วีดีโอ

I just draw a line and put numbers on it. Dunno what you're doing.

Yeah! Maths.

🙏🙏🙏

You are spewing nonsense lol. You clearly have 0 mathematical backgroud and the fact that you're arguing in the comments with so much confidence and even more nonsense, and keep posting more videos like that has led me to write this comment. You sound like this..."Since 1 plus 8 is equal to 72 and a triangle is 4 sides and 5 cats, therefore the moon is flat and has 5 earths". And I disagree with @thomass6988; you shouldn't read a set theory textbook, instead you should start with highschool math and go from there, good luck ;)

Crap, non-science and madness. Never trust bs from In2Infinity.

{0} is not empty.

secret geometry? th-cam.com/video/YthmnzRF8uQ/w-d-xo.html

Nice one!

The funniest part is getting aleph_0 and aleph_1 the wrong way around, it just demonstrates so clearly that not even the tiniest amount of research or thought has gone into this

Why was this video even made? Like, only math people are going to watch it, and math people are the only people that will know that it's false lol

There are NOT necessary an infinite number of solutions to any problem.

STOP MAKING THESE VIDEO's. THEY ARE ALL BULLSHIT!

When you in the end speaks about "solving infinity" in one isolated sentence, it puts the millionth nail in the coffin of meaningless nonsense. Why are you doing these ridiculous video's? Are you mentally ill?

This has nothing to do with real math. I can see you have made other bs videos on math an physics. Delete them all so that you don't confuse people who are not mathematicians.

This video is complete nonsense.

I'm MSc mathematics, and I can assure everyone, that the content of this video is absolute bs. Don't waste your time on this one.

Please check the proof of Riemann hypothesis at: th-cam.com/video/-gnH5MrBA5M/w-d-xo.html

Please do more videos like these, this is just hillarious😂😂😂. You should talk to terrence howard, possibly collaborate with him and make some more hillarious content like this so that all of the mathematicians out there can have a good laugh. 😂😂

Haha, this reminds me of a Tim and Eric sketch!

Was für ein Spinner?!

Honest question - have you actually ever picked up and worked through any maths textbook? I'd be interested to know which one(s).

Props for leaving the comments on though

PhD student TheMathYam shredded this "proof" in brutal fashion.

Casually interchanging convergence and divergence

I know most of the views on these videos are people with some level of maths understanding hatewatching this or enjoying the parody, but if this is your first introduction to RusselL's paradox please go and read about it somewhere else e.g. the wikipedia page. What this person is describing has nothing to do with Russell's paradox. 10/10 bit though

Just in case anyone doesn’t realise, this is COMPLETE BS and should be reported as “misinformation” This is not “actual maths”, as worked out over centuries, it’s meaningless quackery made up by a guy smoking something. Why on earth make up fake maths? It’s laughably childish how 8 is related to the infinity symbol!🤣 And what on earth are you meant to do with the “number plane” if you multiply more than 2 numbers together - it makes absolutely no sense. 🫠 (No need to answer, from your responses to others I know you’ll only say more gibberish)

Complete gibberish like all the other “math” videos. Why deliberately misinform? Why not be a more decent person?

THIS IS COMPLETE SCAM. This video doesn’t even relate to “Russel’s Paradox”, which is about sets containing other sets and nothing to do with number lines or hexagons, or folding a bit of paper and saying “yeh” a lot. Nothing in this is a mathematical proof of anything. (a paradox can’t even be proven.. 🙄) Why be such a charlatan and why in maths, which is literally about proof and where nothing you say makes any sense. Why deliberately misinform?? I was originally hoping this was some kind of prank/troll, sadly not.. maybe turn it into one.

It’s funny how they cite relativity but then assert people at different latitudes experience the same time. They do not.

facts

You have solved a separate problem, a problem you have made up entirely. Something about your self-invented "density" of a set. Can you explain exactly what you think the continuum hypothesis is?

I wouldve blabbered something like this before stepping to A-levels

this channel is worst than a satire or misinformation, it is a sect...

There are four days in every day, how does a cube relate to π? Looking at the globe, you can see there is a noon, a midnight, a sunrise and a sunset. Each point goes past each part of the Earth, making four complete days in each day. The volume of a cube is s³, but the volume of a sphere is only 4/3πr³. Since the cube is inscribed inside the globe, r= (√3/2)s making π completely irrelevant as you move towards the poles.

Embarrassing

Do something valuable with your lives instead, you scammers

Stop taking drugs

Infinite pattern? Which infinity? I was told somewhere that the are 8 of them! LOL LOL LOL LOL

You guys like money. Scam artist you are!

Wait! What? The speed of sound in a vacuum is ????????

PhD of crankery and woo-woo math.

This video is utterly disappointing. You make huge mistakes literally every 5 seconds or say things that make no sense (like density of Infinity). It is obvious that you have no sufficient mathematical education and still you think you solved a centuy old problem like a toddler thinks that that he invented burping on command. You are a disgrace to science

This is just a convoluted proof that n(n+1)/2 + n(n-1)/2 = n²

I'm pretty sure this is satire. I know unconventional or controversial opinions can be correct, but this is not an opinion. It's just the right sounding words glued together with confusion. Of course, it might be that this guy is an advanced AI. They too have a tendancy to throw the good sounding words at you and see what happens, as is the nature of such linear regression.

Awe, yes, the famous 8 infinities of 5 arbitrary limits using a random function you found on your calculator. Beautiful

No

"I won't explain how it relates to primes ... because I'm not quite sure what the word means..."

😂 🤡

Draw some cirles, well you have a proof! How easy life can be sometimes.

Why do you have to add all those fractions ? For each number N on the left you could just write (N+1)/2 on the right. You obtain the same function. So basically you solved the continuum hypothesis by showing that f(n)=(n+1)/2 is a bijection from the natural number to a subset of tge rational numbers (which we know they both have aleph0 cardinality, anyway). Brilliant ! I will make a t-ahirt with (n+1)/2. I cannot belive noone though of this before. You are biggest the genius of our era ! Congrats ! What if you woud just consider f(n)=n/2 ? It is basically the same thing. So you just proove you can divide by 2. What if you take f(n)=n/4 ? Will you discover aleph 0.25 ? And so on ... Cool. Acording to some other video of yours related to limits, if f(n) = limit by d->infinity of n/d you will discover not aleph 0 but some aleph something (i cannot remember how you called those "8 infinities"). Super !