วีดีโอ

thank you, economy will rise by using jet plasma machine and compressed gas(Air) in isolated structure in water pool with more than 80 % efficiency , it transfers gas temperature from engine to water, New energy from sea will change world soon, there are other source of energy that with international cooperation in coastline we can reduce effect of global warming, sea is huge source of energy, further more we can prevent these phenomena like cyclone and flood and wildfire by using this hot seasonal atmospheric condition, recent years in summer, geothermal energy happens in surface of coastline, there are many countries in coastline with seasonal hot weather and water condition in comparison with middle Ocean more than 12 degrees , in sum-up, by using this energy not only is economical but also reduce global warming in countries like Japan, China, India, Mediterranean countries, Iran, Brazil, Mexico, Us, Canada, (Africa and Arabian countries....) . I invented new method base on air pressure rules and quantum physics ionization sea water minerals in strong dynamic magnet bases on paramagnetic and diamagnetic particles and electrical field and electric chemical reactions (K+, Mg++, Na+, H+, H++, li+, H2, ...) +( O2, N2, ...) into up level by vacuum pump from storage into combustion chambers as major part of fuel (more than 50%) for producing electricity and fresh water and fertilizer. this machine produces 150Megwatt-hour/hour and 20000M3/DAY and fertilizer. 7 methods zero pollution for reducing global warming I mentioned in my profile. (G20 countries can solve these phenomena)

I built this

Darby, I liked it better when you called yourself Rocket Joy. :-)

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), is promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interest in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy research history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors. The administrators, workers and fans of such nuclear energy projects are in line with the vast majority of the Earth's 8.0+ billion humans in that they assume that we continue to have at least two decades left to turn this 'Titanic' around. They have all masterfully blocked-out the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5.6 years ago.

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), is promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interest in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy research history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors. The administrators, workers and fans of such nuclear energy projects are in line with the vast majority of the Earth's 8.0+ billion humans in that they assume that we continue to have at least two decades left to turn this 'Titanic' around. They have all masterfully blocked-out the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5.6 years ago.

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), is promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interest in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy research history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors. The administrators, workers and fans of such nuclear energy projects are in line with the vast majority of the Earth's 8.0+ billion humans in that they assume that we continue to have at least two decades left to turn this 'Titanic' around. They have all masterfully blocked-out the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5.6 years ago.

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), is promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interest in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy research history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors. The administrators, workers and fans of such nuclear energy projects are in line with the vast majority of the Earth's 8.0+ billion humans in that they assume that we continue to have at least two decades left to turn this 'Titanic' around. They have all masterfully blocked-out the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5.6 years ago.

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), is promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interest in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy research history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors. The administrators, workers and fans of such nuclear energy projects are in line with the vast majority of the Earth's 8.0+ billion humans in that they assume that we continue to have at least two decades left to turn this 'Titanic' around. They have all masterfully blocked-out the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5.6 years ago.

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), is promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interest in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy research history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors. The administrators, workers and fans of such nuclear energy projects are in line with the vast majority of the Earth's 8.0+ billion humans in that they assume that we continue to have at least two decades left to turn this 'Titanic' around. They have all masterfully blocked-out the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5.6 years ago.

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), is promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interest in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy research history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors. The administrators, workers and fans of such nuclear energy projects are in line with the vast majority of the Earth's 8.0+ billion humans in that they assume that we continue to have at least two decades left to turn this 'Titanic' around. They have all masterfully blocked-out the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5.6 years ago.

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), was promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interests in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors. The administrators, workers and fans of such nuclear energy projects are in line with the vast majority of the Earth's 8.0+ billion humans in that they assume that we continue to have at least two decades left to turn this 'Titanic' around. They have all masterfully blocked-out the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5.6 years ago.

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), was promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interest in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors.

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), was promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interests in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors.

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), was promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interests in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors.

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), was promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interests in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors.

This video, as are all the huge numbers of videos produced by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), was promotional in nature. It provided no evidence that their efforts will lead to a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction that will produce a sustained energy output compared to the energy needed to operate their SPARC tokamak testing facility. Such traditional promotional efforts primarily focus on the assumed success of their operation. Typically their fans have no interest in seeking out critical analysis of such endeavors based upon the very lengthy research history, beginning in the late 1950s, of such experimental endeavors.

This is sales hype that primarily focuses upon the assumed future progress of their operation. Typically such productions are intended to attract venture capital investments. This pitch contains no hint that the experimental quest began in the late 1950s and that the numerous experimental fusion machines, around the globe, have encountered a multitude of problems that slowed their progress, led to massive cost overruns, if not leading to abandonment of the projects. The fans of such projects have no interest in engaging in critical analysis of this technology that they've fallen in love with.

The vast majority of nuclear energy proponents, along with the vast majority of the Earth's 8.0+ billion humans, continue to assume that we have at least 20-years left to turn this 'Titanic' around using their favorite technology. They have become masterful in excluding the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5.6 years ago.

Thank you for this tour. It is clear that numerous details were left out which I find is very common with most nuclear fusion energy experimental facilities. It would have been advantageous to have also heard someone give a critical assessment. I'm sure that most of the viewers only are interested in hearing one side of the story. You used the word fusion in referring to the future operation of SPARC. You should have provided more information on supplying it with the fuel component, radioactive tritium. Currently, it's commercial purchase value is around $30,000/gram. You also made no mention of including a lithium blanket, or creating your own source of tritium. The past presentations, regarding SPARC, stated that the high-temperature superconducting magnets would be key to it achieving useful levels of fusion energy. Many of the viewers assumed that meant the magnets didn't need to be cooled down to cryogenic temperatures to operate. Are we to assume that your design will solve all the plasma instability issues that so many other MCF facility continue to struggle with? How Does SPARC plan to deal with the chamber materials that become contaminated with the radioactive tritium, or components that become radioactive due to irradiation from fusion energy neutrons? When operating at full fusion power levels are the superconducting magnets shielded from being irradiated by the fusion energy neutrons? SPARC is designed to run in a pulsed mode as are all other tokamak type projects when operating at full DT fusion energy mode. SPARC's on time is expected to be 10 seconds then. The stated operational parameters are for the on-time, not for the lengthy rest periods after each pulsed on-time. The press, public and investors deserve to hear the average of the operational parameters over an at least 24 hour period. I'm posing these questions and examples since most fans wouldn't dream of presenting such questions for a project that they have come to love.

Nothing in this video inspires confidence

Let’s Consider the following options and the alternative. Cold Fusion (LENR) - Unproven hypothesized type of nuclear reaction that creates nuclear fusion at room temperature by producing more energy than the amount of input energy can be produced from its altered state. Tokamak Nuclear Fusion Reactor (ITER) - Requires a temperature of 150 million degrees Celsius to create nuclear fusion. Reportedly the record to date but having to use more input energy than produced is 69 megajoules of fusion energy for five seconds using 0.2 milligrams of fuel. (1 megajoule is equal to 0.00027 megawatt-hours) (The reported development cost for the ITER is $150 billion.) The alternative. Solar Hydrogen Energy Recovery Gas Turbine. 301Kwh (equal to 46/6.6Kw home solar installations) of solar energy collected from the sun’s nuclear fusion at atmospheric temperature is sufficient for electrolysis obtained from 1/3 of the water volume of an Olympic swimming pool that is recycled by steam reforming to produce 24 hours of Hydrogen gas contained within a 14 cubic meter space compressed between 350-700 bar to enable the start-up sequence of a hydrogen Gas turbine that in turn enables the synchronizing of its Variable Frequency Generator to maintain equilibrium of compressed hydrogen gas to continually fuel the turbine. Oxygen produced from the electrolyzing process is used as a fuel saving precooled engine catalyst to bring online the turbines energy recovery system and sustain a variably regulated base load power supply to service grid energy demand. The operational variability of the turbine manages both grid inertia, and mis matched frequency while generating a capacity energy range between 86 - 330Mw with optional co-generated steam capacity up to 700Mw of electrical energy on a 24/7/365-day basis. The power generating turbine has three operational parts, 3m in diameter 5.5m long and weighs 6 tons. Installation cost $36.5 -49.5 million, requires an operational footprint area the size of a football field, noise level is 60dbl at 60m, incorporates direct air capture of CO2 at 1,400 Kg/sec and includes a 14-year maintenance free, end of life decommissioning or optional refurbishment program. Sixty-five carbon and pollution free, shovel ready, off the shelf technology that combines solar nuclear fusion with modern aerospace propulsion and existing nuclear and coal fired steam technology to generate a total of 21,450 Mw can be retrofitting to any of the 120 Hydro-electric schemes placed at grid conversion points would provide Australia's 26 million population its entire energy needs covering a combined operational area of 33 hectares for a 2023 total cost between $2.4-3.3 billion. Construction period is 3 to 5 years, meet net zero energy target twenty years earlier and makes wind and solar farms including hydro, gas and nuclear energy production redundant.

Just reply or dont on here I can be on the belt line asap...go by way of john Nolen....past Alliant........

Fusion huh....really.... at what temp and frequency did it reach so called fusion...and the harmonic code...max TeV1.11 Gw...divided by pulse velocity...with an increase in mass at 2.22.1 MwV... MG constant to a variable of 2.113.22y= 2.113

Expensive garbage for funding...I could build it smaller and cheaper with more output in a scale model than that entire set up....pulse static magnetic engine/generator...scaled up even more...what amazes me is you guys think thos is amazing...it is I guess...have me out I live 30 minutes away...I could show u the numbers schematics and programming...so much more to accomplish....do ur donors know people luke me exist...no because everyone I try to come out you guys ignore me...not because my works aren't valid because I haven't even glanced.... for all u donors contact me ...if u want to see a real return for ur donation/investment....and it just needs to be put together...

First Plasma: th-cam.com/video/MrVqhAIpom0/w-d-xo.html

Well, you had me until the politicians started speaking especially Granholm. She’s got all of her money invested in clean energy and she doesn’t care where it comes from just as long as she makes her money I know I live in Michigan. She absolutely ruined this state. We lost over 700,000 manufacturing jobs here because of her ignorance and, complete buffoonery

science is so much more palatable when it doesnt take time to do or do in general... the cool music helps too

George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley would certainly approve.

Couldn't take the background music.

Congrats on all your hard work Grant and team, see ya when you get back!

En cuánto tiempo calculan ustedes que el reactor podría llegar a estar en funcionamiento?

"You can watch the moment WHAM hits first plasma in the video." Um, can we tho? I think you forgot to include that clip lol. Didn't mirror devices reveal insurmountable particle loss mechanisms back in the 80s making them a dead end and causing most teams to abandon pursuing them?

Shitty music!!!

Great job by everyone!

The last sentence in your video is slightly ominous. 10/10

Congrats Grant and team, I know the hard work and hours your team put into this project. See you when you get back home to CFS!

CFS iS fascinating startup/company, when i heared of it for the first time about three years ago, i wanted so bad to work for them in something that match my skills , i actually applied to work with them when they were hiring teams for the new plant in devens mass if im not mistaken, but no luck, it wasn't about my skills but it was more about my work history as a new comer to the us i kept changing from job to another.. If there's an opportunity in the future, I'm determined to be a part of the incredible team working in making the science fiction reality. they're doing something truly historic, and I know I can contribute my skills and hard work to make it happen.

Pretty much following the project... Good luck❤

Impressive!!

Great, when can I invest? 😂

American innovation is phenomenal.

Exiting news. Thank you for the update. AI, home robotics, fusion power, human settlement on the Moon, humans on Mars, quantum computers. The 2050's is going to be amazing.

Wow! I’m surprised to hear that site selection for ARC is already being worked on! I’ve been following CFS for 5 years now and I’m such a believer in your work! I know even once achieved, fusion power will be expensive, but it seems like such a powerful next step in humanity’s evolution. Renewables are critical for meeting the energy needs of today and tomorrow, but with functional fusion power we can find new and exciting things to do with large amounts of carbon free electricity!

HYPPPE LETS GOOOOOO!

I doubt fusion will get very far in Europe because a lot of people, especially Germans are blocking it. The US looks like they will solve it first

Unbelievable that we're wasting so much money on these weirdos with unviable fusion concepts. Unbelievable.

Good Job . Thanks everyone.

❤🎉❤

Keep the updates coming! Also a more in depth tour of the facilities would be awesome.

So cool. 2060, or a little sooner, we can start slowly scaling down coal and fossil fuels. By 2130 we can start attempting to make changes to clean up the environment. Wow wow wow. (none of you made offspring, right?)