วีดีโอ

Well. 4 years later, PR China has made it a success.

your video is incredibly helpful for anyone studying fuelcell

Nuclear power to power fuel production would be the best possible way

I believe Toyota in America has got a law suite against them for their Hydrogen Toyota Mirai ? ? ? th-cam.com/video/1PxjnM0qZEk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=XjZbb05Ygs9FVKZj

Exciting technology however neither talks about the inefficiency of creating and transmitting our electrical energy. Perhaps we should hit pause on both EV and Hydrogen cars and divert R&D funding heavily into developing efficient clean electricity production as most of our energy still comes from burning fossil fuels. All these vehicles are doing right now are creating an overall carbon increase!

We have hydrogen powered forklifts at my Distribution center and they are very neat. We used to have battery powered lift but these hydrogen powered forklift cells are much more efficient and seem to be more reliable.

What is done with the waste heat? Can it be recovered?

Planet needs electricity amd if itsnanimals over wave technology i pick technology

good content but the narrator talks too fast with a boring tone ...

So hydrogen power is basically hydrogen battery

absolutely love the comparison between pros and cons, very well made

Shop them tanks out for H2O tanks and batteries to produce the hydrogen then us the vapor to power the car

Hey Mate. I loved your video. May I asked from where you got the data for the energy efficiency chart of EV and Fuel Cell?

such beautifully explained in just 5 minutes. thanks man

Graphic and its description flawed! you compare the entire cycle on the hydrogen side to an EV which has only stored energy made from something else go ahead and factor in the cold mind burned into electricity, transportation, losses, distribution charges, etc., etc. and you’ll see it’s not that far off

In the (zn_cu)galvanic cell ,anode in negative ,and catode is positive ,I'm confused now 😢

I am not that optimistic. A lot of skilled people have tried for much more than 50 years. No winners only loosers. No promising principle has shown up. Most attempts is just a replay of previous fiascos. As a child i tried to make a perpetual motion machine. As a grown up, and now a machine engineer I dare not try to challange my skills with Wave Energy. I consider it a "Mission Impossible" and waste of money and effort.

You have your film in backwards as the cars are on the wrong side of the road!! LOL

Have Elon arrested and bring out the true Nikola Tesla……

Great video

Hydrogen is the most explosive element on earth, and the atom is too small to contain. Fuel cells are an explosive idea!

You react methyl hydrate solution and barrel its in lead braquet 😂

Came here for engineering but half of the video is commentary on the suitibilty and politics of hydrogen cars which by the way is mostly country specific and dependent on the infrastructure at place.

so, what is the hypothesis ?

NIce to see a proper explanation

Fucken lies I used Hydrogen with no gas compression in my car you fucken liar

In HFC when efm gjves readkng at no load curcuit when hydrogen realsed or after hydrogen and oxygen both released? If only kne gas released what tbe e.mf for each gase released

Broo what is the example of that membrane

Instead of hydrogen which is difficult to come by and store can you use propane instead?

alguem poderia traduzir esse vídeo ?

The Eco-Runner XIII recently set a new record by running 1546.18 miles on 950 grams of hydrogen. That's 0.61442 grams of hydrogen per mile, or 48.83 miles per kilowatt hour, far more efficient than any battery electric vehicle can ever be. A single triple A battery weighs about 14 grams.

Very well explaned as the difference between Hydrogen fuel cell and straight EVs. I do see the change. The thing to know and not discount is Petroleum is the best, highest desinty and renewable fuel on the planet. The problem of pollution is from the "internal combustion engine" efficentcy. The IC engine has been good up until now but is a major polluter. The answer is the "advanced fuel cell that converts petroleum directly to electricity or maybe should be call the "matter converter". Carbon has "excess" electrons, carbon is amazing and Rudolf Diesel had this answer as well as Tesla 125years ago on how to do this. The potential of carbon as in petroleum is fantastic. Petroleum comes from the core of the earth from atomic reaction of the core, this energy, heat condenses and condenses and becomes gas then it condenses and condenses etc to liquid. As this rises from the earth it does pick earth minerals and fossils elements. It doesn't come from fossil but does carry minerals and such up with it. This condenses and condenses etc to coal and finally diamond under certain conditions.

There is no energy crisis, we have an endless supply of Coal, oil, and gas

WHY DO YOU NEED TO HAVE HYDROGEN FUELED CARS?! WHEN YOU CAN BUILD HYDROGEN POWER PLANTS, THEN PUT THAT GENERATED POWER TO AN ELECTRIC GRID AND CHARGE YOUR ELECTRIC CARS )))))))) THAT'S ALL DONE WELL, SIMPLE AND EASY ;) AND BESIDES NO NEED FOR BUILDING ANY HIDROGEN REFUELING STATIONS 🤣🤣🤣

I just don't like batteries. Every device I have ever owned that used batteries has had battery issues. Somehow, putting them into a car is going to make them last longer...??? Maybe some day. If the hydrogen fuel cell can last longer, then I would go that route.

Why does the fuel cell use oxygen from the atmosphere instead of the oxygen produced by electrolysis? This would be necessary to operate if not in earth’s atmosphere.

why do the electrones join back with hydrogen ions in the cathode? shouldn't those electrones go to the traction motor/ battery pack? or are those two situated in between anode and cathode reactions?

Secondary and tertiary benefits of H2 will make H2 very beneficial e.g. H2 to make ammonia (NH3), to make fertilizer, to grow lots of food. Use of H2 for long haul truck (not possible via batteries) means economies can expand, jobs will expand, etc. A straight comparision on conversion efficiency is too narrow and flawed when looking at the Hydrogen economy.

Need to compare total lifecycle cost i.e. cost of replacing expensive lithium batteries, difficult to recycle used batteries, declining efficiency of batteries, loss of economic usage during long recharging battery replacement, etc. Most comparisons are flawed as they compare just core efficiencies.

H2 is a true fuel

except that the mining process to make batteries is still gonna put thousands of tons of pollution in the earth's atmosphere every day because the machinery is all diesel driven. plus the rare earths needed to make batteries is finite, what do we do when we run out of cobalt or lithium?

Wait wait let me see if I get straight. We, the same people who currently use garbage that bubbles out of the ground as a commodity should now trade that for using water which we need to live. Do you truly think that we will not commodify water if we do this?

Why wouldn't you go for the EV route? Well, if you live in a place where the power grid is absolute garbage. That is one consideration. Also, being able to fuel up even when power is out during a storm or an earthquake can be very important. Lastly, one that never gets discussed, is that all our our energy needs would be monopolized by a single utility company--this is made worse by the push to ban gas furnace, gas ovens, and now petrol cars too. For people that live in a country with a good electrical grid, I envy you, and I think EV can work in a place like that. But for me, hmm, our power equipment is all vintage where I live, don't know how they will manage all of that.

You explained the energy chain for hydrogen, none such thing for the EV whose electric chain is assumedly coming from God here. Lol, how built in are the inefficiencies from the very plants that they're coming from in a battery vehicle? And what about all the combined resources to get the setup to be able to provide this energy in the first place to the power plant! what a shame, 'let's trace the energy chain'.

why cant hydrogen cars make hydrogen on board by reacting zinc with hydrochloric acid leaving behind hydrogen and zinc chloride or aluminium with con. sulfuric acid

Sarawak malaysia will produce the first hydrogen in asia Sarawak Malaysia olso will host the international Carbon Confrence on 15 - 16 march 2023

Sorry to break this to you, but CO2 is not a toxic compound. It is a trace gas (0.04% of the atmosphere) that is absolutely essential in photosynthesis, the process by which it, along with water, is converted to food by plants. Without it there would be no plants, and we would all starve. Please note: IT HAS NEVER BEEN PROVEN that carbon dioxide is causing global warming!!! So burning fossil fuels for energy is okay. And we've so far used only about 1/15 of all the known petroleum deposits. Nuclear energy is the energy of the future.

What about tne Automatic Pitch Turbine? It has been shone to be 4 times more power full than the wells turbine.th-cam.com/video/w99QBTdSkpo/w-d-xo.html

The reason is confused in wave particle duality. I solved it. Theoretically, can do. I don't have funding to do practical.

We’ll done sir! Clear and concise explanation .