วีดีโอ

this video really made me rethink whether I am fluent in English. And that is a good thing! This is maybe a video done in three languages: Mathematics, Philosophy, and English; and I'm still but a little baby in all three, haha. AMAZING VIDEO :DDD

👍❤️

4:00 ruliology 11:20 eyes important for science 14:30 rulead

Synchronicity is madness.

13:13 Ariman vs. Lucifer

Paul vs Peter pt4 5:41

Your explaining wolfram theory? Hmmm🤔

@formscapes

thanks for this informative video. very helpful.

Your quote from a prior maestro of Scientific American seems oddly prescient, considering the ignominious self-immolation of the recent maestro of Scientific American...

The Danger rests in our short lifespan and attention span. Synchronistic Mathematics proves what Pauli and Jung could not discover in their day, yet we have greater tools for examination. My 25 years of work is ignored by "Egocentrists". 😊

They mirror your vibration, you inner world, your Youniverse. (You & I in a verse) They are proof that you are creating your reality as you go.

I wish this channel had also a community either on skool, discord or reddit

This is explanation is so good! I never made the connection between Wolframs conclusions and postmodern science. I need to go for a walk now 😂

I see an interesting charlatan. You weave, bend and contort Wolfram into your narrative, which ultimately adds fat to his ideas in NKS. It would also be difficult to debate you because you are clever. Thanks for the vid and putting this out there. It was fun to watch

Keep it up, Awesome video!

Very good channel! Thanks for your work.

I use "Ruliad god" a lot with my friends talk to about theology. Everything else that is conscious I believe is a qualified non-dualistic version of the ruliad. We are recusdions in the rule set bound in the system.

I bought the book 20 years ago. I have been working these ideas for decades as an intuition. I think it has a lot to say about Free Will being computationally reducible. I have also lost a lot of myself in a stroke some years ago. I remember marveling at all the Parliament of signals that I can see since part of my cognition was gone.

Liebe für Feyerabend ❤

great series! Im curious, this does seem to assume that survival and truth are the same, which makes sense from a genetic/memetic/archetypical stand point, it just isn't the case 'necessarily'. Its almost as if these ideas want to survive, and use ouer reliance upon them as a measuring stick for success.. Very selfish indeed.. almost spooky :^) Hope this makes sense

There is causality in synchronicity - it just doesn't immediately precede the effect. Synchronicity is a quantum event, and quantum events are probabilistic not deterministic. In other words there is a lag time between cause and effect.

The OP looks like low testosterone

What I can say about Aristotle to help you understand his term Theology is this: Aristotle was a polytheist who started living 384 years before Christ in ancient Greece. So in order to understand what words meant then, it's necessary to look at etymology. Let's do that. We think (the current paradigm) that the Greek word Theos means God. This is etymologically false. The root in Greek is The- and is a root shared in other ancient PIE languages such as Sanskrit, where the Th- is instead a Dh-. The- in ancient Greek means: to put, place, rank, arrange, position. In ancient Greece, the demigods were not called demigods (that's a modern term); rather, they were called 'arrangers' ie, arrangers of the fates of man. Each polytheistic god had some responsibility over an area of human life: the land/farming, love life, weather, the sea/navigation, etc. You prayed to these characters to ask for specific things eg to pray to Poisiden for a safe journey over the sea. The gods were seem as watchers of mankind who conducted our affairs through their acts. So Theo (where the o is an omega) in Greek literally means 'I arrange' and Theos means arranging. Theory is am arrangement, and Theatre is a performance made up of an arrangement of acts. In that sense, the connection between maths and physics is a generalised study of arrangement, pattern, order. In terms of Wolframs complexity ideas, the arrangements are simple but with the power to combine and in combination, emergence arises. The basis of non-linear systems which give rise to emergence is this idea of non-function specific interaction of components which occurs when there are significant interactions~~~ that are unrelated to a component's function within a system~~~which none the less impact the systems structure and function in am emergent fashion.

What about Aristotle. Is he not the worst enemy of modernity on every front

Pharmacratic inquisition is my favorite thing and it turned me on to some gnostic media. Hey do you footbag? Found you through a hack video comment but I’m liking this video!!!

Has the third video from this been released? I couldn’t find it🥲

Quintessential -thanks good true and especially beautiful

Wolfram's metaphysics' main problem is that the universe is most probably not computational.

Peterson: "That is soo fetch!" Dawkins: "Fetch is never going to happen!"

The logical system is never gone. It’s over your head and was measured in one night sky. One step at a time. By one civilization at a time. The pace hazely seen by your own night sky

Okay you just blew my mind with that number.

Some people like being led by the nose.

This is one of the best videos about Synergetics on the web. I really love the connections you make here and the amount of work you put into this is commendable. I disagree with some of the connections you draw and your overall tone comes off as a little bit... critical... or scrutinizing in a way that almost made me think you were going to mock Bucky as a charlatan and lump him into a group with Leadbeater. You have a strong intellect and your ability to summarize and curate presentations is really inspiring. Your intellectual scrutiny and matter of factness can come off as a bit condescending or impermeable, which I felt challenged by in both videos you made on synergetics. You seem to know key points of Synergetics and Fuller's work and your design aesthetic, clear speaking, and pacing through these videos is really superb. I am curious, have you read Synergetics 1&2 in their entirety? I found myself grappling with your statement that Bucky makes a philosophical leap from points to spheres and that he gives no explanation for that. I havent reached a conclusion regarding it, although I know that Modelability plays a role in it... my thoughts on it currently are this: you cannot have a partial, considerable event ~ all considerable events are finite ~ All considerable events have an inside and an outside and are at minimum a tetrahedron ~ all spheres are high frequency polyhedra ~ all polyhedra are complexes of energy events in critical proximity to one another and related through lines of force ~ the centers of spherical event phenomena are related to other spherical event phenomena through lines of force (vectors) that tend toward octet truss arrangements because of how spheres relate to one another in closest-packing ~ Fuller worked to decrease abstraction and increase modelability ~ coordinate systems are not abstractions that we should base our models on rather, coordinate systems themselves are models of observable integrity patterns and the generalized principles of universe provide the "leap" from abstraction to modelability. Anywho, all of this is to say, keep up the great work! Your work is valuable and I am grateful for your assistance in bringing Synergetics into the collective conversation. Cheers ~

schizophrenia

I wonder if Bucky ever read about sacred geometry, he is drawing 3d versions of a number from that space. Scientists might like numbers (in their work), but no one else does. Mr V needs to find a way to make it not, or they will never transfer knowledge / break down boundaries.

I wonder what he would have made of sacred geometry. Tried reading Synergetics a couple of times, but I find it too obtuse for now.

I experience synchronicities literally every day and I also am clinically diagnosed with OCD and the two have latched on and have ruined my fucking life. Egocentrism and paranoia DEFINITELY. I'm glad to see some one who says that synchronicities are dangerous. All these new agers who say Synchronicities are signs from the universe are saying something very dangerous.. because my synchronicities are deeply negative. I don't know how to overcome this

Oh my. I am afraid in a few years you will look at this video and be thoroughly embarrassed. Nevertheless, I suppose it will at least serve as a demonstration of how much you will have learned until then.

What was that outro video, did you make it? I want more

🍿

This is great. Your content and way of thinking is very similar to my own.

great series. very thought provoking! thank you.

I noticed that this video didn't make it into your Memes Playlist.

I have a love hate with continental philosophy, because on the one hand I find it very interesting and imaginative, but on the other I despise how unclear and allegorical writing it is. I feel that this happens with Feyerabend, in his search to create a new paradigm in epistemology (which he partially achieved), he wrote in a way so different from what we are used to reading in epistemology, that his ideas can easily be understood as if was making an apology for pseudoscience. But, it is simpler to say that Fayerabend concluded that the scientific method is not universal, and therefore is not objective, because all disciplines, in practice, have different methods.

succulent ideas!

Promo-SM

👍

If this guy read Kant he would have saved a lot of time

❤awesome listen