วีดีโอ

I see it by u.. and i know it since, when in my time i just was a jounger man. But now, my life is short, but, "you make me beleave", again. Thanks from the frozen ass of this world. Las Condes, Gran Santiago de Chile. Austral América. September, 17. 2023.

A near unsettling moment when you realize the machine was seeing things beyond the space in the photo. Probably the most bizarre yet fascinating tech in the movie.

stable diffusion in action ;-)

We can do all that photo stuff nowadays on smartphones

Deckard : Enhance 224 to 176. [a man's arm becomes visible] Deckard : Enhance. Stop. [the man's shoulder and wrist are visible] Deckard : Move in. Stop. [close-up of man's wrist] Deckard : Pull out, track right. Stop. [writing is visible] Deckard : Center and pull back. Stop. [arm and door are visible] Deckard : Track 45 right. Stop. Center and stop. [doorway and mirror are visible] Deckard : Enhance 34 to 36. [dresser top is visible] Deckard : Pan right or-and pull back. Stop. [mirror is visible] Deckard : Enhance 34 to 46. [blurred white object in mirror becomes visible] Deckard : Pull back. Wait a minute. Go right. Stop. [Zhora's arm becomes visible] Deckard : Enhance 57 to 19. Track 45 left. Stop. [Zhora is visible] Deckard : Enhance 15 to 23. [marks on Zhora's face become visible] Deckard : Gimme a hard copy right there.

Yes the hard copy is not the same angle as what's on the screen, however if you compare the hard copy to what's on screen, it appears the Esper took the liberty of rotating her head to get a better angle of the snake tat.

We need an updated version

Now if this were CSI the enhance feature wouldn't have any limits at all.

???

#Google #Assistant ....😐.... - ......🙂.......

“Just print the damn thing!”

“Just print the damn thing!”

Amazing camera 👌😍 I don't like when they do this in shows / movies based in current time which try to be realistic Of course it's perfectly acceptable in this scene since it's Blade Runner

Right at the start of this clip, he looks at the photograph surrounded by musical notation. Before he rights it and puts it in his mouth, the picture appears as a Cyclops.

7 replicants downvoted this video.

Love love love. Like the Mesa scene in 2049. Love!!!

why did this give me the creeps the first time i saw it

This is like Siri, except Esper appears to work.

And I have what is told as an Idetic. Memory. I never forget a fuckhead.

This is child's play to me. I have a naturally suspicious eye.

Esper, the screen saver: th-cam.com/video/_er7xZd7zUU/w-d-xo.html

THANK YOU ~ Since I first saw the pic at age 8 or 9, I've ALWAYS said it was a 3D image while everybody told me it was "just zooming in really far" and indeed there is a 2nd reflection of the convex mirror within the angled dressing mirror (which I had always thought was a half-open door) But I find it notable that despite there being a convex mirror, we don't really see a photographer, but we do see hints of what seem to be a remotely activated camera - it's MY feeling or belief if you will, that there are either several fixed cameras around the apartment, or the mirrors themselves either hide lenses behind 'em OR possibly contain sensors to encode the imagery - ALTHOUGH, of course, the MIT "see around corners" device would be more in keeping with a Phillip K. Dick "speculative fiction" piece. It's normal up to the point where he's close-up on her arm, but changes dramatically when he sez "track 45 left" and it seems it's not a number of pixels but rather an ANGLE of incidence and 45-degrees seems about right when you imagine the turn or is it panning I should rather say, taking place at that virtual range distance from the zoom-in enlargement - Everybody I've spoken to while watching the film focuses on the fact that the woman's appearing to the left of the obstruction (sequin dress hanging over dressing mirror - which I had thought was a door - and that to the left of the sequins we were looking into the next room obscured by shadow and poor contrast) But note that when he's looking or "tracking 45 left" the image to the right of the sequins disappears, her elbow disappears then reappears significantly further left (my reason for thinking it was a mirror on the back of a door, perhaps a folding door with two mirrors or a folding dressing screen with mirror panels etc) the doubled elbow is confusing, that if it were indeed a single mirror with an obstruction that tip of her elbow wouldn't protrude as though her arm was ten feet long - So the image to the left has got to be a 2nd generated angle of view. SO - my thoughts are that it could all be a photo COMPOSITE of sorts, where several fixed 2D cameras presumably hanging on walls or mounted atop dressers or shelves or desks against the wall - perhaps all of the walls? - SO - I'm thinking these 2D images would inform a COMPOSITE in a sense, not like a typical 3D photo wherein two lenses stand apart at a distant equivalent to the average span between a person's eyes - But RATHER, this composite could be taken from ANY of these fixed lenses, once it has first established the parameters of the room and where the lenses are shituated within that space ... ??? Just a brain~fart!

3D picture

Plenoptic light-field cameras - look it up - very interesting

People are working on this photo tech now. The system uses light bouncing from areas normally hidden and projects a very accurate 'echo' if you will, of what objects are relfecting that light - so yes this will be possible - at the moment the trade off is that the resolution is poor if you want to see 'around corners' - but they are working on that as well. And yes - the final shot is a different angle entirely - that's just bad work from the film's continuity team :) One of the best movies ever.

reminds me of work aside from all the darkness

When Ridley Scott knew how to make movies! Look at those far-field out-of-focus lighting effects and shadow-play!

if you hadn't noticed all frame references are the same

How was such a picture taken? With a drone flying through the entire apartment making google-streetview snapshots of everything?

"Now lets make a birthday card for Granma"...235 hours later: "That turned out great!" "Now I'll just boot up my Faxatron 3000XL so i can send this card for Granny." "It too has the same brilliant voice command system as my Esper !"

The technology to see around the corner as he does here exists, and can be seen on MIT's website (note that the photo he puts in the device is not just printed, its attached to a disc or tape of some kind that could contain the info needed to accomplish this): web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/camera-sees-around-corners-0321.html

Funny you mentioned that, because Vangelis later used that exact synth on some of his albums.

well it is TEH FEWTCHARR

2:27

The hard copy he prints off isn't even the same angle as the final freeze frame.

...imagine trying to watch Porn on that small ass tv. hard to masturbate too! :P

First, I apologize for the typo, that's very uncharacteristic - I must have been in a rush or something. Yes, I know film pictures are limited by their grain, but the resolution of a film photo is purely limited by the quality of the film. Assuming you had implausibly flawless film this would be possible (although, in reality, it clearly isn't possible).

There's no way to know whether the picture was taken on film or digitally, first of all. Second, film pictures are still limited by their grain. Third, you spelled "know" incorrectly.

Korg Wavestation years before it was even a thought. Thats what this soundtrack is giving me. Amazing movie on so many levels.

That photo must have been shot with a 200 megapixel camera.

im not familiar with the movie, but is he simply scanning an old photograph?

what bugs me the most is how he could take a picture of so many pixels

@rchealy The look around the corner scene has bugged me too for years, but actually it seems you are right. gizmodo-com/5894972/this-futuristic-camera-can-see-around-corners-using-lasers (just replace the first - with a dot)

@SocratesTheGadfly: I used to be so ticked off about the same thing, but look at today's technology... the imperceptible is now easily perceived through DSP. Everything emits/reflects light and casts a signature upon surrounding objects. Is it so hard to think that in 2019 a routine would be written to take samplings or averages of reflected light from 2D captured objects to cast a reliable representation of what is around the corner?

@CaptainJen Smaller Faster Stronger Better!!!

@andmaketherain But more importantly than that.....he's hunting replicants. He knows she is one if she's living with Leon.

@SocratesTheGadfly Check out Jean-Francois Rauzier's website

@Deathbringer99699 Deckard was looking at a photo from Leon's apartment. In the photo, Roy Batty is in the tub to the left. But on closer inspection, Deckard finds Zhora in another room and pictures of scales. He had found a scale in Leon's apartment. Deckard was then able to tie in that where he could find the owner of the scale, he could find Zhora.

@CaptainJen Because he's a lowly detective.

dont know if this is the right place to ask,, im watching blade runner right now.. but i stoped after have watched this.. and i dont get it.. who is the girl in the picture?.. whats so important about it?...