วีดีโอ

In the USA Harvey Publications, owners of the Caspar the Friendly Ghost copyright sued Columbia Pictures, claiming that the Ghostbusters logo infringed on Caspar copyrights. The court ruled that the design of a ghost is generic and can't be copyrighted.

It seems more like a Howard the duck rip off than Donald... Disney owns Marvel now, maybe they'll try again.

Disney's 373 alt accounts disliked this video.

Who's got the sweetest disposition?!? The one who keeps receipts.

interesting. i cant help wonder if his lawyers would have pointed out that a duck is from God/nature and Disney took inspiration from that, therefore he too can use a natural duck as inspiration. any similarities would result from the fact a duck is a duck & a ducks likeness belongs to us all. its not as if ducks are only here in the USA, you've got ducks over there.

Howard the Duck had the same copyright issue. So they made him wear pants and etcetera.

I love it when big corpos get outsmarted and there is nothing they can do

Love the street art videos, especially stickers

in the 50's when Disneyland was being built, my parents fresh from the war got their first house near San Francisco. my mother want to landscape her yard, naturally. imagine her surprise when she was told there would be *no* decorative wrought iron available for a couple of years. Disney had bought *all* of the stock.

"Craziest, funniest, most awe inspiring story involving copyright" ? Totally oversold this story lol.

Disney woke and broke now.

Wouldn’t classifying his work as satire or parody have been much easier?

1:38 that almost looks like a musician called Daedelus, but not quite.

love to see slaps from other places, please do more videos like this

thank you for showing us around. i really enjoyed the presentation and commentary, and the selected works are exquisite.

wow haha

Didn’t Howard the Duck do this way earlier?

Well played.

this was Sofa king entertaining

You cannot copyright an animal or the personification thereof. Satire is protected as well as parody. American copyright is written into the Constitution. We are the only country with such a clause in our founding document. Satire and parody are protected as well so as to secure its use as political free speech. That letter would not hold up in an American court even with the manipulation of copyright law for this particular copyright holder.

I believe those communist things are remnants of the recent psyop by putin

Golden 💯

mickey jesus

I am sofa king

The portrait after the Affimative Youth sticker looks like it could be Bad Boy Bubby

Great video! I really like searcxhiung for stickers and murals in any city I visit. btw "Borrachos" is a word in Spanish that means "drunks"

Love this! I love taking pictures of them when i visit big cities.

Fascinating af, love it

Brillant, just brilliant!

Aesthetic warning: very cool

hey disney....got any sour gwapes?

🥳. .💘. . !

It was fun trying to research some of these. Only found a few, but they were all clearly marked like Mew 17:01 Also 4:48 the Zipgun was a dude chillin on the subway reading a magazine and eating chips.

Nice

Great video!👍

Is there an English translated version?

your english diction, phrasing & pronunciation is better than 99% of native speakers :) great video indeed - hope there are ready to use magazine templates too as unlike you i have Zero design skills 😊

so we're all supporting plagiarism now and call it good art.. ? Nice..

Genius! :)

so hes a duck that looks like a bird pretending to be a duck

LMFAO wonderful!

This is why intellectual property isnt real.

7:50

I thought it would be “Howard the duck” lol

Love it! Duck vs Disney... Arne Wins. 😎🇦🇺

HAHA! Er det noe jeg aldri trodde ville dukke opp på YT så er det Arne And! Skål kosmonauter!

Yes, I remember well those comix! Disney’s attack boosted the popularity of the series enormously, everybody loved their solution 😂🤣

So Arne is basically Bojack Duckman?

So many of these comic artists in every country copying Disney because they can’t use their own ingenuity or create their own original work. Then making money of the back of Walt Disney’s own genius. Disney lets fan art sell all the time, people like him should lose for making an income out of it. They should’ve sued him again for using the Walt Disney name on the weight. He didn’t beat the lawyers.

typical greed of every big american corporation