วีดีโอ

You should do one with music writing. I’m about to test out claud now. Chat gpt has been mostly disappointing. It excels in defining genres, and instrumentation. Its really vague in allot of sound design areas. The worse part is the musical notation itself. Weather its suggestions are flat out boring (cookie cutter to the extreme), or just doesn’t have a great way to display timing of what its trying to describe. In gpt3 i was able to get it to write me some midi. Which was flat out bonkers. In 4 it sent me a link to download a midi from Drive. The link was broken. I asked it to send me a new link in which it responded it couldn’t use Drive….. when it comes to UE5 blueprints, i was able to get it to do things there are literally no tutorials for on YT or google results. It took me months of fine tuning to get a decent enough data table CSV. To its credit though the data table was over 8000 rows and about 6 columns. But the trial and error had allot of headaches attached.

I needed this video. Thanks man.

I have used gemini 1.5 pro, chatgpt 4o and Claude sonnet 3.5 base model and OMG Antropic made a great work. The results where MUCH MUCH better in every single aspect I used he models for: - Coding - Data analysis - Huge data information sum ups - Getting insights and core info from research papers - Law content - Studying purposes: making Anki type questions, creating Feynman technique summaries, etc By far Claude offered me the best outputs out of all and it was just the free version... definitely gonna give a try this one for a while and analyse even deeper. If you ask me definitely pick Claude pro version which is even cheaper than rest of LLMs

Well done!! Can you do it again with the new GPT-o1 model?

08:40 As someone who has a `# journal --follow | less +F` terminal for my home server in lieu of a fish tank, I must warn you all AI companies are furiously and continuously downloading and re-downloading everything that won't block them on the Internet. anthropic, bytedance, openai, etc. I also know they've brought the Internet Archive down at least once with their aggressive spidering. Better tests would be completely novel images never uploaded.

Clark Melissa Garcia Melissa Williams Anna

Also, you 19:29, you gave point to GPT but you didn't increase its point on the screen. Thank you though for your contribution. It was interesting

7:28 >> Sorry, but GPT found it was a brick while Claude found it as a stone, which is not correct. 8:02 >> Sorry, but GPT found it was Obama, yet Claude only said it was the man in suites, which is not correct.

Johnson Jeffrey Walker Timothy Jones Christopher

For coding Sonnet won

Anderson Sarah Smith Robert Thomas Carol

Great vid, thank you

This is a really good video

Patric, you seriously think that 4o is smarter then 4? Have you even used both to compare? I think if you had you would know that comparing claude to 4o make no sense whatsoever.

Great video thanks! It would be really awesome if you get them both speaking with each other to, i font know, maybe how to solve some of the greatest problems of humanity. And maybe have them choose, together, what the 1st most important would be! Do you think if what I’ve suggest is even possible???

Hello, Good video. I liked and subscribed. First, I think you stiffed GPT4o on the R:8 summary question. Yes, it was more than 300 words-however, since it hit all the aspects of the dense article, GPT4o should have received a point. Also, the prompt scrolled fast-I was unable to read it-so I don’t know if you asked to limit it to 300 words. Second, I have to write a production program for a small operation insurance company. I will use GnuCOBOL; which of the two would you use to assist in that project?

Thanks for the comparisson! I do agree in the end it comes down to personal preference, and people should really try both (and perhaps also Gemini) to see which one suits them better. I used to write poems in my youth, I was quite fond of them, and I actually prefered the poem GPT gave you, it felt more elegant with more "fancy" but also soothing words, while Claude in my opinion gave a not very memorable rendition with somewhat generic and common words. But again, its personal preference.

New research shows that not only does being polite in your prompts not work, it actually may work against you, and make the LLM less likely to give an accurate response.

excellent. taken notes and off to practice!

Insane value! Also I love the video quality and audio. Could you please tell me the equipment use? Appreciate it! more power Patrick!

Please try gpt 4o for a continued conversation, you ask something and then it answers and then you interrupt and ask a follow up question.. as if its a real person sitting beside you

so, gpt is better at emotions and closer to the much feared AGI

I think it would be better to do a blind comparison.

#SmythOS has exceeded our expectations in terms of scalability. We've handled increasingly complex AI projects while maintaining performance and efficiency. The platform's ability to adapt to our growing needs is truly impressive.SmythOS AI agents give better solutions

Thanks for making a good videos

Very cool! How did I miss this? Been paying and playing around with Midjourney twice (once in 2023, and once in 2024). This UI is preferable IMO to the midjourney one I experienced before. Actually, the results here was insane for being free honestly, really sharp and good. Awesome tip!

Hi, I need to subscribe for one of the paid version of these AI chatbots (Claude3.5 sonnet, chatgpt 4o etc.) for the coding purposes mainly. I need to frequently uploading files, images, and sometimes referring to the web links. I have huge length of codes to analyze and other files. Will it be exactly same if I directly subscribe to chatgpt 4o from openai or subscribe to perplexity and use the chatgpt 4o AI model in the setting, similar cases for other AI models too? In case of perplexity, I will be getting multiple AI models in just one plan, is it really true and practicable?

I understand that in the free version of Claude, you get 5 free queries with Claude Sonnet. How many free queries will I get with Claude Sonnet if I buy the Pro plan?

How do you go about creating such comparison videos? How do you film and edit the videos? :) Really nicely done!

Thanks you 🎉

Where are you taking your answers from? (for example, the GDP one I think Germany came fourth, not fifth)

Conclusion: GPT-4o is for research and Summarization, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet is great for poetry, conversation, storywriting and dialoguing. I prefer to spend $20/month for GPT-4o

First time visitor. Awesome stuff. Clearly presented. And your speaking is a good pace. So many TH-camrs need to learn how to slow down and enunciate. Everything feels so hurried. You’ve earned a new sub. Than you.

I've tried both for non-trivial coding and Claude is MUCH better at complex tasks, GPT-4o didn't stand a chance.

So biased😮

Your videos have been so helpful, Patrick! Looking forward to see your new videos!!!

Yeah, really succeeding as a so called prompt engineer definitely involves being part linguist, part consultant, part data scientist, part developer, part ai engineer and part automation expert. And honestly those working in these fields already have a huge headstart and are just as passionate about AI as everyone else. I still love the role, since it's a combination of specialized skills, where specific industry knowledge can potentially help you with finding a unique spot, but not becoming versed in these other fields just means you are automating your expertise with data and prompts to replace yourself for a company. Landing a safe job related to prompt engineering means being a thought leader and being able to build up and maintain whole ai systems in combination with already established skills.

I've watched a lot of AI videos out there, this one was truly helpful. You've gained my subscribe & my full attention Patrick! Thank you!

the only thing seperating them is now the training data

Thanks for sharing. If I ever see a thumbnail with any type of money figure on it, I immediately disregard it and roll my eyes. They’re all playing off peoples desires to make a lot of money really fast. Doesn’t typ work that way.

This video needs to be shared, shared and shared! I am tired of all those "make trillion $£¥€ with only..." clickbait videos.

Привет, спасибо за видео)

GPT-4o is completely useless

This explains prompting well to those who are beginners. Shared with my parents 😅 😂 and friends, your channel is going to 1000x by October. Great stuff, Patrick. Easy to binge-watch to catch up. Now subscribed to keep on it, so keep them coming. Haven't seen agentic agents talked by you like langchain or others your thoughts? Maybe some tutorials on your takes on automations with make etc.

For today Claude 3.5 and GPT 4o are my favorites among all of them. Most of the time I prefer Claude because it is clearly more "intelligent". But recently I stumbled upon a problem. I had a handful of receipts I needed to process. I made a pdf file with all of receipts and asked Claude to make a spreadsheet with all the information from them. But Claude missed one receipt for some reason. When I mentioned it, Claude tried to solve the problem by adding another receipt with arbitrary information in it! On the other hand Chat GPT did the job correctly right away.

3:23 i thought someone was inside my house whistling

Well researched. You document many of the use cases I need and use. An excellent video.

Hi Patrick, great video liked and subscribed. I loved the conclusion part. This is also my personal experience. I use the OpenAI Mac app which makes ChatGPT my daily. But whenever I need a structured output or something more challenging than summarize this pdf, or Google meet transcription… I use Claude. I haven’t opened the web interface of ChatGPT in awhile. For the API, Claude is worth testing but I recommend everyone take your time testing it if you heavily pre-prompt and fine tune. You maybe have to adapt heavily.