- 269
- 304 476
SDAQ&A - Official YouTube Channel
Australia
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 26 ต.ค. 2013
Revealing Adventism One Conversation at a time!
SDAQ&A Clips #2 (From S6:E11) Larry Geraty - Full video link in description.
SDAQ&A Clips #2 (From S6:E11) Larry Geraty - Full video link in description.
มุมมอง: 191
วีดีโอ
SDAQ&A Clips #1 (From S6:E5) John Denne - Full video link in description.
มุมมอง 22128 วันที่ผ่านมา
SDAQ&A Clips #1 (From S6:E5) John Denne - Full video link in description.
Ellen & her love of the apocrypha @SDAQanda
มุมมอง 373หลายเดือนก่อน
Ellen & her love of the apocrypha @SDAQanda
S5:E24 - Des Ford LIVE ‘From the Vault’ Part 2 - Feb 6, 2016
มุมมอง 1.3Kปีที่แล้ว
S5:E24 - Des Ford LIVE ‘From the Vault’ Part 2 - Feb 6, 2016
S5:E23 - Des Ford LIVE ‘From the Vault’ Part 1 - Feb 6, 2016
มุมมอง 1Kปีที่แล้ว
S5:E23 - Des Ford LIVE ‘From the Vault’ Part 1 - Feb 6, 2016
S4:E24 (3/3) Ted Wilson's Adventism. Is it yours? With John Rosier
มุมมอง 1.2K2 ปีที่แล้ว
S4:E24 (3/3) Ted Wilson's Adventism. Is it yours? With John Rosier
S4:E14 - (2/3) Ted Wilson's Adventism. Is it yours? With John Rosier
มุมมอง 1.2K2 ปีที่แล้ว
S4:E14 - (2/3) Ted Wilson's Adventism. Is it yours? With John Rosier
S4:E12 - (1/3) Ted Wilson's Adventism. Is it yours? With John Rosier
มุมมอง 2.1K2 ปีที่แล้ว
S4:E12 - (1/3) Ted Wilson's Adventism. Is it yours? With John Rosier
S3:E15 - Ellen LOVED the Apocrypha!? - Matthew Korpman, Dr Ron Graybill & Dr Denis Fortin
มุมมอง 5K3 ปีที่แล้ว
S3:E15 - Ellen LOVED the Apocrypha!? - Matthew Korpman, Dr Ron Graybill & Dr Denis Fortin
S3:E1 - We’re NOT happy! - Women speak up about WO
มุมมอง 8423 ปีที่แล้ว
S3:E1 - We’re NOT happy! - Women speak up about WO
S2:E1 - Dr William G. Johnsson - Des Ford 40th Anniversary of Glacierview
มุมมอง 4.7K3 ปีที่แล้ว
S2:E1 - Dr William G. Johnsson - Des Ford 40th Anniversary of Glacierview
Promo S2:E1 - ‘1844 - Did anything Supernatural happen the night of Oct 22?’ Dr William G. Johnsson
มุมมอง 1.5K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Promo S2:E1 - ‘1844 - Did anything Supernatural happen the night of Oct 22?’ Dr William G. Johnsson
Outback Hippies - live footage over the song ‘Wonder Where You Are’
มุมมอง 1109 ปีที่แล้ว
Outback Hippies - live footage over the song ‘Wonder Where You Are’
# 1 - Women's Ordination is a good thing. Renée agrees.
มุมมอง 11710 ปีที่แล้ว
# 1 - Women's Ordination is a good thing. Renée agrees.
Comment #2. I’ve never read the 28 fundamental of Seventh-day Adventist. I never even read them when they were 27. I know that there’s a lot of lack of love in the church and that’s where my concern is. because it doesn’t matter what we believe. If we don’t know Jesus Christ personally all the doctrine in the world isn’t gonna save us. I know that’s a fact revealed to me by God himself through His word. I think every denomination (person) has something to offer in the line of knowledge. It took me a long time to realize that I do have a brain of my own, to use it! I can use it! and I don’t have to worry about what people think about me using my own God-given gift of individual free-will. I appreciate all the videos, I watch on TH-cam. They’re very educational. I’ll give them that, at least. I know I’m not afraid to listen to other people’s education. … because I have the word of God as my entire standard (so thankful), and I have Jesus Christ as my example (alleluia)! He promises He will never leave nor forsake. that’s good enough for me. 😀 Take care. I will continue listening to you, among the other videos I listen with Seventh-Day Adventist thinking, teachings, and techniques. I’m truly trying to understand as much as I can. We all have one short life. My goal is to spend the rest of it to learn all I can. I’ve wasted my past… I’ve wasted my you away from truth. I seek to not waste anymore time.
I just started listening to this, another one of your video, after a few days of pondering the matter, contemplating what’s going on here, from the few I heard prior. I was one of them who mentioned the tattoos (in short, why all the tattoos?), but I never got an answer. So, give it to me straight: asking questions has to be strictly about your version of Christianity versus Adventist version of Christianity? In one of your videos, I heard last week (I don’t remember which one it was ), you mentioned that the Christians aren’t going to kill Adventist; that that just isn’t gonna happen! I beg to differ. I sat at my sister-in-law’s kitchen table, roughly 9 years ago, as we were talking about Sunday vs Saturday, and I told her exactly what I thought was going to happen, if believing Matthew 24, and the seventh day Adventist teaching, about killing those who offend them. Remember Cain & Able? Surprisingly, her reply was, “So Be It!” she’s all for killing people who don’t go along with Sunday. And that’s my sister-in-law 😮 I truly don’t know what to believe anymore, especially when it comes to people’s teaching. Jesus got to the point, very quickly. My first suspicion is “Why drag out these videos so long?” Is it because we lack so much understanding we must go on and on to make a point worth making? We, as Professed Christian’s, give so little love to one another. Through His words I know what Jesus Christ is like, and I know what the heavenly Father is like, to the best of His knowledge, as revealed through staying in God’s words. I’m just waiting to see an actual glow (evidence without question) of the Holy Spirit, living throughout any of us. Is God’s Spirit in any of the people I encounter or even in myself! Maybe what we should be asking ourselves, is, what does love look like in a living human being? I know I ask myself that all the time.🥹 I keep praying-asking God to show me the love that He talks about, in my self, and through at least another person (my version of what love would look like, as spoken of in 1 Corinthians 13:4-7; Galatians 5:22-23). Good day 💜🙏🏼🥹 John 13:35 “By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.”
IN RESPONSE TO DIVISONS IN THE CHURCH...(Diversity in unity) Ellen G. White believed that while individuals have unique gifts and perspectives, they should come together in harmony to fulfill a common purpose, especially in advancing the work of God. Here is a summary of her thoughts on this topic, drawn from her writings: Unity Amid Diversity Ellen White recognized that God created people with different talents, temperaments, and backgrounds. She saw this diversity as essential for the church to fulfill its mission. In Testimonies for the Church, Volume 9, she wrote, "In the diversity of the gifts that God has placed in the church, there is to be unity; each is to follow in the line of service for which he is best adapted." The Body of Christ White often referred to the church as the "body of Christ," where each member has a unique role, much like the various parts of the human body. She stressed that no one part is more important than the other, and all must work together. She wrote in The Ministry of Healing, "God has different ways of working, and He uses different kinds of workers to do His work. In the church of God there are a variety of gifts and duties." Avoiding Uniformity While advocating for unity, Ellen White cautioned against demanding uniformity in thought or method. She believed this would stifle creativity and the work of the Holy Spirit. She stated, "God does not design that His work shall bear the stamp of one man’s mind and one man’s judgment" (Testimonies for the Church, Volume 9). Christ as the Unifying Factor White taught that the foundation of unity in diversity is Christ. By focusing on Him, believers can rise above personal differences. "The closer we come to Christ, the nearer we shall be to one another" (The Adventist Home). Ellen G. White's vision for diversity in unity serves as a powerful reminder that the strength of any community lies in embracing individual differences while working together toward a shared goal.
Peter, I'm glad you did this. Sad I couldn't attend live. A key point worth drilling down on was where the ADL guys kind of glossed over saying "the substitutionary atoneing death of Christ". That could be taken many different ways. It would be very telling of their picture of God if they were to clarify what they mean by each of those words. It's bound to come up in the next talk when they speak on the Gospel so if you could try getting an answer on the actual machanics of what they mean by those heavy theological terms. Is this a blood sacrifice view? Is this a "hidden by Christ from the wrath of God" view? And then what does their answer surmise about the God they follow? I find people don't usually know how to answer if they haven't looked beyond the emphasis on "MY salvation".
Good evening Motosapien. When you participated in SDQ Q & A, I listened carefully to your acclamation of Maxwell's avuncular description of, and aversion to, the bloody consequences of mankind's rebellion against Holy God. I'm sad to think that you have subscripted to Maxwell's view that rebellion against righteousness can, and always could have been, assuaged by a gentile invitation to "trust God". To be sure, Maxell made a mighty, and in some ways admirable, effort to find a rational version of 19th century SDA fantasies -- among other reasons, to keep his job in the face of juvenile administrative resistance -- but it was impossible that he could do so consistent with the plain teaching of scripture. Maxwell may or may not have consciously bought into the vestiges of Arianism that infected -- and I would suggests continues to infect -- SDA Christology and soteriology, but it certainly infused his unremittent aversion to the notion that God required sacrifice in order to redeem mankind. Did Maxell truly not understand that the bloody sacrifice by which God became, and was revealed to be, both just and the justifier was suffered by God Himself? Has there ever been anything more profound and consequential in all eternity?
@jamesandres6312 Hi James. As someone who sat in Graham's SS lessons multiple times you should know these answers about Maxwell. Arianism? Absolutely not. Maxwell was on record through the tape recordings by the Kirk's for over 40 years. His own words "Jesus is God in human form". You've previously made the claim that he subscribed to moral influence theory, also completely false. Graham was repeatedly clear on his stance towards the issues and definitions, most keenly in the open letter 'The Scourge of Theological Gossip'. Both Maxwell and Provonsha pushed back on leadership in their time. They kept their jobs not because they capitulated but because they were theological sound and well educated in their positions so when those, notably juvenile, leaders tried to railroad them they knew more about their position and reasoning than those leaders did (my own take on reading between the lines). That was in spite of open opposition from high ranking folks like LaRondelle. You speak so much of blood, I'm sure you remember Graham's observation about hematolotry? Worship of blood. You seemingly are describing a God who demands blood sacrifice for appeasement, are you not? What of Micah 6:6-8? Isn't the God of the Bible the one who speaks with a still small voice? The One who says not by might or power but by My Spirit. When Elijah went out to meet God he didn't leave the cave for the power and light show but only for the gentle whisper. This isn't simply a Maxwellian view. @RachelleAnonymous just pointed me to a book by Brad Jersak who came from the Orthodox Church and independently found the same view of a gracious God that I have! You can find the trailer for 'A More Christlike God' here on TH-cam. Please, I'd love to hear what you think of his preposition.
@@jamesandres6312 I have to come back to also clarify about how you've surmised my position. To say "Maxwell's view that rebellion against righteousness can, and always could have been, assuaged by a gentile invitation to "trust God" is a gross misrepresentation. The only way in which God could set and keep men right was to make Himself visible and familiar to their eyes! I'm sure you know the quote as it was one of Graham's most poignant citations. Or maybe you stand with the former editor of the Review who defiantly said "it is NOT the only way!" But then what is being implied about God's methods and the required means by which we are saved?
@@Motosapien46 "You seemingly are describing a God who demands blood sacrifice for appeasement, are you not?" That -- particularly the rhetorical "blood sacrifice" -- is the key point emblematic of Maxwell's (well intentioned) sophistry. Do you think that the sole source of goodness, love and righteousness in all eternity -- namely, the Almighty God -- can allow evil to exist forever? I hope you do not believe that is a viable option for the loving creator of all things. If that is not a viable option, what is? Is there really any other option for God than eradication of evil once and for all and forever? And if that is not "death," what is it? Hopefully you do not believe that "the wages of sin is death" (Romans 6:23) is a joke or a lie or an exaggeration. What you call a "blood sacrifice" I call the most wonderful display of love that could be imagined in all eternity -- namely, God Himself paying the price of our rebellion in order to save us from our unrighteousness while remaining the unsullied source of all goodness, justice and righteousness in all existence. "The only way in which God could set and keep men right was to make Himself visible and familiar to their eyes." Wrong. Extremely wrong and sophomoric. To be sure, that is the only way that God could reveal Himself to us in any way we can understand. But for God to simply enter humanity by the birth of Jesus and then depart (ascend) to heaven with nod and wave goodbye would make a mockery of the sin problem. "The wages of sin is death" is not a joke or an exaggeration. God and evil cannot coexist. Evil and evil doers must be eradicated. That is by definition "death." God does not have to eradicate evil doers that plead the death of Jesus -- what you call a "blood sacrifice" -- as their own death. Jesus' death is the vicarious death of every believing Christian that they need not suffer. God can and will transform them from evil to righteousness, and give them the gift of eternal life, and still be 100% just precisely because, and only because, of Jesus' "blood sacrifice."
why all SDA believers are so afraid about this verse : HEBREWS 4 : 7 1. God make another sabbath day WHY ? and God call it TODAY (means 24 hours or only 1 hour). 2. on the 7 day WHY ? God closed the sabbath (day) specially to those sinners, unbelievers, disobedient 3. WHY ? God add a day or another day that he called today (sabbath day) for those new believers to worship him ? SDA PLEASE ANSWER ME IN ETERNAL SPIRITUAL WAY (HOLY SPIRIT) OF TRUTH from your very heart and from your soul. I'm waiting to be answered, Thanks, God bless ❤❤❤ from 🙏💖🇵🇭 philippines
54:40 boy can I relate.. I wasn’t suicidal but high anxiety because of all the “America in prophecy” sermons and “impending doom” Myles, keep revealing these doctrinal fallacies. The Lord will keep bringing the increase.
1:34:18-1:36:54 This is such a great question!!! The neo/progessive/liberal adventist deny deny deny and pick and choose or pluck out what adventist doctrines are resealable/usable to accepte. It is impossible to chat with one who for example who denies the IJ but turns around and says there still is an actual physical sanctuary in heaven that will be used for judgment.......😅 like come!
He spoke is stop him and let Steve speak
MIKE CULBRON- DALE ratzlaf said and believed that ADAM KEPT THE SABBATH AT CREATION ...how about that sport?
Former adventist like mike and all the rest get furious when adventist say things that cant be proven or back with the BIBLE. but they yes can do it.MIKE COLBURN says that Adam did not kept the Sabbath at Creation,That Adam did not REST at Creation.only GOD DID....MiKE cannot prove that. it's pure speculation. THE DOUBLE STANDARD/TALK OF FORMER Adventist.
Tom your WRONG!!! She gave a date they did not. Big difference.
Former sda dont love adventist ..period.a fact, yet they talk about adventist loving people.
So you as a former adventist leave the church.because you found out that EW was a PLAGIARIST . right? which is the $1 reason why former adventist leave the church. then you are PROVEN THAT ELLEN WHITE WAS AND IS NO PLAGIARIST . that TRUTH proves you wrong.what are you left with now? TAHT YOU WERE WRONG.IN ERROR.
REWATCHING THIS GOD BLESS MYLES
Michale C- they (all former) sda contradict themselves and dont agree with themselves.
Sir Nillo-what evidence you have Abraham did not keep the Sabbath or the 10 Commandments ?
Michael C- the majority of them(former) sda dont answer questions.because they know who they can fool and who they cant.
I want to ask Mike-how does one pulls his wife out of the sda church when you find out that you were being lied or found out EW was a plagiarist .
Mike says.he feels that there is so much confusion in the sda church.no Mike. confusion brings division .no such thing exist in the sda .I know I live it.seen it.does not exist.
Mike Colburn-YOU HAVE NOTHING NEW TO ADD as a former sda.
Mikes stop the double talk. saying that adventist dont want to get out of the sda becaus they will lose this or that.
Do you guys really know what anti-gospel is? make it clear when you say that sda is anti-gospel. stop throwing stones and hiding .
Michael C. with you.
You’re Michael C?????
Listening a someone who claims to be a prophet has nothing to do with honoring that person.but on honoring GOD who speaks through that person. as Mike make it seem that is what adventist do.
6;51 am in Adelaide Australia .. I see.
It is a fact that all former adventist get out of the sda church because off Ellen White and PLAGIARISM CHARGES against her.
Sweeping statement number 1. ‘It is a fact…ALL former Adventists…’ lol. Oh man. That’s a classic.
How can adventism be anti-gospel ? when it speaks exactly what is food in the BIBLE/ANTI-GOSPEL is the attacks former sda bring against the Sabbath.that is anti-gospel.
The Sabbath is a MEMORIAL OF CREATION. it has nothing to do with the Jewish people ,as belonging just for them. The Sabbath existed way before the OLD COVENANT came to be. or exist.so to integrate the Sabbath as part of the New Covenant .
Mike. be more specific when you says that JESUS dont require no one to do anything . I bet you are talking about not keeping the Sabbath. and all the things sda teach that need to be done, etc
The question answered in Acts 1:7 was about when the Kingdom of Israel will be restored. Not about the second coming? It was about the timing of the restoration of the Temple. Agree?
The apostles saw the resurrection (and the ascension). They are real and buried in the Vatican. First hand accounts.
lol. And Harry Potter is a wizard. According to that series of books. I’m not. Repeat NOT discounting the Bible. I’m simply saying the resurrection can NOT be proven outside of the book.
The new gospel of former adventist. believers can be disobedient to GOD and still be saved.they wont save exactly with those same words.but will say it in a different way.
Come on the show John. Don’t be a sideline hit and run sniper :)
@@SDAQandA - I am thinking about it. if I do I am not going to promote no one or force no one to believe what I believe.specially since I became a sda through the readings of EW. not knowing nothing about who EW or the sda were. I am not telling no one believe in her.and its my belief GOD LEAD me to her writings.its may experience and belief . each one needs to find out the truth on their own.thats my position . I am Realist . A Rebel.I dont have time for Nonsense . I know its due to my Military Background. I dont let no one Manipulate me.and I know when it wants to be done.I know who is a sheep and who is a wolf. I respond according when dealing with others.
@@SDAQandA - So you let me know if you want me in your show. after what I wrote to you before. It will be interesting to me to ask a former sda q few questions also face to face(video) mainly dealing with EW and plagiarism .and why former sda like you keep accusing her of being a plagiarism. after the fact that you are not a COPYRIGHT LAWYER. like all the thousands of sda .who keep leaving the sda church because they found out Ellen White copy, thieved from other writers(according to all of you)
Do you have to be a copyright lawyer to know if someone passes off others material as their own? Wow 🎉🎉🎉
@@JOHNVALDEZ-e8hfair enough.
Ellen also said you have to stand without a mediator? So, is Jesus the only atonement or do you have to stand without a mediator?
EGW is a clown, and her followers are just the audience who paid with their souls to enjoy the circus.
It is interesting that the majority of former sda come from SODOM & GOMORRAH(california or san Francisco )
Every time I hear an adventist come out of the sda .I watch the videos.THEY HAVE NOTHING NEW TO SAY. all former adventist have the same story. EW was a plagiarist. the sabbath was not in genesis .and on and on.
The prophet John did not have it right also. Paul did not have right also.peter?worst?king David? Abraham? all of them, even after being a prophet they were a MESS. why mike and former adventist dont go after them also? BIAS AND BIGOTS. that why they dont do it.
The DOUBLE STANDARD of former adventist.when I hear mike.
Progressive truth is not a copout .like mike claims.mike you have to say that. and believe that.because if you dont,.then you are wrong.
In answer to Mike K. saying that if EW lived to =day she could not be a sda.because of their doctrines back then. oNE CAN SAY THE SAME THING ABOUT THE APOSTLES. they had everything wrong. starting with their SHUT DOOR. still believing that all their rituals should still be practiced .so when MIKE and all the rest of former sda bring such accusations. they ARE BEING BIGOTS AND BIAS. bias and bigots individuals ARE DISHONEST.
In answer to Peter saying that maybe Ellen White did not believed in GOD. or knew GOD.......anyone who knew EW said that SHE WAS A TRUE CHRISTIAN. one of her most fearlessly attacker.DM CANRIGHT. at the funeral .passed and view her in her casket 3 times.and said .that EW WAS A REAL CHRISTIAN. Peter knows all that...he just choses not to believe in her.
Here we go again.the same old LIE AND ATTCAK AGAINST ELLEN WHITE,PLAGIARISM. the most shocking part is that a CATHOLIC COPYRIGHT LAWYER.DEBUNKS THE PLAGIARISM CHARGES AGAINST ELLEN WHITE. 27 pages of legal opinions.that Ellen White was no plagiarism .
Ezekiel 36 is about the rebirth of Israel, not the commandments. God is preparing for the rebirth of Israel. Cant take single text of context. God vindication is not about the commandments its about Israel unfaithfulness and Gods faithfulness to the land covenant. 36 Then the nations that are left all around you shall know that I am the Lord; I have rebuilt the ruined places and replanted that which was desolate. I am the Lord; I have spoken, and I will do it.
There is a WARNING & LESSON in all those former adventist story and why they left the sda. they all have ONE THING IN COMMON" THEY REJECTED EW AS A PROPHET OR MESSENGER OF GOD. The moment they reject EW. they became DELUSIONAL . and started believing and attacking the BIBLE. attacking anyone who stand for the BIBLE.then they claim.they are not attacking anyone.
Jesus taught that God needed justified? It's nonsense.
Christians for 2000 years did not interpret Rev 17:12 to mean a future Adventist church. That's myopic.
Nor did they interpret 2 Peter 1:12 to mean that truth changes over time -- a monumental error that has malignantly infected SDA propaganda for more than 175 years.
Then the dragon was enraged at the woman and went off to wage war against the rest of her offspring-those who keep God’s commands (jews) and hold fast their testimony about Jesus (gentiles). Rev 12:17
"I will put a new spirit within you" After being taught in Adventism that spirit and breath are the same thing, looking back, this doesn't make any sense. So God is gonna put new breath in us? New oxygen? Like what? Adventism teaching on the nature of man doesn't comport with this verse (and many others).
If the truth sets people free, ask the ADL if they have assurance of salvation. I didn't a former sda. Ask them what they doubt about Adventism. Are there any doctrines that don't quite jive? Ask them what sins did Ellen White get caught up in. I bet they can name the sins of Moses or David.
ADL showed from the Fundamental Beliefs that they have Assurance of Salvation through Abiding in Christ. 1:41:52
@thatnicekid04 Now ask them what they mean by abiding in Christ. "Through the grace of God and their own diligent effort they must be conquerors in the battle with evil." Ellen white GC 425
@vegacool1 didn't Jesus say to overcome?
@thatnicekid04 how did the Hebrews overcome at the first passover?
@@vegacool1 by doing what God said
@1:09:54 "It is my conviction, Presuming for a moment, that this GOD (Isa 14: 12 onwards) is Christ and this Christ is Michael." No Scriptures, nothing for evidence, just a conviction. So here we have a conviction, based upon an assumption, to build a narrative. In other words, a whole doctrine stands on a foundation what was laid with assumptions and now must be the truth. You cant make this up. May God have mercy, for I don't even have 10% of Job's patience when hearing this crap
"... (christians) they say that it is sufficient to read the Bible exclusively, either alone or In a small grp at home. But, strangely, through such 'bible reading' they have reverted right back to the apostles doctrines..."