • @DeepakGupta-ut1wf
    @DeepakGupta-ut1wf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonderful! And you have a lovely presence too JP. Thank you!❤️😇

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much, you are so kind to say that! :)

  • @mikebell4435
    @mikebell4435 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you, Mike!

  • @TheArielsong
    @TheArielsong 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much for this. Kat Adamson mentioned this book 2 days ago which led me to check it out, and then I discovered your interview. I only discovered Sailor Bob a few weeks ago even though I live just a few hours away. I have been trying to decide whether to try and see him in person. Listening to James made it clear for me and I have now requested a meeting with him. Thank you again so much.

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your message! :) And that is so cool that you live within a driving distance of one of the greatest 20th and 21st century western nondual teachers! I live about 24 hours away by airplane, so you have the chance of a lifetime to spend time with Sailor Bob while he's still around. I am so glad you have took on the opportunity to do so. It will change your life: you will see that it's not yours to begin with! ;)

    • @TheArielsong
      @TheArielsong 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes that is certainly the sense I am getting (on both counts). :) Thanks again, heaps.@@jpjakonen6441

    • @TheArielsong
      @TheArielsong 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jpjakonen6441 Hi again Jp. I just wanted to touch base and let you know that I drove the 7 hours to visit Bob and Kat. Wow! It has been a life transforming 6 days. It was your comment above that really validated that I was moving in the right direction. Thank you so much. How perfect everything is! "It will change your life: you will see that it's not yours to begin with! ;)" is so spot on.

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheArielsong Hey, I'm so glad you made the trip (no distance) and met the man (no one there)! Living as oneness does solve a lot of problems, starting with the root of them all, the identity crisis of having an identity! :D I am so glad to hear that my comment helped you to validate the directionless direction (no one there, either) you are moving. I guess 7 hours counts as "a few hours away" down under. Welcome home, dear - now it's "post-awakening", as my dear friend and mentor Fred Davis of Awakening Clarity Now wisely says.

    • @TheArielsong
      @TheArielsong 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jpjakonen6441 Hahaha! Yes, indeed. It feels like a beginningless end or an endless beginning, or both, or none... but its effortless. :)

  • @ramasatyanarayan9887
    @ramasatyanarayan9887 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's wrong right now. This is one of the best books I have ever read. In my opinion one should be very lucky to have come across this book and read it . This book is a life changing book. I don't know whom I should be grateful for this. Thanks.

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much for your comment. It is, indeed, life changing: from not participating with what is going on towards being the going-on.

    • @dobie6929
      @dobie6929 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      summary please ? key points ? I have ADHD

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dobie6929 Key point is in the title - ask that question when you feel overwhelmed by life. Then notice a subtle shift. What changed?

  • @astrozoo
    @astrozoo ปีที่แล้ว

    I love James Braha!

  • @buddhaneosiddhananda8499
    @buddhaneosiddhananda8499 ปีที่แล้ว

    We make the most progress when we help others...🎉🎉

  • @SpiritualReform
    @SpiritualReform ปีที่แล้ว

    James, there is another perspective (to me it's a truth) that no one knows about; i've been sharing it with a few people. Although very few people know about this truth, most can't seem to be able to apply it in their lives. This truth also says that all is consciousness, and that you are one with it all. Nothing new there, of course, for many already know about it. But that is the basis of it all. Now, this truth also explains why no one reincarnates, but also why karma is nothing more than a belief. This truth explains how time is simultaneous, and how linear time is perception that we experience (no, it's not an illusion, it's perception). This truth also explains how all our lives (past and present and future) are simultaneous. It's very easy for me to explain these things. With this, i can also explain why children think they remember their past lives, which actually aren't their lives but the lives of their Essence's counterparts, or their other versions of themselves. This truth also explains that life is nothing more than a continual exploration of self, or of consciousness, which you are one with. This truth explains why right and wrong, good and bad, is perception. I can also show how we live in a system that we've created our own selves (but there are many more systems out there). I explain what happens after we die and the process of dying and what takes place....................basically we all go through what is called a 'transition process': it is to help shed our human beliefs and our human objective awareness so to become again our true natural selves. It is after this process that we choose again where and what to experience next; but again, no one comes back. An aspect of you may choose to come back, but it's not you. I explain all these things. I can also show how we all have alternate selves experiencing in alternate realities, and how these alternate selves and these realities are generated. I can also show people how each one of us has no more than 6 other versions of our self experiencing here on Earth while we are having our own experience. This truth can also explain why people such as Babaji can materialize their body on this planet. And much much more. This truth also shows that life is not about this or that, and all those things most people think it’s all about. It explains how we are not here to learn anything, and how evolution is perception that we humans experience, when there truly is no evolution.

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for sharing this, 13x60! All lives can indeed be seen as simultaneous, when all time can be seen to happening in this here now, timeless now. I really love and am intrigued by the notion of kids "past lives" being the lives of their Essence's counterparts: as if they are remembering facets of their "Kosmic address", or how life can be experienced from that particular Essence quality, that they might have (still) access to. Also: life seen as a continual exploration of self / consciousness, which we are one with, comes really close to my off-hand definition of spirituality (just cut a new video about it): "An open-ended interest in the phenomenological experience of being human". Shedding our human beliefs is - I hope! - something we can work with in this life, too! ;) But what an interesting idea: that after that purging or transition, we choose where and what to experience next - and I'm with you, no one comes back, most likely, but oneness - like an Ouroboros - comes back having fun, or at least experiencing, chasing its tail. Alternate selves experiencing in alternate realities is close to the everyday concept of imagination. That is a very real, albeit subjective, place where our many selves are experiencing many alternate realities. (I'm doing my best to ground this in everyday phenomenology! :) In the same vein, I understand that we are not here to learn anything, as that would imply a learner. How about just being? On the other hand, on the relative side of street, which always should be included in an integral nondual vision, there is so much to learn, from calculus to good manners to reducing carbon emissions as a global systemic society. Thanks for your input, I really appreciate it.

    • @SpiritualReform
      @SpiritualReform ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@jpjakonen6441 Well, i appreciate you responding to my post. I must say that much of what i say also come from my own personal experiences, or other people's experiences. For example, my girlfriend told me of an experience she once had, but she couldn't understand what took place. She was married then. She was in her home when suddenly she felt very thirsty and went to sit on the sofa. Out of nowhere, a man walked to her and gave a glass of water. This man looked like her husband, except that he had blond hair _(her husband at the time had black hair)._ She remembered that the furniture and the wall papers were different. What really happened? Because i already understand these things and have had similar experiences, i was able to explain to her that she experienced her alternate self within an alternate reality where her alternate husband handed her the glass of water. Interesting enough, i've heard many similar stories from other people. We do temporarily jump realities here and there and are not even aware that we do so. Now, let me explain more clearly why we have simultaneous lives. It's not exactly because time is simultaneous although simultaneous time is also playing a role here. There is another factor that no one i know knows about _(except for a couple of people such as Frank Kepple, an experienced astral projector)._ There is consciousness, and there is the expression of consciousness. Consciousness may express itself as individuated units of itself. These individuated units are not separate from consciousnes given that in reality there is no separation; there is the experience of a sense of separation but there truly is no separation. Some of these individuated units of concsiousness have developed their own unique individuality. We may refer to them as Essences. There are infinite number of essences. I am my own essence, just as you are your own essence this even though we're both still one with consciousness itself. Note that not all animals are their own essences. They are an expression of consciousness but most are not essences. Most are generated through other essences. I just wanted to make this one clear for a better understanding of what i'm saying here. We're not different from each other, however, for us and the animals or plants, or even a rock are still consciousness. There are no hierarchies in consciousness. Now, think of you or your essence as your hand. In this life, you are one of the fingers belonging to this hand focused here on this planet, having your own personal experience. All the other fingers in your hand can be looked at as the other focuses of this same essence (the hand), each finger having its experience simultaneously to each other, each focused within a different time framework. One finger is presently experiencing what we view as 400 BC, while another finger is presently focused experiencing 3000 AC, while you as one of the fingers is experiencing your present reality here on 2023. You and the other fingers from that same hand (essence) are interconnected. What you or any of the other fingers experience become each finger's experience and the hand's experience. In fact, you and the other fingers feel as if you were the same. In your dreams, you do experience what the other fingers are experiencing. Except that you think it's you having those experiences; this, again, because all of you are interconnected feeling as if you were the same. Children are not remembering their past lives. They are tapping into the lives of their other focuses who are also part of a same hand, or essence. In fact, some people can remember, or tap, or be regressed into their future lives. But because it does not make sense to them, they dismiss these type of experiences. Note that all these past, present and future experiences are simultaneously occurring on this same space or location we call Earth. It's just that each experience is occurring within its own frequency, thus we cannot see that most of the other lives are simultaneously occurring right here in the now. But had you the ability to change your frequency, you would be able to see and experience what the other focuses are experiencing. This can also explain why we don't come back. There is no need to because once you and your other focuses are done with your present experiences, you will have experienced everything your essence set itself to experience on this physical plane. Let's say, your present experience is of a man who experiences material abundance. Well, one of your other focuses is by contrast experiencing lack, or poverty. Material abundance and poverty are actually different aspects of a same theme. When you are exploring a theme, you and your other focuses are exploring all the different aspects of that same theme within the different timeframes. That is how it goes. _"In the same vein, I understand that we are not here to learn anything, as that would imply a learner. How about just being?"_ You can just be. But can you imagine just 'being' without doing anything whether it's just observing, or meditating? It is said that consciousness is an action in itself, that nothing is ever static. If this is so, then you cannot just be. For even if you are in a deep long meditation, you are engaging an action which won't last forever. Now, in a sense, we are always learning. That is part of the process of this human experience. But again, it's perception that we experience. Just when you thought you have learned so much in your life, upon your death, you will realize that there was never anything to learn, for you are already all knowing. In fact, you will have to forget all that you've learned on here in order for you to be you again in your true natural state. Think about it; we don't always do the things that we do so to learn from them. Many times it's for the sheer fun of it. There are no levels in consciousness - this is a truth. So it's not that we're moving from one point to another point. This would be pure human speculation. Because we experience from a sense of linear time, thus we believe that everything moves in a linear manner.

  • @angelicamoon64
    @angelicamoon64 ปีที่แล้ว

    ✨🙏✨

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you, Angelica Moon! :)

  • @thatchzembo1001
    @thatchzembo1001 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great talk guys thanks!

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for listening! :)

  • @christinaOmNamahShivayo
    @christinaOmNamahShivayo ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir James Braha is an amazing man every time I hear him speak I learn something new. He has contributed so much to Jyotish and self-awareness is a relatable way that is easy for the westerner to understand.

  • @RobertKorngiebel214
    @RobertKorngiebel214 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, like the cargo in a hot air balloon, the more that's thrown overboard the higher it rises and the more expansive the view. Using this parallel analogy, the experience as this arising occurs is loves appearance and need for expression as compassion and/or creativity. The unbounded view see's the expansiveness and innately fills it. Is this in line with your experience?

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, and at the same time what is transcended must also be included - like we include words but transcend them when learning to speak in full sentences as a kid. Same applies in psychological growth. And what is thrown overboard is different at each stage. Basically, it's throwing away identification with a more narrow perspective in order for the hot air balloon to arise. Yes?

    • @RobertKorngiebel214
      @RobertKorngiebel214 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, this is very clear, all must be included...no exclusion. Thank you, JP. @@jpjakonen6441

  • @AmmarAmmar-xl6wd
    @AmmarAmmar-xl6wd ปีที่แล้ว

    James braha is a great guy...I love his philosophy

  • @OsmiumFist
    @OsmiumFist ปีที่แล้ว

    Bob just turned 95.

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Talk about a force of nature! 😀

  • @robbin4720
    @robbin4720 ปีที่แล้ว

    Never heard that expression before, "cosmic address", for the localized sense of being. The cosmic address can vary but only one occupant. This was a good example of how everyday experience is a pointer, if I am alert and open to it. Wow.

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Robbin! Thank you for reminding me! I didn’t remember using the term in the video, but I bet I did as you mentioned it. It is a very important topic and helps understand a lot, I think I’ll get back to it a few videos down the line…Thanks for the inspiration!

  • @alainememoirofficial
    @alainememoirofficial ปีที่แล้ว

    hey, you must know integral theory right? ChatGPT Yes, I'm familiar with Integral Theory. Integral Theory is a comprehensive framework developed by philosopher and author Ken Wilber. It aims to provide a more inclusive and holistic understanding of various aspects of human experience, psychology, spirituality, and society. The theory suggests that reality can be best understood by integrating multiple dimensions, perspectives, and levels of development. Integral Theory is often represented through the "AQAL" model, which stands for "All Quadrants, All Levels." This model considers four fundamental perspectives (quadrants) and various developmental stages (levels) across multiple domains of human experience: Quadrants: Individual Interior (I): The subjective, psychological, and experiential aspect of an individual. Individual Exterior (It): The objective, observable, and measurable aspect of an individual's body and behavior. Collective Interior (We): The shared cultural, social, and value-based dimensions of a group or society. Collective Exterior (Its): The external systems, structures, and institutions of a society. Levels: Archaic: Primitive survival-oriented behaviors. Magic: Animistic and mythic beliefs. Mythic: Traditional and religious worldviews. Rational: Modern scientific and rational perspectives. Pluralistic: Postmodern and relativistic viewpoints. Integral: Integration of multiple perspectives and contexts. Transpersonal: Spiritual and holistic consciousness. Unitive: Mystical and interconnected awareness. Integral Theory emphasizes the importance of recognizing and integrating these various dimensions to gain a more complete understanding of complex issues, whether they are related to individual development, interpersonal relationships, or societal challenges. It has been applied in fields such as psychology, education, spirituality, business, and social activism. Keep in mind that Integral Theory has sparked both interest and critique, and its concepts and applications are subjects of ongoing exploration and discussion. User what you say, how different would the theory be if it was inclusive theory? ChatGPT If Integral Theory were framed as an "Inclusive Theory," it might place even greater emphasis on embracing diversity, multiple perspectives, and cross-cultural considerations. While Integral Theory already aims to integrate various dimensions of human experience, an "Inclusive Theory" could extend this integration to a broader range of cultural, ethnic, and global perspectives. Here are some potential ways in which an Inclusive Theory might differ: Cultural Diversity: An Inclusive Theory might explicitly recognize and incorporate a wider array of cultural viewpoints, beliefs, and practices. It could emphasize the importance of understanding and valuing diverse cultural contexts and their contributions to a holistic understanding of human experience. Global Perspectives: In addition to acknowledging different cultural perspectives, an Inclusive Theory might emphasize the inclusion of global viewpoints from various regions and societies. This could lead to a more comprehensive understanding of human experiences around the world. Power Dynamics: An Inclusive Theory could highlight the influence of power dynamics and social structures on individual and collective experiences. It might examine how privilege, oppression, and inequality intersect with the AQAL dimensions and developmental stages. Intersectionality: Building on the idea of power dynamics, an Inclusive Theory could further integrate the concept of intersectionality. This involves recognizing how various aspects of identity (such as race, gender, sexuality, ability, etc.) intersect to shape unique perspectives and experiences. Ethical and Moral Considerations: An Inclusive Theory might place a stronger emphasis on ethical and moral considerations when integrating different perspectives. It could explore how values and principles from various cultures and backgrounds can inform a more inclusive and compassionate approach to addressing complex issues. Decolonization: An Inclusive Theory might engage more deeply with the process of decolonization, considering the historical, cultural, and psychological impacts of colonization on different groups and societies. This could involve reevaluating and deconstructing existing power structures and narratives. Environmental and Ecological Perspectives: An Inclusive Theory might also extend its integration to ecological and environmental perspectives. It could explore the interconnectedness between human experience and the natural world, acknowledging the importance of sustainable practices and the impact of ecological factors on human well-being. Dialogue and Collaboration: An Inclusive Theory might encourage more intentional dialogue and collaboration between individuals, groups, and cultures with differing perspectives. It could provide tools for navigating difficult conversations and fostering mutual understanding. Overall, an "Inclusive Theory" could build upon the foundations of Integral Theory by taking an even more expansive and culturally sensitive approach to integrating diverse perspectives. It would strive to address the complex interplay of identity, culture, power, and context in a more nuanced and comprehensive way.

  • @alainememoirofficial
    @alainememoirofficial ปีที่แล้ว

    How different would the theory be if it was inclusive theory instead of integral? one might wonder..

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s a good question! Maybe there is a parallel universe that has it like that! :)

  • @RobertKorngiebel214
    @RobertKorngiebel214 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, JP, for the very clear and concise video, it started the morning here off with clarity. Thank you, as well, for the excellent presentation of references.

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dear Robert, thank you so much for your comment, it really means a lot to me. I do this out of love and you just reflected it back!

  • @phk2000
    @phk2000 ปีที่แล้ว

    James, your book is fantastic. Anyone interested in this stuff should buy it and read it.

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      I really think it’s most likely one of the best if not the best introduction to non-duality from a very logical and common person standpoint.

  • @RobertKorngiebel214
    @RobertKorngiebel214 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this interview, I was unacquainted with James Braha and his book Living Reality prior to your interview. You mention that you’d also interviewed Fred Davis. Is that interview publicly available somewhere? 🙏🙏🙏

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am doing a new interview with Fred for this series soon, please stay tuned! 😀

  • @RobertKorngiebel214
    @RobertKorngiebel214 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful, clear, concise, well contextualized interview. Thank you JP!

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much for your kind words, Robert. It means a lot! :)

  • @robbin4720
    @robbin4720 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just saw the whole thing with my wife. So beautiful and clear. Thank you. And great questions by the way.

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Robbin! I am so glad you watched it & liked it. Made my day! :)

  • @robbin4720
    @robbin4720 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quite a scoop. Well done.

  • @chawek137
    @chawek137 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great interview, great guest.🙏

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you, that is lovely to hear!

  • @ronrouyer2069
    @ronrouyer2069 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful fun talk. I'll have to check the book out. Are the recording tapes on market?

    • @jpjakonen6441
      @jpjakonen6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! You mean the recordings James did when Bob was visiting? I think not - and James' book has all the best bits transcribed! :)