วีดีโอ

Brother your videos have blessed me so much. Thank you, I can’t wait to meet you in paradise and thank you in person. Say hi to the Father for me. ✝️❤️✝️

Didn't Erasmus put the 'comma johanneum' on his 3rd edition only after he was pressured by the catholic church?

It’s a shame that Dr Ken Ham denies biblical cosmology. Sad.

Just found this brother’s videos yesterday, what a blessing. Sad that he passed.

And he said unto his disciples, Gather ye up the fragments that remain, that nothing be lost. *John 6:12*

Be truthful the only reason most of modern Christianity believes the Comma Johanneum is true is because they believe that God is a Trinity. The vast majority including you DO NOT have God's Spirit ( believe it or not) because you do not have rely on Gods works ALONE. For there has been ONE covenant , ONE testimony from Adam to this everyday and God's Words are Spirit and God's words are the truth. And the gates the grave have not prevailed against it.

Did u say sinisticus was pre 8th century- that rag is strongly disputed

J White is very dodgy by their fruits ...

What’s the motive for adding it because the Trinity was already accepted by at least 260? It was quoted or alluded to by a large number of early Church fathers It was exactly quoted by Cyprian before 260 Socrates of Constantinople said that “some have corrupted this epistle” of 1 John because they wished to separate Jesus humanity from his deity. Jerome specifically said the passage had been removed by “Unfaithful translators” (who we would guess are the Arians) Gregory of Nazanzius says the Comma belongs. It is present in 98% of the Latin copies (which were virtually free from Arian influence) It was accepted by at least 350 Bishops - many of whom were Arians - at the Council of Carthage.

Laughable..truly…what God can do is every thing…not all people are saved you dork …God gives them free will.

Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism. I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin, but not the Greek so out it goes. Good will towards men Doxology in Matthew Without cause God manifest in the flesh Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin, so out they go The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek and Latin so out they go. Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8 some throw out. If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem, what would you see as a problem?

A circumstantial case for the Comma of John: In 484 A.D. the bishop of Carthage with 400 bishops quoted the comma to an Arian Vandal king. Being the bishop of Carthage, he would have had access to the Scriptures of Cyprian, and he probably had a Vulgate, maybe a first edition. Also, Gregory Nazianzus wrote on the grammar, and he had a student named Jerome. Seems strong evidence to me. Blessings.

A circumstantial case for the Comma of John: In 484 A.D. the bishop of Carthage with 400 bishops quoted the comma to an Arian Vandal king. Being the bishop of Carthage, he would have had access to the Scriptures of Cyprian, and he probably had a Vulgate, maybe a first edition. Also, Gregory Nazianzus wrote on the grammar, and he had a student named Jerome. Seems strong evidence to me. Blessings.

A circumstantial case for the Comma of John: In 484 A.D. the bishop of Carthage with 400 bishops quoted the comma to an Arian Vandal king. Being the bishop of Carthage, he would have had access to the Scriptures of Cyprian, and he probably had a Vulgate, maybe a first edition. Also, Gregory Nazianzus wrote on the grammar, and he had a student named Jerome. Seems strong evidence to me. Blessings.

Can someone point me to the rule that one person, and one only, can be involved in the writing of a book? We could point to the Psalms. And to the Proverbs. We all understand that these were composed by more than one man. We could point to 1 Corinthians, Colossians, and 2 Thessalonians. "The salutation of Paul with mine own hand, which is the token in every epistle: so I write. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen." Likewise the epistle of 2 Corinthians starts, "Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, and Timothy our brother, unto the church of God which is at Corinth..." Also to Deuteronomy, _the last twelve verses_ of which may well have been written by Joshua. Concerning the gospel traditionally titled "St Mark," I've long thought that a pair of Apostles, namely Peter AND Andrew, wrote it together. _ Mrk6 <>< And he called unto him the twelve, and began to send them forth by two and two (...) And they went out, and preached that men should repent.

8:40 Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled; *lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau,* who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright. For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.

ok we are done here this has been a huge witch hunt thanks for posting Robert

Dr White also hates glossalia

dts hates anything to do with γλωσσα

well if God inspired it that also means He intends to preserve it why else inspire it????????

yeah never doubted the last ending of Mark. How can a gospel end with εφοβουντο γαρ?

Very helpful. thank you

Can you please tell me the source of the opening music/singing? Thanks!

Papias c. 130 tells the story of the woman taken in adultery. There is much detail about its transmission and history in the introductory notes to the Fragments of Papias in Michael Holmes's Apostolic Fathers. So one way or another the story is ancient and even if we dispute evangelical authorship, the story is arguably a true story preserved by followers of Jesus and which at the least was added to the canonical gospel to preserve it. But I think it was there from the start since Papias is associated with John and knew him or the so-called John the Elder, the disciple of the Apostle John.

Lol if “none” means “none” then I guess you don’t seek after God either.

@RobW0071: I have revisited your videos over the course of many years, and find them both insightful and encouraging. I see you haven't made any videos in some time, but my heartfelt wish is to see more content from you, as I believe you have much to offer the church which should be disseminated as widely as possible, including TH-cam as a vehicle towards that endeavour.

May his work be remembered. RIP Robert.

Thank you, I enjoyed this very much! I have always believed that 1 John 5:7 belongs in the canon of Scripture, which we call the Word of God.

The trinity comes from sun worship. It started with nimrod Semiramis and Tammuz at babel. From the latin vulgate and textus receptus it found its way into all the bibles today. Just like sun day Sabbath it is sun worship idolatry. None who practice it will inherit everlasting life. Defend it at your peril. I am not here to convince you or prove anything. I just told you the truth. Either you accept it or you don't. Hell and rapture are 2 more lies you believe. And the Sabbath is void. None of you are saved. John didn't write the coma johanneum. The Catholic church added it tampering with the bible. And the coma johanneum wasn't added until the 3rd edition of the textus receptus. He caved in under pressure. Rom 3 30 makes it clear God is one. Immediately some fool will add to God's word saying yes he is one in 3 parts. It was God who put you under this delusion because you are unworthy.

Memory Eternal, Brother. Thank you for your life and insight...

God INSPIRED what Moses wrote. No oral tradition. You open a can of maggots with that theory.

Nothing introduces greater evil into the world than a heretic.

In the age of carbon dating, neither Sinaiticus nor Vaticanus can be accepted until the are proven to date significantly before the 19th and 15th centuries respectively. The British Museum uses the specious argument that too much material would be required to date Sinaiticus. I think they at least suspect the truth and don't have the courage to take responsibility for destroying a century of "scholarship".

Does anyone have the resource or footnote for his comment about the St. Augustine and the Waldensians at 21:35 I would like to look up that reference for myself.

I spent some time copying out a text. Skipping due to a repeated word or phrase is very common.

Simon repented. Read Acts 8

Despite the arguments, and debates concerning 1 John 5:7, the Real Fact is---This verse is a Fabrication, a "Corruption" of the Text! And anyone who cares to Research the matter, will Find, there were quite a Few Scriptures that were, Altered in order to offer a trinitar- ian slant. Seek Wisdom. Seek Truth.

I wish the family would give us a brief biography of this kind Christian gentleman.

A lot of errors.

Sorry, why did you compare Codex Montfortianus with the edition of Stephanus? You should compare it with the Third edition of Erasmmus. It is exactly the same.

Have you seen James Snapp's manuscript argument?

I thought that masculine participles match non-masculine nouns if the noun is a person or is personified.

Jerome (342-347) "In this I found translators (or copyists) widely deviating from the truth; who set down in their own edition the names only of the three witnesses, that is, the Water, blood, and Spirit; but omit the testimony of the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; by which , above all places, the Divinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit is proved to be one" -- In Codex Fuldensis (546 AD) But, the Comma is in the Prologue; not in the text of Codex Fuldensis itself. The text is in a mss that is about 200 years removed from Jerome; so it must be weighed accordingly.

But isn't Codex Wizanburgensis a Latin Codex, not a Greek Codex?

Hi brother. The early church fathers ( antenicean) quoted the original manuscripts that the textus receptus comes from.They quote Mark 16:9-21 for example that the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus dont have. James White doesnt know what he is talking about. This was pre-vaticanus and way way before Sinaiticus which was proven a fraud.

This is really good and underlines the devils attack on the church through the word by casting doubt and inserting revision, just as he did in Eden.

Romans 8:23 is very specific that adoption is the redemption of our body; that's the SCRIPTURAL definition of adoption... In...is it 1st or 2nd Peter (?!?!), it says He predestined us according to his FOREKNOWLEDGE - KNOWING what would happen - NOT anything about a predetermined outcome. Note also that "We are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, prepared beforehand that we should walk in them" - so; does that mean we all walk perfectly in those works? After all, they were prepared beforehand - it must mean that if Calvinists are consistent! See how erroneous these Calvinistic assumptions are?!?! If Calvinism is true (please remember here that Calvin burned someone at the stake!!!), * every sinner has the ultimate excuse - AND - * God is absolutely NOT love, if he created them to be eternally tormented, giving them NO chance to repent. Period.

Here is a problem with your Calvinism: For all you know, you have "evanescent faith." You merely think "think" you are one of the elect, but God is just temporarily tricking you. Sorry, your confidence in Calvinism is misplaced, and Augustine was the first to teach this stuff. Calvinism tries to be a square circle, which is impossible. You cannot say God decrees all that anybody says, thinks and does, then say, "and by the way, God is not the author of sin." That's a square circle. The WCF sections 3 and 5 are square circles.

Had these verses by "slipped in," the Christian world would have ERUPTED. You don't just sneak a story like this in Holy Writ. Former Mormon here. Sad how Mormons hear James White and others attack these verses, and they can say, "See, the truth was lost, so Joseph Smith had to restore it." Stick with the scriptures of the Reformation. 1 Corinthians 15:1-4.

I think this is a dividing line. Funny how those I see who love, love, love God, embrace the Comma, and those that seem Pharisaical (and frankly, cold) reject it, and they think they are so smart. Really. I love how the host is not afraid to bring prayer into this, etc.,