วีดีโอ

Not barelvi.

Please reserve all negative comments.

I did not hear a criticism of Imam Bukhari. He did not dismiss anyone sticking to his books

You didn't understand what he said. Imam Bukhari was not Hambali. He was a Mujtahid who deduced the Fiqh himself without following any other Madhabs. Those who follow Sahih Bukhari will make many mistakes because they will follow the literal hadith with all it's variants and mistakes. Those who follow a Madhab instead of the hadith are the real followers of the Sunnah because Imams Abu Hanifa & Malik & Shafi'i & Ahmad have sifted the hadith and chose the correct ones according to their methodologies. We must follow FIQH books to stick to the Sunnah. Following hadith books will lead ppl astray.

You criticise Hanafis for not doing rafful yadayn. You do realise that Malikis also DON'T do rafful yadayn??!!! Imam Abu Hanifa saw some of the Companions praying with his own eyes! He learnt the Salah directly from THOUSANDS of students of the Sahaba! Especially from the students of ibn Masud and Ali (raa)!!!! None of them did rafful yadayn!!! Therefore, we choose to follow the Madhabs that learnt directly from the Sahaba and their students rather than any Sahih ahadith.

My comment is not to attack Abu hanifa madhab or any else. The only point I am trying to make is that he this mufti said that people are using bukhari who came hundreds of years after the prophet criticising the people who do that. Whilst in the next point the mufti quoted ibn hajar who he called and elder. Ibn hajar came hundreds of years after Imam bukhari. So my points why is ibn hajar a bigger authority that Imam bukhari. Remember I respect both of them and love all the Imams of fiqh

I am just pointing out his discrepancy in quoting a later scholar while complaining about others who quote bukhari who is actually old than Imam ibn hajar. Do get me. He dismisses bukhari for coming later then quoted someone who came after bukhari do you understand me. And raful yadayn was an example not an attack. And I love Abu hanifa and all the other imams of fiqh and Hadith of the salaf as salih. And Imam bukhari teacher was Imam Ahmad ibn hanbal. Imam bukhari was a hanbali until he became a mujtahid. Search it up if you don’t believe me. All commented for is to show the shaykh here his blatant double standard. No hate just to open some people eyes to not believe everything he says because he is famous now.

May Allah guide you to the straight path.

الله يهدين جميع

Ameen akhi

Ameen

آمين. True scholars. These guys have no idea

why did you accept the quran in the first place. then you will now pseudo salafis are misguided

And they will make it crystal clear with all evidences without distorting the real meaning and with consenses.😊

oh really😂. Where u got this information from?

@ bro Just slapping the title mufti in your name doesn’t make you a mufti. People need to fear Allah and be more humble….

@@MadinahLivin May Allah protect muslims from present day biddah of 'salafi sect'

@@murtazaalam6254 if you think following the salaf is a biddah you’re severely mistaken 😂 poor miskeen

​@@murtazaalam6254*May Allah protect the Ummah from the people of whims and desires i.e the mutakallimoon. Ibn ‘Abdul Barr رحمه الله on Ahlul Bid’ah and Ahlul Kalaam Ibn Abdul-Barr Al-Māliki (rahimahullāh, d. 390H) quoted the saying of Imām Mālik: “It is not permitted to accept the witness of Ahlul-Bid’ah and Ahlul-Ahwā.” Then he explained: “The people of desires according to Mālik and all of our companions are Ahlul-Kalām (the people of theological rhetoric). So every mutakallim (one who resorts to theological rhetoric) is from the people of desires and Bid’ah whether he is an Ash’ari or other than an Ash’ari. His witness is never accepted in Islam. He is to be abandoned and disciplined for his innovation. And if he continues upon innovation, his repentance is sought [by those in authority].” (Jāmi’ Bayān Al-‘Ilm wa Fadlihi, 2/96)

DO moment

@@faisalanwar6109 Vidhi what is this behavior