วีดีโอ

First there are no black panthers ! Only black leopards n jags n the difference between them besides a stocky build are the leopards have longer tails for balance when climbing n their rosettes are smaller with no small spot inside them. N leopards are more built for climbing n have rotating rear ankles for grip when coming down trees

It weighs an avg of 100 lbs more and is the same length. He's a what is it with you cat/tiger lion fan boys?

Cry

No. Fattest yes.

​@@LiarSlayer01-gb7enLion is smaller and skinnier

For sure. th-cam.com/video/dc2CpbpCF58/w-d-xo.html

Завидуешь.

​@@user-wk8tc1gk7nAll myths: The tiger is stronger, the tiger can kill an adult elephant, the tiger's muscle mass is 72% LOL, the tiger can do this, the tiger can do that, blah, blah, blah, all the fantasies and lies to help tiger fanatics to deal with their burdens, because tigers will never be the king of the jungle or the king of beasts, and the lion will always be superior to tigers.

No Tigers scare away Lions

Tigers king of coward, the one a leopard wild boar destroyed in circus pitted fight

Wow great research. Was that your doctoral dissertation

​@@The_beast7_Treal beast remain single. True COWARDS maintain GANGS. 😂😂😂

My video will show exactly that, they are thin…it’s the good angle and the stripes that plays a huge role by giving the illusion of being thicker…

It's wrong, this number comes from a sub adult male. Not a full adult. Seek and see... Most experts claim 1000psi.

1000psi

3. Siberian tigers actually average 176.4kg, and because they are the fewest in number of all wild tigers (over 600 individuals), it's hard to see much larger specimens, but during winter, it's very possible to see big males who can weigh between 230-270kg. This is because during winter, Siberian tigers like grizzly bears have to put on much weight (though they don't need to hibernate), so they can put on up to or a little over 30kg of fat to survive the harsh conditions of the cold, and this extra weight can enable them go a week comfortably without food. So imagine a big male who weighs 220-240kg, then he puts on 30kg, that's 270kg. Sadly, given the reduction in prey size and availability, plus lose of habitat, it's hard to see many male Siberian tigers weighing that much, but there will definitely be monsters out there. So the 280-300kg is now unrealistic.

4. Bengal tigers (together with a few types of lions) are probably the largest wild cats today. Bengal tigers, especially the ones from kaziranga and Corbett have very big and healthy specimens that can weigh 200-270kg with ease (with some weighing over 270kg). Due to lack of media coverage or attention in specific areas in Africa, massive lion specimens aren't weighed and even if they're weighed, they don't make it to the media. For instance, in game reserves like Dinokeng and Entanambi, two male lions weighed 300kg and 309kg respectively, but the media won't show this. A huge male lion called BDM weighed 280kg+ at the time of his death, there are other game reserves with massive male lions who aren't weighed or whose weights don't make it to the internet.

5. The population of lions that are considered bigger than others cannot average 190kg, more correctly, the smallest of the bigger lion population should average 200kg and the biggest should average over 235kg. Reason? An old Namibian male lion who was about 17 yrs of age and looked so skinny and not so impressive was weighed and he weighed an astonishing 217kg! Now Crater lions, Okavango lions, even the private game reserve lions usually produce males that look far bigger than this old Namibian male, so there's no way they would weigh 190kg, no way at all.

​@@danieluzowuru3998они вас не хотят слушать им это не нравится.

​@@danieluzowuru3998вы тоже им не нравитесь. Они привыкли к другому.

Stop crying kid

In the wild, the average weight of Siberian Tigers - 235 kgs for males and 187 kgs for females Bengal Tigers - 220 kgs for males and 150 kgs for females African Lions - 190 kgs for males and 130 kgs for females. So, the Siberian and Bengal Tigers are both larger than African Lions in the wild.

These data are not right.

@@andreamozzo7965 Only for Lion fans

​@debayanpal3181 cherry picking.Childish and pathetic.You pull figures out of your ass

In the wild African lions weigh less than captive lions.. This is the opposite for Bengal tigers.. Wild Bengals are much bigger than captive Bengals.

Bruh Tiger has defeated lion in 70% fights because they are not just bigger,they are more active,have more experience of living and fighting alone.Thet have a bite force of 1050 psi and lion has a bite force of 650 psi.Tigers have Bigger claws,Canine teeth, better fighting skills in a 1v1, better swimmers and jumping skills and are more agile and also have more stamina because lions sleep 18-20 hours a day

^ Textbook example of a tiger fanatic with misinformation 🤡

@@slimmy478-6 There are many videos of tiger vs lion comparison on channels and their is information on Google as well

@@slimmy478-6 Tigers have a 3 inch canine and lion 2.5 inch.Tigers have 4 in claws while lion 1.5 inch.Both tiger and lions are good swimmers but when it comes to swim longer then tigers are better at swimming.You can check Google and videos of wild ciencies

@@slimmy478-6And there was tiger named gunga who killed 30 lions in his life span

They extinct too

The Kenyan lion from Koch was at times referred to as a “cattle killer”, but it wasn’t habitual enough to make him fat, as Koch noted that it was simply big, not fat. As for the 261kgs tiger, that is M105, Sauraha, who exceeded the scale of 272kgs, with stomach content (he looked 1/3 full). The empty belly mass was estimated using the chest girth. However, there are more recent weights that has surpassed either for either felid.

@@nightiever Koch's lion was 272 kg empty. M105 and M126 where baited and the equipment was included. Higher weights are not 100% reliable. Neither before nor after those.

@@aristotels_aristotals I am pretty sure the unadjusted weight of the tigers alone were “272+”.

@@nightiever The Sauraha tiger M105 and the other huge male M126 bottomed at a 600 lb (272.2 kg) scale while being weighed and including the weighing equipment to lift him (Dinerstein, 2003).

@@nightiever yes suraya and m 105 extended 272 kg sure , the balance wasn' t capable to weight on more , probabilly this 2 tigers they was near 290-300 kg , but they aren' t the records, absolutely not , the official record of the bengal tiger was the famous bengal tiger killed and weighted in Nepal, in one industry of sugar in 1967 , this tiger was weighted for 3 times for more security, and his poids is confirmed and registreted to be kg 388. 7 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 this tiger is exposed at smitsonian museum at Washington. But there are others records confirmed of bengal tigers of 325 kg , 320 kg , 310 kg ecc....the modern record is one exemplar weighted from the guardian of reserve wasif in central India, 345 kg !! . The bengal tigers in national park kaziranga actually haves one average of 250-252 kg , with exemplars that arrives usually until 290-320 kg ( bbc wild speak also of the max records until 360 kg ) . The historical record ( we speak always of exemplars in the wild obviously) for the siberian tiger is one exemplar killed by the hunters and weighted 384 kg in 1954 , there was also others 2 exemplars weighted around 400 kg , but unfortunately they weren' t confirmed, actually the siberian tiger have some exemplar estimates to arriver until 350 kg , the actuall range of the siberian tiger is 220-250 kg ( we considerate always males) with one average around 230-235, and the bengal tiger in all India have one average around 228-233 kg .