วีดีโอ

Seems like there is some talking past each other here. The existence of God is not a presupposition apriori it is a result of aposteriori reasoning flowing from revelation not deductive reasoning independent or resident inside humanity as a result of some kind of legacy imago dei. Revelation and deduction are not the same thing. God has indeed revealed his mind in Christ and granted that knowledge (in and through his Son that is through participation). This communicated and revealed knowledge such that the believer alone knows things as God knows them in himself. (That is truly, but not exhaustively, since he has granted that human knowledge through the human being Jesus Christ so that we know the things in a human way. The only way we may know them). When the unbeliever however posits and says "God" all they can conceive of is an idol. Their knowledge of the idol therefore is kind of apophatic experience formed in privation and not as a revelation in and through Jesus other than an experience of the obverse. The incarnation as Word of God to man and word of man to God has made communication between the two possible not some kind of self evident general condition. These things were gifted in the humanity of Christ before the world was made. The above seems to be a challenge to Geisler's position without giving away ground to Van Til but perhaps i have not listened carefully enough.

No Steve the Bible never call Jesus God You are speaking nonsense

I served as a prison chaplain, mainly in the federal system, for 31 years. I can't tell you how many inmates from the inner city were raised with little or no contact with their father. As a result, many were introduced to crime by gangs as young teenagers.

Matthew 16:28 “Truly I tell you, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.” next verses Matthew 17:1-2 After six days Jesus took with him Peter, James and John the brother of James, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. There he was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became as white as the light.

Spiritual Monism: 1:14 Dualism: 4:56 Materialistic Atomism: 13:00

One the best messages. I've listened to it several times over the years. Steve Gregg is one of the best Bible teachers of our time.

I will never forget this teaching. I still carry it with me after 20 years and it has changed the way I live my life.

Jimmy Akin doesn't make sense. Worship isn't based on the recognition that someone or something is uncreated. Many pagan cultures worshipped, venerated and prayed to gods they considered to be created or subordinate to an overall creator God. Also, we simply don't see the apostles praying to any saint who had just died, and they could easily have invoked the intercession of Stephen, the first martyr.

5 For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?Hebrews 1;5

The thief on the cross lived before the great Commission, he didn't need to be baptized. Now he could have been by John when all of Jerusalem came out to be baptized by John and temporarily fell away. Old Testament people were never told to be baptized.

17:01 “every day that we have lived for ourselves..” that’s a little off. Gregg had multiple wives and multiple honeymoons for example. He would be “living for himself” in enjoying that time w/ his wife. The issue here is one committing premeditated overt sin bottom line and all of this “living for yourself” nuance is too hard to pin down

🙌✝️❤️

Spot on! Absolutely phenomenal exegesis! 🙌🙌🙌 Only wish 95% of the church knew this 😊

Steve Gregg is teaching that “Everyone did what is right in their own eyes” is the model for the Church. Yeah that’s nuts. The book of Judges in part is a polemic for the monarchy, you’re not supposed to think the chaos and relativism are good. But since Gregg rejects the institutional nature of the church this is all he is left with…cheering for chaos.

Hallelujah ty Lord for this beautiful message. And ty posting it.

Very good insight on First Principles. I read his work on this topic, but in this lecture, he broke it down even more.

Calvinism is false

1. Existence exists (There is something rather than nothing). 2. A = A (Whatever exists is what it is and not simultaneously what it is not). 3. Consciousness is consciousness of existence. (Consciousness is consciousness of something. A consciousness conscious of nothing is a contradiction of terms). These axioms are performatively affirmed even in attempts to deny them. They require no proof because without them, you couldn't prove anything at all. These axioms provide the grounds for intelligibility. Existence is metaphysically primary and conceptually irreducible.

"Sprinkling" sounds like an obvious reference to baptism. They entered the waters and water was sprinkled over their heads.

I think that there is a misunderstanding here. A person is justified through faith. We say “faith alone” because we are saved by grace through faith and nothing else(Ephesians 2:8-9). Not “faith and works” not “faith and love”, not “faith and sacrements “ , not “faith and church membership “. “Faith alone” means that the saving work of Christ is applied to a person through faith and nothing else. A person is saved by Christ by His death for one’s sins and resurrection. (1 Corinthians 15:1-4).This is applied to a person through faith.(Romans 5:1). There is nothing else necessary and anything else is adding to the work of Christ. When a person is saved, they receive the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 1:13-14). Love is a fruit of the Holy Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23). One cannot love until one is first saved. Likewise, a person cannot do good works until one is first saved. We are spiritually dead and cannot do anything pleasing to God unless we are first born again and saved (Ephesians 2:4-6). This is not a minor distinction. The reason being if you add anything to the gospel, you preach and/or believe a different gospel that is damning (Galatians 1:8-9). If you add works or love to the gospel of salvation by grace through faith, you are saying that what Christ did was not enough for your salvation and that you must contribute to it. This is a false gospel and if one clings to it, one will wind up in hell because one is not trusting fully in Christ for their salvation but are ultimately trusting in themself. One either trusts in Jesus for their salvation or they don’t, there is no such thing as partial trust in Christ. That’s why this is so important and that is why the reformers were necessary. I think that this issue is still a major divide between Catholics and Protestants and rightfully so. We’re talking two different gospels, the biblical one which saves and the Roman one which damns. The discourse on this video is good but we must remember that the issue of justification through faith is a major issue and we cannot have true spiritual fellowship until Rome repents of her gospel and embraces the biblical one.

It’s very weird to me to say that the oral traditions are the word of God but that the actual words of God, themselves, are not preserved in oral tradition… I mean how can you possibly validate any claim that rests solely on the “authority” of oral tradition?

I can't find the part 3 video

37:04 - you have not asked if Mary is an uncreated being.... Interesting that he would say that, because pretty much all other things making God unique from men has been given to Mary. Maybe in 100 years they will add this one too. The he says he don't know if people pray more to Mary than God, he did no study of it. Really, really?? Just look at the Hail Mary, look at it!

Bahnsen is my hero.

Thank you for teaching! God bles you .

I wish he addressed how Genesis 15:13 fit with the 215-year theory. That verse is the main reason why I stick with the 430-year timeframe as I can't see a logical way to interpret Genesis 15:13 in any way except that they were actually afflicted that long. If anyone reading this happens to know how this is reconciled with that theory, I would be interested to hear!

What happened to the remaining videos in this series?

THANK YOU ❤ 🔥🔥

Volume too low.

Hmm I see the change-the second advent- happen at v.43 and not v. 35.

What a bad a$$! Greg❤️🌹

At 13:30 when he summarizes the argument from Spinoza would he not need to show the necessity for such a perfect being to exist Before he concludes God exists? How does he make the jump from defining what a perfect being is, to requiring that a perfect being must exists? Couldn’t the atheist just deny the existence of a perfect being? Am I missing something? It’s a hard argument for me to follow. God bless!

One of the most brilliant and underrated Theologians and Christian Philosophers of the 20th century. Dr. Gordon H. Clark (1902-1985). Can't wait to sup' with him in the Heavenly Kingdom...the Ultimate Lord's Supper!

to think Jesus meant to literally eat his flesh and drink his blood ... turns you into a literal cannibal ... something against the word of God six ways from sunday. It's obvious it was symbolic

my biggest problem with the Catholic view on this, is that just taking a "pattern" of how Jesus treated Peter, and extrapolating that out to be some kind of head of an earthly conglomorate, is a stretch. All of those passages have to be interpreted a very specific way in order to reach the Catholic conclusion. It could just as easily be said Peter was the head ... of the apostles. He was in charge of them, not the whole body of Christ. Nowhere in the Bible does it lay out anything that is actually clear, regarding the pope/papacy, and Rome, and a head quarters, etc. if God wanted to set up a political like structure for the church, where there's some kind of "head" on earth, and bishops with all the garb etc ... he would have done what he did in the old testament and given us the blue print for it in his word, with rules and structure etc. Going off a couple verses where Jesus elevates Peter, and building out the entire thing we see today with all the rituals, garbs, etc etc, is one heck of a stretch.

How was brian able to turn up the volume?😊

Always loved this guy's teaching. I used to listen to him in private when I was still lost pagan. He helped me a lot! May God be blessing Him for speaking to heathens such as I!

Pay attention at 37 minutes

Praise the Lord for you uploading this Brian may God bless you in Jesus name

I usually agree with Steve on what he has to say, but I do disagree on what he said about Michal and David (or at least, I see him as being inconsistent with what he just said prior). David went and married other women after Michal was taken from him, so according to what Steve just said, doing such a thing is accepting the divorce (just like a man who gets married after his wife leaves because she is committing adultery). How are the two scenarios different? In other words, if a man is mad that his first wife leaves him because she is committing an adulterous relationship, so he goes on to marry another, but then his first wife is sorry and tries to return to him, is he still free to take her back even after he has married?

thanks for posting his talks, he had a big influence on my thinking as a Christian. Have you been able to find his talks on the gifts of the holy spirit (1 Cor 12 -14)?

Church is a fellowship of believers, not necessarily FOR unbelievers. Although they could attend. Church is global then there is a local sampling of congregations. There is no loyalty to a denomination … there is one leader of the body of those who follow the gospel and keep Gods Will as set forth in the written word. And there is one church from beginning to end. But there are congregations that would be worse than no congregation… Paul pointed out. It’s an invisible spiritual union, the global body. But, there are qualities of the institution. One overall church. Baptism is the initiation rite. The members are identifiable. An institution was expected. The apostles were the initial institution. They set up deacons and elders who aren’t chosen hastily, they are to be ordained after they’ve had ‘time’ in the body. The body should obey and submit, respect them… Jesus gives apostles authority to set rules… bind and loose… forbidding and permitting… need for organization, offices and structure outlives its members… Roman’s ch 12… leader is a servant not dictator… if they speak against God, are acting outside the Word of God… but with binding and loosing … it’s up to the apostles to set the standard … recall ‘where two or more are gathered’ approach. The church sets penance for sin.

Leader is a servant not a dictator. The leader must obey God and if they act outside, the body does not have to obey. What is bound and loosened on earth will be bound and loosened in heaven. This was said to the apostles… but it applies to the church to follow the apostles. But, because it was the apostles will be the ones who set the norms for future leaders to follow. But there is a need to deal with new situations, beyond the lives of the apostles. But it should follow apostolic tradition.

Notes… Catholics Both/And … Union of all believers. Many elements of Grace. Mathew 16 & 18 … 1 overall church, points to it being an institution. It’s membership is identifiable and baptism is part, excommunication can be part of it… Jesus expected it to be institutional. Starting with the 12 apostles who went forth to set up… by setting up deacons and elders… Paul and barnabas set up churches then set up deacons and elders. Hebrews 13:17… sets up an authority in the church… the authorities set up rules… rules of conduct… Peter also plays in.

One of the greatest and most practical straight-from-the-Bible sermons I’ve heard in my 46 years of walking with God, in Christ!

Just for anyone that gets lost after the cassette is turned over, he is now in Psalm 12:6. It seems like the teaching from Psalm 11:2-12:5 has been lost.

How does your channel have so few views?!

“

SIN and Souls Do Not exist! 'sin' is a made-up control mechanism created by petty despots, and fascists for dolts who cannot think for themselves! FAITH = Lack of evidence .'. therefore = No proof!! No gods here ... just another ranter ... hahah Fake promises of heavens = Child abuse; Elderly abuse Fake threats of FAKE hells = Child abuse; Elderly abuse AFTERLIFE! End Times..? rapture.. ? HaHaha...! Who gets this afterlife? Humans? Dogs? All Hominins? Like Homo Neanderthal? and Homo Denisovans? Homo CroMagnon?? As with All Animals under Kingdom Animalia, when we die --> we Die! Time to start prosecuting these fraudsters for Terrorism and fraud !

Great talk…