- 52
- 9 648
ASAPbio
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2016
ASAPbio is a researcher-driven non-profit that promotes transparency and innovation in life sciences communication. We'll feature informative videos, recordings of relevant meetings, and interviews with biologists who are using preprints and open peer review in their work.
A brief history of preprints in the life sciences
When you think about the start of preprinting, your first thought is likely to be arXiv and the 1990’s. However, the history of preprinting goes back much further. Join us for the next 30 minutes as we travel back to discover the history of preprints - with a focus on the life sciences.
The slides are available with a CC-BY licence: bit.ly/history-of-preprints-slides
Feedback for ASAPbio community sessions: bit.ly/ASAPbio-community-feedback
bioRxiv podcast episode: pod.fo/e/1114f7
Timestamps:
Intro - 00:00:00
Academic publishing revolutions - 00:00:47
When did preprinting first start - 00:03:06
information exhange groups - 00:04:55
arXiv - 00:09:34
e-Biomed - 00:11:46
bioRxiv - 00:13:12
The COVID-19 pandemic - 00:15:04
Preprints enable experimentation - 00:16:16
Formal recognition of preprints - 00:18:43
Feedback on the session - 00:21:13
Schedule for 2024 community calls - 00:23:30
The slides are available with a CC-BY licence: bit.ly/history-of-preprints-slides
Feedback for ASAPbio community sessions: bit.ly/ASAPbio-community-feedback
bioRxiv podcast episode: pod.fo/e/1114f7
Timestamps:
Intro - 00:00:00
Academic publishing revolutions - 00:00:47
When did preprinting first start - 00:03:06
information exhange groups - 00:04:55
arXiv - 00:09:34
e-Biomed - 00:11:46
bioRxiv - 00:13:12
The COVID-19 pandemic - 00:15:04
Preprints enable experimentation - 00:16:16
Formal recognition of preprints - 00:18:43
Feedback on the session - 00:21:13
Schedule for 2024 community calls - 00:23:30
มุมมอง: 40
วีดีโอ
Research Integrity, trust Markers and Forensic Scientometrics
มุมมอง 51หลายเดือนก่อน
At our July Community call, we discussed the importance of trust markers and research integrity in addition to the newly proposed field of forensic scientometrics. In recent years, science has been experiencing a crisis in trust, with record numbers of retractions, news reports of fraudulent studies, lawsuits against scientists correcting the literature and a deep politicalization of research. ...
How to write a pitch for an op-ed about preprints
มุมมอง 752 หลายเดือนก่อน
Have you ever wanted to write an op-ed but didn’t know where to start? In our latest Lunch & Learn session we cover the basics on how to write a pitch for an opinion piece. We will look at a potential framework to use for crafting a pitch and some advice for writing the pitches and full op-eds. Get out there and pitch your op-eds! The slides are available with a CC-BY licence: bit.ly/op-ed_slid...
ASAPbio × Arcadia: A discussion on gauging the impact of science
มุมมอง 1132 หลายเดือนก่อน
Traditional signals of scientific quality - journal titles, closed peer review, and impact factors - fail to reflect the utility and rigor of scientific work. There are additional challenges faced by scientists publishing outside of traditional systems, including discoverability, tracking reuse, determining ways to re-evaluate quality over time when sharing living documents, and more. We need n...
Ai in preprints and publishing with Josh Nicholson
มุมมอง 733 หลายเดือนก่อน
At our May Community call, we discussed the use of Ai in publishing and preprints. The rise of Ai represents a global challenge for all aspects of life. In academia, Ai promises to revolutionize scientific publishing and yet presents major problems for publishers and researchers. On the one hand, preprint servers, such as bioRxiv, have recently begun trialing the use of Ai generated preprint su...
The impact of Robert Maxwell on scientific publishing
มุมมอง 3014 หลายเดือนก่อน
Robert Maxwell was many things from an MP to a fraudster. He also had an outsized impact on academic publishing, effectively creating the system that we have today. In this Lunch & Learn we spend 30 mins discussing his impact and the lasting effects that we still feel today within academic publishing and research culture more broadly. The slides are available with a CC-BY licence: bit.ly/Maxwel...
Preprints across the globe; landscapes, perceptions and challenges with Ludo Waltman
มุมมอง 995 หลายเดือนก่อน
At our March Community call, we discussed the globalization of preprints. The adoption of preprints varies greatly across geographical regions, with many of the efforts to drive adoption originating from the US and Western EU. However, this approach often neglects the opinions and needs of others. In this community call we hear from Ludo Waltman about the perceptions of preprints across differe...
A brief history of peer review; ASAPbio lunch & learn
มุมมอง 3115 หลายเดือนก่อน
Peer review is often taken as the gold-standard in academia and used as a seal of approval for a scientific study. Additionally, many academics mistakenly believe modern peer review to be over 350 years old. Surprisingly, academics are not taught the history of peer review with many not understanding where this process originated or how it has continually evolved over time. Slides are available...
ASAPbio Community Call. Connecting the dots; linking preprints to other outputs
มุมมอง 1267 หลายเดือนก่อน
At our first Community call of 2024, we discussed the linking of preprints to other outputs. The research community produces multiple outputs relating to any individual research project including data sets, methodologies and protocols, peer reviews, outreach or media and more. Linking these many outputs to the preprint is very important for reproducibility and for readers. One of the companies ...
ASAPbio Community Call: The trials and tribulations of post publication peer review
มุมมอง 589 หลายเดือนก่อน
In our November 2023 community call we heard from Lonni Besancon, Assistant Professor at Linkoping University, about his work investigating unreliable science and post-publication peer review. As preprint reviewing and commenting increasingly drives the push towards transparency, these topics become ever more important. Lonni has conducted multiple meta-research projects and written opinion pie...
Community & Commercialisation in biomedical preprint servers
มุมมอง 599 หลายเดือนก่อน
This year’s open access week theme, “Community over Commercialization,” is relevant to not only journals but also other parts of the scholarly communication infrastructure. There are now over 50 preprint servers for the biomedical community, many of which-including the largest by monthly volume, Research Square-are owned or closely affiliated with for-profit publishers. By owning servers, publi...
ASAPbio September 2023 Community Call: Perspectives on preprint peer review models
มุมมอง 20211 หลายเดือนก่อน
At our September Community call, we discussed perspectives on preprint peer review models. Preprint peer review services have substantially increased in recent years. Each service operates in a different way, with some partnering with journals, some focussed on providing authors with reviews and some like a traditional journal. In January 2023, eLife became the first journal to shift it’s model...
Driving recognition of preprints in research assessment
มุมมอง 576ปีที่แล้ว
The recognition of preprints by publishers has been a significant step in preprints becoming common usage in the life sciences. In more recent years, funding bodies and hiring committees have implemented policies recognising preprints as valid research outputs and as evidence in grant or job applications. We will hear from Hannah Hope (Open research lead, Wellcome Trust) and Needhi Bhalla (Prof...
Introduction to Crowd Preprint Review
มุมมอง 180ปีที่แล้ว
On June 30, 2023, ASAPbio's Associate Director Jonny Coates presented an introduction to this year's 2023 crowd preprint review program.
Community preprint adoption in the social sciences: perspectives from PsyArXiv & SocArXiv
มุมมอง 277ปีที่แล้ว
Compared to other disciplines, biologists are preprint novices. For example, social scientists have been posting working papers to SSRN since 1994. But much has changed in the social sciences publishing landscape since that time, and a new wave of community preprint servers have launched over the last decade. In the May 2023 ASAPbio community call, we heard from preprint advocates in the social...
Does posting a preprint give away my copyright?
มุมมอง 44ปีที่แล้ว
Does posting a preprint give away my copyright?
Is there any quality control at preprint servers?
มุมมอง 61ปีที่แล้ว
Is there any quality control at preprint servers?
Preprints are not reviewed - can we trust them?
มุมมอง 62ปีที่แล้ว
Preprints are not reviewed - can we trust them?
Enhancing community participation & understanding of preprint review
มุมมอง 249ปีที่แล้ว
Enhancing community participation & understanding of preprint review
Alex Navarro's experience posting a Preprint in Progress
มุมมอง 91ปีที่แล้ว
Alex Navarro's experience posting a Preprint in Progress
ASAPbio competition: Make your negative result a preprint winner
มุมมอง 87ปีที่แล้ว
ASAPbio competition: Make your negative result a preprint winner
The impact of preprints for early career researchers
มุมมอง 1512 ปีที่แล้ว
The impact of preprints for early career researchers
Sónia Gomes Pereira's experience with preprints
มุมมอง 702 ปีที่แล้ว
Sónia Gomes Pereira's experience with preprints
Maria Sobczyk's experience with preprints
มุมมอง 342 ปีที่แล้ว
Maria Sobczyk's experience with preprints
This is GREAT
You gotta really work hard to avoid conspiracy theories when talking about this situation, makes me think maybe theres a conspiracy here...
Highly Insightful.
I think that while everyone could write everything about any topic, a brazen person could just as easily claim expertise on a subject and sprout nonsense. Now, other persons who are not experts on a topic would not know how well (if at all) the brazen person's claims should be taken. Assessment can be made easier by asking the question: what do other experts - your peers - think of your findings? I think that is the most important and underappreciated thing scientists can do. Vet each other for the general public. Self correction. On the other hand, when suddenly grand money appears and one has to explain to the tax payer or sponsors which persons got which grands that things really go downhill. That takes peer review to bureaucracy.
@ASAPbio: thank you for sharing this recording.
Thanks to Prof. Besancon for this work and for posting this!
We don't need journals anymore. A peer-reviewed pre-print is all we need.
【ｐｒｏｍｏｓｍ】
Very very nice Sharing my dear respected friend full support & Big Likes from Ahmed Ali Nizamani.......