วีดีโอ

1:25:36 capítulos 4 e 5

1:22:32 ideologia

1:15:00 leitura sintomal

1:09:50 circunstâncias do livro, seminários

1:03:54 ruptura epistemológica

51:53 teoricismo e historicismo

37:37 Foucault - História da loucura

33:50 estruturalismo

It's quite clear for me that Deleuze tried to dissolve identities as a something fundamental and a lens of viewing things but he don't exclude thinking about them as operational thing which later he tried to formalize as continuation and extention on fundation he built. We can treat his works as composed from two different periods, IMO it's change in focus but still continuation based on previous reflections, not something separated conceptually. Differential forces create identities but not become identities - it's still ongoing process of becoming. I think the problem can be in too dogmatic readings both of philosophers. While the value is in speculative and open-end thinking.

THANKS A LOT FOR SHARING THIS INSIGHTFUL PRESENTATION

Intellectual cosplay from the guy dressed as a wizard. If these texts are important, work to clarify and not obscure them.

Excellent 👌

Is anyone aware of anyone who reads N's "eternal recurrence of the same" as a trap laid by N himself? The fact that it produces at least two distinct interpretations as you suggest, an ethical and a metaphysical one, shows at least two types of will to power at work, which both operate on the assumption that the question is a serious proposition, rather than a sarcastic joke played on anyone who would take such a question seriously? From what I can see, all the potential outcomes of considering Nietzsche's proposition seriously, are indicative of a particular tendencies of consciousness, which Nietzsche continually takes aim at throughout his work. IE wish thinking, fleeing into the ideal, making concept mummies, and alienation from one's own life, among others. As he says continuously in Twilight, how can one make any judgements of one's life, when one is engaged in the process of living it? It becomes a nice little day dream to distract from the deeper implications of his work.

At 1:26:00 there is mention of the intention of the naming power to transform or more like create the full imagination of “what’s going on” per a given situation. Almost like making a fictional person who is the ideal version of something and then everything gets put on a scale to this but without the name, it becomes extremely difficult to a create change in the world. Anyway the man in black said, they had difficulty having a practical example of this. Which left me confused. Wasn’t this one of the major tactics used in the women’s movement? (Not to say it’s over but one of the unifying things that enabled discussion thus enabling action-was only a factor but a key one) I’ve read so little of these people but I’m certain that I’ve read enough to know I know nothing, so do take what I have to say with a grain of salt but with the regards to high philosophers and what I’m picking up is that they are dealing with the same ideological issues as the common person but because it is being produced through a lens of a specialty and not derived through commonality that whatever gets produced in the theory industry is useless to the person who is the basic moving part of societal changes. Why Marx and Engel were effective in innovating change, why the women’s movement works and is working and why Kant, Hegel, Adorno don’t really get the job done? Bc they themselves are not interested in it?

My experience with Foucault's written texts and oral presentations suggests that the former are, by far, more (self-) disciplined, integrated, coherent.

Lord Almighty

Stiegler’s reading of Nietzsche isn’t that controversial. It’s worth remembering that Deleuze doesn’t adopt Nietzsche without qualification. The eternal recurrence “is univocity of being, the effective realization of univocity”. Its not simply Nietzsche nor is it Spinoza without qualification. Univocity in eternal recurrence, for D, implies identity and sameness but only the same of that which is different.

Need the damn articles

These people are so derivative, carbon copies of their distorted interpretation of a great man, one of my heroes, Derrida, and Algerian Jew, a man between worlds. Please stop this damage to his legacy. Intellectual laggards!

These people need real careers. Enough imagination work, as a Literature Major from Oberlin College. Go freaking do something for the world. Your work is fake.

Shame on Gayatri for bastardizing Derrida's work. She is a ethnofascist misusing his work to make up leaning full hell into false narrativization. It's her life.

Interesting debate

Read "Keynes" and "Hayek" 2:22:19

Besides KOOLHAAS, what other architect Vidler mentions?

When I discovered Ali Shariati in 1980, I was able to connect the Islamic Revolution with other world revolutions and liberation movements. The collaboration with Frantz Fanon during WW II and thereafter made me feel that we are all connected as we seek justuce and truth.

Like si vienes por la clase de Harold

Да уж! Какая банальная и никчёмная публицистка эта Ханна Арендт.

Jesus Velasco was a little hard to understand for me ?

thank you guys

Stephen Hicks is best known for his documentary and book, Nietzsche and the Nazis, which is an examination of the ideological and philosophical roots of Nazism, particularly how Friedrich Nietzsche's ideas were used and misused by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis to justify their beliefs and practices Bing search

the marxist density here is quite .. demanding

The host is insufferable.

great to see this video! i had been finding this a provocative read to bring up with family and friends and there's so many sick perspectives here to meditate and reflect on. thank u all for sharing! x

what is the matter with this comment section, what a bunch of blowhards

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 🎥 *The video discusses the concept of revolution and its complexities.* 04:47 📚 *Marx's "The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon" and Koselleck's concept of historical semantics are discussed as key texts.* 15:24 🔍 *Marx's view on the repetition of history in revolutions and the idea of revolution drawing inspiration from the future.* 26:18 📆 *The discussion touches on the relevance of historical context and conjuncture in interpreting revolution and semantics.* 30:56 🔄 *The idea that the concept of counter-revolution may have outlived the concept of revolution itself is explored.* 31:47 🌍 *Revolution in the modern era has lost some of its explanatory and emancipatory power due to the dominance of counter-revolutionary forces.* 35:13 📚 *Conceptual history, as proposed by Kozelek, suggests that modernity reshaped the meanings of terms like freedom, democracy, and revolution, leading to significant social and political changes.* 43:03 🔄 *Critics argue that modern revolutions, despite their progressive goals, can exhibit totalitarian tendencies, turning the revolution into a constant state of exception with the need to eliminate internal enemies.* 50:54 🔍 *There isn't a single model of revolution; history has witnessed various revolutions, some marked by freedom and participation, challenging the notion of a singular revolutionary tradition.* 56:39 🧠 *Identity politics can be a double-edged sword, both acknowledging privilege and identity while potentially limiting our ability to think imaginatively about those who differ from us.* 01:06:52 🔄 *Marx and Engels in the 1872 edition of the Communist Manifesto acknowledged that the first parts of the manifesto about revolutions had become outdated, relating to the question of national liberation not being a revolution.* 01:10:24 🤔 *Marx's view of proletarian revolution is that it cannot happen through human agency but is driven by the situation itself, drawing on Hegel's concept of dialectics.* 01:12:50 📜 *Marx's choice of emphasizing content over form in discussing revolution highlights the difficulty of providing a purely formal definition of revolution.* 01:14:52 🌍 *The concept of revolution should encompass more than just formal definitions, incorporating content-wise understanding and addressing issues like gender revolution and subaltern struggles.* 01:17:39 💬 *Marx's idea of creating poetry and drama in revolutionary discourse suggests the importance of creativity and the impossibility of a purely formal definition of revolution.* 01:33:13 🔄 *The concept of revolution can be expressed through various terms and not limited to a singular definition.* 01:37:10 📜 *Marx intertwines politics and poetry, suggesting a complex relationship between them in his writings.* 01:42:15 🤔 *Revolutions often carry a tragic dimension due to radical confrontations and potential failures.* 01:45:06 🌍 *Revolutions may not be entirely contemporary, and their imaginations often touch upon different forms of poetry and literature.* 02:01:07 🌐 *The concept of identity as a basis for revolution may have limitations, as it can be manipulated and misinterpreted.* Uprisings are *seen as moments of pure negation and resistance, whereas revolutions may fail due to internal contradictions.* The question *of how war and armed rebellion play a role in contemporary capitalism is crucial and requires further exploration.* The distinction *between national liberation and revolution is complex, and it's important to consider their historical contexts and potential outcomes.* Intersectionality and *essentialism can coexist, but it depends on how they are applied and the context in which they are used.* The debate *on the concept of revolution and its relevance in the modern world is ongoing, with some suggesting that uprisings may have replaced traditional revolutions.* Made with HARPA AI

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 📜 *Andrew Arato discusses the recent case of Doyle Hamm's execution and how he walked out alive.* 02:23 🌍 *The discussion is centered around exploring anti-imperialism, national independence, and contemporary uprisings in Latin and South America.* 15:10 🔄 *Andrew Arato discusses the logic of revolution and the representation of the whole by a vanguard, highlighting Lenin's role in introducing anti-imperialism into revolutionary discourse.* 21:22 🔀 *He discusses the post-transition models of political transformation that have achieved change without the typical consequences of revolutionary upheavals.* 28:20 📜 *Arato mentions the importance of constitutionalization and cites examples from Germany and South Africa as alternatives to traditional revolutionary approaches.* 28:59 🔍 *Autonomy, self-determination, and anti-imperialism are interconnected concepts in the context of resistance movements.* 41:29 🌍 *Movements of occupation represent not only spatial but also temporal interruptions and alternative temporalities.* 49:03 💼 *Resistance movements are opening spaces for alternative social and economic relations but may not yet present a fully radical alternative to capitalism.* 55:00 🇪🇺 *European autonomy movements from the 60s and 70s highlight the generalization of capitalism and the blurring of boundaries between labor and life.* 55:52 🇮🇹 *Italian autonomy movements emphasized the concept of leaving labor outside the factory, expanding the idea of labor beyond wage labor.* 56:19 🌐 *Autonomy in a biopolitical setting and its Latin American genealogy, including anti-imperialist movements and Neo-Zapatistas.* 57:22 💡 *Autonomy has existed within imperial politics and colonial dynamics, offering spaces for colonized subject populations.* 58:02 🤝 *Autonomy, self-possession, self-determination, and self-defense concepts have a liberal origin but can be adapted to non-liberal or socialist contexts.* 59:13 🌍 *Emergence of autonomous movements globally, but fragmentation and articulation between these movements pose challenges.* 01:02:59 🔄 *Considering alternatives and the role of time and temporality in revolutionary movements.* 01:22:09 🌐 *Anti-imperialism remains relevant, but there are various forms of imperialism, including financial and territorial.* 01:38:26 🔄 *Revolution should still be affirmed, but it should evolve beyond the traditional Leninist approach.* 01:44:11 💧 *Issues of land, water, and small communities are still at the heart of revolutionary struggles in places like Mexico.* 01:45:34 🏞️ *The 1917 Mexican Constitution, which considered land and water as belonging to the nation, represented a form of socialism.* 01:46:27 🌎 *Anti-imperialism in Mexico involves both international extractive forces and domestic issues with indigenous communities and the state.* 01:47:23 🌍 *Discussion on the rejection of private property as a source of societal problems in revolutionary thought.* 01:48:28 📚 *Revolutions led by poets and artists, such as the Sandinista revolution, have historical significance.* 01:49:35 🏛️ *Lack of a political vocabulary to discuss the changing global landscape, especially the decline of the nation-state.* 01:51:20 💥 *Political violence has constrained political projects in the global south.* 01:52:58 💰 *Global right-wing regimes promise to control the rapid speed of financial capital through authoritarianism.* 02:14:09 🌍 *Moments of occupation, like the Arab Spring, brought domestic and political aspects together in resistance movements, particularly in the women's movement, linking personal issues to capital and labor.* 02:15:32 🌐 *Financialization and digital capital are not inherently more anti-revolutionary than industrial capital, but the fragmentation on the ground and complex articulation between resistance moments pose challenges.* 02:16:42 🔄 *Revolutions don't always need to align with past genealogies; sometimes they symbolize a complete break from the past, as seen in the French Revolution.* 02:17:27 💼 *Neoliberalism as a term can be misleading, as it encompasses diverse economic systems and policies, from social democracies to more market-oriented regimes.* 02:19:27 💡 *Instead of focusing solely on revolution, exploring alternatives within capitalism and making it more livable for people can be a fruitful approach.* Made with HARPA AI

Some mixup here between serial music, John Cage and minimal music. Infelicitous.

Thesis and anti-thesis male and female, or female and male.

We never find the dasein or what is the true man of these philosophers. Like authors of any non fictional or historical writings, we can never know what influences or biased reasoning they had in their own concepts.

These guys just don't see how language in any format has limits to describe or define God or the God of the Greek logos.

I think the Hebrew bible that the creator God put eternity in his heart.

Blanchot like doestevesky experience similar experience of a firing squad that had a tremendous effect on his mind, doestevesky reacted opposite to Blanchot.

We forget how the the generations that experienced 2 world wars and the Spanish flu after, we can't relate too these experiences, language can't express the horror these generations had. Also you can't use definitions to describe the horrorrs of the holocaust or the atomic bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. These philosophical people struggle to use definitions without the use of the written word or spoken.

WHat are these lesser known texts of Nietzsche on mass media ?

Did my PhD on Adorno in 1981 . Effected heavily by Horkheimer and Adorno I was enamored by The negative dialectic . My title. “ The Role of the critic and the logic of criticism in Hegel, Bruno Baruta and The Frankfurt School “ that was my dissertation from The American University . I gave up philosophy to pursue a successful career as a tennis teacher , keeping critical thinking as the lode star . In this pursuit I became very successful as a tennis teacher , but I ruined my ability to have. Areal understanding of philosophy as an ontological reduction . In my life I did not understand the negativity in the dialectic as always a positive . I rejected the import of practical due diligence in favor of theory as alienated , and stressed that my children stay away from instrumental mistake , not realizing that the entire schemata of negative dialects is a misappropriation of the dialectic imported from The Indic civilization without without understanding that the unity of theory and practice are already coexisting. The miseffects of The Frankfurt school and its charm has permeated into the likes of. Derrida and Foucault . Now it has turned into woke philosophy. Reduction of philosophy to pure critical criticism ala Bruno Bauer is too much a part of Adorno. I supported Adorno over Heidegger but now I believe I was in my youthful error , where Heidegger and Adorno needed to be understood as two poles of the dialectic. Adorno is quite narcissistic in isolating the German fascism as a unique event in history . My life was very effected with my non critical approach to the very presupposing the veridicality of “ critical thinking”. This flaw comes from Hegel’ s misunderstanding of the dialectic as a pure negativity or struggle. I now understand that the very designation of the dialectic as always as a struggle is the atavistic urge to be theological , in a world of evil . The Frankfurt school Ned’s a reevaluation where negativity is to be understood as a positive. Science is not different from art in two aspects, one that due diligence is essential to both,secondly a pleasure one gets from a passion to to be dispassionate . I am reworking the uncritically established premises of critical theory , in my real life. Yielding to Heidegger in infringing the first person I think it is necessary to see the human being as an ontological reality confronting the world as a possibility.In other words back to Parmenides , and bypassing Aristotle , something that the phenomenologists are not able to do. They too have a theological respect for Aristotle who ruined philosophy forever , never giving relevance to mind experiments , that are essential to philosophy. Adorno and Athens Frankfurt school need to be sublated . Any suggestions?

What kind of dressing comes with the word salad ?

Can someone please provide the site for project emancipation?

if care isn't taken to keep the demiurge dead, the result is conservative fundamentalism, which due to the death of god, is a bit of a post-modernist political pholosophy that is unaware that it is. it thinks its reconstructed myths, which have more to do with mccarthyism than the bible, its kinda gnostic when you think about it.

Félicitations pour votre fils prof raoult 👍🏼

old commie blabbering on. Just read Nietzsche yourself. most people do not.