Virginia Wickline
Virginia Wickline
  • 39
  • 169 324
The Eyes Don’t Have It: Masks Make it Very Hard to Read Emotion in Most Facial Expressions
Southeastern Psychological Association (SEPA) - Spring 2021
The Eyes Don’t Have It: Masks Make it Very Hard to Read Emotion in Most Facial Expressions
Key Words: Facial emotion recognition, mask-wearing attitudes, locus of control
มุมมอง: 124

วีดีโอ

Setting Your Critical Value (Step #2 of Hypothesis Testing)
มุมมอง 1293 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
SPSS: Skew and Kurtosis (Non-Normal Distributions) - 3 different ways
มุมมอง 25K4 ปีที่แล้ว
SPSS: Skew and Kurtosis (Non-Normal Distributions) - 3 different ways
SPSS Creating a dataset
มุมมอง 16K4 ปีที่แล้ว
SPSS Creating a dataset
Factorial ANOVA (Part 1): Factors, Levels, and Conditions
มุมมอง 8134 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
Factorial ANOVA (Part 2): Understanding Main and Interaction Effects
มุมมอง 4464 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
One-Way ANOVA - Within (Part II)
มุมมอง 994 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
One-Way ANOVA - Within (Part I)
มุมมอง 1624 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
Correlation (Part V): Reading a Correlation Matrix (Table)
มุมมอง 1644 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
Correlation (Part IV - Reading Scatterplots)
มุมมอง 3544 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
Regression - An Introduction
มุมมอง 1664 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
One-Way ANOVA - Between (Part 2): Effect Size, Post-Hoc Tests
มุมมอง 1844 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
One-Way ANOVA - Between (Part 1)
มุมมอง 1524 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
Research Designs & Internal Validity Threats
มุมมอง 2574 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
Correlations (Part 3): Correlation Types & Hypothesis Tests
มุมมอง 1884 ปีที่แล้ว
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
Correlation (Part 2): Assumptions & Cautions
มุมมอง 1834 ปีที่แล้ว
Correlation (Part 2): Assumptions & Cautions
Correlation (Part 1): Correlation Basics
มุมมอง 1954 ปีที่แล้ว
Correlation (Part 1): Correlation Basics
SPSS Correlation Analysis: Start to Finish
มุมมอง 5564 ปีที่แล้ว
SPSS Correlation Analysis: Start to Finish
Hypothesis Testing: Z-Score Example
มุมมอง 2955 ปีที่แล้ว
Hypothesis Testing: Z-Score Example
Graphs for Frequency Distributions (Bar, Histogram, etc.)
มุมมอง 2315 ปีที่แล้ว
Graphs for Frequency Distributions (Bar, Histogram, etc.)
Descriptives: Central Tendency, Variability, & Graphs
มุมมอง 1.2K5 ปีที่แล้ว
Descriptives: Central Tendency, Variability, & Graphs
My 3 Goals Popplet (Georgia Southern)
มุมมอง 2135 ปีที่แล้ว
My 3 Goals Popplet (Georgia Southern)
SPSS: 2 x 2 Factorial ANOVA
มุมมอง 2385 ปีที่แล้ว
SPSS: 2 x 2 Factorial ANOVA
SPSS: One-Way ANOVA (within)
มุมมอง 3765 ปีที่แล้ว
SPSS: One-Way ANOVA (within)
SPSS: One-way ANOVA (Between)
มุมมอง 5545 ปีที่แล้ว
SPSS: One-way ANOVA (Between)
SPSS: Correlation (Pearson, Spearman, scatterplots)
มุมมอง 78K5 ปีที่แล้ว
SPSS: Correlation (Pearson, Spearman, scatterplots)
SPSS: Transform - Compute a sum or average (scale or subscale score)
มุมมอง 6K5 ปีที่แล้ว
SPSS: Transform - Compute a sum or average (scale or subscale score)
SPSS: Cronbach's Alpha (internal consistency)
มุมมอง 5845 ปีที่แล้ว
SPSS: Cronbach's Alpha (internal consistency)
SPSS: Transform - Recoding (changing scale of measurement/reversing a score)
มุมมอง 1.7K5 ปีที่แล้ว
SPSS: Transform - Recoding (changing scale of measurement/reversing a score)
SPSS: Selecting cases, organizing by group, & split files
มุมมอง 8685 ปีที่แล้ว
SPSS: Selecting cases, organizing by group, & split files

ความคิดเห็น

  • @mohamedlahssaini
    @mohamedlahssaini 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much from Agadir town

  • @JaneMurphy-d4p
    @JaneMurphy-d4p 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Clearest educational video I have ever watched. Thank you!

  • @TammyMorton-em4po
    @TammyMorton-em4po 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video thank you!

  • @bethzirkle4943
    @bethzirkle4943 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very helpful!

  • @V_3707
    @V_3707 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is very helpful. Thank you so much. Is there any specific marker to check the distribution? Or is it just the histogram? How do we write that in the paper? Is it just by looking at the histogram?

  • @NhungLe-qm5yr
    @NhungLe-qm5yr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! The explanation is excellent!

    • @virginiawickline3419
      @virginiawickline3419 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the feedback. Glad it helped!

  • @nikenpaudel2726
    @nikenpaudel2726 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very informative video! I got a data (sample size more than 100) where the z value of skewness and kurtosis fits into the range of +3 and -3, which suggest the data is normal. But the kolmogorov smirnov test suggests the test is non normal. What inference or conclusion can be drawn from this? is the data normal or non normal?

  • @rosemarysoto2078
    @rosemarysoto2078 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How can I do a correlation with only data? I do not have any surveys

  • @rosemarysoto2078
    @rosemarysoto2078 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ?

  • @rosemarysoto2078
    @rosemarysoto2078 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Ronin, why did you have a bandaid on your arm?

  • @rosemarysoto2078
    @rosemarysoto2078 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is good but how do I know what data to enter. Do you know a statistician who could help me?

  • @ravencroftgraphics3d
    @ravencroftgraphics3d 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had to use spss previously, didn't like it. have to use it again... still don't like. no choice in the matter though. i have a Q regarding it as we will use qualtics to do a study, and spss for the data. which do you build the 'questions' for the qualtric questionnaire in? you listed the colors, can those colors in name under variable view be individual questions?

    • @peytonmagi9337
      @peytonmagi9337 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      SPSS is the fucked

  • @mrspaulsen1717
    @mrspaulsen1717 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks so much for leaving this information up-- you have a very nice presentation style. It was very helpful!

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My pleasure. Thanks for your kind words.

  • @shocolatf9275
    @shocolatf9275 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much ❤

  • @janellespira8736
    @janellespira8736 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am returning to SPSS after not having used it for years. This was so helpful to remind me how to use SPSS. Thank you!

  • @newzviewz17
    @newzviewz17 ปีที่แล้ว

    can u please share a link of data set you used in this video for practice? Thanks

    • @virginiawickline3419
      @virginiawickline3419 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sorry for the late reply and the need to say no. The dataset I use here is just for my class.

  • @Untouched77
    @Untouched77 ปีที่แล้ว

    what should i do if all my dots are clustered near the bottom? there's a lot of them so it just looks like a rectangle

  • @sneasnake6368
    @sneasnake6368 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for this video! I have a quick question: is it possible to do a spearman's rank correlation test with an ordinal variable (1-7 scale) and a nominal variable, for example age that have been sectioned into groups? If not, is there a way to see if there are any correlations between these two variables? Thanks again!

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi! My pleasure. Nominal variables should not be used with Spearman. If age has been chunked into 3 or more groups, it would be an ordinal variable as well and Spearman could be used. If age is just two groups, you would want an independent samples t-test or a point-biserial correlation.

  • @GabrielleErickson-c4o
    @GabrielleErickson-c4o ปีที่แล้ว

    This was extremely helpful, thank you! I'm a bit more optimistic about using SPSS now :)

  • @superpiggy001
    @superpiggy001 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for the informative video!!! Truly appreciated it 😍😍

  • @eslamhamada5157
    @eslamhamada5157 ปีที่แล้ว

    i have a test tomorrow and i came across your channel an hour ago and this is the best and simplest content explaining SPSS !!! your channel is really underrate thank you so much for this educational content keep going

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very cool! Glad I could help - hope your test went well!

  • @IFNp96
    @IFNp96 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much. I was having trouble deciding wether Pearson or Spearman were appropiate. I now know its Spearman.

  • @CYLUZBHS
    @CYLUZBHS ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you. Lucky students.

  • @doardia6150
    @doardia6150 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you! very helpful

  • @chantelleflynn9984
    @chantelleflynn9984 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much

  • @LM-bo4jc
    @LM-bo4jc ปีที่แล้ว

    This was extremely helpful, thank you so much!!!!

  • @ferretity
    @ferretity ปีที่แล้ว

    if there are a lot of cases clumped together, what kind of graph can we use to show correlation? I have a statistically significant correlation between household income and credit debt, however the scatter plot looks clumped together...?

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 ปีที่แล้ว

      Spearman would be more flexible and appropriate in this case - it can handle lumpy data better than Pearson

  • @imperator..
    @imperator.. ปีที่แล้ว

    WHY SHE TALKING MORE JUST SHOW AIM OF THE VIDEO AND OVER, FUK

  • @austinb3560
    @austinb3560 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tough subjects are great when you have a good teacher. I wish you were my bus. analytics professor. I hate that mf so much.

  • @greyngreyer5
    @greyngreyer5 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So what about ordinal data? Scale responses, agree-disagree? How do I make an "appropriate" graph for those? Do I just mark those as scale-type data? You confused me xD

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      From my understanding, statisticians disagree here. Some say it is OK to use a histogram for ordinal data (see, for example, sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/bs/bs704_summarizingdata/bs704_summarizingdata4.html#:~:text=When%20one%20is%20dealing%20with,categories%20have%20an%20inherent%20order). Others say you should not use a histogram for ordinal data and should use a bar chart or box-and-whisker plot instead (www.uni-bamberg.de/fileadmin/eng-ling/fs/Chapter_19/411Frequencydata.html).

    • @greyngreyer5
      @greyngreyer5 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@virginiawickline2609 You rock! Thanks a lot. Appreciate the sources too :)

  • @fadhilfp6
    @fadhilfp6 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot, Madam, for your lovely explanation. My question related to the normality: Can we run a normality test (Shapiro or k-s test) to make a decision rather than usage figures, because for beginners like me, I can not judge on the normality from figure or you must decided on figures. Thanks in advance

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My pleasure! Absolutely a normality test is appropriate. I run out of time to also teach this during my class (which is the primary audience for this video), but if I were doing it myself for research, I would rely on a K-S (Komolgorov-Smirnov) test myself.

    • @fadhilfp6
      @fadhilfp6 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Virginia Wickline So, if the normality is violated, then the spearmen coefficient is a suitable alternative for pearson to make the correlation or not mandatory

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fadhilfp6 If normality is violated, Spearman is more appropriate. For more, see: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/3730/pearsons-or-spearmans-correlation-with-non-normal-data

  • @katiekim2121
    @katiekim2121 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Thank you!!

  • @kirtideswal3921
    @kirtideswal3921 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanku very much mam.. I have a question that how we interpreted it in our article. Can you suggest me any Article in which transformed data is shown

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I apologize for missing your comment. I do not have an article on hand to suggest. Sorry!

    • @kirtideswal3921
      @kirtideswal3921 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@virginiawickline2609 ok.. Thanku very much mam for your reply

  • @golamrabbani2077
    @golamrabbani2077 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mam,Can I get this data sheet what have you used?

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Golam, with regrets, no. The dataset is used in my classes and is kept private since they helped fill out the items.

  • @alimoradi7906
    @alimoradi7906 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is so much perfect

  • @cococnk388
    @cococnk388 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stats is so interesitingggggg

  • @Thekra-es3dp
    @Thekra-es3dp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much.

  • @dopeee1534
    @dopeee1534 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi virginia, thanks for your videos, it really helps me, but can you do the example with less data like 3-5 data, but a lot of respect from indonesia🇮🇩

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Dopeee, thanks for checking out my videos. I appreciate your comment and need to kindly decline. My videos are primarily designed for students in my class with the dataset we use, so I need to keep the variables shown to help them.

  • @sandrastojanovska
    @sandrastojanovska 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You helped me a lot. Thank you.

  • @johncassidy1600
    @johncassidy1600 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this! Extremely clearly explained (revisiting SPSS for first time in 20 years!)

  • @tyler2798
    @tyler2798 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Most helpful SPSS guide I've ever watched. So straightforward and explanatory on all the points I usually get confused on.

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the feedback, Tyler! Happy to be of service.

  • @umbertocalleri5560
    @umbertocalleri5560 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi! What is the best way to plot a spearman correlation so that we clearly see the information that it is giving? I think it's not useful to plot a regression line as it depends on outliers, while the spearman correlation doesn't.

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi! I sometimes still plot a regression line or a Loess curve to see where the data change directions. I am open to options/suggestions from other viewers!

  • @SarkarSAziz
    @SarkarSAziz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankyou so much

  • @seokseok9683
    @seokseok9683 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for this!

  • @phd.eriolamariuscharlotade5634
    @phd.eriolamariuscharlotade5634 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ı have tried all the transformation but still, it did not fixed the positive skew matter. what should we do?? please guide me

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmm...have you also considered removing outliers (high Cook's D value) or cases with high leverage?

    • @phd.eriolamariuscharlotade5634
      @phd.eriolamariuscharlotade5634 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@virginiawickline2609 is it normal to remove it. I am about to consider this variable as dependent one. It was behaving like poisson but with this behavior it doesn't respect poisson assumption either.

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@phd.eriolamariuscharlotade5634 Hi! You are reaching the limits of my knowledge. However, it is fairly common to remove cases with high Cook's D values so you are removing the influence of outliers. See, for example: towardsdatascience.com/identifying-outliers-in-linear-regression-cooks-distance-9e212e9136a

  • @juanjo_sound
    @juanjo_sound 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    super helpful

  • @stephshani9067
    @stephshani9067 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The video cut off before you were able to finish.

    • @virginiawickline2609
      @virginiawickline2609 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oops - sorry! Thanks for the feedback! This segment covers making a continuous (ratio) variable into two chunks (nominal). I will work on shooting a new video very soon for reverse scoring.

  • @virginiawickline2609
    @virginiawickline2609 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    NOTE: This video was made before SPSS started calculating effect size (Cohen's d). If you run effect size, use the "point estimate" to determine if the effect is small (.20), medium (.50), or large (>.80). Use the absolute value for Cohen's d (no negative sign).

  • @fayyazahmed3467
    @fayyazahmed3467 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent 👌 Mam