วีดีโอ

Yes I really like it because it helps me improve my English thanks

Do you recommend creative feature for paraphrasing a research paper?

Cool!

To anyone who might come across this comment. My name is Nella from South Africa. I just started my journey into UXR. If there is anyone who can be my mentor or guide me through the process please let me know. Any tips or advice on courses to take please come through. Thanks.

Take home message: 1. situate your work and be clear of your study motivation and context 2. writing with consistency and accessible (plain) language 3. reading the best papers from CHI is a good practice 4. give reviewers good reasons for liking your work 5. in your abstract, signify the most important contribution (not findings), and why it matters to the community 6. research-community fit (a concept inspired by product-market fit) - is it for CHI? Contextualise it with a people-focus perspective 7. creating a motivating writing environment and prepare for long writing sessions when the deadline draws close.

Good morning!!

I just started using Scholar. The content produced from the prompt is very nice, but the citations it gives are sketchy. There are lots of links to main sites and page 404s. There is a high number of incorrect returned citations. This is puzzling for a research tool with an advertized 200M doc DB.

Thanks for the video. Do I need to pay a subscriptiojnifni have ChatGPT plus account? Thanks!

Thank you Lennart for this! Pretty enjoying all the projects that we are doing together! Looking forward to new ones!

Thank you 🙏

For one of the E’s last E my hs teacher says i have to mention a literary device and she’s always telling me i’m wrong but won’t show me how to do it correctly. How can one apply a literary devices state it’s effects in a correct way?

Hi Professor Lennart, thank you for this detailed video, very well explained! Would like to seek your opinion, is there any gamification framework that fits well with customer/user engagement? Many thanks!

Good content! Please what is is your view on writing review article do you think is still worth when there is alot of AI that can summarize and sometimes provide good critic. And what is your view on writing review article in the future? Thanks

🤖 Cut your stress in half with AI research tools. Learn how here: learn.lennartnacke.com/tc-oosz9-aiwebinar/ Use code LENNART30 to get Consensus 30% off: go.lennartnacke.com/consensus

As always, it's perfect! Thanks so much for sharing your insights with us.

Very detailed and useful tutorial! Thank you!

Excellent tutorial, Lennart. Consensus is one of my favourites too. They consistently add new features and it is getting even better.

Nice writing structure and explanation here, Lennart

Nice tutorial, as usual 👍

Great tutorial, Lennart ✌

Thanks but I will use Undetectable AI instead of this

👍👍👍

Hi Professor, I was looking for something amazing, just like what you've shared. Thank you for posting such great content. I'm really excited to learn more from you. Thanks, Sam

Hey Lennart, just wanted to drop a quick comment to express my appreciation for the content you share... Your expertise in UX is truly remarkable, and it aligns perfectly with my interests. Keep up the great work!"

I have a History paper today and one of the questions they are gonna have me do is to write 2 -3 pages long History essay and my teacher requested I do the PEEL method, thank you for explaining

thank you..looking forward to more learning

Thanks for this.

I've started to use the Undetectable AI to make my essays and its really a great tool for students

Fantastic summary …Thanks Prof. Nacke!

Advocacy is a process creating awareness.

I have to say, as a Digital Designer who ahs been a working corporate deisnger for over 30 years, there is much wrong with this interview. I do appreciate the effort and information. However talking about how to pursue a career in design requires a significant amount of diverse experience to fully address. Without getting into specific, I would encouge viewers to seek out other videos on the topic to supplemtn the information in this one. I will give you one example: question was how do you ensure you arent being asked to real work during a design challenge. Answer was: If the topic of the challenge is very close to the company's product, it should be avoided. Wrong. The answer is, you don't know. You have to decide if you want to do the challenge amid the risks vs bowing out. One tiip is to not be so arrogant to think that your work during an interview will be used for production - it likely won't. Most design challenges are legit, regardless of what is being aksed. Finally, it would be heplful if the host could get their audio issues sorted out to ensure clear consistent audio from all sounces used in the video.

🖖🏻 It's good ​

Excellent explanation of how to do this

Wow I didn't even know reference managers existed this is one of my most challenging parts of research.... Keeping track of what info I got from which research papers. Thank you for all these tips will check out your other videos for sure 🙏🏼

Really good advice! I basically use them all. The one thing I struggle with the most is to actually find the time. To block the calendar and not have the time eaten by all the other things you need to do. Would love to hear your thoughts on it!

I totally agree with this. Step 4 is a definite must!

I think there is a natural tension between the desire for CHI to be a diverse community and the emphasis on excellent writing during the review process over other aspects of the work (like good research ideas). Strict focus on writing can be a barrier for people without English as a first language or those who come from non-academic backgrounds. I hope that the shift to a revise and resubmit format will focus the review conversation more on the merit and novelty of the research contribution with the understanding that writing can be improved during revision.

This one was super useful! :D my first paper got accepted at CHI LBW!! thanks for making this series

TAKEAWAY 1) Situate a paper so that it is specific to your community yet generic for all to understand the use case 2) Why does the paper matter? 3) Substantiate your work with proper statistical tests if any. 4) Consistency of terminology 5) The abstract should have the spice just enough to titillate the reviewer to go through the paper. 6) Prioritize on content that might lead to rejection (poorly presented results; missing related work; ) 7) Research should be people focussed for CHI. 8) When you build a system/application/software - what can people take away from that so that others in different fields of work can use that for their work. 9) Don't use the wrong statistical tests 10) Use version control.

Great video!