วีดีโอ

Your average pagan is "living in the gospel" more than Scott Hahn....🙄 True Catholic objectivity is what's missing from culture and society.

The world doesn't want to binge watch a show about repentance from sin, truer words were never spoken! And the world for the most part DON'T want to repent. St this point who's the bigger heretic, Dallas Jenkins or Scott Hahn? 🤔 The gospel according to Dallas Jenkins is the gospel of men....

St. Peter and St. Andrew, his brother were following St. John the Baptist when first called by Jesus in the Gospel According to St. John. You're right about EVERYTHING in a movie being purposeful. That there is only ONE way to follow Jesus is the most unpopular conceptions in today's culture and society.

Thank you for the gift of a channel I don't have to cringe through! 🫡 I identify as a Traditional Catholic, ie, Sedevacantist! 👍 Let me take a crack at the novus ordo "creed"; we believe in every heresy taught, but do not implicitly endorse them. 🙄

Thanks to the second Vatican Council, we are living in the modern day equivalent of arian heresy. 🙄 There's theological gold to be mined here, for those with the humility and the COURAGE to face their preconceived notions. For information on the infiltration of the Catholic Church, I recommend "The Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked, by Monsignor George F. Dillion. The church of the novus ordo is freemasonry pure and simple. 🙄

In my reading of Church history, heretics don't care about the inherent contradictions of their "doctrine". In other words, heretics gonna heretic. What Catholic Faith is more than aesthetics??!! I'm shocked sir! 🧐😉😏

Penn and Teller did the same trick at the 44 minute mark on a cable special back in the nineties. 🙄 These people fool the incredulous into disbelief in the One True God. Gee if you can't trust a fake "magician" who can you trust?

The opening premise would be correct, if the Dimond brothers ACTUALLY were Catholic. 🙄😬😂 The Dimond brothers NOT researching a topic BEFORE putting out a TH-cam video? Color me shocked.... The Dimond brothers prey on ignorant people who think that they are Catholic. What bothers me is many false Catholics make more effort to defend and make excuses for actual heretics than defending and supporting actual Catholics who call them out.

A question for the channel owner, have you muted me? If so please let me know.

The pictures are devastating

Im churchmmilitant67 and I approve this message and channel! Finally some sanity on this God forsaken platform! 🫡👍

For people who care about the integrity of the Catholic Church, can you honestly look at the pachama blasphemy and still support Vatican II? 🤔🧐

Interesting side note: Bishop Sanborn's "thesis" video is under private. You can't watch it unless he approves you. 🤔 The irony is that Bishop Sanborn left the SSPX, because it supported Vatican II, and 40 years later he's doing it covertly.

Or as I have said ad nauseam, the "thesis" is R&R through the back door....🙄 Bishop Sanborn's "thesis" makes a mockery of the Sedevacantist theological position and brings scorn and ridicule upon Sedevacantists.

As for me I accuse Mr. Bregolio of blasphemy in regards to pachama. Signed a proud Sedevacantist.

Pretty sure anyone can baptize if they say proper form. If an atheist can...

An "Experiment" of the Devil, indeed. Intentionally designed to destroy the Religious Life! And so, more ABHORRENT CORRUPTION from Hell was channeled through the hierarchy of the Church. How can anyone not see this was a purposeful attack by the Enemy which fosterd Rebellion, Dissolution, Division, and Sin!? EWTN' s Foundress, Mother Angelica saw this Modernization and opposed it, leading the Faithful to Our Lord Jesus Christ in a loving, strong, unequivocal, manner, by way of the Traditional Catholicism of the Saints and the Magisterium. 👑✝️🕊️🙏💖

Masterful survey, what an assembly of specific details.

it is helpful for me or for all

Fascinating parallels! Thank you for posting this video.

I liked the show a lot initially and even encouraged others to watch it. I was uncomfortable with a few things but shoved them into the back of my mind or couldn’t quite put my finger on what exactly the issue was. Thank you for clearly laying out the issues with this show! I now have the ammunition to correct my previous mistake in supporting this show.

The formal material thesis is a great confusion! In time of interregnum there is completely no pope materially or formally. Nervetheless the papacy is still existing in POTENCY in the Church! When there is a reigning pope, the papacy is existing in ACT in the CHurch. The philosophical terms POTENCY and ACT, not the notion of formal and material pope, are keys to explain the current crisis of the Church.

As an ordinary lay woman, I find it very unsettling to hear clergy, priests and bishops, especially, fighting amongst themselves, calling one another cruel names, mocking those who hold other positions. Bp. Sanborn, a “thesis salesman?” It doesn’t matter which, if neither be correct. Disdain of one bishop for another in the hearing of the laity makes them feel like children whose parents are fighting. To bind the consciences of the faithful under pain of mortal sin, to make a choice that necessarily excludes the other, to demand the laity who are just trying to save their souls to be theologians, and to bar them from the Sacraments for failing in making such a final decision, is just plain wrong.

Pope Pius XII and the Sacred Congregation of Rites did NOT change the liturgy itself, they only changed the timing which did not invalidate the liturgy. This is stipulated in the decree at the beginning of the Holy Week Manual for Priests which binds anyone and everyone to follow this manual under the fear of anathema. The Holy Week Manual for Priests is by far an interesting read, the book gives instruction on what is to be done and how to follow the liturgy.

God answer my prayers, thank you for creating these videos, in this days is so hard for young’s to understand the word of God. Is well explained and understand. God bless you.

My Lord and My God🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 Are Traditional Masses said in English ? I don’t understand Latin.

Next Chris Angel etc levitating 🕴 let’s get somebody to find the crane 🏗 nearby on video

A layman critiquing a theologian who worked under Pius XII. Nice try.

In french the first Q/A: th-cam.com/video/4Z8wNwKBs-Y/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=Lecturescatholiques

Thank you for your work. I've been struggling to "settle" for a position for over 2 years now since, as a Novus Ordite, i decided to stop being nominal and get to know and practice the "faith". Although i'm still somewhat troubled, i appreciate how your videos have helped me to attain some clarity. Finally, i wanted to mention that it was your video of last year's beautiful Rosary procession at Mount Saint Michael what made me reconsiderate Roman Catholicism altogether after having comformed for Eastern Orthodoxy and even actively seeking to become a part of it for almost a year at that moment

Thank you for this

In french the second Q/A: th-cam.com/video/pVhMKg9WA60/w-d-xo.html&lc=Ugw5e128YI6xkgTWi2N4AaABAg

The novus ordo is not Catholicism

Is the CMRI actively trying to unify the other sedevacantists and form a conclave?

Absolutely phenomenal piece, can't praise it enough.

It's sad that the Nuns who accepted their breach of love for God and follow the changes are the very ones who destroyed their Religious Orders. The changes were disasterous, St. John Paul ll condemned, "Change for the mere sake of change, " He called for the "Reform of the reforms."

So wicked. To think that women consecrated to God went down such a wicked and perverse path, especially the immorality and corruption of others.

The thing that killed this show for me was THAT DEATH season 4. The true Jesus of the Bible when he learned his friend was dying went to him. Traveled a great distance and raised him from the dead. This show presents Jesus as a selfish powerless jerk, who chose NOT to raise one of his followers from the dead. But then goes to raise up his own buddy.

Thesis salesman is disrespectful. It's your excellency.

Totally awesome guys! Great podcast!

I thought the calendar went back twelve or thirteen days, which is why the Greeks have Christmas on our January 7, even though they call it December 25 on their Julian calendar.

My kids struggle with following with the missal so I am very grateful to have this video. Thank you!

Note sent to his Excellency on September 4th, 2024. No acknowledgement or reply as of yet. He is an exceedingly busy man. Your Excellency, below are some thoughts I’ve shared with a fellow Catholic who is producing a video in opposition to the Thesis. You may not have considered them. I’m sharing them that you might see the Thesis through another lens. This is all in the interest of unity in truth as novelty is never unifying for Catholics. In focusing on how and why something is sustainable, sometimes one overlooks why it is not. We all talk about the bad fruit of Vatican II. The bad fruit of Vatican II came from the Modernist & FreeMasonic hierarchy. How can we expect good fruit from a Bad tree? It's not God's ways. Our Lord told us a bad tree cannot give good fruit. Thus, the notion that the poisonous tree will give us a Catholic Pope is contrary to the words of Christ. Also, in rejecting Christ's doctrine and legitimizing the doctrines of demons, the Novus Ordo Institution has cut itself off of the vine. Unconnected to the vine it can do nothing of merit. The production of a true Pope would be of tremendous merit. So that too is incompatible with the teachings of Christ. Finally, the Catholic Church possesses the Marks and Attributes of the Church always, with continuity over time. The Virgin Bride the Lord will marry in Revelation 19 will be dressed in white a reflection of her faithfulness to the Groom. Here too, I'm proud to be a totalist. Mustn't our Holy Mother the Church also be a totalist when it comes to faithfulness? Saint Paul tells us in Ephesians 5, that our Lord will present her to himself himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy, and without blemish. If all of a sudden the apostate institution produced a Catholic that the Apostate institution claimed as the Pope, how would that institution then become indefectible/ever-faithful from the inception? It can't. Note on Ephesians 5: [24] "Church is subject to Christ": The church then, according to St. Paul, is ever obedient to Christ, and can never fall from him, but remain faithful to him, unspotted and unchanged to the end of the world. DELETED PARAGRAPH Our Lord's Bride must be ever faithful, for what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness? what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? 2 Corinthians 6: 15. Belial will not be His bride! This is deductive logic by analogy, but it may help describe why the thesis is so appalling to Catholics who believe in the Church as the Indefectible ever-faithful Bride of Christ. To call the Vatican II Institution the HRCC is also to call it the Bride of Christ. Whichever of these nouns one might use, to make that claim is a BLASPHEMY against: 1. Christ, who promised to send the Holy Ghost to Guide her in all truth forever, 2. the Holy Ghost who would have failed to succeed in the purpose for which Christ sent the Holy Ghost; and 3. our Lord's ever-faithful Bride herself. To think the papacy will be filled by the Harlot just really galls the Catholic who believes all that the Church has taught about herself, including that She is the Pillar & Ground of Truth. That in no way describes the Harlot. This is the continuity problem. All of these qualities are meaningless if they are not ever-present. Thus, to promote the Thesis is to Blaspheme God and the Church. It's simply despicable. Again, for what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness? 15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever? The Harlot cannot become the Bride. They are separate and distinct for after the Harlot is judged and destroyed, then the marriage takes place. The Harlot and Bride are never the same thing.

Don’t you just love Bishop Sanborn’s HUGE ASSUMPTION GIMME: Validly elected!?!? The 1958 conclave followed the suspicious deaths of Pope Pius XII, Chancellor of the HRCC, Celso Costantini, and cardinal Mooney in the span of 15 days, was memorable in black smoke following white smoke TWICE (that ain’t how it works), all the while Communist Russia and FreeMason controlled US (who already nuked the two most Catholic cities in Japan) are conducting unprecedented nuclear testing which stops immediately after John XXIII steps out on the balcony, but the AntiCatholic/Communistic/Occultist/Modernist-Freemason immediately installs 23 AntiCatholic Modernist “Cardinals”!!! But the Thesis promoter ASSUMES valid elections. You know what is said about that word. The one who does makes an Ass-U-Mee. Not to worry, surely one day these Anti-Catholics who have purged Catholicism from the worldwide Diocessan Freemasonry-Modernism reeducation network, will produce a Catholic Pope! 😂 😂 😂. YOU CAN’T MAKE IT UP!

The Catholic Church is: Indefectible and ever-faithful (see Ephesians 5: 23-27); The Pillar & Ground of truth (1 Timothy 3: 15); The Bride of Christ, who, after the Harlot (puppet) of Babylon (Judaic Puppet Master) of Revelation 17, is judged and then destroyed (Revelation 18), marries Christ, the Bride Groom in Revelation 19. The Vatican II Catholicism elimination institution of the Vatican II Freemasonic, communistic, occultist, modernistic AntiCatholic papal claimants have something in common with a pregnant woman (excepting only our Blessed Mother) neither is or can forever become a virgin. Our Lord doesn’t marry the harlot. The Vatican II Antichurch has not been faithful to Christ and will not be His Bride. But yet Bishop Sanborn claims the Harlot can someday produce a true Vicar of Christ! Amazing!!

Somehow a series of invalid AntiCatholic false Cardinals who were nominated by anticatholic papal claimants and who taught a false contradictory religion have power to elect the next anticatholic false pope in a sham election, rinse and repeat and then someday if these anticatholics who have waged war against Catholicism screw up and elect a Catholic posing as a modernist somehow this guy becomes pope. Never mind that all of these guys are modernists, communists, and Freemasons who use murder, intimidation, etc. in these conclaves, somehow these guys could actually produce validly and legally their opposite and their enemy. It is so absurd it’s laughable. Bishop Sanborn is an intelligent man but how he can actually believe this and convince bright seminarians is astounding!!! What a crock!

I wan to know: (I) the identity of the one speaking; (ii) if the one speaking reading from something that has been writing by someone else; (iii) how can I get citations supporting what is being said. I’m asking because the Thesis is written and I’m familiar with the response of the SSPX to the Thesis, but I’m wondering if there are responses from the Sedevcantists know as Totallists.

Bishop Sanborn is repeating the continued error of ignoring Divine Law’s authority over Canon Law as the LeFevbreists have done. A heretic (and apostate) cannot be members of the Holy Roman Catholic Church. The thesis is legitimizing the illegitimate, and endorsing contradiction.

@catholiccrusaderfilms3974 1. Please can you share link to video referenced in 30:00 mark? 2. Your arguments are very sound. You erred in saying Cum Ex Apostolatus is still in force. It's not. See Fr Dutertre's accurate explanation in his work on the heretical pope.

The thesis is a means of justifying the Sede clergy. It is an active cope and grasp at ecclesiastical normalcy. And it's effect is to rarefy the faith for the laity. The thesis' main flaw is it would take a valid pope to promulgate it, if true. No one has the authority to insist we accept it. And, though I understand it fairly well, I do not see how it adds anything to my faith, and confounds it at times.