วีดีโอ

Ohio class are extremely capable. Instead of decommissioning they should be turned into cruise missile platforms with special ops platforms.

Imagine the money used to help people who need help like the homeless

Surviving a nuclear war. Right. Do you even understand what you are talking about?

Man is you thinking the time as well as cost to produce how many tomahawk do you think you can produce in a year you need continuous shooting that big guns can do and 5" guns don't shoot far enough if you want fire gun support re-up the Zumwalt with it's 920 6" rounds produce 32 × 920=29440 155mm rounds that shoot 63 miles and about 4 new battleships with 1000 16" 2700ib rounds that shoot at 24 miles the time to produce and cost shouldn't be a problem plus it can give a lot of Americans some good paying jobs so not only the few can be getting rich for giving America very little

Telling all that is helping the enemy. Stop him.

SSBN-826 District of Columbia!!! Next Protector of the Seas

Why just 16 missiles? The Ohio has 24. 🤷‍♂️

* not defense, offense

blame russia

Thanks for looking into the data! I thought that was a nice touch.

The Columbia Class will not just be the next Ballistic Missile Submarine. It will also be the basis for America's next attack submarine aka SSN(X). This will have a 13m diameter hull, electric drive and displace about 10,000 tons, which is exactly a Columbia without the 70m missile section and the SLBM hump.

Let me put it simply for you guys... (1) You cannot have affordable shipbuilding (or any kind of building) with a DE-INDUSTRIALIZED AMERICA. (2) The de-industrialization of America (or any affluent country for that matter) is INEVITABLE with FREE TRADE. (3) So, you are going to have to decide -- do you want free trade or do you want a powerful nation and everything else.

National Offence Budget to be precise

Good entertainment but not exactly a West point graduate production. Lets just all hope for peace.

That's ridiculous 14 billion dollars that's BS half of that is going into politicians pockets we can build a Ford class aircraft carrier for less

Electric drive… woawww. That’s not like the French nuclear submarines have been using it for 40 years and that all conventional subs around the world use it…. So new… Same goes for the C shaped rudder, or X shaped plus pump jet in the case of the French..

Seems like the US Navy watched this video and decided to bring back some battleships

I like the beard.

Thanks bro I enjoy this vid . Yes, hopefully these nukes will never have to be launched !!!! Go US Navy!!!👍👍👍🇺🇸

We need an update on this video now

Your introduction is long-winded, contentious and tendentious.

The new motto of the .mighty United States Navy Submarine Force: "Attack to be recognized "

Skip to 3:00

Who's watching this 2024

What was the navy thinking having an OSPREY hovering above a multi $billion dollar Ohio Class Sub.

It’s refreshing to just get the facts without any political propaganda.😊

9:44 Full lie and absolute propaganda The US does give a Shit about Civilians

Neutron bomba

IDK why people even mention the Typhoon class, there are less than four I believe and how many are even deployed? Russian build quality is legendarily bad.

AMERICAN 🇺🇸 CAN NOT GROUND INVADE IRAN 🇮🇷 BECAUSE IRANIANS ARE MORE ORGANIZED THAN IRAQ 🇮🇶 AND AFGHANISTAN

HERE IS WHY I DIDN’T WANT NOBODY IN MY FAMILIES TO JOIN THE SERVICE… CUZ OF UNNECESSARY WAR LIKE IRAQ 🇮🇶 AND AFGHANISTAN 🇦🇫 AND ALL BASE ON LIES AND PROPAGANDA

Iran people love American it’s just the government has a stranglehold on the people

Ur wrong Iran people are waiting for USA to come save them I think the army would give up and surrender talking as an Iranian

Hope not its our governments faults and either countries populations faults .

Well maybe if Congress hadn’t tried to kill all the sub building capability in the 90s, we wouldn’t have these problems. Oh! But there was the non existent peace dividend.

The US will not invade Iran as Iran now has the capability to assemble many nukes in a short time. And Russia and China will not allow US to do what they want as Iran is technologically advaced. We have no worry. The US has no financial capability to go to war any good adversary like Iran.

Are you taking the worst case perspective?

I think both China and Russia want the Americans in a war with Iran. They know we can't toil in their neighborhood if we're locked down in the desert. China stands to gain the most. With their birth/death rate problems, we need to stay unshackled from major wars for at least another decade. By then, hopefully, they won't have the work force / military population like they do right now. China is the key, hell with everyone else, unless they outright attack us. We need to stock up and build our military.

mga tanga ang USA winawasak lang ang bansa kung umatras man sila giba giba na ang kalaban

It's a movie about this I watched back in 2018, you don't actually see the war but in the movie it shows on the news how the US had invaded and the US was about to capture Tehran then Russia dropped tactical nukes on U.S. positions then it started a nuclear war and in the end the main character went to sleep in a machine and woke up years later to a nuclear earth, can't remember the movie name but if anybody remember please tell me

Talking. Pts

National draft would cause a civil war inside the USA. America is tired of dying for Israel and international corporate profits. "Treason is trading American blood for foreign oil. No more American graveyards on far off foreign soil."

Iranian coastal defense artillery are legion. The moment we lose a ship, the American people will demand a cease fire. The USA will then a execute a false flag on US soil to rally the people.

12:35 sinking a carrier would cause Americans to consider a nuclear response! It’s that simple! We don’t de escalate, we destroy! Great video!😊

Good video

Rubbish.. US can never beat Iran. This video is just unrealistic video and a propaganda by another American..

IRAN 🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷

I addressed NGS in my February 1988 article "Naval Gunfire Support: What We Need to Understand," Field Artillery Magazine. It addressed then current U.S. and Soviet systems. Following GW1 the battleships went away as did any remaining "gun" destroyers / cruisers leaving the gap we have today. One consideration your videos (which I enjoyed) didn't reflect on was the capability for "area" saturation, something the Army now accomplishes with conventional 155 mm fire. Not all targets fit the criteria for precision fire. Even if they did it is problematic that a 5" round could destroy a T-80 and even less so for a hardened bunker. The 5" (127 mm) is in the same class as the Abrams 120 mm or Russian 125 mm and not all of their shots are kills. Another thought to meet the Marines' requirements was the Extended Range round. ---The HE-ER Mark 148 (Planned) 13.65 in (34.7 cm) diameter, extended-range (ER), sub-caliber cargo projectile with sabot was considered. Fired from a 16" barrels this projectile was to be ET-fuzed with a payload of about 300 M46 grenade sub-munitions. Experiments with this projectile were conducted during the 1980s, but development was cancelled in FY91 when the battleships were decommissioned. Projected range was to be in excess of 70,000 yards (64,000 m) at a muzzle velocity of 3,600 fps (1,097 mps). ---I have always thought the system with the most potential was the cancelled Major Caliber Lightweight Gun (MCLWG) program. This was the 8"/55 caliber Mark 71 major caliber lightweight, single-barrel naval gun prototype was mounted aboard the destroyer USS Hull in 1975 to test the capability of destroyer-sized ships to replace decommissioned cruisers for long-range shore bombardment. The Navy cited a number of reasons including accuracy problems for the Mark 71, however, new technology could do a lot with a 8"/203 mm round. It is large enough to house a lot of the new hyper velocity or ER technology, is a very good option for both precision and saturation fire support, and the ER extension could range as far as 70 km. As a final note, I think that in some ways the Navy is overthinking NGS. What the Marines need is a "gun" system that doesn't fire an $86,000 projectile but something much simpler, more cost effective yet much more effective than a 5" weapon. The 8" as a new "high tech" model might just be a solution worth resurrecting.

I don't believe we Americans lack the manufacturing capacity to complete all the missile tubes. However, we actually don't need nearly so many missile tubes; though they're a sound part of an oceanic war system. But realistically, how often are we as an American Navy going to sink an enemy warship or detonate a powerful missile on an enemy coast? Perhaps with some frequency depending on contingencies, but not so often we need so many tubes. It's better to fire three defense system evasive smart water missiles at a time rather than fifteen missiles with a trajectory; This would be a detail except that you complain of a manufacturing problem with the the tubes. Four missiles tubes per Columbia Class War Submarine will be quite acceptable. Moreover, we don't need to be constantly firing small missiles with small detonations, a great mass of petty missiles and petty warfare. Driven to warfare, we should sink an enemy battleship with shock and awe: a nuclear harpoon; for more serious warfare, hit the enemy coastline with a water hydrogen nuclear missile. They will soon stop their small bullyings; and understand that we know the science of war and we mean business like the Death Star.

you should do an updated one. thnx