วีดีโอ

Thanks so much

Thanks so much

Equity please

Common law

Are we allowed to mix the effects or u put positive and negative effects 😢

😅i was watching while u were passing by LLB 1 block 😂😂😂then i shouted aaah

Thank you

A case of grace ibingira v Uganda

Discuss the role played by political parties in Uganda's constitutional transition to its independence.thanks

Thanks brother

your the best big up

This is very helpful

Thanks a lot counsel walter

Thanks Walter 😊

This is one of the best videos. Thanks gentlemen

Batch ten law

Batch 10

Thanks

Thank you so much

Thanks a lot for the good work counsel Walter

Many thanks counsel Walter for the good work

Thanks very much for this hard work

Elements of a valid contract

Thanks Mr Walter

Please help with electronic contracts thank you

Thanks

Indeed uu have made it easy

This is awesome

Part 2 please 🙏🥰

Indeed! School of law made easy ✔️✔️

Thanks senior counsel

Plz may u discuss introduction to law also

So whoever is in this comment section is a first yr😢😢

🎉🎉

Help me sir as tackling a unit of the same but its hard for me sir i need assistance

Many thanks counsel (R v white ) is a little bit different from your explanation .....throw more light on it Cases R v White - 1910 286 words (1 pages) Case Summary 28th Sep 2021 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law Share this: Legal Case Summary R v White [1910] 2 KB 124 CAUSATION - ATTEMPT Facts The defendant put poison into the evening drink of the victim, his mother, with the intention of killing her. The victim drank a few sips of the drink and then fell asleep. She did not wake up, however the medical evidence was that she had died of a heart attack rather than as a result of the poison. The defendant also gave evidence that he had not intended to kill her by a single dose but had planned to deliver multiple doses over a longer period of time. The defendant was convicted of attempted murder. Issues On appeal, the question arose as to whether the defendant could be liable for murder given that his actions had not factually caused the death. A second issue was whether having delivered a single dose was a sufficient ‘attempt’ to ground the conviction in light of the evidence that the defendant had intended the victim to die as a result of later doses which were never administered. Decision/Outcome The court established the ‘but for’ test of causation, according to which the defendant could not be convicted unless it could be shown that ‘but for’ his actions the victim would not have died. On the facts of this case the test was not met, therefore the defendant could not be convicted of murder. On the issue of attempt, the court held that it was sufficient that the attempted murder had been begun, notwithstanding that the defendant had not completed his plan. The conviction for attempted murder was therefore upheld.

Thanks so much for the support

Thanks very much, easy to understand 🙏

Thanks alot

Tnx

Much obliged counsel but we a requesting a video on corporate criminal liability

Help me with the case of fox odoi and 23 others vs AG

Help us and discuss equity and ADR

Thanks very much sir

Help me with privity to a contract doctrine

But our lecturere told us self intoxination is dutch courge

We appreciate

I am very grateful for your good work

Am really great full counsel 😊..

Thanks for your help sir about defenses