- 21
- 139 910
Principles of RF,microwave Filters & Amplifiers
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2017
วีดีโอ
Conditional stability enforcement for Microwave Amplifier
มุมมอง 4.1K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Conditional stability enforcement for Microwave Amplifier
Gain Definitions of Microwave Amplifiers
มุมมอง 5K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Gain Definitions of Microwave Amplifiers
Amplifier design of maximising transducer gain
มุมมอง 5K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Amplifier design of maximising transducer gain
Quantitative Characterisation of Nonlinearity for Large Signal Amplifier (Contd.)
มุมมอง 8677 ปีที่แล้ว
Quantitative Characterisation of Nonlinearity for Large Signal Amplifier (Contd.)
Quantitative Characterisation of Nonlinearity for Large Signal Amplifier
มุมมอง 1.2K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Quantitative Characterisation of Nonlinearity for Large Signal Amplifier
Amplifier design for specified noise performance
มุมมอง 2.5K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Amplifier design for specified noise performance
Tutorial an Insertion Loss based Microwave Filter design
มุมมอง 7K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Tutorial an Insertion Loss based Microwave Filter design
Introduction to Insertion loss based Microwave Filter Design
มุมมอง 11K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Introduction to Insertion loss based Microwave Filter Design
Symmetrical lossless network description for filter design
มุมมอง 4.1K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Symmetrical lossless network description for filter design
Concept of Image impedance and Propagation Constant
มุมมอง 14K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Concept of Image impedance and Propagation Constant
5:53 here it should be BC = A^2 - 1. BC = √(A^2-1) is wrong as A^2 - BC = 1 which gives => A^2-1 = BC. Thenafter by multiplying and dividing by Z°^2=B/C you can solve for B and C correspondingly.
thank you very much
thank you srila prabhupad and krishna for providing me this video
The world's best teacher thanks
Thanks but i see two possible errors. 7:31 if we move Ys to 1+jb it will add (0.28)+(0.5-0.329)...whis is 0.45... how did you end up (0.28)-(0.5-0.329) which is 0.11 or 0.12??? but why not 0.45
Where is the frequency scaling ? Why did not we apply to the transmisson lines? These examples were extracted from Pozar's book. However Professor, you should explain the all the part of the question, we can totally check the book and you are writing the same solution rather than your solution :/ . Your own comments should be very prominent than the written ones.
What a fascinating lecture... Giving a lesson by using your own comment is the most prominent asset for a student who is learning as a beginner any kind of field. Ever since I could remember, I have always wondered why we needed to create different kind of parameter for our networks. Yes, we totally read the books etc however, sometimes we need to hear a different perspective from the teachers. Thank you very much for your efforts.
In first 2 minutes, I was sure this will not be like some boring lectures.
How can length of the stub can be calculated for bandpass since there are two wc for bandpass
I find your manner of writing loop equations, i.e. the signs being used, orthogonal to conventional perspectives.
10:49 The matrix is wrong. But great video! Thanks
Thankyou sir.. very helpful. life saver!
there is some problem in playing the video
For example 3 with the bandpass filter design, when actually implementing this filter, do we use N*2 actual physical elements? I don’t see a way to make one transmission line section behave both as an inductor and a capacitor so that would mean you would need 2 transmission line sections to realize one N element which includes the pair of inductor and capacitor. Does anyone have any references I may use that shows a physical realization for this filter using the insertion loss method and prototype method as shown in this video?
At 10:14 the value for C should be 1/Zo or Yo.
There is some problem in that lacture I an unable to play
Thank you Sir for the lectures
This was incredibly helpful! Thank you for posting this 🙏🏻
nice work professor. We can also do tunable matching networks like using BST capacitors to change load for different frequency.
Thanks, but my left ear felt out 🙁
Sir in s parameter analysis s21 is for forward gain....we know about the gain....but why we go for transducer gain, operating gain, available gain
It is because the input and output matching are to be considered as how much they impact the overall gain. 2 lectures back sir has explained this concept.
thank you
Sir not helpful this video lecture didn't clear ur concept
where does the n^2 = 1+ Z2/Z1 (at 27:55min) come from? is that a r²ow of the impedances?
Haathi ke bacche kich samjha bhi dia kar.... bas tipe jaa Raha hai...Tere jaise 🐖 ke bacchi ki wajah se hi nptel badnaam hai boring hone ke liye... Apne saath saath pure bengal ka naam kharaab kardia tune
Brother have some respect for teachers. If his approach seems boring to you then go on internet is full of other learning resources there is no need to disrespect someone like that if you simply can't understand them.....
he is for sure a bengali by his accent
watching at the speed of *1.75 :P
great idea, saved lof of my time😂
Use 1.5 speed and thank me later
thanks
Hi Sir Please share the link to enroll to this course
TY sir ,greetings from China.
Thanks a lot sir!...huge respect:)
at 14:52 if l=c=root(2) then l^2*C^2*r^2=1 is not satisfied right? it should be l^2*c^2*r=4
tumar ko nahi aata
sir what is stepped impedence design of butterworth and chebyshev LP filter?
th-cam.com/video/ULqhO-Seeek/w-d-xo.html
lecture 9
lecture 8
Sir, You are a Good RF Engineer.
How can we reduce gain bandwidth product in RF broadband amplifier
Tutorial on Insertion Loss Method of Filter Design
Microwave filter implementation
Insertion Loss Method of filter design-2
Insertion Loss based filter design
Constant-k Prototype filter
Image Impedance and Propagation constant
Topic: m-derived prototype filter design
excellent
thanks sir for lectures
Sorry to say, but the teacher, in spite of being from IIT is confusing students at times. At times there are mistakes in taking negative signs. Once he says that, the following represents the passbands and the next moment he says that it is stopband condition then again after some time, he requotes it is pass band condition, without realizing that he said it the wrong way earlier. I mean no disrespect to the professor, it's just that it becomes frustrating to find out such mistakes, moreover, I start to doubt that it is me who is wrong.