วีดีโอ

David Gross, you just like politician wasted 1 1/2 hour talking and said nothing except regurgitating current garbage model west has imposed on science world. you an american Nobel Laureate shown how ignorant of physics you are explains how stupid the rest are. your model is over 90% wrong. too long to list them. I challenge you and your indoctrination center university of Washington physics to prove me wrong. I pay 100,000 chine’s Yuan to any one charity proving me wrong. Scientist are stupid and western world leaders do not have the back boon, ball, intelligence or power to order their scientist to prove me wrong and expose their lies past 63 years. So currently over 90% of physic is fiction and lies continue. people deserve better

It's not a particle, Kathy

Many assumptions are made that cannot be proven at this time. The lady stated that we now know the geometry of the universe and this is simply false. We can see that it possesses a local relative flatness. The end. I suspect we live in an incredibly huge closed universe that is not undergoing "accelerated expansion". The cosmological redshift will be found to be due to one or more of the following: 1. Undiscovered primordial field that underlies all existence and is the source of all other fields. It could interact with EM emissions in such a way as to leech energy from photons travelling extreme periods of time. 2. Distorted EM fields in gravitational wells. 3. Increased densities at early times 4. Highly amplified magnetic field effects. 5. Extreme amount of mass existing outside our horizon. I am sure others exist as well but I seriously doubt "accelerating expansion" is actually true. If we look at our density today at 10e-29 and begin to roll it back in time we get the universe down to a radius of 10e-15 meters with Planck density. Of course that is only counting the mass currently within our horizon. I tend to not buy into the existence of true physical singularities. This universe is ruled by physical laws and even if it was "created" by some entity it has evidently decided to let it run on autopilot and obey these laws. What we see today exists due to a change of state in the early universe. Inflation is favored due to being a decent placeholder to get a grasp on the mechanisms. The universe could have always been relatively the same size but have been in a different state or phase before the "Big Bang". Even if it was at 10e-15 meter radius then it would not have been "dense" in the same way we usually associate with it. Everything would have transitioned to a bosonic state and therefore many things could exist in the same state at the same place and time. Space and time would have been fundamentally different then. Some type of Higgs mechanism was the likely catalyst. I visualize it as a universe wide "sublimation" . This is why inflation is not needed. This is a good time to encourage people to think outside the box. Regardless of what is told to us the fact is that many of the 'foundations" are nowhere near as stable as advertised. Unfortunately modern academia is on a relatively short leash and therefore it will take a few mavericks to overturn the current models. The CMB, redshift being the actual movement of space, DM, DE, the M/AM asymmetry, nucleosynthesis the standard model and more are still on shaky ground.

Skip to 5:45

when dark matter annihilate, does she decay? What matter is generated? ❤ And if you don't know what dark matter is, how do you know she is 25% of universe?

W=80.42939*(8.809/8.753)^2=81.5 Gev : weak interact massive particle[WIMP] for dark matter ch/3=pl*pm*c^2/2 by electron decay from strong force g(p)=g*m^2/pm^2=g*(pl/4.1888*l)^2=1.13*10^28 which can deduce ch=2pi*l*m*c^2=2pi*pl*pm*c^2/(4pi/3) into EM force k*e^2=g(p)*pm^2/137.036 which shrink proton radius pl=g(p)*(4pi*pm/3)/c^2=8.809*10^-16 meter to 8.753*10^-16 meter, W*p/R=ch/6pi for regular matter can emit light spectrum r=En=ch/L=chR=me*(c/137.036)^2/2=13.6*e*(1/1^2-1/n^2)[1.602*10^-19]=13.6*e*((1/1^2-1/2^2)+(1/2^2-1/3^2)+...+(1/n^2-1/(n+1)^2))=(h/2pi)*(f1+f2+...+fn) in negative vacuum energy 2pi*k*e^2*137.036=ch=(2*A1*137.036*pm*c^2)*(4pi*A*137.036)=En*L=(4.9154)^3*pm under critical mass[6^3*pm] =8pi*g*(m*c^2/2)^2/c^4 : solution of GR field equation can expand our universe as dark energy, ch + ch/3 + ch/6pi = En[100%] : oscillation between dark energy ch[72.13%], dark matter ch/3[24.04%], regular matter ch/6pi[3.83%], deduce experiment data from Planck satellite 68.3%=(72.13-3.83), dark matter 26.8%, regular matter 4.9% by 24.04+2*3.83=26.8+4.9 : mix cocktail of dark energy, dark matter, regular matter, in bullet cluster emit blue light from matter indicate dark matter at that area indicate such mix, so do Sterile neutrino S=(E*T)/(M*T) can emit Cherenkov blue radiation by neutron decay time 879[second]=(8.397*10^-16)^2*(1.049*c)/(137.036*pm*1.049^2) by pion decay which shrink proton radius to 8.397*10^-16 meter=8.809/1.049 at speed of 1.049*c=(1+(128.51991*137.036*60/(454*5280)/3^2))*c which had been measured faster than light speed c=299792458[meter/second]=1/(up)^0.5[u=4pi*10^-7. p=8.85418782*10^-12] by 60 feet across 454 mile=454*5280 feet, DUNE experiment for dark matter known for decay ratio 85.73% between muon[105 mev=(3*137.036/2)*0.511], electron[0.511 mev=me*c^2=g*m^2*137.036/A] from strong force by 14.27=A/(3*137.036*(A-A1))=128.51991/(3*137.036*(128.51991-128.4980143))=128.4980143/3^2=(80.351+0.135)/(137.035*(80.485-(80.42939+0.015448))) deduce W boson from CERN 80.42939 Gev[80.351+,-0.094], A1/A=128.4980143/128.51991=5.2908712*10^11/5.29177282*10^-11 from weak force pm/me=(1.672621868*10^-27 kg)/(9.10938356*10^-31 kg)=4pi*137.036^2/128.51991=1/(4*A1*137.036^3)=(pi/(128.4980143*A*137.036))^0.5 at Atom scale A^2=g(p)*pi*me/128.4980143*c^2 unite strong force g(p) with EM force k*e^2=ch/(2pi*137.036)[e+]=me*(c/137.036)^2*A[e-]=4pi*g(p)*pm*me*137.036/128.51991 which can reproduce Dirac's quantum field deduce 0.001161409725=1/(2pi*137.036)=e+/ch from positron e+=ch/(2pi*137.036)=k*e^2 for anomalous electron magnetic moment of (g-2)/2 factor ,2pi*0.001161409725*(me/pm)^2=(me/pm)^2/137.036=128.4980143*A/3.1415926=2.16*10^-9=0.00116592026-0.00116591810=(0.001165920+((61-41)+(57-25))*10^-9/2) - (0.00116584719+6845*10^-7+154*10^-8+92*10^-9) : discrepancy of muon magnetic moment of (g-2)/2 factor between experiment data, theoretical prediction, by graviton g*m^2 oscillating between l, pl, A 3 scale can generate 3 family of particles in standard model, T=g*m^2/137.036*8.38=k*e^2/(8pi/3)=0.015448 Gev[1.602*10^-19/c^2] : Tau neutrino, M=pm^2/(2*g*m^2*137.036)=0.1811 mev : Muon neutrino, E=me^2/(g*m^2*137.036)=0.108*e : Electron neutrino, g*m^2*137.036/A=me*c^2=0.511 mev[electron][3*137.036/2]=105 mev[muon][137.036/8.38]=1.717 Gev [tau], 4pi*M=2.276 mev[up][137.036*4pi/3]=1.306 Gev[charm][137.036]=179.0137 Gev[top], 8pi*M=4.552 mev[down][137.036/2pi]=0.099269 Gev[strange][137.036*10/32]=4.25 Gev[beauty quark]=(10/16)*137.036/g(p) for 10D super string theory SO(32) unite 10D of open string with 16D of close string by super symmetry 137.036=g*m^2/k*e^2=GR/QM=(m*g*pm*g(p)*pm*g*m)*(1/137.036)/((e-)*g*(e+))=ER/EPR, deduce experiment data for top quark 172.76 Gev[+0.3]=179.0137-4.25-1.306-0.099269-0.015448-0.135-0.13957[pion]-0.004552-0.002276 , 91.1875 Gev[Z]-1.777[tau]=126.25+125.0895-80.42939-81.5[WIMP] : another mix cocktail in micro scale, 126.25 Gev=(8.809/8.45)^3*ch : Higgs boson by muon decay shrink proton radius to 8.45*10^-16 meter, (6.674103388/6.661181)^2*0.001161409725=0.00116592026 : anomalous muon magnetic moment of (g-2)/2 factor from g=6.661181*10^-11 : gravitation constant at proton scale where g(p) give proton mass[pm=1.672621868*10^-27 kg] and positive charge unit e=1.602176634*10^-19=16*g*pm*c^2 compare to g=6.674103388*10^-11 at Planck scale l=g*m/c^2=(h*g/2pi*c^3)^0.5=1.616231*10^-35 meter, 125.0895 Gev=2^(1/6)*ch : Higgs boson from super symmetry 137.037=(2*ch*p)/e^2=g*m^2/k*e^2 unite QM with GR by Calabi-Yau manifold which contain 3 two dimensional Schwinger-Dyson quantum field Ch=2pi*l*m*c^2[typ1]=2pi*pl*pm*c^2/4.1888[type2b]=2pi*A*me*c^2/137.036[type2a] by ADS/CFT duality from 3 quantum black hole l, pl, A^2.

The fundamental phenomenon of dilation explains dark matter. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A graph illustrates its squared nature, it increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. The "missing mass" needed to explain galaxy rotation curves is dilated mass. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. In other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.

Great video, thanks and congratulations ... This other video teaches new physics, show hidden variables to study gravity, with a rational demonstration of the non-existence of dark matter th-cam.com/video/b5TU-YJrMVE/w-d-xo.html

Joke. The blonde, who had once again repeated her second year, exclaimed at such a lecture: “Every year it’s the same thing, what happened 13.8 billion years ago, what happened 13.8 billion years ago, when will it end!?” 🤭

Woke crap ontro.

Carroll began the lecture by saying how early investigators of quantum mechanics were told to change their fields to more respectable topics or urged to go somewhere else. That is the story of Carroll himself. At the time he gave this lecture, it seems that Caltech was urging him to either stop pushing his many worlds hypothesis or go somewhere else. Not long after this lecture, he moved to Johns Hopkins. Carroll is a gifted speaker and great theoretical physicist. It's too bad he has spent so much time urging acceptance of a theory that few people can grasp.

I think we need to go back to 1/r² and the three dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law! Spherical 4πr² geometry is fundamental to this process and this is based on Huygens’ Principle of 1670 that says, “Every point on a light wave front has the potential for a new spherical 4πr² light wave". The spherical interior is naturally 3D and we can think of each point on the curvature of the wave front as a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction as vibrations forming resonance. The spherical 4πr² surface forms a 2D boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π of everyday life.

If light has no mass how does the light escaoe the gravity of the sun?

Are neutrino oscillations on antifermions too? i.e. Do they have six flavors? On the other hand, when you explain the big bang theory said you don't know what happened with antimatter. In my opinion, the thoughts' world is built with antimatter, because annihilation we can't merge it with our world. And then matter and antimatter form one thing...

Very nice video. Explanations a layperson can understand. It is nice to hear someone talking about what we don't know and what we don't understand rather than acting like they know it all and presenting everything as fact to the general public.

This started out nice and loud. Then it got quieter.

Hey let's take two popular topics and just put them together in a title to sell a book and then just talk about basic stuff that's been explained over and over and then just make up some connection ... in order to sell a book ... yeah. She works at Harvard? Ok. She must be a super genius then right? Better buy that book lol. After all, I'm not a super genius so she must have super special to say to me, right? Not only did I down vote this video, I'll be blocking this channel as well. Good say, sir!

I know we want to reach longer wavelengths or less cutoff. But amplitude is important also. The first discovery was due to getting the amplitude under control, and we can get better amplitude resolution.. I believe getting better amplitude resolution might be more important than reaching for size. In a perfect world, of course, it would be better to get lengths double the size of the universe... but, the amplitude is so important.. we have a lot to learn just from the size we've managed to achieve this cutoff. Gr8! Peace ☮💜Love

I love LIGO, and that we now are recording/viewing gravity waves. It is a massive shift in how we are going to figure out reality. I cried on the day of the announcement of the news of the first discovery. I was overwhelmed knowing we'd managed to construct physical measurements at this resolution of anything. I was hoping the speaker would be giving us more science about how we're using the discoveries now within our science, but I can't expect everything. I appreciate the walkthrough of the details and history in the making. Thank you. Gr8! Peace ☮💜Love

Ok. Ok. Ok. Ok... ok......

It could be a black hole that just got big enough for the straw to break the camel's back. One more atom flew in, and that was the limit for gravity to hold all it's energy together, and exploded outwards... and still is.. Personally I put forth that the black hole was billions of times the size of all the matter that we see, or maybe a stupidly bigger number. Gr8! Peace ☮💜Love

Adelberger's fascinating instumental contribution clearly reveals there are limits to our understanding and he is unafraid to speak them. This is the first step to our expansion of knowledge in this enigmatic field of fundamental physics. Thank you, Sir, for speaking so eloquently on the subject in a language that l, as a layman, was gifted the ability to grasp certain nuggets: a peak through a window from which l was heretofore excluded. Thank you again and thank you internet!

Until we understand gravity (we don't l think it's density) then we will _never_ be able to invent anti-'gravity' vehicles. Are aeroplanes the ultimate in 'gravity'- defying technology? Recent UFO sightings suggest otherwise. It's frustrating to say the least. Perhaps there are more discoveries out there than 'they' are ready to disclose?

Timestamp 32:40 Not enough matter to justify the big bounce. Also; fluctuations in the conformal field are not explained at all before compression to Planck length. Timestamp 37:50 Inelastic energy should have been seen in operation near a black hole, event horizon as ordinary radiation in the Kerr modelling. We have not observed it.

Too long-winded and not concise.

Big bang, dark matter, dark energy and other inventions are the grossest mistakes of cosmologists. Such elementary mistakes made by these so-called "cosmologists" are not permissible even for middle school students of the most mediocre school. These errors are analyzed in detail on a solid foundation of physical laws (without any scientific delusional fantasies of cosmologists) in the book "Big Bang of Scientific Idiocy", author Pavlovich Konstantin. The book can be downloaded from аmаzon.

.#zZz#.⚡⬇️⬆️💀☢☣НЕЙТРИННЫЙ/КОДОВЫЙ СИНТЕЗ ЭП ДЕЛЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ💀⚡🔥 - ЭТО ДАЛЕКО НЕ ТО,ЧТО МНОГИЕ ПОДРАЗУМЕВАЮТ И ОБЪЯСНЯЮТ АУДИТОРИЯМ В УНИВЕРСИТЕТАХ!.ПОВТОРЯЮ - ДАЛЕКО НЕ ТО....ВЫ ГОВОРИТЕ,О СИСТЕМЕ ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЯ СВЯЗИ,ВНЕШНЕЙ И ВНУТРЕННЕЙ СИСТЕМЫ ГРАНИЦ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ ИЗЛУЧЕНИЯ ПРОЦЕССОВ НАЛОЖЕНИЯ,ПЛАНЕТАРНОГО СИНТЕЗА ЗЕМЛИ!.ГДЕ,САМА ГРАНИЦА И ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЕ - ЕСТЬ УЖЕ ЯДЕРНОЕ/НАЛОЖЕНОЕ ПРОСТРАНСТВО ПЕРЕДАЧИ ЭП,ПЛАЗМЕННО/УРАНОВОГО ТРАНСПОРТА ДЕЛЕНИЯ ЭП,ПО ЯДЕРНОМУ ОТВЕТУ ЭП/СИСТЕМ,УЧАСТВУЮЩИХ И ПОДДЕРЖИВАЮЩИХ,ПРОТОННО/НЕЙТРОННОЕ ИЗЛУЧЕНИЕ СИНТЕЗА ЗЕМЛИ💀⚡🔥НЕ БОЛЕЕ ТОГО!.ЯДЕРНЫЙ/КОДОВЫЙ/НЕЙТРИННЫЙ СИНТЕЗ ЭП ДЕЛЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ - ЭТО ЗАКРЫТЫЙ/ЯДЕРНЫЙ ПРОЦЕСС ВВОДА,САМОГО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНОГО/ЯДЕРНОГО ЗАКРЫТИЯ ЭП ИЗЛУЧЕНИЯ СИСТЕМ/НАЛОЖЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ ЗАХВАТА,ПО/КС/ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ И ЯДЕРНОГО ПРЕВРАЩЕНИЯ - КОДОВОГО/ГРАВИТАЦИОННОГО НЕЙТРИНО ЯДРА ЗЕМЛИ,С ЯДЕРНЫМИ СИСТЕМАМИ ВВОДА,В САМ ЯДЕРНЫЙ ПРОЦЕСС ЯДРА/СВЯЗИ,ПО/К.Ц.П.ЭП.Д.М.К./💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥Я ПИСАЛ НЕОДНОКРАТНО РАНЕЕ,ЧТО ТОЛЬКО СИСТЕМА ЯДЕРНОГО ЗАКРЫТИЯ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ НАЛОЖЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ - ОПРЕДЕЛЯЕТ СИСТЕМУ В СИСТЕМЕ НАЛОЖЕНИЯ СИНТЕЗА ЭП!.ЭТО - ИНАЯ ЯДЕРНАЯ СИСТЕМА ЭП/ВВОДА МАТЕРИИ,КОТОРАЯ ЯДЕРНО ВВОДИТ ВЕСЬ ЯДЕРНЫЙ СЧЁТ ПРОСТРАНСТВА МАТЕРИИ ВЕЩЕСТВА ЭП💀⚡🔥,ГДЕ САМ ЯДЕРНЫЙ/КОДОВЫЙ/НЕЙТРИННЫЙ СИНТЕЗ МАТЕРИИ ЭП - ЕСТЬ ЯДЕРНОЕ/КОДОВОЕ/ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНОЕ ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЕ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ,В САМОМ ЯДЕРНОМ СЧЁТЕ/НАЛОЖЕНИЯ ПРОЦЕССОВ ДЕЛЕНИЯ,ПЛАНЕТАРНОГО СИНТЕЗА ЗЕМЛИ,И ЯДЕРНЫХ СИСТЕМ ЗАКРЫТИЯ И ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЯ СЧЁТА,ПО/КС/ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ НОСИТЕЛЯ МАТЕРИИ ЭП💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥🔥🔥🔥⚫⚫⚫⚫💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡⚡⚡

Wow. That is some SERIOUS gadgeteering and precision measurement!

Take a drink every time 'um' is said 😂

What if the speed of light is a property of Space/Time? Spacetime gives us dimensions and geometry, angles and curves.

SMH, sorry but this is just bad science.

How do we know if we are dealing with a neutrino or an anti-neutrino given they have no electric charge? In which ways are they different? Is a neutrino an electron that lost its electric charge? Why do we say an electron is simply the smallest space an electric charge can occupy? I thought beta decay of a neutron produces an electron and an anti-neutrino, why saying it is a neutrino?

🌌♾️🎓

Gravity is simple Galilean relative motion. The earth is approaching- expanding at 16 feet per second per second constant acceleration- the released object (apple). Start at start. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well...... everything. So,no.

This man stated "much of what we know about the universe may have been wrong." Billions after billions of dollars are wasted on space. wow

The clearest explanation of cyclic universe theory

The Gyroscopic Atom (Amended Version) Setting the quantum “n”. T1 = t / (1-v1^2/c^2)^0.5 t = 1s / 1s = n v1< v2 T2 = 2s / 1s = 2 = n v2 = ((1-1/T2^2)* c^2)^0.5 = 259,627,884m/s T3 = 3s / 1s = 3 = n v3 = 282,647,040m/s etc…. Determining the distance of the electron from the nucleus, radius. Let: nhf2(-) = 4pi*R2(-)^2*f2(-)^2*m(-) R2 = (nh / 4pi*f2(-)*m(-))^0.5 f2(-) = v2^2*m(-)/2h therefore: R2 = (2nh^2/ 4pi*v2(-)^2m(-)^2)^0.5 = 1.58066*10^-12m R3 = 1.7782*10^-12m However each electron has a charge “q(-)” thus the energy can be set as 4pi*r2(-)^2*f2(-)^2*m(-) = q(-) / 4pi*eps0*r2 r2 = (q(-)*h^2 / 4pi^2 * eps0 * m(-)^2* v2^4)^1/3 = 3.7651*10^-17m r3 = 3.3619*10^-17m On the one hand the radius “R” is increasing yet on the other “r” is decreasing. E2 = q(-)/4pi*eps0*R2 = 910.986eV E3 = 809.785eV e2 = q(-)/4pi*eps0*r2 = 38.244 MeV e3 = 42.840 MeV Determine the parallel resistance2. FORCE2 = E2*q(-)/R2 = 9.2338*10^-5N POWER2 = FORCE2*v2 = 23973W I = V/R V is the voltage “1eV” I = POWER2/V = 23973A RESISTANCE2 = V/I = 4.1712*10^-5 ohms force2 = e2*q(-)/r2 = 162740N power2 = force2*v2 = 42.2519T.W I = 42.2519T.A resistance2 = 2.3667*10^-14 ohms |Resistance2| = resistance2*RESISTANCE2 / resistance2+RESISTANCE2 = 2.3667*10^-14ohms |I2| = |1eV/Resistance2| = 4.2251*10^13A |Power2| = |I2*1eV| = 4.2251*10^13W |Force2| = force2 = 162740N |Radius2| = r2 = 3.7651*10^-17m Determine the parallel resistance3. FORCE3 = E3*q(-)/R3 = 1.2937*10^-9N POWER3 = FORCE3*v3 = 0.34023W I = V/R V is the voltage “1eV” I = POWER2/V = 0.34023A RESISTANCE3 = V/I = 2.9391 ohms force3 = e3*q(-)/r3 = 204161N power3 = force3*v3 = 57.705T.W I = 57.705T.A resistance3 = 1.7329*10^-14ohms |Resistance3| = resistance3*RESISTANCE3 / resistance3+RESISTANCE3 = |I3| = |1eV/Resistance3| = 1.7329*10^-14ohms |Power3| = |I3*1eV| = power3 = 57.705T.W |Force3| = force3 = 204161N |Radius3| = r3 = 3.3619*10^-17m Determine the parallel resistance23. |Resistance23| = |Resistance2*Resistance3 / Resistance2+Resistance3| = 1.00041*10^-14 ohms |I23| = 2eV / |Resistance23| = 199.916T.A |Power23| = 2eV*|I23| = 399.833T.W |Force23| = |Power23 / v23| = 2.9546*10^6N v23 = photon parallel exchange velocity = v2*v3/v2+v3 = 135,324,444m/s |Radius23| = (q(-)^2 / 4pi*eps0* |Force23|)^0.5 = 8.8364*10^-18m Permittivity of the parallel space23. |eps23| = 1/mu0*(135,324,444m/s)^2 = 4.34547*10^-11F/m v23 = (q^2 / 4pi*eps23*Radius23*m23)^0.5 m23 = q^2 / 4pi*eps23*Radius23*v23^2 = 2.5669*10^-45kg The parallel Newton constant “G23” m23 = h*v23 / G23*m(-) G23 = h*v23 / m(-)*m23 = 3.8347*10^49 N.m^2 / kg^2 Parallel force of gravity “F23(g)”. F23(g) = G23*m(-)*m23 / Radius23^2 = 1.1483*10^9N g23(g) = F23(g)/m23 = 4.4737*10^53m/s^2 v23(g) = (G23*m(-)/Radius23)^0.5 = 1.98826*10^18m/s An m23 particle falling inside the g23(g) gravity field falls a distance “x23(g)”. x23(g) = 0.5*g23(g) * t23(g)^2 = 4.4182*10^-18m t23(g) = v23(g)/g23(g) = 4.4443*10^-36s In other words the m23 particle falls half the Radius23 in the allotted time “t23(g)”. The gravitational velocity v23(g) in tern produces a gravity particle m23(g). m23(g) = h*v23(g)/G23*m(-) = 3.7714*10^-35kg For each energy level there is a corresponding parallel Newton constant “G34,G45,…”. Thus each gap between the energy levels may be compartmentalised and as such each energy gap may be entangled. *********************************************************************************** 750 7/3/24

Esoteric if you're not a part of the in-the-know physicists, but he is passionate about his subject.

ARE WE LIVING REALISTIC ILLUSIONS?? IF YES HOW IS IT ALL POSSIBLE??

Dearest Lisa Randall, pl. show the 01 uni-verce in a 010 Quanta. Black and White, Light in Dark, Sunny Black holes, flying Star appear ~ disappear in blink of an i-ye imploding within, Ouroboros.

Good until 51:00

Thank you! ^.^

“The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics. The CAUSE of gravity discovered/ published in 2002, that’s just for starters. All Standard Theory/Model was replaced by Expansion Theory in 2002.

Gravity is simple Galilean relative motion. The earth is approaching- expanding at 16 feet per second per second constant acceleration- the released object. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics.

By graviton g*m^2 from super symmetry 1/137.036=k*e^2/g*m^2 which unite QM with GR oscillating between Planck scale l, proton scale pl, Atom scale A can generate 3 family of particles in standard model, T=g*m^2/(137.036*8.38)=0.015445 Gev : Tau neutrino, M=pm^2/(2*g*m^2*137.036)=1/(2*g(p)*137.036)=0.1811 mev : Muon neutrino, E=me^2/(g*m^2*137.036)=0.108*e : Electron neutrino, g*m^2*137.036/A=me*c^2=0.511 mev[electron][3*137.036/2]=105 mev[muon][137.036/8.38]=1.717 Gev[tau], 4pi*M=2.276 mev[up][137.036*4pi/3]=1.306 Gev[charm][137.036]=179.0137 Gev[top], 8pi*M=4.552 mev[down][137.036/2pi]=0.099269 Gev[strange][137.036*10/32]=4.25 Gev[beauty quark]=(10/16)*137.036/g(p) for 10D super string theory of SO(32) unite 10D of open string with 16D of close string by super symmetry 137.036, deduce experiment data for 172.76 Gev[+0.3][top quark]=179.0137-4.25-1.306-0.099269-0.1349768-0.13957039-0.015445-0.004552-0.002276, 91.1875 [Gev][Z boson]-1.777[tau]=126.25+125.0895 -80.42939-81.5[WIMP], 126.25[Gev]=(8.809/8.45)^3*ch : Higgs boson by vacuum energy ch=111.4421 Gev[1.602*10^-19/c^2] transfer from strong force into EM force by muon decay which shrink proton radius from pl=g(p)*(4pi*pm/3)/c^2=8.809*10^-16 meter to 8.45*10^-16 meter, 2^(1/6)*ch=125.0895 Gev : Higgs boson by 3 two dimensional Schwinger's quantum field[1D string + 1D time] ch=meter*kg*c^2=2pi*l*m*c^2=2pi*pl*pm*c^2/4.1888=2pi*A*me*c^2/137.036 which can compose a unique extra 6 dimensional Calabi-Yau manifold for string theory fits our universe by 1/137.036=e^2/(2*ch*p) from 3 quantum black hole l, pl, A^2 by ADS/CFT duality, S=(E*T)/(M*T)=g(p)*(me/pm)*(e-/e+)*(r/(A*A1*c^4))=2.16*10^-9/(pi*0.001161409725) : see/saw=constant Sterile neutrino can deduce 2pi*0.001161409725*(me/pm)^2/137.036=2.16*10^-9, 0.001161409725=1/(2pi*137.036) : anomalous electron magnetic moment of (g-2)/2 factor from potential energy of positron e+=ch/(2pi*137.036)=k*e^2, Sterile neutrino also is candidate for dark matter ch/3=pl*pm*c^2/2 by ch + ch/3 + ch/6pi = En=chR=me*(c/137.036)^2/2=13.6*e*((1/1^2-1/2^2)+(1/2^2-1/3^2)+...+(1/n^2-1/(n+1)^2))=(h/2pi)*(f1+f2+...+fn) : 100% total negative vacuum energy of Dirac's sea ch=(4.9154)^3*pm under critical mass as dark energy which can expand universe, ch have meter^3*kg/second^2 dimension can deduce Kepler law[meter^3/second^2] of orbit between planets[kg], galaxies [kg] where can found dark matter ch/3=(8*pi^2/3)*g(p)*pm*me*137.036^2/128.51991 due to reaction of asymptotic freedom of strong force g(p) as pressure energy of expanding universe which's 1/3 of mass energy ch=8pi*(137.036*A)^2*pm*c^2[128.4980143/128.51991], ch/(6pi)=W*p/R for regular matter can emit light spectrum r=En=chR=me*(c/137.036)^2/2 by electron decay which shrink proton radius to 8.7548*10^-16 meter produce W=80.5*(8.809/8.7548)^2=81.5 Gev : weak force decay as WIMP[weak interact mass particle] which is a candidate for dark matter, 80.5=80.351+0.1349768+0.015445. p=8.85418782*10^-12 : permittivity of free space ch=2pi*g*(137.036*up*e-/l)*(137.036*up*e+/l), u=4pi*10^-7 : permeability of free space ch, c=1/(up)^0.5=299792458[meter/second].

Weak force unite strong force g(p)=g*m^2/pm^2=g*(pl/4.1888*l)^2=1.13*10^28 which's by graviton g*m^2=ch/(2pi) : solution of GR field equation ch=8pi*g*(m*c^2/2)^2/c^4 oscillating between Planck scale l=g*m/c^2=(h*g/2pi*c^3)^0.5, proton scale pl=g(p)*(4pi*pm/3)/c^2 with EM force k*e^2=g(p)*pm^2/137.036=ch/(2pi*137.036)[e+]=me*(c/137.036)^2*A[e-]=4pi*g(p)*pm*me*137.036/128.51991 which can reproduce Dirac's quantum field, Schrodinger's equation of vacuum ch/(4pi*A*137.036)=me*(c/137.036)/2, turn into quantum gravity at Atom scale A^2=g(p)*pi*me/128.4980143*c^2 by ch=(2*A1*137.036*pm*c^2)*(4pi*A*137.036)=En*L produce photon r=En=ch/L=chR=me*(c/137.036)^2/2=13.6*e[1.602*10^-19], deduce pm/me=1836.1527=4pi*137.036^2/128.51991=1/(4*A1*137.036^3)=(pi/(128.4980143*A*137.036))^0.5, from it can deduce (me/pm)^2/137.036=128.4980143*A/3.1415926=2.16*10^-9=0.00116592026-0.00116591810 : discrepancy of muon magnetic moment of (g-2)/2 factor between experiment data[0.001165920+((61-41)+(57-25))*10^-9/2], theoretical prediction[0.00116584719+6845*10^-7+154*10^-8+92*10^-9] from Fermilab at 8/10/23 as torsion between proton[pm=1.672621868*10^-27 kg], electron[9.10938356*10^-31kg] in Atom scale[A=5.29177282*10^-11 meter], also can deduce 80.42939 Gev[+,- 0.0094] : W boson from theoretical prediction 80.351 Gev[+0.006], 85.73% ratio between muon[105 mev=(3*137.036/2)*0.511], electron[0.511 mev[1.602*10^-19]=me*c^2=g*m^2*137.036/A] decay from strong force by 14.27=A/(3*137.036*(A-A1))=128.51991/(3*137.036*(128.51991-128.49801421207))=128.49801421207/3^2=(80.351+0.1349768)/(137.036*(80.4859768-(80.42939+0.015445))) where A1=A*(128.4980143/128.51991)=5.2908712*10^-11, 0.015445 Gev[1.602*10^-19/c^2]=g*m^2/(137.036*8.38)=k*e^2/(8pi/3) : Tau neutrino, which EM force k*e^2 =g*m^2/137.036 is gravitational force by graviton g*m^2 oscillating between proton, electron in Atom.

Excellent talk. Obviously a principle exists which has not been discovered (yet).

He still didn't tell us why the distant SNs were fainter and therefore further away than expected. Relative to what? Their CRS?

Gravity is not a Force.

Dark matter the proof of the unseen world??