- 51
- 34 223
The Marshall Society
United Kingdom
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2020
The Marshall Society is one of the oldest and most prestigious societies in Cambridge. It was established in 1927 and is named after Alfred Marshall. Past members include John Maynard Keynes, Nicholas Kaldor and Joan Robinson. Our interest lies in bringing together young economists in Cambridge by organising seminars and events, and engaging in rigorous discussion on contemporary issues. This channel aims to spread the activities of the Marshall Society to the wider public and encourage greater engagement in economics.
Professor Jagjit Chadha OBE - Money Minders: Central Banks and their role in an economy
Professor Jagjit Chadha OBE gives a lecture at the Marshall Conference 2023 covering the role central banks play in the world today and how they control the macroeconomy.
มุมมอง: 475
วีดีโอ
Dr Michael Kitson - Global Crises and Megatrends
มุมมอง 295ปีที่แล้ว
In this lecture at the Marshall Conference 2023, Dr Michael Kitson covers contemporary global crises and their causes. While also depicting what the megatrends of the present day are and how these create opportunities and challenges for economic actors.
Dr Jose Gabriel Palma - The Krugman Challenge, inequalities and the South America Problem
มุมมอง 342ปีที่แล้ว
Dr Jose Palma speaks on how inequalities between countries arise, how they become entrenched and what possible courses of action economists can take to avoid and prevent this problem.
Economic Fables: Reflections of a Storyteller w/ Dr Ariel Rubinstein
มุมมอง 9402 ปีที่แล้ว
Dr. Ariel Rubinstein is a professor of economics at the School of Economics at Tel Aviv University and the Department of Economics at New York University. He is a leading theorist in Game Theory, Bounded Rationality, Experimental Economics and Choice Theory. He was present in Cambridge this April to deliver the 2022 Marshall Lecture on the topic: “Economics without prices and without games.” In...
Why Have Central Banks Misread the Inflation Story? w/ Charles Goodhart
มุมมอง 9612 ปีที่แล้ว
For many months central bankers have been calling inflation ‘transitory’ and insisting it is only caused by temporary pandemic pressures. Today with CPI inflation at 5.4% there is an increasing acceptance that the Bank of England and other central banks have badly misread the situation and now they are rushing to raise interest rates to prevent a wage price spiral. In this talk, Charles Goodhar...
Predicting Conflict Using Newspaper Text w/ Dr Christopher Rauh
มุมมอง 1722 ปีที่แล้ว
Dr Christopher Rauh discusses his current research on violence particularly in developing countries. Dr Rauh teaches the Corporate Finance course at Cambridge, but his main research interests are in labour economics and political economy. In this talk he will be speaking on his work on predicting political violence using newspaper text. Other work he has done includes research on universal basi...
Libertarian vs Keynesian Debate: Marshall Conference 2022
มุมมอง 3722 ปีที่แล้ว
This is a 90-minute debate between a libertarian economist and a Keynesian economist. They will be discussing the motion “This House Believes that Government Intervention Is Necessary In Times of Economic Crisis”. Proposing this motion we have Will Hutton… Will Hutton is an academic, journalist and the former Principal of Hertford College, Oxford. He was formerly editor of The Observer and econ...
Why Are Houses So Expensive? w/ David Miles
มุมมอง 3742 ปีที่แล้ว
Real house prices over the past 40 years have almost quadrupled, significantly outpacing real income growth. This is a massive problem for younger people who are increasingly struggling to get onto the housing ladder. This issue has become even more pressing the past couple of years as house prices have continued to accelerate upwards. In this event David Miles discusses why houses are so expen...
Using 'Big Data' to Understand Human Behaviour with Prof Neil Stewart | Marshall Conference 2021
มุมมอง 1653 ปีที่แล้ว
The annual Marshall Society (University of Cambridge) Conference was held online on the 6th February 2021. The theme of this event was "Behavioural and Experimental Economics: the New Orthodoxy?". We had four speakers talk on a range of fascinating topics. You can watch the rest of these videos here once they are released... th-cam.com/users/playlist?list....
Classical Dynamics of Market Price Formation with Vernon Smith | Marshall Conference 2021
มุมมอง 1973 ปีที่แล้ว
The annual Marshall Society (University of Cambridge) Conference was held online on the 6th February 2021. The theme of this event was "Behavioural and Experimental Economics: the New Orthodoxy?". We had four speakers talk on a range of fascinating topics. You can watch the rest of these videos here once they are released... th-cam.com/users/playlist?list....
A Behavioural Economist's Defence of the Market with Robert Sugden | Marshall Conference 2021
มุมมอง 4093 ปีที่แล้ว
The annual Marshall Society (University of Cambridge) Conference was held online on the 6th February 2021. The theme of this event was "Behavioural and Experimental Economics: the New Orthodoxy?". We had four speakers talk on a range of fascinating topics. You can watch the rest of these videos here once they are released... th-cam.com/users/playlist?list....
Insights From Behavioural Economics with Graham Loomes | Marshall Conference 2021
มุมมอง 2703 ปีที่แล้ว
The annual Marshall Society (University of Cambridge) Conference was held online on the 6th February 2021. The theme of this event was "Behavioural and Experimental Economics: the New Orthodoxy?". We had four speakers talk on a range of fascinating topics. You can watch the rest of these videos here once they are released... th-cam.com/play/PLt9iuZ3Z91OApfeQqlP_voDDMjJd36Sh7.html.
Where Will the US Economy Be in 2024? w/ Jack Lew
มุมมอง 633 ปีที่แล้ว
Where Will the US Economy Be in 2024? w/ Jack Lew
Why Is Infrastructure Such a Big Problem For the US Economy? w/ Jack Lew
มุมมอง 303 ปีที่แล้ว
Why Is Infrastructure Such a Big Problem For the US Economy? w/ Jack Lew
How Should Joe Biden Deal With China? w/ Jack Lew
มุมมอง 483 ปีที่แล้ว
How Should Joe Biden Deal With China? w/ Jack Lew
What are Joe Biden's Instincts on Economic Policy? w/ Jack Lew
มุมมอง 163 ปีที่แล้ว
What are Joe Biden's Instincts on Economic Policy? w/ Jack Lew
Is Government Debt Too High in the US? w/ Jack Lew
มุมมอง 183 ปีที่แล้ว
Is Government Debt Too High in the US? w/ Jack Lew
What Can Joe Biden Do With a Divided Congress? w/ Jack Lew
มุมมอง 103 ปีที่แล้ว
What Can Joe Biden Do With a Divided Congress? w/ Jack Lew
How Has the Pandemic Affected Investment Banking? w/ Goldman Sachs CFO, Marty Chavez
มุมมอง 634 ปีที่แล้ว
How Has the Pandemic Affected Investment Banking? w/ Goldman Sachs CFO, Marty Chavez
Problems With the Fed's COVID Response w/ Goldman Sachs CFO, Marty Chavez
มุมมอง 464 ปีที่แล้ว
Problems With the Fed's COVID Response w/ Goldman Sachs CFO, Marty Chavez
Limitations of Bitcoin as a Currency w/ Goldman Sachs CFO Marty Chavez
มุมมอง 1604 ปีที่แล้ว
Limitations of Bitcoin as a Currency w/ Goldman Sachs CFO Marty Chavez
What is Money? w/ Goldman Sachs CFO Marty Chavez
มุมมอง 784 ปีที่แล้ว
What is Money? w/ Goldman Sachs CFO Marty Chavez
Will Algorithmic Trading Cause The Next Financial Crash? w/ Goldman Sachs' Marty Chavez
มุมมอง 1084 ปีที่แล้ว
Will Algorithmic Trading Cause The Next Financial Crash? w/ Goldman Sachs' Marty Chavez
Digitalization and Financial Markets with Goldman Sachs CFO, Marty Chavez
มุมมอง 994 ปีที่แล้ว
Digitalization and Financial Markets with Goldman Sachs CFO, Marty Chavez
Is It Inevitable That China Will Become the World's Largest Economy? w/ Barry Eichengreen
มุมมอง 7524 ปีที่แล้ว
Is It Inevitable That China Will Become the World's Largest Economy? w/ Barry Eichengreen
What Can Joe Biden Do Without a Democratic Senate? w/ Barry Eichengreen
มุมมอง 374 ปีที่แล้ว
What Can Joe Biden Do Without a Democratic Senate? w/ Barry Eichengreen
Is US Government Debt Too High? w/ Barry Eichengreen
มุมมอง 1704 ปีที่แล้ว
Is US Government Debt Too High? w/ Barry Eichengreen
Why Hasn’t Africa Benefited from Globalisation? w/ Dani Rodrik
มุมมอง 6254 ปีที่แล้ว
Why Hasn’t Africa Benefited from Globalisation? w/ Dani Rodrik
Is China Really a Free Trade Miracle? w/ Dani Rodrik
มุมมอง 2004 ปีที่แล้ว
Is China Really a Free Trade Miracle? w/ Dani Rodrik
It is not hard to imagine the fossil fuel companies have been very clear to these neoclassical economists that good things will happen for them personally if they convince lawmakers that climate emergency is not going to effect much...
What is the software they used to simulate? He said it’s open source and anyone can download and use it. Anybody know please help me about this. Thanks.
Economics was not prioritised as highly as it is now, in the past. Economic theory was always the means to fund projects and infrastructure that benefited a specific nation. A nation's people, and their prosperity was it's purpose. Currently it is being used to justify greed and pulls the efforts from nations to benefit individuals outside the national interest. Environment, health and scientific progression is being sidelined in order to continue an obsessive act of watching a number go up. This number has no correlation to the flourishing of people.
_zz.
The introduction that relates economics to religion, then separated various disciplines of the Psyche into disassociated sciences is why Physics is in "Crisis", because it's all about aspect-version(s) of holography dimensionality and inside the e-Pi-i function is what composes the Periodic Table and Standard Model spectrum of logarithmic Fluxion-Integral Temporal superposition as understood to be outside of the Aether connection. Think about the inside-outside presence of the Camera Obscura, vertices in vortices manifestation and how vanishing-into-no-thing is as a consequence of logarithmic 2-ness string-like nodal-vibrational distance-time stretched inside 3-ness Cavity Resonance of WYSIWYG transverse trancendental sync-duration dimensionality. Imagine sound as light inside an Auditorium, because distance-time is Electron-photon-phonon-Proton Neutronic oscillation transparency in Spacetime-distance-time superposition. All analogous comparisons lack congruence in Truth, if the images are not true flash-fractal thermodynamical resonance in e-Pi-i Fusion-Fission Function projection-drawing modularity.., 3D-T Holographic Principle Perspective.
When it comes to the math derivation that derivation is only correct if w times L / Y is constant. Otherwise, the integration step is wrong, as alpha depends on time. Also, when you integrate you add a constant C, which after you get rid of the logarithm will become multiplication by C.
Fantastic presentation
Fascinating.
Sheerest brilliance imo.😏😳🤭
The speaker might have confused neoclassical economics with neoliberalism interpretation. Another problem is that his emphasis on dynamics might be a misunderstanding about the purposes of neoclassical economics. The objective here is not to predict but rather to see what happens if certain assumptions can lead to meaningful results, which might have practical policy implications.
great! loved it.
NEWS FLASH! The U.S. abandoned the actual U.S. dollar, $, in the 1960's. The fiat Federal Reserve Note, FRN, is not, and bears no relationship whatsoever to the actual U.S. $. th-cam.com/video/pP8Mz4IDDXk/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/CK81ik2NZoc/w-d-xo.html
Load of wishful thinking and delusions of superior knowledge which in reality is best described as rubbish !
You seem to really hate Steve Keen so could you enlighten us in your own economic views?
@@camcorl7921 Firstly - i don't hate Steve Keen. -I hate what he says and can't back up with independent facts or reasoned logic or the fact he walks away from explaining his own statements. For example I believe he has a very poor understanding of how trade between businesses involved in exporting and importing is financed which is evident in his discussions with one of his own fellow MMT founders- Warren Mosler. My own economic views about what particular macro subject ?
@@Rob-fx2dw Not a particular macro subject simply your views on economy as a whole, the field I mean, its methodology ect. Which currents you agree with and generally your views on all that jazz? Like are you a behavioral economist, which economists do you agree with, what are the economic textbooks, models and other such stuff you would recommends. What are your own views?
@@camcorl7921 Firstly all of the designated official money is fiat money and it is connected in the economy and all money only has value because it is accepted by others as a means of comparing values of goods and services. No goods and services means no value to the money. Wealth is not money but money itself merely is a means of comparing wealth and transferring that measure to another entity or saving that measurement for the future. There is no credibility in believing that one entity in the economy has any exclusive innate ability to create wealth more than any other. For instance creating a situation be it by law in which one entity has a legal right that is forbidden to others does not create wealth. All it does is enable wealth to be reallocated. If you want to learn more about the economy than refer to the work of Prof. Stephen Hanke of Johns Hopkins University because he has a very good handle on how the economy works and has worked over time.
@@Rob-fx2dw okay so if I'm getting things right you lean on the free market economy side of things. I'll get back to you in a few years perhaps if I remember this.
For those of us who have raged over the rather obvious and perverse elements of standard economics this lecture is hilarious and gratifying. For the longest time they have pulled assertions from their nether regions and not one of their colleagues cried fowl or even ran away from the smell.
p̾r̾o̾m̾o̾s̾m̾
I found the first part quite interesting, and then it fell apart as he failed to apply the same thinking to climate change hysteria. th-cam.com/video/WB69D_Yi7Po/w-d-xo.html
great lecture
If you want slaves, why educate them to be masters. This lightweight extends beyond even today's insistence on banality. The most frightening image I can conjure is this person being in charge of anything.
No arguments, only insults. He and others, similar to him proved economics wrong. You believe nonsense that has no bearing to reality. Empirical evidence shows the exact opposite from the nonsense in which you believe in. Of course, if you cared about evidence and logic you would have changed your stance a long time ago. You pretend to believe in supply and demand nonsense because you want to believe in it, you don't care about evidence not a tiny bit. Economics is not science, it is pure mythology and propaganda. Try doing physics with the same rigor economics or psychology is done and you would be laughed out of the room.
Great questions!
Steve Keen can't even see his own hypocrisy. Consensus of economists means nothing because economist are controlled by the elite who use them to push neoclassical policies but climate change will destroy the planet and the environment will die off because there's a consensus in academia (there isn't).
3,501 views on MON 18 APR 2022 - - 20:40 hrs ( -5 GMT )
If you took 1000 economists and joined them end to end they would never reach an agreement.
Venezuela and zimbabwe are keynesianism in a nutshell. you channel money to unproductive outlets then youll kill off saving which is the driver of economic growth. Debunking economics is like Debunking gravity or debunking spherical earth. keen is an economist like flat earthers are physicists.
Me: "Help, I'm going to fall from the 10th floor of my building." Neoclassical firefighter: "We've surveyed all the residents of the building and found that height off the ground has no correlation with health. You'll be fine."
Assume a trampoline
I have heard even a better one: "What does an economist think when he sees 20 bucks on the floor? He assumes that if there really were 20 bucks on the floor someone would have already picked it up, so obviously it must be a hallucination, there are no 20 bucks on the floor"
I'm sorry, isn't that what they did in the research described? They surveyed companies, and then determined rising marginal cost doesn't tend to happen because of the responses they were given? It might have been a better idea to actually look at the company's data and financials.
As a psychologist, this makes me even more skeptical about the ‘new’ behavioural sciences based on nudge theory and economic models of consumer behaviour. Thanks for sharing.
I'm not an economist, but from my perspective in the field of biology, the assumptions, models, methods, and claims of economics have long seemed absurd to me. Yet business and economics people react as though I'm the one who is insane. They also seem blissfully unaware that anyone in the Natural Sciences putting up a paper using the same methods and standards would be rightfully mocked and ridiculed.
That is because economics is a subdiscipline of political economy, which is a subdiscipline of moral philosophy. Mainstream economics cast aside the most basic observation by their predecessors; namely, that nature (i.e., the factor "land") is not produced by humans and does not respond to what economists refer to as "the price mechanism" in the same way as does labor and capital goods. This was brought out by the American political economist Henry George in the late 19th century.
TBH I am a very Trump-sceptic person and I would like to point out that Biden has to improve circumcstancees for the people. Elsewise they risk a Trumy dynasty and sadly they are not good leaders exactly. It is most annoying to me that of all people Trump run as hard was the one to as hard oppose the left as he did. I am more a I wish I could share your view of the non-threatening nature of the mosr lunatic right in gernerall.
We could resolve the porblem by helping more concerted efforts for free speach plattforrms
To a degree it is pur job to make it and make it better then those
*You* are underestimating chinas growth potential
Ah I actually disagree I feel the communist party has done a phenomenal job of archiving and maintaining controll
I understnad were you weeere comming form, but if you look at the ability to remain in controll showcased for example by the wahishing of Jack Ma or similar dissapprences or even the lockdown in Wuhan you can see a quite steady hand of controll that has just only given away economic decisions to a degree not to an amarda of buracts but a capitialistic competition.
Menticide
Zoom owned by Chinese Bill Gates
The connection between Amazon and Alibaba is not dealt with. Individual traders buy from Alibaba in China and sells on Amazon. So the Americans is fueling Chinese economic growth
FERGUSON IS A SOCIALISTIC LYING PUPPET OF SATAN!!! HE THINKS HE KNOWS IT ALL, WELL, NOT BY MY BOOK!!! IN MY BOOK, ALMIGHTY GOD IS STILL THE ONE WHO SITS ON THE THRONE! HE SEES ALL, KNOWS ALL, HEARS ALL & KNOWS THE END FROM THE BEGINNING!!! HE PREDICTED THE COVID DEATH TOLL WAY TOO HIGH. WHY, BCUZ HIS MASTER WAS HOPING FOR MANY TO DIE!!! HE DIDN'T COUNT ON THE FACT THAT WE HAVE SPIRITUAL WEAPONS THAT GUARD US FROM THE EVIL ONE & THAT OUR PRAYERS RISE UP BEFORE THE THRONE OF GOD & CAUSES GOD TO MOVE ON BEHALF OF THEM! NO WEAPON FORMED AGAINST US SHALL PROPER. EVERY TONGUE THAT ACCUSES US IN JUDGEMENT, WE WILL CONDEMN, THIS IS OUR HERITAGE, AS SERVANTS OF THE MOST HIGH GOD, OUR VINDICATION IS FROM THE LORD!!! HE KNOWS THIS VIRUS WAS PLANNED WAY AHEAD OF TIME, FROM CHINA, AND IT WAS PURPOSELY SPREAD ACROSS THE NATIONS. GOD ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN FOR MANY REASONS, WHICH I WON'T GO INTO, BUT WE, THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA ARE AWAKE & RISING & WE WILL FIGHT FOR OUR NATION'S FREEDOMS & RIGHTS!!! WE WILL NEVER GIVE UP! OH, THOSE VARIENTS & STRAINS, THOSE WERE ALSO CREATED. AS FOR MASK, THEY DON'T WORK! THE VACCINE IS BEING SHOVED DOWN OUR THROATS, WHY? POWER & CONTROL! YEA, WE'RE NOT AS DUMB AS YOU ALL THOUGHT WE WERE! YOUR TIME IS ALMOST UP, IF I WERE YOU, I'D GET DOWN ON MY KNEES & REPENT & ASK GOD TO FORGIVE YOU, YOU STILL HAVE TIME, AS LONG AS YOU ARE BREATHING. CHOOSE WISELY!!!!
Who is an Economist? NOT a Mathematician NOT an expert in Finance NOT a Psychologist NOT an Engineer NOT a Physicist NOT a Linguist NOT a Political Scientist. Then who is he dealing with everything from the impact of technology to money matters as pseudo scientist? And the most funny thing is that he plans everything ex post facto and then try to lead us to Neverland.
An economist is only someone who holds & professes a theory of how money works in reality & that is ProfSteveKeen. I knew that after viewing one of his early TH-cams from around March of 2016; watching the volume of money fall in one vessel as it rose in another vessel. It was good fortune to stumble upon that TH-cam.
For 40 years all western scholars failed dismally about China true analysis and its nature...China is a formidable opponent the western world has ever had..China is bigger and older than the rest of the western world
Thanks for the thoughtful discussion. I was already a Goodfellows fan- now glad to have found the Marshall Society. I loved Ascent of Money- looking forward to reading his new Doom...
With the pandemic, the world at last awakening to Cold War 2.0, Stalin 2.0 and 1984 2.0.
Respect, Mr rogers
Existential threat no.1 is the exponential increase in the development and capacity of Artificial Intelligence (soon to be Artificial General Intelligence). If it goes wrong, possible to create a totalitarian hellscape that we will all end up living under. The solution is to get a group of ethical engineers to build a benevolent AI system that is good for all humanity, as it is impossible to regulate this industry worldwide. Also find a way to stop squabbling and hack our desire for status and winning as individuals, groups, nations bla bla. Find a way to transcend this or everything will burn. Our toys are too powerful now.
Fantastic conversation and great insight as always from Niall Ferguson
Thanks for Uploading.
Niall's caution on China is well founded. Thank you
The real pandemic is the transformation of democracies into authoritarian states.
I love this man. Thanks to you both for a great discussion.
Thank you Jim!
Wow zero adds. Unlike reditsilvwr bit??s
@1:50:00 yeah, Thailand did not really do so well. Sure they contained covid, but they completely crashed their hospitality and tourism industry and failed to provide full wage subsidies for those workers who are now almost completely uberized. Same in NZ. F-ing disaster for the precariat. Just not as bad as the USA. Writing from NZ I can tell you we did bloody well by world standards, we've got pro-cricket and the America's Cup going full blast, and it all looks fantastic, beautiful summer Christmas with BBQ's and all,... but still needless suffering heaped upon those who could least afford it, the unseen unheard poor. I mean, we've actually now got Dalit in New Zealand.
Thailand & New Zealand did not know to employ & pay each person as an emergency public health worker? Did not know to pay them the equivalent of USA-$25 for every of the day's 24 hours & then employ & pay them for 42 days? Such a wise action to free billions from Bull-Shit Jobs, lower Co2 pollution & isolate Covid-19 was not done worldwide. Why think Thailand or New Zealand would be smarter than the average Yogi-Bear?
@42:30 (and relevant to the tax question @1:05:00) note that war bonds did not really significantly provide the fiscal space for war spending. In the UK in particular it was rationing that was the main inflation control. Likewise today in getting green energy infrastructure up and running governments will not need to sell green bonds, they could, but it is regressive, since it hands out free money (interest) to only those who can afford to purchase bonds in the first place. It will be more progressive to ration "use of carbon" (e.g., concrete, air travel, high NCE foods) and the more polluting forms of energy generation, and impose the rationing inversely to incomes. If only there will be the political will.
@22:00 Blanchard is even wrong about his "long slog." Modelling the real economy as distortions to a "completely competitive" economy is a bogus notion which suggests classical _physics envy._ (Physicists use perturbation theory in QFT because they have no other viable option.) But the physicist is perturbing a zeroeth order linear system. What's the correct analogy in macroeconomics? It is not a perfect competition system! In economics the zeroeth order is in fact a perfectly fair (non-competitive) system with trade parity, cooperation and everyone spending all their income. The non-linear distortions are _adding in competition,_ equity imbalances, trade imbalances, savings leakages, wealth imbalances and the rest.
We could rise a CO2 tax, but redirect revenues directly back to citizens, per capita!
Shall I have the following argument? The interest rate reflects the cost of capital (and growth opportunity), right? Following this logic, for example, if the government is facing the problem of paying back debt, it would mean the economy lacks growth opportunities. The lower growth opportunity would in turn mean a lower cost of capital or a lower interest rate. Then it's actually hard for the government to have debt concerns. Thinking of the sovereign debt problem in a static framework may be misleading.
This is a very nice talk. Thanks a lot for the Speaker Oliver Hart and moderator.