C. M. Bradley
C. M. Bradley
  • 54
  • 315 029
Plotinus' Vision of The Beautiful
Plotinus. Ennead 1.6.[1].7. “The Essential Plotinus.” Translated by Elmer O'Brien (modified). Hackett, 1964.
We must ascend towards the Good, towards there where tend all souls. Anyone who has seen it knows what I mean, in what sense it is beautiful. As good, it is desired and towards it desire advances. But only those reach it who rise to the intelligible realm, face it fully, stripped of the muddy vesture with which they were clothed in their descent. Just as those who mount to the temple sanctuaries must purify themselves and leave aside their old clothing, and enter nakedness, having cast off in the ascent all that is alien to the divine. There one, in the solitude of self, beholds simplicity and purity, the existent upon which all depends, towards which all look, by which reality is, life is, thought is. For the Good is the cause of life, of thought, of being.
Seeing with what love and desire for union one is seized-what wonderful delight! If a person who has never seen this hungers for it as for his all, one that has seen it must love and reverence it as authentic beauty, must be flooded with an awesome happiness, stricken by a salutary terror. Such a one loves with a true love, with desires that flame. All other loves than this he must despise and all that once seemed fair he must disdain.
Those who have witnessed the manifestation of divine or supernal realities can never again feel the old delight in bodily beauty. What then are we to think of those who see beauty in itself, in all its purity, unencumbered by flesh and body, so perfect is its purity that it transcends by far such things of earth and heaven? All other beauties are imports, are alloys. They are not primal. They come from it, all of them. If then one sees it, the provider of beauty to all things beautiful while remaining solely itself and receiving nothing from them, what beauty can still be lacking? This is true and primal beauty that graces its lovers and makes them worthy of love. This is the point at which is imposed upon the soul the sternest and utmost combat, the struggle to which it gives its total strength in order not to be denied its portion in this best of visions, which to attain is blessedness. The one who does not attain to it is life's unfortunate, not the one who has never seen its beautiful colors or beautiful bodies or has failed of power and of honors and of kingdoms. He is the true unfortunate who has not seen this beauty and he alone. It would bode him well to cast kingdoms aside and the domination of the entire earth and sea and sky if, by this spurning, he might attain this vision.
#philosophy #spirituality #religion
มุมมอง: 278

วีดีโอ

Debate Aftermath w/ Bob of Speaker's Corner
มุมมอง 835ปีที่แล้ว
Interview with Bob of Speaker's Corner regarding his debate with atheist Matt Dillahunty on "Secular Humanism vs. Christianity: Which is Better for Society?" featured on @ModernDayDebate The conversation also bled into various related matters of social and political theology not discussed during the debate. Follow me on X: CMBradleyVideos Follow Bob on X: btbsoco Subscri...
Plato on Philosophical Disillusionment
มุมมอง 704ปีที่แล้ว
Plato's discourse in his dialogue "Phaedo"-known as "On the Soul" in antiquity-on avoiding the trap of giving up on argumentation and discussion as means of attaining truth. As he terms this, "misology" is a sickness of the life of the mind and of the soul. One can rest from arguments, but Plato is insistent that, if fault is to be assigned, it ought be assigned to ourselves rather than to argu...
Joe Rogan Challenges Christian Intellectual Stephen Meyer
มุมมอง 5Kปีที่แล้ว
Response to Joe Rogan's conversation with Christian intellectual Stephen Meyer on religious and psychedelic experience. Stephen C. Meyer received his Ph.D. in the philosophy of science from the University of Cambridge. A former geophysicist and college professor, he now directs Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture in Seattle. Joe Rogan is a tand up comic, mixed martial arts fana...
Debate Aftermath w/ Michael Jones @InspiringPhilosophy
มุมมอง 8Kปีที่แล้ว
Interviewing Christian philosopher Michael Jones (@InspiringPhilosophy ) on his recent debate with Daniel Haqiqatjou (@MuslimSkeptic ) on "Is Child Marriage Acceptable? Islam vs Christianity," hosted by @ModernDayDebate The FULL DEBATE: th-cam.com/video/FfEUXndMFXA/w-d-xo.html Michael's Channel: youtube.com/@InspiringPhilosophy 00:00 Debate Highlight 00:26 Introducing Michael Jones 00:56 Introd...
The TRUTH about Mary and Joseph's Ages
มุมมอง 1.1Kปีที่แล้ว
The TRUTH about Mary and Joseph's Ages
Christian RESPONDS to the NEW Jordan Peterson & Mohammed Hijab Conversation
มุมมอง 2.3K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Christian RESPONDS to the NEW Jordan Peterson & Mohammed Hijab Conversation
Seraphim Rose on Alan Watts
มุมมอง 116K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Seraphim Rose on Alan Watts
Leo Tolstoy - The Sickness of Nihilism
มุมมอง 2.5K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Leo Tolstoy - The Sickness of Nihilism
Alan Watts on Eastern Orthodox Christianity
มุมมอง 8K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Alan Watts on Eastern Orthodox Christianity
The Brilliance of Pinocchio
มุมมอง 3.3K4 ปีที่แล้ว
The Brilliance of Pinocchio
Jordan Peterson - Creative Exploration & Its Illnesses (2011)
มุมมอง 5814 ปีที่แล้ว
Jordan Peterson - Creative Exploration & Its Illnesses (2011)
Jordan Peterson - The Meaning of Meaning (2007)
มุมมอง 8914 ปีที่แล้ว
Jordan Peterson - The Meaning of Meaning (2007)
Jordan Peterson - The Pragmatics of Meaning (1999)
มุมมอง 8094 ปีที่แล้ว
Jordan Peterson - The Pragmatics of Meaning (1999)
Maps of Meaning SUMMARY by Jordan Peterson (1999)
มุมมอง 4.6K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Maps of Meaning SUMMARY by Jordan Peterson (1999)
The UNSEEN Jordan Peterson Project (2020)
มุมมอง 4414 ปีที่แล้ว
The UNSEEN Jordan Peterson Project (2020)
The Limitation of Jordan Peterson: Is There Meaning to Life?
มุมมอง 2.2K5 ปีที่แล้ว
The Limitation of Jordan Peterson: Is There Meaning to Life?
Does "VIOLENT SPEECH" Violate Its Own Standard?
มุมมอง 8395 ปีที่แล้ว
Does "VIOLENT SPEECH" Violate Its Own Standard?
Atheism Defined Properly
มุมมอง 2.3K5 ปีที่แล้ว
Atheism Defined Properly
Twitter EXPOSED On Antifa, Proud Boys, & Gavin McInnes
มุมมอง 11K5 ปีที่แล้ว
Twitter EXPOSED On Antifa, Proud Boys, & Gavin McInnes
History of Ethics - Greek Poets & Presocratics
มุมมอง 1.8K5 ปีที่แล้ว
History of Ethics - Greek Poets & Presocratics
David Bentley Hart's BEST ROASTS
มุมมอง 53K5 ปีที่แล้ว
David Bentley Hart's BEST ROASTS
Critiquing Bret Weinstein
มุมมอง 2.7K6 ปีที่แล้ว
Critiquing Bret Weinstein
Does Twitter Defend Domestic Terrorism?
มุมมอง 6996 ปีที่แล้ว
Does Twitter Defend Domestic Terrorism?
Why You Need to Talk to People That Disagree with You
มุมมอง 16K6 ปีที่แล้ว
Why You Need to Talk to People That Disagree with You
Jordan Peterson - Can an Atheist Walk with God?
มุมมอง 1.7K6 ปีที่แล้ว
Jordan Peterson - Can an Atheist Walk with God?
Jordan Peterson vs. Sam Harris - TOP 5 FAILS - Debate #1 (2018)
มุมมอง 4.4K6 ปีที่แล้ว
Jordan Peterson vs. Sam Harris - TOP 5 FAILS - Debate #1 (2018)
Jordan Peterson Z: A Necessary Message
มุมมอง 7K6 ปีที่แล้ว
Jordan Peterson Z: A Necessary Message

ความคิดเห็น

  • @arielleHT
    @arielleHT วันที่ผ่านมา

    so funny for us jews when we real the old testament and see so many false translations lol

  • @rigmar9250
    @rigmar9250 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I always had this nagging feeling about Alan Watts that I could not really explain. He should’ve become a student instead of a teacher.

  • @hweiktomeyto
    @hweiktomeyto 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Which pints with aquinas video was the opening clip from?

  • @caravan3636
    @caravan3636 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hahaha what the hell? Watts speaks of presence, non-forcing, and non-judgement. Christianity dwells much on duties, judgement and grim subjects. Life is not a grim subject nor is it a mission of some sort. The truth comes from within, not from some tradition. You sadly have no real idea about what he speaks, and have never really meditated or seen within yourself. You even judge him on his tendencies of drinking, and quote him from his worst. May you heal from this delusion of tradition, and come to find peace within yourself, instead of seeking for it elsewhere.

    • @JohnOfDamascusLover
      @JohnOfDamascusLover 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I could've failed to exist I'm not the standard of peace so obviously I'm going to the eternal source not a contingent source.

  • @Drsahiba-i7s
    @Drsahiba-i7s 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Here is a list of the Church Fathers and relevant figures mentioned, along with their approximate birth and death dates: 1. Saint Augustine of Hippo Born: November 13, 354 CE Died: August 28, 430 CE 2. Saint Jerome Born: c. 347 CE Died: September 30, 420 CE 3. Clement of Alexandria Born: c. 150 CE Died: c. 215 CE 4. Epiphanius of Salamis Born: c. 310/320 CE Died: 403 CE 5. The Protoevangelium of James (Authorship and Dating) Attributed to: Unknown author, falsely attributed to James Written: c. 2nd century CE (circa 150 CE) These individuals and texts either reflect cultural norms or provide indirect commentary on Mary's youth assert that she was 12 years old when she married Joseph. 😅 And bishop mar mari Emmanuel confirmed that he found some old manuscripts

  • @JLR0123
    @JLR0123 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Marriage in a nutshell. I see you. You see me. Let’s talk it out.

  • @timmcfadden4653
    @timmcfadden4653 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Yes, so well researched and produced!

  • @Dino_Medici
    @Dino_Medici 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    U rec any other books on beauty

  • @georgethakur
    @georgethakur 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks.

  • @rvb-l9d
    @rvb-l9d 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    During Alan Watts' time, Zen Buddhism became quite well-known in the West. Another person who helped a lot in this task was Dr. Suzuki [1870-1966], a Japanese scholar who was also a Buddhist monk for some time. Zen caught the attention and interest of Thomas Merton [1915-68], a Trappist monk whose works were very popular in the 1960s and 1970s and are now forgotten. The emergence of knowledge of the main Eastern traditions and philosophies was something fascinating and at the same time challenging for the West. In the Christian religious field, many accepted this challenge, some simply rejecting it and others seeking points of contact. But between the two universes there are great chasms. The most fascinating thing about Buddhism is that it is a spiritual path that has no idea or concept of God and that dispenses with this concept. But it is not to be confused with mere vulgar Western atheism, which consists of a rabid denial of the concept of god of Abrahamic monotheism.

    • @CMBradley
      @CMBradley 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Merton's "Mystics and Zen Masters" had some interesting chapters for sure.

  • @pslanez
    @pslanez 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I had been in conflict about Alan Watts in that a man who was so wise and seemingly enlightened could drink himself to death. This video has cleared that up for me. He was wise but certainly not enlightened, and in fact it seems like his ego snuck in round the back door and used his wisdom against him and instead chose the eastern teachings that would justify his hedonistic lifestyle.

  • @fetching-s3q
    @fetching-s3q 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This has helped me. Thank you.

  • @chikkipop
    @chikkipop 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What a fraud.

  • @paulbrocklehurst2346
    @paulbrocklehurst2346 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Well well well, it seems - no not _seems,_ it clearly *is* the case that DBH’s _best_ roasts of atheists such as Dawkins, Harris & Dennett etc. is simply to put all his efforts into dismissing them as lightweights he’s not even going to waste any breath going into the slightest detail over beyond declaring their ignorance & stupidity. Anyone versed in philosophical fallacies knows full well that this is simply the _ad hominem_ attack stratedgy which someone who cannot supply any significant details about the shortcomings of their opponents will employ to impress people who don’t stop to wonder _“But what exactly makes Dawkins or Harris’s or Dennett’s criticisms so weak & misguided?”_ seem like brilliant knock out blows when actually no blow was even exchanged at all. Not one. Feel free to prove me wrong by quoting something of significant _substance_ in anything DBH said within this video which is ironically entitled *David Bentley Hart's BEST ROASTS* if you think I _am_ wrong about that but I absolutely _guarantee_ you’ll fail to quote anything that fits the description of anything that isn’t merely an exercise in presenting empty ad hominems which is something _any_ fool could do isn’t it?

    • @CMBradley
      @CMBradley 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It's a compilation of him making jokes, my man. It's not that serious :) If you're curious about substance, though, then I'd recommend reading his books.

    • @paulbrocklehurst2346
      @paulbrocklehurst2346 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@CMBradley Oh I've seen him in many an interview on TH-cam & all he can ever come up with are vague hand waving assertions about how he knows better - even with regard to theists like Jordan Peterson etc. but any fool can blow his own trumpet like that but fail to give us any good reasons to waste their money on one of his books making exactly the same unsupportable claims. If he's so wise & erudite tell me something of demonstrable significance which you learned from him which support the existence of _any_ god claimed to be the 'real deal'. Can you do that or are you going to parrot the same claim that it's so complicated I need to read one of his books (like Peterson also claims)?

    • @CMBradley
      @CMBradley 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      If it makes you this upset, Paul, then don't. Focus on something more uplifting.

    • @paulbrocklehurst2346
      @paulbrocklehurst2346 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@CMBradley A fool like DBH isn't worth getting upset about but I will focus on the paper thin reasoning (or rather lack of it) he has for criticizing atheism when nobody (including you) can think of even one good reason to believe _any_ god claim.

    • @CMBradley
      @CMBradley 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You sound upset. And that's alright. You can be honest about things. As far as theistic arguments go, God willing, I'll be interviewing philosopher Chad A. McIntosh in January on cosmological arguments. If there's a specific question you'd like me to ask, let me know.

  • @ZenonPinezka-c7j
    @ZenonPinezka-c7j 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You always rely on someone to watch over you, as if you’ve learned nothing from Zen. Wounded like children, still carrying scars.

  • @thejourney4999
    @thejourney4999 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    44:32

  • @thejourney4999
    @thejourney4999 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    1:50

  • @aqeebshahbaz3306
    @aqeebshahbaz3306 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Islam is the truth

  • @matswessling6600
    @matswessling6600 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    He is lying. Dawkings has not stated that evolution solves the existential problem. Maybe David got this from Lennox which states a very similar lie.

  • @matswessling6600
    @matswessling6600 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    daniel dennett is not smart? who is this guy?

    • @warriorpoet9629
      @warriorpoet9629 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Do some research. Be smart.

  • @adamm3492
    @adamm3492 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This what I found when I was hoping to see him debate Sam Harris sadly he hasn't and his name only came whilst listening to Alex speak with Rainn Wilson and Alex had brought up Hate as though he was very sure that he had read him as well. I'm not sure I like he new version of Alex....

  • @Bandito-Dorito
    @Bandito-Dorito หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rose was assuming Jung was in a position he was never in - Roses writings were a reflection of himself, keep in mind he wasn’t orthodox at this time and he was doing exactly what he claimed Jung tried to do. It wasn’t Jung’s intention to fully understand all of eastern philosophy from their own perspective. It’s clear he didn’t even know who Jung was or rather what the spirit of his work was. This entire argument is fallacious, all I see from the orthodox online is circular pride and self flagellation. I know this isn’t the case for all, but it’s the duties of Christians to keep themselves in check. You would rather have answers then truth, resulting in this finger pointing. This is disappointing.

    • @CMBradley
      @CMBradley 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I appreciate this comment. Thank you.

  • @JechtNH
    @JechtNH หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think Alan Watts said it himself, he's just a spiritual entertainer. It's a nice place to stir up one's curiosity but nothing more

  • @Ian-ue6tx
    @Ian-ue6tx หลายเดือนก่อน

    I feel the same as Fr Seraphim, at first I thought Alan Watts was great but he could never give me what Christ gives me. I still consider him a good entertainer but he doesn't have the Truth.

  • @johnnynesbit8289
    @johnnynesbit8289 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I first was interested in watts. But then I the truth came and called me. There is no universe without the creator

  • @philotheasbliss
    @philotheasbliss หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤❤

  • @philotheasbliss
    @philotheasbliss หลายเดือนก่อน

    PRAY FOR US FR. SERAFIM ❤ WE LOVE YOU SO MUCH ❤

  • @333Paradigm333
    @333Paradigm333 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It does not surprise me at all that Rose went into the Orthodox Church considering it has much in common with Eastern Mysticism. Theosis is.... "A central part of the Orthodox Church’s theology is the notion of deification, more properly known as theosis. This concept of theosis is a crucial underpinning of Orthodox belief and practice, and is integral to Orthodox mysticism. To support this concept of theosis, the Orthodox theologians quote certain “Church Fathers”, such as Irenaeus, Athanasius of Alexandria, and Gregory Nazianzen. Timothy Ware comments, “Such, according to the teaching of the Orthodox Church, is the final goal at which every Christian must aim: to become god, to attain theosis, ‘deification’ or ‘divinization’. For Orthodoxy our salvation and redemption mean our deification.” Nevertheless, theosis is sought by different means, including Hesychasm, the Jesus Prayer, and Light Mysticism." It is becoming God through mystical means is nothing short of Eastern Mysticism. Hesychasm (meditiation technique), Jesus prayer (repetitive chant), and light mysticism (meditative tequnique) are all borrowed from the eastern mystics. It is nothing close to what the Bible teaches about Soteriology.

    • @acekoala457
      @acekoala457 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Nothing close to what I interpret the Bible to say about Soteriology" Fixed it for you

    • @333Paradigm333
      @333Paradigm333 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @acekoala457 nope, sorry you didn't 😉

  • @ryanquillin7201
    @ryanquillin7201 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “There are two ways, one of life and one of death and there is a great difference between the two ways”- The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles to the Nations, known as the Didache

  • @Scottus-q8l
    @Scottus-q8l หลายเดือนก่อน

    The most monstrous ego in contemporary Christian theology. All that learning and it taught him nothing about humility.

  • @kevinwhelan9607
    @kevinwhelan9607 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for taking the time- and I imagine it involved a lot- to cut this together. You are truly a vessel of God's loving grace❤❤❤

  • @kevinwhelan9607
    @kevinwhelan9607 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Each one a mic drop moment. Good on Bentley Hart❤😂🎉

  • @DeanBurrito
    @DeanBurrito หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lol 🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @CMBradley
      @CMBradley หลายเดือนก่อน

      What? Haha

    • @DeanBurrito
      @DeanBurrito หลายเดือนก่อน

      @CMBradley indeed.

  • @DeanBurrito
    @DeanBurrito หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whoa good job here brother this is exquisite glory to God!

  • @ristoarnaudov8481
    @ristoarnaudov8481 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Name of the track at 0:35 ? That flute sound

  • @traditional_Melkite_Orthodox
    @traditional_Melkite_Orthodox 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm Indian and really love the writings and works of Fr Seraphim Rose of blessed memory. He was one of my major inspiration for my journey to Holy Orthodoxy.

    • @Harsh-w5g
      @Harsh-w5g หลายเดือนก่อน

      Me too God bless you dear friend! ☦️❤️‍🔥

    • @traditional_Melkite_Orthodox
      @traditional_Melkite_Orthodox 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@Harsh-w5gGod Bless. Are you living in India or abroad?

  • @ArmwrestlingJoe
    @ArmwrestlingJoe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I found Alan watts when I was 15 or so. I had left Catholicism but my thirst for truth and spiritual fulfillment then led me to Terence McKenna who I would say was the modern day Alan watts. Terence’s vocabulary and speeches were so interesting and thought provoking. I now see them for what they are which is empty word play. I, like many other young men, am cursed with intellectual curiosity which can lead one down a road of searching for searchings sakes and taking risks via drugs or other means. I hope to find Christ and be cured from my searching once and for all.

    • @saladfingers.
      @saladfingers. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ...and young women.

  • @raywest7222
    @raywest7222 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Father Seraphim Rose is an antichrist

  • @raywest7222
    @raywest7222 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seraphim rose is anathema for me now

    • @CMBradley
      @CMBradley 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hahaha

  • @FruitOvTheDoom
    @FruitOvTheDoom 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Translation: "Jung was wrong because we deny the validity of any Western thought on that basis alone"

  • @Cabanaman
    @Cabanaman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wake up babe, new cm Bradley video just dropped

  • @Christianity_and_Perennialism
    @Christianity_and_Perennialism 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice, thank you.

  • @User24x
    @User24x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is a difference between discussing with those you disagree with in pursuit of the truth, and platforming destructive views of the intolerant. There are an infinite number of false and irrational positions, but only a finite number of true and rational positions. And some positions are clearly and provably irrational and false. We must be intolerant of the intolerant (see: paradox of tolerance). In the examples you have shown, one should not platform those with intolerant views. If your views are intolerant or obviously wrong, they should not be shown tolerance and should not be platformed. Discuss with them if they have new information, sure. But platform them? No.

    • @CMBradley
      @CMBradley 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I find your viewpoint intolerant and will therefore delete your comment...

    • @User24x
      @User24x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CMBradley That comment just shows that you don't understand the paradox of tolerance or where it applies. To have a civil society, we must be intolerant of those who are intolerant. Example: Rascist white people who are intolerant of black people. We cannot be tolerant of those who wish to cause harm to others.

    • @CMBradley
      @CMBradley 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm familiar with the idea, and I don't fully disagree with it, but what I'm trying to show you is that one can't assume it will be applied justly, rather than conveniently abused by bad sociopolitical actors (like those in this video). Also, I appreciate your interaction, but if you want to be taken more seriously, then engage with the video's content, particularly those parts which undermine the point you're trying to make.

    • @User24x
      @User24x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CMBradley The claim that all "bad actors will abuse things" does not discredit the core idea that one should not tolerate intolerance. It's like saying we shouldn't allow people to be sent to prison for any reason because "bad actors" will abuse that ability to send people unfairly to prison. It's like saying because "bad actors" will abuse gun rights, that no one should have guns. The content of your video contain the implication that one should platform flawed and destructive ideas, such as the ones in the example clips at the beginning. I do not disagree that people in pursuit of truth should talk to others who disagree with them. But we are limited by time and must be pragmatic. There's a finite number of true and rational arguments, but there's an infinite number of wrong ones. Spending all of one's time discussing ideas that are so clearly wrong is not a good use of anyone's time. If a KKK member thinks all black people should die, there is no and should not be any "discussing with them just in case we may be wrong."

    • @CMBradley
      @CMBradley 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@User24x So, this video is less to do with "platforming" and more to do with the general value of virtuously engaging with people that hold different perspectives than oneself. Of course, as you mention, the limitations of mortality call us to be judicious in these matters. However, other aspects of our finitude often smack the thoughtful individual in the face when one realizes just how often one is wrong, either morally or intellectually. What one person or society regards as incontrovertibly true is just as strongly disregarded by other people or societies. Slavery is a good example of that in the domain of ethical truths: civilizations that generally hold a moral opposition to slavery are, historically speaking - if not contemporarily as well - a minority. Yet, you (I assume) and I would gladly and passionately stand in that minority. Now, this video is primarily philosophical, and part of the project of philosophy is to question what one (or a society) takes for granted. Nevertheless, that's partly how Socrates was murdered. The people in the opening montage of this video are, imo, much more dangerous and self-righteous than those whom forced Socrates to drink poison. They are not civil people interested in truth and virtue; they are radicals (and blind followers) hell-bent on suppressing (rather than disproving) voices at variance with their own. This was years ago, but look at how many young adults were blowing airhorns, destroying property, etc. in attempt to prevent Jordan Peterson from telling young adults to be honest people, responsible people capable of helping others, and not to be fascists that violently force others to lie. And that's where the cultural concern still sits today, but in different forms. Those trying to suppress "misinformation," "hate speech," or "platforming [insert false accusation to dismiss somebody]" are *disconcertingly often* those least capable of judging what actually is misinformation, hate, or whatever else. Like I suggested previously, I do actually agree that intolerance has its proper places. However, your prison and gun analogies don't work here. Unjust sentences are, of course, bound to happen in any society - whether by accident or by intent; but a society in which there is an endemic of bad judges putting innocent people behind bars completely destroys that society's proper functioning. Moving on, JS Mill's point about gaining a clearer and stronger apprehension of truth through its encounter with error is also a worth noting. That can apply to "platformed" discourse or to private conversation. Consider Michael Jones' (InspiringPhilosophy) debate against Daniel Haqiqatjou (MuslimSkeptic) in 2023 on whether or not child marriage is morally acceptable. Some might think that choosing to debate that topic gives it a certain degree of credibility of which it clearly isn't worthy. However, an alarming amount of people defend it! Moreover, some "Influencers" with large audiences have even softened to the practice! In fact, those who hold to marginal viewpoints often find its opposition's refusal to debate as an indicator of its strength. So, rather than lend the practice credibility, Jones utterly humiliated it with the hammer of truth. Again, rather than aiding the cause of child marriage, the debate - by all appearances of its reception - was a massive loss for the cause. Also, concerning private conversations, as alluded to at the end, Daryl Davis' choice to talk to Klan members has not only eventuated in dozens of those people deradicalizing and leaving the Klan, but led to deeply meaningful relationships. Not everyone has to (or ought) do that kind of thing, but it is an obvious good. There's more to say, but I'd just be repeating what I already said in the video. Cheers, mate. God bless you.

  • @mrpallycapoops
    @mrpallycapoops 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seraphim Roses view of Watts resonates with my view of modern spirituality coming into adulthood having been brought up Catholic…a smorgasbord of choice to suit oneself. Ironically I fell into it myself keeping an open mind to the idea that our consciousness was evolving. However believing in anything led to believing in nothing concrete and a black hole. When faced with the prospect of that abyss I realised that the only option left was to turn back to God. Back to traditional Catholicism and the spiritual light that I have experienced is one that I never did as a younger person. But the path went through Orthodoxy because of its fearless adherence to tradition in the face of modernist seductions. I appreciate its role in reminding Catholics of our duty to tradition and the truth. Maybe one day the two paths may again become one in God again.

  • @CMBradley
    @CMBradley 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Like, Share, Subscribe, Pray, Give Thanks. Plato, Republic VI.490a-b

  • @Inevitable-Infarct
    @Inevitable-Infarct 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is interesting. I myself am very thankful for Jung. If it weren’t for him, I don’t think I would have been humble enough to see my flaws and my errors. This beginning stages of humility is what got me to first accept Christ, and then Orthodoxy. Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on Carl Jung.

  • @Book-bz8ns
    @Book-bz8ns 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are lots of teachers. Nearly all of them fail "the test of the teacher". So far the only ones that haven't failed are Jesus Christ and the Saints. I've been in a similar path as Seraphim Rose, except I never had money for university. I arrived a little later to nearly the same place though, and here I am. Will I become an Orthodox monk at age 58? I don't know. Let me learn to pray first, and be baptized. I have lots of reading to do.

  • @ckahlquist2129
    @ckahlquist2129 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sadhu, sadhu, sadhu

  • @philotheasbliss
    @philotheasbliss 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤❤

  • @hfz6131
    @hfz6131 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thnks bro ❤