UmpireHockey
UmpireHockey
  • 143
  • 581 184
Product Evaluation - Yapalong 6000
Product Evaluation - Yapalong 6000 | Field Hockey Umpires Radio Review
Welcome to our in-depth Product Evaluation of the Yapalong 6000, a top choice for field hockey umpires seeking reliable communication equipment. In this video, we dive deep into the features, performance, and overall value of the Yapalong 6000 radio system. Whether you're a beginner or experienced umpire, understanding the best radios for field hockey umpiring is crucial for maintaining clear and consistent communication with your team.
We cover key aspects such as signal range, sound clarity, and ease of use, all while highlighting why the Yapalong 6000 stands out in the field hockey community. If you're on the hunt for the perfect umpire communication radio, this review is for you. Learn how this radio can enhance your on-field decision-making and coordination, making your job as a field hockey umpire more efficient and professional.
If you're a field hockey umpire looking to upgrade your equipment or simply curious about the Yapalong 6000, don't miss this detailed breakdown. Stay tuned to get all the essential information and tips on using radios in field hockey umpiring.
Keywords: field hockey umpire radios, Yapalong 6000 review, umpire communication system, field hockey radios, umpire equipment review, radio for field hockey, best radios for umpires.
You can buy a pair of Yapalong 6000s (USA & Canada) packaged together with what's needed for field hockey umpires at Yapalong6000.com. This redirects to my online store at BolsterHockey.com
I sell an online, on-demand umpiring course at UmpireHockey.com
I sell umpiring and field hockey related merchandise at merch.UmpireHockey.com
I authored several field hockey books available on Amazon and FieldHockeyBooks.com
My other websites:
UmpireFitness.com (free objective mobility measures proving you or assigners with an umpires fitness readiness)
FieldHockeyTalk.com (podcasting field hockey discussions with players, coaches, umpires, recruiters, product developers, and others)
Join the Facebook Field Hockey Discussion Forum:
groups/fieldhockeydiscussionforum
#fieldhockeyumpires, #hockeyumpires, #yapalong
มุมมอง: 9

วีดีโอ

Product Evaluation - MatchGear
มุมมอง 17หลายเดือนก่อน
In this Product Evaluation - MatchGear video, we dive deep into the innovative features of MatchGear for Android and Apple Watch smartwatches, a must-have tool for field hockey umpires looking to elevate their game. Whether you're a seasoned umpire or just starting out, this review covers everything you need to know about MatchGear and how it can revolutionize your officiating experience on the...
It's a Hit
มุมมอง 317หลายเดือนก่อน
Some people think that if the hands are not together, a shot on a penalty stroke can't be considered a hit. That is not correct.
EXO-L BRACE (on and off)
มุมมอง 715 หลายเดือนก่อน
If you have weak ankles, wearing an EXO-L BRACE will prevent inversion (rollover) ankle sprains. They're seatbelts for your ankles. Learn more on AnkleSaver.com.
Umpiring Penalty Strokes
มุมมอง 4777 หลายเดือนก่อน
Finally, a video of two umpires who take up proper positions on a penalty stroke and demonstrate proper technique.
You Make The Call
มุมมอง 5898 หลายเดือนก่อน
You're the umpire. Attack is pressuring. The ball flies up off the goalkeeper to the top of the circle. An attacker swings at but misses the ball. The crowd roars! What's your call? Play on, penalty corner, free hit out? Do you card the attacker? Please "rulesplain" your rationale.
UmpireFitness.com Intro
มุมมอง 1248 หลายเดือนก่อน
UmpireFitness.com is a completely free resource designed to provide umpires with objective measures regarding their speed, agility, and, generally, their physical readiness to umpire games. To do this, umpires complete objective physical challenges involving fast acceleration, rapid deceleration, left and right change of direction, and basic agility.
Drilling
มุมมอง 87410 หลายเดือนก่อน
The goal of this video is to provide a common sense understanding of what is meant by 'drilling', which is slang for a particular type of dangerous play in indoor hockey.
Why Wear a Mask
มุมมอง 87ปีที่แล้ว
This is a public service announcement. Penalty corner defenders, please wear a penalty corner safety mask. Don't wear those silly goggles that only protect a tiny portion of your face.
Penalty Stroke Gone Wrong
มุมมอง 610ปีที่แล้ว
Please note that if the goalkeeper/defender stops the ball or the ball comes to rest in the field of play before the ball enters the goal, the penalty stroke is OVER.
Trick Play
มุมมอง 104ปีที่แล้ว
Don't get fooled! Remember, if before the free hit is taken the defender is 5 away, the defender can "crash the party" as soon as the attack has played the ball. HOWEVER, the attack has to ACTUALLY play the ball (not just pretend to play the ball). The ramification of falling for this trick play, when the free hit is within the attacking quarter of the field, is a penalty corner.
Swing and a Miss
มุมมอง 74ปีที่แล้ว
Remember, it is NOT a foul to swing and miss. This usually gets a deep breath but, in a circumstance such as this, it shouldn't get a whistle. Why not? Because the swing went into open space... not someone's head!!
Wrong Restart Location
มุมมอง 62ปีที่แล้ว
The only time it is legal to use the HITTING ACTION to put a ball into the air is when you are shooting. Raising the ball using the backhand edge HIT is understood to be intentional (otherwise we can't applaud players for using the same hitting action to roof the ball into the goal). Therefore, the restart should have taken place where the player broke the rules by hitting the ball into the air.
Banana Shot
มุมมอง 61ปีที่แล้ว
The quality of the video isn't great but, this is a great example of a BANANA SHOT on a penalty corner. This first shot on this penalty corner is made using the hitting action and, therefore, must be on a path to cross the goal-line at a height of not more than 18 inches/460mm. As a result of the hit, the ball rises much higher than 18 inches. Oh no!!! Should the umpire blow the whistle?!? No. ...
Yes, Virginia There is obstruction
มุมมอง 204ปีที่แล้ว
This is a great example of obstruction by a third-party. Note how the player without the ball in grey uses her body to impede the player in maroon from getting to the ball. This type of obstruction is also known as shadow obstruction. You might also hear this called a block out. When a secondary signal is used by the umpire to indicate this type of obstruction, the arms are crossed and uncrosse...
Obstruction (full sequence)
มุมมอง 102ปีที่แล้ว
Obstruction (full sequence)
Playing the ball on the ground
มุมมอง 30ปีที่แล้ว
Playing the ball on the ground
Jewelry is Allowed
มุมมอง 54ปีที่แล้ว
Jewelry is Allowed
Drilling -- indoor hockey
มุมมอง 2162 ปีที่แล้ว
Drilling indoor hockey
Are You Ready?
มุมมอง 3302 ปีที่แล้ว
Are You Ready?
Umpire Coaching / Not Coaching on a Penalty Stroke
มุมมอง 2372 ปีที่แล้ว
Umpire Coaching / Not Coaching on a Penalty Stroke
Judging Field Hockey Block Tackles - Part III
มุมมอง 5083 ปีที่แล้ว
Judging Field Hockey Block Tackles - Part III
Judging Field Hockey Block Tackles - Part II
มุมมอง 5213 ปีที่แล้ว
Judging Field Hockey Block Tackles - Part II
Judging Field Hockey Block Tackles - Part I
มุมมอง 1.4K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Judging Field Hockey Block Tackles - Part I
Misapplication and Dismissal of Captain's Response
มุมมอง 1193 ปีที่แล้ว
Misapplication and Dismissal of Captain's Response
YOU MAKE THE CALL (whistle or play on)
มุมมอง 7933 ปีที่แล้ว
YOU MAKE THE CALL (whistle or play on)
Positioning (corner stall)
มุมมอง 2453 ปีที่แล้ว
Positioning (corner stall)
Take Down Tackle Guidance II
มุมมอง 4073 ปีที่แล้ว
Take Down Tackle Guidance II
Take Down Tackle Guidance
มุมมอง 4273 ปีที่แล้ว
Take Down Tackle Guidance
Better Positioning = Better Calls
มุมมอง 6513 ปีที่แล้ว
Better Positioning = Better Calls

ความคิดเห็น

  • @sunnysidhu7898
    @sunnysidhu7898 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you. Good Commentary.

  • @dannrobotdancer
    @dannrobotdancer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dangerous play, free hit for defender

  • @Mitoxd.
    @Mitoxd. 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Learn to use the tongue, put it over the whistle and push, move the tounge and put it back so its ssharp, this is useless

    • @UmpireHockey
      @UmpireHockey 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Talk about useless, what a crap comment. How about a comment that brings some value to the table?

    • @BMY1-fe4gk
      @BMY1-fe4gk 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Technique may not have been 100% perfect every time but listen at 0:15 and 0:42. Those are actually really good sounding chirps on a fox 40. Besides, it’s a tutorial, not a game.

  • @ZigZagHockey
    @ZigZagHockey 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ball stuck in goalkeeper's equipment - penalty corner. In what I like to think of as saner times, this generally no fault occurrence (we are not talking about a goalie catching and hold the ball) resulted in a restart with a bully 5m from the circle. Why the change? A bully wasn't considered exciting enough, and more penalty corners lead to more goals being scored. Is that fair? No, but who cares about fair? The same thing has happened with accidental deflections of the ball up off goalkeeping equipment that may have fallen in a way that led to dangerous contesting for the ball. Game stopped, and penalty corner awarded (or worse, allow the dangerous play to occur and then penalise), when it used to be a bully restart. Deflections up off defenders' sticks are treated in the same way, penalty corner. Not entirely fair when a close range shot at the goal may be travelling at a velocity in excess of 100kph. Isn't that dangerous? Yes, often, but don't try to convince anybody of that.

  • @clementchitakasha3699
    @clementchitakasha3699 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's not a hit

  • @SirChappie10
    @SirChappie10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Once had someone sit on top of me to keep me out of play

  • @LTBurger
    @LTBurger ปีที่แล้ว

    k.

  • @NeuroJoe
    @NeuroJoe ปีที่แล้ว

    At least use a travel mug when umpiring ;)

  • @Jay-q5l2m
    @Jay-q5l2m ปีที่แล้ว

    0:04 0:15 0:28 0:38 0:42 0:52

  • @Cat-Valentine20
    @Cat-Valentine20 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was really high one time and heard this by my school lmao

  • @de_lemon894
    @de_lemon894 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Ive got my first winter hockey games tomorrow to umpire (Ive done like 6 games of summer hockey before) and I was wondering if anyone knew and could help me with how to remember the stick checks and obstruction rules and mainly when I have to call them. Also this is a whole grading carnival so any advice I get would be greatly aprreciated

    • @UmpireHockey
      @UmpireHockey ปีที่แล้ว

      Obstruction is obstruction... players are not allowed to obstruct with their stick or their bodies. A "stick check" is usually obstruction but if it happens off ball, than it is personal misconduct. A stick check within proximity to the ball is obstruction AND should be carded too. Are you/were you also a player?

    • @de_lemon894
      @de_lemon894 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UmpireHockey tysm and yes I am But I didnt know the rules to well

  • @RedEye3
    @RedEye3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for making the other sounds. Wondering how they made those pitchy whistles... opening and closing chambers with fingers.

  • @sandeepdagla2753
    @sandeepdagla2753 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    please Upload New umpire signal video

  • @llewellynsoine8422
    @llewellynsoine8422 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video...but...the ball doesn't have to be passed 'hard' you are not allowed to go through the player. If the channel is blocked or occupied, then you need to find another way around and not through.

  • @ReviewbyArvinder
    @ReviewbyArvinder 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello

  • @nazcasteve
    @nazcasteve 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This looks like part of a penalty stroke shootout. What happens if there is a penalty stroke awarded in regular play (during the game) and the shot is saved/deflected into the field? Are the rest of the players beyond the 23m line allowed to resume play immediately like in soccer, or is it ruled dead with a 16m restart for the defending team?

    • @crismaloney
      @crismaloney 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No. During a penalty stroke, only one attacker and one defender is allowed inside the 23.

    • @nazcasteve
      @nazcasteve 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crismaloney Understood, but if the shot is saved/deflected back into the field of play, can the rest of the players then enter the 23, or is it ruled dead with a 16m restart?

    • @crismaloney
      @crismaloney 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nazcasteve In no circumstance during a penalty stroke can other players approach. Not even the attacker taking the stroke can approach once the shot has been taken. When it is over, goal/no goal, the other players can cross the 23.

    • @nazcasteve
      @nazcasteve 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crismaloney I'm not getting my question across properly - I want to understand your final sentence regarding when it is *over*, not during. If the shot is saved/deflected by the goalie, does this effectively mean the penalty is over, and normal plays resumes, i.e. all other players can cross the 23, and try to play the rebound, defend etc.? I had one umpire tell me if the shot does not go in, the ball is restarted at the 16m by the defending team. This would imply normal play with all other players crossing the 23 does not resume if the shot doesn't go in

    • @crismaloney
      @crismaloney 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nazcasteve Hi Steve - Sorry. The penalty strokes ends when the ball goes into the goal or does not go into the goal, goes out of bounds, or comes to rest any place in the field of play. So, the ball deflects off the goalkeeper and stops, no goal, no follow up shots… and yes, play is restarted with a free hit (or free push indoors) just outside the circle in front of the goal. At that point, the players can go anywhere they’re normally allowed to go.

  • @nataliaioanatihan5987
    @nataliaioanatihan5987 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @florianbeuk7181
    @florianbeuk7181 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dit is hakken van paars want paars raakte de bal niet aan en wit had de bal

  • @carloscosta4889
    @carloscosta4889 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Free hit for defense! Dangerous play for the defender player cause the goalkepper is behind.

  • @abhijain5554
    @abhijain5554 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    th-cam.com/video/6SAw2XUSY8o/w-d-xo.html Can anyone explain to me why the action at 1:02 that results in the ball being knocked into the D for the attacker to score is a legal action of a swinging stick

  • @sandrabinder2111
    @sandrabinder2111 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant

  • @gebsdojo
    @gebsdojo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good leg drive on that last (illegal) tackle!

  • @phanluong4100
    @phanluong4100 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We like your last move :D

  • @sonalisingh7471
    @sonalisingh7471 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankyou

  • @alihosie74500
    @alihosie74500 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The first I think is a PC - batted off the baseline - body position - only one way that ball was going. 2 - i am actually not convinced thats a pc - it looks like a full turned foot block rather than kick - so it rebounds off rather than is kicked off. 3 looks like a bit of an attempt to block that sort of goes wrong and is deflected off legs - so long corner

  • @nurulasyhadah503
    @nurulasyhadah503 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    yellow card coz very danger tackling coz slidding tackle

  • @Bonzo-gw4lj
    @Bonzo-gw4lj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it possible the umpire interpreted the situation as the goalkeeper deliberately obstructing the ball? That would be a penalty stroke, no?

    • @Bonzo-gw4lj
      @Bonzo-gw4lj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      After another look, this looks unlikely to be intentional.

    • @UmpireHockey
      @UmpireHockey 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because this is specifically covered in the rules, the answer would be no. Even if somehow the goalkeeper was so amazingly skilled as to intentionally get the ball caught in their protective equipment, the rule says that the penalty is a penalty corner. It would be like changing some other rule that is detailed in the book. Like making the goalkeeper go up to the centerline if they enter the circle early on a penalty corner... because the umpire says that they did it intentionally. Too bad. The rule specifies that someone else goes... THAT is the penalty. Not a card. Not the goalkeeper goes. And, not a PS if the ball gets stuck in the goalkeeper's protective equipment.

    • @ZigZagHockey
      @ZigZagHockey 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UmpireHockey What is even worse is that in saner times a ball lodged in the equipment of any player would have resulted in a restart with a bully for a no fault stoppage. There is no reason that this sort of incident (and a few others that are now dealt with by penalty corner) could not be resolved with a restart for the attacking team on the 23m line. Any ball off the pitch over the base-line from a defender's stick, and also a high rebound of the ball off equipment, that was not of itself directly dangerous to another player, are two examples. Will these two umpires learn from this? Probably not, they would likely have though it impertinent of a player to ask them to look at the text of the Rule. They are both far to old to be learning Rule basics.

  • @sathrugnapeddireddy7528
    @sathrugnapeddireddy7528 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir and Madam s

  • @rhyangriffiths5398
    @rhyangriffiths5398 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    play on for me. the first HIT must be backboard height that was a scoop so play on.

    • @nurulasyhadah503
      @nurulasyhadah503 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      free hit for defender coz not enough 3 touch the pusher high ball to scoring for shot conner and danger to defender opponent

    • @rhyangriffiths5398
      @rhyangriffiths5398 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nurulasyhadah503 it was a valid shot on goal and the defender stood in between the taker and the gk so I'm gonna have to disagree with you.

  • @annariesser6491
    @annariesser6491 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I took my first stroke today and I double tapped the ball on accident and it didn’t count I was kinda annoyed with my self😢

  • @enzoscocco7103
    @enzoscocco7103 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Free hit for defense. The attacker playing the ball hit the ball two times. She should no play or approach after the first push

    • @rhyangriffiths5398
      @rhyangriffiths5398 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      but was an advantage gained by the attacker hitting the ball twice on the injection?

  • @azzadzarull
    @azzadzarull 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the shot is fine by me, its a push so it can be raised. 9.9 Players must not intentionally raise the ball from a hit except for a shot at goal. A raised hit must be judged explicitly on whether or not it is raised intentionally. It is not an offence to raise the ball unintentionally from a hit, including a free hit, anywhere on the field unless it is dangerous. If the ball is raised over an opponent’s stick or body on the ground, even within the circle, it is permitted unless judged to be dangerous. however the injection is foul because the attacker that inject the ball played it twice. 13.3.j - after playing the ball, the attacker taking the push or hit from the back-line must not play the ball again or approach within playing distance of it until it has been played by another player.

    • @rhyangriffiths5398
      @rhyangriffiths5398 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      but did the attacking team gain an advantage that they wouldn't gained if the injector only played the ball once?

    • @azzadzarull
      @azzadzarull 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rhyangriffiths5398 13.3.j - after playing the ball, the attacker taking the push or hit from the back-line must not play the ball again or approach within playing distance of it until it has been played by another player.

    • @rhyangriffiths5398
      @rhyangriffiths5398 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@azzadzarull yes I know it's against the rules but did the team gain an advantage from breaking the rules?

    • @azzadzarull
      @azzadzarull 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rhyangriffiths5398 yes. if the injector stop after the first contact, the defending player can reach to the ball faster than any other attacker player.

    • @NeuroJoe
      @NeuroJoe ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed about the insertion, play should have been whistled right then for a double touch. However, for the scoop shot on the cage, even though it's not a hit, I would consider that dangerous (as an aside, this is Exhibit A for why all corner defenders should be wearing face masks)

  • @rhyangriffiths5398
    @rhyangriffiths5398 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is a sliding tackle that has grounded a player. It is a 10 min yellow card at the minimum. It doesn't matter weather or not the defender got the ball first she still took the other player to ground.

  • @ZigZagHockey
    @ZigZagHockey 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't see how calling obstruction an impedance event (conflating it with the never employed Rule 9.4) is going to change the current inability of umpires to see obstructions. What is obstruction? Generally (when committed by a ball-holder) it is the illegal prevention of a legitimate tackle. This prevention is usually achieved by shielding the ball with the body or stick from an opponent who is within playing distance of the ball AND demonstrating an intent to play at the ball. i.e. trying to tackle or to reach a position from which a tackle may be made. A legitimate tackle is one that is made legally i.e. without breaching Rule 9.13, which not only forbids physical contact but even the making of a tackle attempt when physical contact will be caused by the attempt. A very severe and totally unnecessary Rule (because Rule 9.3 already prohibits all physical contact and because Rule 9.13 is used in a way that nullifies Rule 9.12 and makes tackling a ball shielding player an impossibility).

  • @bubbamcgullicutty8966
    @bubbamcgullicutty8966 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there any doubt that a penalty stroke can come along with a card ? Of course not, why should it ? Anyhow, the injury is the fault of the player. Wearing an appropriate jersey instead of those ugly shoulderfree ones could have prevent it. Don't forget, we are no basketball players !!

    • @NielsDekker2024
      @NielsDekker2024 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      For some offences, a PS and a card should be awarded. I agree with you that the injury is the fault of the player. But anyhow, pushing a player to ground is still an offence

  • @rhyangriffiths5398
    @rhyangriffiths5398 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I agree with some parts of this video but you needed to remind people about the advantage rule.

  • @rhyangriffiths5398
    @rhyangriffiths5398 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    that is at least a red card. hands down.

  • @rhyangriffiths5398
    @rhyangriffiths5398 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:40 ummmm a penalty stroke can be awarded for a non-intentional offence which stops the probable scoring of a goal too.

    • @crismaloney
      @crismaloney 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. There are many reasons that a PS can be called. Not all of those reasons are in this video. It isn’t a video tutorial of all reasons one might see a penalty stroke awarded. It is a video about the coach’s behavior and why some umpires don’t card such be behavior.

    • @rhyangriffiths5398
      @rhyangriffiths5398 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crismaloney, it's not the coach that you card anyway, its the captain. in that case, if I were umpiring id green card the captain if it was the first issue I had with the coach if it was the second or more id Yellow card the captain for team misconduct.

    • @crismaloney
      @crismaloney 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rhyangriffiths5398 A fault of the video is that it doesn't highlight that the competition taking place was under the governance of the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) rules. In NFHS games, the umpires are not allowed to card captains for things for which captains are usually held accountable (the whole point of having captains is lost). Instead, umpires are to hold coaches accountable. Within this governance structure the coach who came on the field and interrupted the play should have been immediately given a green card for delay of game and if the coach did not instantly turn around and leave the field, the red card should be used. All that said, whether to card the coach vs the captain or to give a green, yellow, or red, is not the ask ("Why Umpires Don't Card Coaches") of the video. The video asks us to consider why didn't a carding happen? The video provides the answer. It says that there is a structure in place that creates a systemic problem that limits the likelihood of the umpire using the tools they have to penalize misconduct.

    • @rhyangriffiths5398
      @rhyangriffiths5398 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crismaloney is that just American rules or worldwide? cos I'm in New Zealand and that is the first I've even heard of carding coaches.

    • @crismaloney
      @crismaloney 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rhyangriffiths5398 The NFHS only governs play in high school in the USA.

  • @matthewharris3131
    @matthewharris3131 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can't give a PC for an offence that happened after the whistle blew. It's a personal foul against the player (green card), and the you carry on with the free hit from outside the 23m area.

  • @rhyangriffiths5398
    @rhyangriffiths5398 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    it is not even a pc, the initial whistle was blown outside of the 23. it is a free hit and depending on time and score would be a green or yellow card

  • @ManinderSingh-nz1yz
    @ManinderSingh-nz1yz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plz tell the signals with whistle sound

  • @marcialaplante1065
    @marcialaplante1065 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    As a goalie I would not haha. I love shootouts, but I think a PC goal is just as valuable as a field goal. Some teams' strengths are their PCs while others rely on their field play - in this case you'd be benefiting the latter. I also think that PCs can be good, because instead of having shooters take shots from places they shouldn't(crowded areas, bad angles, etc.), having them try to earn a corner off a foot it much safer.

  • @mattbates5629
    @mattbates5629 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Red card, the player changed the line of her run to move back across onto a collision course with the defender so it was a deliberate action, clearly a high chance of causing injury.

  • @mattbates5629
    @mattbates5629 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    the knock away was deliberate and took place inside the 23 therefore a PC should be given (its also an upgrade from the free hit). Verbal warning only needed as the PC is enough of a penalty but any subsequent knock away take place then a card should be used.

  • @anonymouswriter448
    @anonymouswriter448 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's with wearing the mic you're not at a game or about to be at one. So youre just wearing it to show off. Plus I could buy that shirt for $20.

  • @crux1179
    @crux1179 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    10 yc and a ps

  • @TheDanielCarson
    @TheDanielCarson 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Definately a stroke, I'd give it a 5 minute yellow

    • @crux1179
      @crux1179 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ps amd 10 yellow

    • @crux1179
      @crux1179 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why only 5?

    • @TheDanielCarson
      @TheDanielCarson 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crux1179 He got a penalty stroke basically a 75/25% of a goal, if you would give a 10 minute yellow for a shoulder charge then I would award a penalty corner and a 10 min yellow

    • @crux1179
      @crux1179 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheDanielCarson thats crazy, its a deliberate foul inside the circle, on a player carrying the ball. Thats automatically a PS. Because its a dangerous physical foul wich takes the player to ground a 10 minute yc is appropriate

    • @mattbates5629
      @mattbates5629 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crux1179 Absolutely PS for the deliberate foul inside the circle, Yellow also but for 5 or 10 mins? I would lean towards the 10 but how the game has gone before hand might be a deciding factor.

  • @bringyourzella1991
    @bringyourzella1991 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stroke not stoke Just saying