- 1 576
- 118 199
Referee Adventures
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 1 มี.ค. 2022
2024 NCAA M D1 3rd STF v OHS 36' foul, freekick position
2024 NCAA M D1 3rd STF v OHS 36' foul, freekick position
มุมมอง: 55
วีดีโอ
2024 NCAA M D1 3rd Rd STF v OHS 20' yellow reckless
มุมมอง 18612 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA M D1 3rd Rd STF v OHS 20' yellow reckless
2024 NCAA D1 Women Virginia Tech v Duke 73' Yellow Card
มุมมอง 8516 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA D1 Women Virginia Tech v Duke 73' Yellow Card
2024 NCAA W D1 Penn v UNC 63' Yellow SPA
มุมมอง 25021 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA W D1 Penn v UNC 63' Yellow SPA
2024 NCAA W D1 Penn State vs. North Carolina 74' Unsporting Behavior or Violent Behavior/Conduct
มุมมอง 2.1K21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA W D1 Penn State vs. North Carolina 74' Unsporting Behavior or Violent Behavior/Conduct
2024 NCAA W D1 Penn v UNC 36' yellow reckless
มุมมอง 15421 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA W D1 Penn v UNC 36' yellow reckless
2024 NCAA W D1 Penn v UNC 33' offside decision
มุมมอง 1.1K21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA W D1 Penn v UNC 33' offside decision
2024 CUNY W John Jay vs Brooklyn College 54' violent conduct reds
มุมมอง 43วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 CUNY W John Jay vs Brooklyn College 54' violent conduct reds
2024 Mens Soccer D3 Berea v Bluffton 86' high jump shortened
มุมมอง 24วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 Mens Soccer D3 Berea v Bluffton 86' high jump shortened
2024 Mens Soccer D3 Berea v Bluffton 78' yellow
มุมมอง 14วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 Mens Soccer D3 Berea v Bluffton 78' yellow
2024 NCAA W CAR v AUG 86' red violent conduct
มุมมอง 58วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA W CAR v AUG 86' red violent conduct
2024 NCAA W D2 1st Rd 1st & 2nd Yellows
มุมมอง 27วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA W D2 1st Rd 1st & 2nd Yellows
2024 NCAA W D2 1st Rd 87' SPA or DOGSO Red
มุมมอง 29วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA W D2 1st Rd 87' SPA or DOGSO Red
2024 NCAA Women D2 1st Round Concordia St. Paul vs Missouri Western State Unviersity 78' Yellow
มุมมอง 73วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA Women D2 1st Round Concordia St. Paul vs Missouri Western State Unviersity 78' Yellow
2024 Girls Academy 09 Salvo vs Central Illinois United 56' offside decision
มุมมอง 30วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 Girls Academy 09 Salvo vs Central Illinois United 56' offside decision
2024 NCAA M D3 2nd UWS v AMH 52' penalty kick
มุมมอง 7114 วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA M D3 2nd UWS v AMH 52' penalty kick
2024 NCAA M D3 2nd UWS v AMH 37' yellow reckless
มุมมอง 2614 วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA M D3 2nd UWS v AMH 37' yellow reckless
2024 NCAA M D3 2nd UWS v AMH 37' yellow reckless, injured reentry
มุมมอง 9114 วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 NCAA M D3 2nd UWS v AMH 37' yellow reckless, injured reentry
2024 MSHSL B NSP v HM 50' push dissent restart
มุมมอง 2314 วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 MSHSL B NSP v HM 50' push dissent restart
2024 MSHSL B NSP v HM 40' buzzer beater goal
มุมมอง 5414 วันที่ผ่านมา
2024 MSHSL B NSP v HM 40' buzzer beater goal
Ref blew the call - first it looks like the Penn State player is ONSIDE @0:24 and second PSU player who scores is ONSIDE @0:33. Plus, as noted, the UNC player appears to "deliberately play the ball" @0:27 which means both PSU players cannot be offsides. While it is an awkward move that deflects poorly, (1) she had plenty of time to see flight of ball; (2) no PSU player was contesting her effort or potentially interfering with her attempt to play ball; and (3) while she takes w left foot, that might be her strong foot based on playing left back. So GOAL should have been the call.
onside...defender made a deliberate play on the ball...was not off balance
@@garydurso8475 deliberate play is an interesting question but first question: was there anyone in an offside position?
When the blue player kicked the ball forward from near the halfway line, the blue player who touches the ball first after the white defender kicks the ball, is in an ONSIDE position. Stop the video at the 1:04 mark and it is clearly visible. So, it doesn't matter what the white player does when she kicks at the ball. The blue #25 is onside. Yes, she is in an offside position when white kicks. But you need to go back to when the ball was played by BLUE to determine infringement. This is a slow developing play. But, you need to go back to when it started to determine offside. You determine offside position when kicked by blue, not white. And the player who scored is behind the ball when #25 passed to her. Goal.
All of the comments here missed the play. The offsides was earlier. Two PSU players were offside when the original kick occurred. They were technically 'offside' when the kick was made, regardless of who touched later.
To add: One player clearly offside and one close call at :23 to :25 on the video. It is a long pass, but a pass nonetheless, and it originates in the attacking half of the field. What happens later in the box does not matter.
@@RSQ-z4m check out the "short" version where the determinative moments are freeze framed (end of video). #25 is pretty clearly onside (two opponent nearer the goal line) when the ball is actually played by her teammate (AR is caught out of position and has to turn suddenly which is why he probably doesn't catch this). #23 is in an offside position (not itself an offense) and not interfering or gaining an advantage. After #25 receives the ball she dribbles forward--ahead of 23--and passes the ball to #23 who is now in an onside position (ball nearer the goal line) and the she scores. th-cam.com/users/shortsyfoV5yX2g6w?feature=shared
@@refereeadventures391 OK, But at :04 (freeze it), just over the half line, the the ball is struck and a PSU player is clearly offside and another PSU player is very close to offside. Offside is called when the ball is struck. The ball could hit every UNC and PSU player after that and the offside would still be in effect. For the office rule to be in effect the ball has to be in the attacking half when a pass is made. It was.
None of that matters….. from the camera angle the girl was kept on side by the slow movement of the North Carolina player up the field
I think that hits the nail on the head. Gotta remember question 1 is: was there a player in an offside position?
@@refereeadventures391 Exactly. And there *was* when the first pass occurred at :23. Check the rule book. That pass was long, but made in the attacking half. #14 was offside when that pass was made.
None of that matters….. from the camera angle the girl was kept on side by the slow movement of the North Carolina player up the field
elbow to the throat, studs-first kick to the opponents midsection, straight red in my opinion
how did the ref not understand that, and also neither announcer knows the freaking laws of the game?
Announcers' knowledge of the laws...varies! The real key here is that the player was onside.
That was a deliberate play on the ball by the defender. Offsides according to the NCAA: 11.3.3 If the player receives the ball from a deliberate play from the defender (except a save) 11.3.3.1: A deliberate act is one in which a player chooses to act, regardless of the outcome of the action. This deliberate act is neither a reaction nor a reflex. A deliberate action may result in the opponent benefiting from the action (e.g., a deliberate, but misplayed ball that goes directly to an opponent). A reaction or reflex may result in that player benefiting from the action (e.g., a ball inadvertently contacting the arm and falling directly to the player’s feet). Note: A deliberate play by the defender may result in an opponent in an offside position receiving the ball directly. This is not to be penalized as offside.
The deliberate (mis)play question is interesting, but it's secondary--the attacker was onside.
@@refereeadventures391 No. An attacker is offside at :23 of the video, when the first pass is made.
A deep red card. That ref is a dickhead.
illegal call, take action PSU.
Not a protestable situation in NCAA. Arguably, the referee has some discretion here, but tough to see a studs kick to the midsection as anything but red.
they both go red, eh?
@@trukweaz yes. I'm not sure what the first foul was exactly by the defender, but it looks like after the elbow to the face by the attacker, the defender yanks her hair and hits her. Somehow, it still isn't clear this is "fighting" under NCAA rules.
Easy red
@@josiasroach5601 yes. Going studs toward the opponent's abdomen to perform a surprise surgery should always be red! 😂🟥
I see a hard tackle here. Not a foul just a hard tackle
From a close look, I don't think it's a foul, but the referee is so far out of position, that's a tough sell. And looking at the whole game, that seems to have been an issue: th-cam.com/play/PLP2fcl_FLMpCxITh0UusvcIZgxCEz6MKS.html
There is nothing here that says dogso for this foul. If you want to argue red its for serious foul play bc of the force she uses when she kicks the attacker when fouling her but other than the foul its just SPA
Agreed. No SFP here. There is another defender right there too. Clearly tactical.
what am i missing?
@@trukweaz the only thing I can think is he attempts to or does somehow stomp on the opponent's foot, but there's so little reaction or movement by any opponents that I can't tell what happened. The critical piece is hidden behind players on the video.
no card?
@@trukweaz not even a foul called! If you check out the full version he restarts with an indirect free kick to the goalkeeper (which is correct if it's stopped for an injury with no foul since the ball is in the penalty area. Everything about this looks red given the height and foot at or close to the opponent's head. What's crazy is that something seems to happen off camera that leads to a purple player getting either a second yellow or straight red. The first yellow is also posted at 78'. 🤷♂️
Straight red all day
100% yellow card.
Was this awarded a free kick or penalty? 🤔
PK
no PK given though
Hahah um... what lol
Red! There was no attempt to play the ball. So even outside the box or inside , still a red 👍🏻
@@jhooooo14 it's red for that reason.
As a player if you want that call, you have to sell it. If you continue to stay up and attack goal, what are we supposed to do? It’s advantage. Now if he fell, that’s a different story.
huh
@@trukweaz a strategic decision by the coach
Is that enough “denial”?
@@trukweaz yes. The defender made a choice there. Take the foul out of the equation and all 4 Ds are present: attacker is headed straight at the goal, the attacker is all alone and the closest defender isn't going to get in front of him, he has control of the ball and he's going to be in a great position to take a shot on frame with the GK forced to come out or hold his position. We could maybe talk about whether that's a foul we'd call, but if it's a foul that is a red card.
@ yes. That’s my question. At game speed can we see a true denial of the chance to keep playing and score? There is a little bump and grab for sure. And he is clear of the other Ds.
@@refereeadventures391 and for sure a bit more force, etc. DOGSO red all day. im just not sure if im CR running full gas back (and telling my Ar via comms to watch for it) if the "denial" is sufficient enough.
@@trukweaz well, this AR also called this despite the comms: th-cam.com/video/4ayUQvAhnAA/w-d-xo.html
What do mean "surprising"??? She kicked the white player. Straight RC...easy.
@@johnandrews5141 😱😂
that looks like a handball to me...
@@trukweaz yep. Probably a yellow too because it looked intentional (but maybe not). Either way, should be a DFK coming out. A reminder to get wide to look in here. No way for ref to see it in that position. Not sure what the AR said there.
Can’t tell - doesn’t look like they have comms.
I think cr should have moved left as the kick came in. Let the ar handle his side. We had a handball goal in one of our states games. Cr out of position. No comms. Goal counted.
Yellow card? Really!
Everyone (even on the replay) misses the initial kick into the stomach by red. Then the ref doesn't see the kick, just the push. Should have been two reds on this play.
late for sure.
just a touch!
😂
CR needs to be in a good place to make a bad call. He seems to be way behind that play
@@trukweaz definitely not in a good position.
#earnedthat
Why did she start kicking💀
Looks like she was quite unhappy with the the contact before that...just a bit disproportionate
anything on that hit in the box at 29:11 of the clock?
not on that or the other jump by that guy
best of the year:_)
@@trukweaz at some point I'll have to get the lead up in the game to this situation. A lot of learning opportunities for aspiring referees.
I saw the lead in. Still a classic.
huh. even slowed, i dont see an obvious HB
Slowing it down to 0.25x speed, it looks like the "clear foul" wasn't so clear. It looks to me like she got the ball first, then the opposing player's foot landed on top of the ball, causing her to fall, not the red player.
On the contrary, it IS EXACTLY what I want to see. More of this please, ladies. Equal pay for equal lefts and rights.
huh. after years of hockey and lax officiating, im not sure I would card that. Foul and free kick. maybe to keep the temperature of the game in check?
@@trukweazhigh studs. Missed contact to gut. Studs contact to waist and thigh. Low force/bent leg. The action "endangers the safety of the opponent." It's a red card. If the referee doesn't take care of that, the message to the players is: "it's cool to come in studs to your opponent's abdomen, I'm not going to really punish you for it." Police don't issue citations for attempted murder.
@@refereeadventures391 i see it now, i had to watch on my computer, not phone. I just saw the initial shoulder to shoulder push, didnt see the post fall argy bargy
@@refereeadventures391 i do wonder if the CR got a good view on it from behind, too.
@ this one was hard to see what got to yellow. I'm still not as sure but it's a third place game no one wants to be at!
@@refereeadventures391 for sure. the other vid, red is VERY obvious
Great call and great eye. I 100% agree. That was studs up right into her leg.
State tourney match. Not impressive.
that looks in the box from here/
for sure. if it's actually a foul, it's gotta be a PK!
@@trukweaz you can see however, PKs were not being given that day: th-cam.com/video/dyFiLKhg1eE/w-d-xo.htmlfeature=shared
tricky one
The trip itself is pretty clear (sticks foot in, misses ball, catches attacker's foot) and the referee seems to be looking right at it. From this angle we can't tell if it's on the line or outside. But not calling it at all is pretty surprising.
I see one yellow card, but borderline, very borderlthey're lying and 2 straight reds in this video Can anyone tell me what the outcome was
@@tonylorinser4116 outcome of the game or the incident. I believe the incident was just the one yellow card. Marshall won the game. The bigger issue was the missed red card earlier on
EVERYONE WATCHES WOMEN SPORTS 😎
Helluva game girls 👏🔥
it looks like red trys a deliberate header and misses. no offside.
Call was correct. Management was decent not the best. If you are going to keep red players away may not be the best idea to walk past the injured player in leading the red away. As well would probably been best to show the red immediately to diffuse and mass confrontation or any retaliation from the white.
I think the post-incident piece is critical. Referee confirmed it was to the face with the AR b/c his attention was caught by the foot initially. But making sure nothing pops off after is really important and they got lucky here. Good learning opportunities in this video!