Declan Purcell
Declan Purcell
  • 2
  • 343 627
Size of the Universe
The Size of the Universe
www.spaceposter.shop
Information Wall Poster
How to Comprehend the Size of the Universe
Size of the Universe
Universe Size
มุมมอง: 386

วีดีโอ

Proposed Pyramid Construction Techniques
มุมมอง 343K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Pyramid Construction - How the Pyramids were built also see... www.spaceposter.shop Music: Romantic Chillout by Cosmo Kids

ความคิดเห็น

  • @dantyler6907
    @dantyler6907 10 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Makes no account for the 2nd gallery-like void, discovered a few years ago. Most (maybe all?) GP construction estimates never seem to account for the internal voids, just stacking stones flat. And with the newly estimated 2nd gallery, no telling what else the GP has inside!!!😮

  • @awuma
    @awuma 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Any ramp theory must deal with the amount of work done against friction. The most efficient would be straight up the sides, or at least up a ramp much steeper than the commonly assumed small ramp inclinations. The work against gravity, mgH, remains the same, but the work against friction increases as the inclination decreases: WORK = m*g*H * [1+mu*cot(theta)], where mu = coefficient of friction and theta = inclination angle. Also, since sliding friction is usually less than static friction, especially when lubricated, a quick steady pull without stopping up the sides would require much less energy than a long intermittent motion up a gently sloping ramp. Of course, the force needed to go up a steep slope is greater, but force is just proportional to the number of workers. FORCE = m*g*[sin(theta) + mu*cos(theta)]. Of course, here I am assuming sliding motion. Rotational step movement is something else again.

    • @declanpurcell571
      @declanpurcell571 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Using the outer finished surface of the pyramid as the ramp support is feasible, even though it would be increasingly challenging to raise blocks from the very base to the uppermost levels of the pyramid approached construction complete. The need to increase ramp angle is more of a practical measure to reduce the actual ramp construction material required as opposed to reducing the coefficient of friction. An internal ramp requires zero additional construction material as opposed to an external ramp. As calculated and demonstrated in the video, the 2:1 (22.5 degrees) slope can reach to within 30m of the top, and if the angle was slightly increased could reach higher. The use of such a simple internal ramp, for a number of reasons would be more practical than trying to use the outer surface as the ramp. However, the internal ramp theory also has explanatory merit to the purpose and functions of the chevrons and also as to why they are offset from the centre which would not have been done for any other reason. In other words the internal ramp fits the evidence.

  • @AngelB-s5k
    @AngelB-s5k 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I think the blocks on the outside of the pyramids are a cover up of whats inside, what would it look like without all the blocks covrring it up

  • @Alexi7666
    @Alexi7666 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    27 years of ropes and wood ramps? What sort of rope and wood did Egyptians have to work with?

    • @declanpurcell571
      @declanpurcell571 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      They had very good quality. Google: Tutankhamun Tomb' and 'Door Seal'. Some good photos of wood and ropes.

  • @Alexi7666
    @Alexi7666 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Yeah, getting the stones up the ramp is tough, but once you get the stones up how does the hydraulic life set the stones in EXACT place?

  • @kenefdz
    @kenefdz 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I've enjoyed both your videos...but you might want to look into using a spellchecker more often.

  • @stevetoyne
    @stevetoyne 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The granite blocks used for the ceiling of the kings chamber no doubt rose with the pyramid, one course at a time.

  • @gerryb5578
    @gerryb5578 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Do the other pyramids on the plateau exhibit an internal ramp😊

    • @declanpurcell571
      @declanpurcell571 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Unfortunately, no evidence for such yet…

  • @frankiemiles-d7e
    @frankiemiles-d7e 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If you used ramps and ropes, then you would probably use a pulley system going up and over, and down the other side with a counterweight

  • @joaojunior3192
    @joaojunior3192 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very interesting! I was wondering if there was a 3rd ramp to place the last triangular stone at the tip of the pyramid? Probably, to descend from the end of the pyramid, they used the same ramps that they ascended?

  • @IronBroccoli
    @IronBroccoli หลายเดือนก่อน

    Multiple pulleys when dragging the blocks up would act like a giant snatch block would it not? What an amazing video!

  • @CoffeeFiend1
    @CoffeeFiend1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've always thought the sheer fact (yes quite literally a fact in this case) that a lot of the rooms/chambers in the various pyramids/temples/structures have objects/artifacts within them that are either too big or just about the same size as the tunnels leading to them kinda necessitates the internal structures/rooms being built first.

  • @kirkmccormack1
    @kirkmccormack1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super work Declan! Have there been chevrons discovered at 85m and 115m previously? Also, what is the filler material for the core so you think? Cheers, Kirk.

    • @declanpurcell571
      @declanpurcell571 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks Kirk, Unfortunately, there is no conformation of any other chevrons above the visible set at approx. 18m. However, investigation in the areas where I predict, there could be indications of such construction ramp openings. The 85m and 115m heights are based on an exact ramp angle of 1:2, however, I would now predict an upper ramp might have a slightly steeper angle to ensure the exit was closer to the top. There are a number of good photos showing high precision cut outer casing stones, and a layer of large rectangular & square roughly cut blocks directly behind. On deeper openings it’s possible to see increasing numbers of basically large boulders and large rock infill. I would expect the majority of the inner core stonework was taken straight from the quarry and quickly positioned with teams of man (or maybe this was a job for the youth) ensuring all gaps were tightly packed with smaller rubble, and even well packed sand. Obviously, stone in the vicinity of inner structures would also have been better cut to be more structural. I have demolished a 200-year-old, 600mm thick two-story house wall constructed of random quarry stone and possible even field stones held together by a weak mortar and it stood perfect all that time. I would be confident that such stonework would provide adequate structural integrity inside the pyramid. Declan.

    • @kirkmccormack1
      @kirkmccormack1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ Fascinating, Declan. I think Pat McAfee’s book, Stone Buildings, has reference to rough infill stone used for the walls of castles, with a poured-in hot lime being used as gap filler and binder (very different time period of course). The significant value of your hypothesis is that it has predictive power. If a future scan reveals further chevrons or lintels at those general locations, you have a proof. At TU Dublin School of Architecture, we have being using exceptionally detailed digital models to explore the construction and sequence of buildings (down to the nail in some cases). We’d be happy to assist you in developing an even more detailed version of your diagrams. If every block was modelled and compared to photogrammetry scans, it would be a gargantuan file size, but a pattern may emerge perhaps…

    • @declanpurcell571
      @declanpurcell571 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kirkmccormack1 Thanks Kirk. I don’t think it would be possible to confirm any construction method from block modelling and I’m not aware of any publicly accessible high-definition video footage or photogrammetry scans of the external blockwork in the areas of proposed construction openings. However, if TU Dublin School of Architecture was interested in attempting such, I would be interested. I certainly think a more sophisticated video demonstrating the theory would be a good project for the school to undertake in order to showcase its technical capabilities which I’m sure would get world attention if the theory was proven correct. Best Regards, Declan.

  • @mattjenkins2244
    @mattjenkins2244 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah the more you think about it the shafts make sense for construction

  • @johnmcclane144
    @johnmcclane144 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With all due respect and not being a sensationalist... you are a fucking genius! This is the most thought-out, logical explanation for the construction of the great pyramid. My only regret is that you have but 2 videos to enjoy on TH-cam.

  • @mossyslopes
    @mossyslopes หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine the pride these men felt constructing this wonder. You have just finished your harvest & the Nile has been bountiful again this season. You then head off with your son & two brothers for the journey to Giza. You are soon jointed by many others leaving their village - called upon to work on the pyramid for the earthly embodiment of the gods - the pharaoh. Pretty epic story to tell the grand-kids. 😂

  • @saberkun4506
    @saberkun4506 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If egyptians built the great pyramids theyd be extensive written evidence about how who why etc. There isn't. Also consider the fact that the only actual pyramid there's evidence egyptians built that comes close to the gyza ones is the bent pyramid, and thats a failed attempt. I dream of the day the truth is finally acknowleged, that many of the big ancient civilizations who we credit as the first organized societies only developed in the ruins of much older forgotten ones. Ie. Aztecs, incas, Egyptians .etc trying to copy the construction styles and reusing the materials of ruins they settled in for their own cities. Cheers.

  • @y_x2
    @y_x2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The top portion does not works.

  • @jbinkley22
    @jbinkley22 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What logs and ropes and handle 80 ton blocks???? Clearly there more to the picture that what history tells us. They had some kind of advanced technology that we dont understand

    • @tops2934
      @tops2934 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's main issue of Pyramid building and this video overlooks it

  • @reapingshadow2866
    @reapingshadow2866 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is the mistake in this theory? It is very logical. The logic says, use the least energy. Using the body of the pyramid as the ramp is very smart, and logical since you do not have to build than later destroy outer ramp.

  • @cryptonitor9855
    @cryptonitor9855 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Megafauna ofcourse jeez...

  • @whitefalcon630
    @whitefalcon630 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The great void is real!

  • @Stno3582
    @Stno3582 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The problem with the mystery of how pyramids were built was that it was always attempted to be answered by historians and not engineers. Here we have an engineer who applied physics to explain why steep ramp was used and a simple, yet effective construction method that makes a TOTAL sense and it is pretty much proven now by the discovery of the internal ramp. Internal ramp clearly explains the position of every chamber. Simply wow Sir

  • @Stno3582
    @Stno3582 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One guy applied physics and great amount of simple logic and has solved the mystery alone - I love the internet haha. This is the most plausible explanation ever, construction was enormous but had to be fairly simple - sort of cut and cover.

  • @rogerswyer5357
    @rogerswyer5357 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Quite simple, rope, roller's and sweat.

    • @declanpurcell571
      @declanpurcell571 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Everything is easy when you know how :-)

  • @jbird6609
    @jbird6609 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey , i am a retired construction engineer. The way i would do the pyramid is to go straight up the sides using a counter weight method. I would use 30 crews on the east and on the west sides. My estimate is it took 20,000people, 12 years to build, Its the confirmation of the high civilization of ancient Egypt.

    • @declanpurcell571
      @declanpurcell571 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      why would you use a counterweight?

    • @jbird6609
      @jbird6609 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@declanpurcell571 They had people. 50 people weigh about 7500 pounds. The biggest stones were about 5,000 pounds. So if you have a pulley at the top and 7500 pounds pounds of people walking down the side of the pyramid, do you think the stone will move? It will move easily.

    • @declanpurcell571
      @declanpurcell571 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jbird6609 Totally agree with utilising men as the counter weights, as I indicate in the video (5:40). Utilising stone as the counterweight does not work as it would take more effort to raise the counterweight than the actual blocks themselves. Have you specific details on raising the 80 tonne blocks to a height of 60 m and construction of the final 5% to the very top..?

    • @jbird6609
      @jbird6609 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@declanpurcell571 The theories i have been looking at is there was a shallow ramp inside the pyramid boundaries. Using Pullies and extra men, still walked down the steeper side of the pyramid, but at shorter strokes. After construction the ramp was integrated into the final structure.

    • @jbird6609
      @jbird6609 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@declanpurcell571 I think you are really close to solving it. The part using men pulling with arms i think not. Using counter wt people with gravity and leg power is is more convincing. Now think about 30 crews working 6 hour shifts on 2 sides of the pyramid at once, productivity would be maximized.

  • @SixOhFive
    @SixOhFive 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But as the block gets higher less men would be able to pull the load up until only two guys are left. Unless they used the post method and walked down the stairs as they pulled it up.

  • @legitbeans9078
    @legitbeans9078 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude just randomly throws out the most logical great pyramid construction techniques on all of youtube and then just peaces out, lol.

    • @declanpurcell571
      @declanpurcell571 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      :-) Thanks. I have another in mind, but could be next year...

  • @bruwatso9179
    @bruwatso9179 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Elevated knowledge with a catchy soundtrack.

  • @thiagolucas4722
    @thiagolucas4722 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great! You made the most brilliant video about the construction of the Great Pyramid of Khufu on TH-cam. Your hypothesis is the best I've ever seen! It is completely plausible from a structural, logistical, and archaeological point of view. Please make more videos about your construction hypothesis for the Great Pyramid (and other pyramids of the 4th dynasty). The world needs to know about your hypothesis

    • @declanpurcell571
      @declanpurcell571 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks. Comment appears on the Space video. Would love if you could place on the pyramid video as good comments always appreciated and I may be changing the space video in the future.. Best regards, Declan.

  • @i.p.p.5594
    @i.p.p.5594 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And what is the effect of using the Nile to pull the strings

  • @larmufc1
    @larmufc1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've a theory that they used big tug boats tied to the blocks using canals around the pyramids to lift them

  • @Merlo_parlante
    @Merlo_parlante 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great work, totally consistent with muon scan. The only question is: how did they put in place the pyramidion?

  • @RobGutmann
    @RobGutmann 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome video man! 5:55 matches perfectly with this: th-cam.com/video/Mx2i5o55xxQ/w-d-xo.html

  • @ZAntilles
    @ZAntilles 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about the last 30 meters?

  • @bluedot6933
    @bluedot6933 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    they should have left the internal ramp. makes it so you can go to the top.

  • @DragonsAndDragons777
    @DragonsAndDragons777 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One way to truly be sure is just to redo it ourselves

  • @MagnusNemo-xc5nx
    @MagnusNemo-xc5nx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seems more probable than an spiral internal ramp. This method also allows clear sighting down the sides to ensure the pyramid does not go out of alignment as construction nears the top.

  • @GabrielKozsar
    @GabrielKozsar ปีที่แล้ว

    Question: why did they gradually closed the grand gallery instead of immediately with a smaller ceiling ? The must have used it for a longer period while being closed gradually ? Any ideas ? That is why probably Houdin's theory uses the counter-weight method.

  • @GabrielKozsar
    @GabrielKozsar ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes!! Brilliant. This is exactly what I had in my mind too when meditated around the Houdin's theory yesterday. Reconstructing the pyramid with animation course by course helps alot to solve this because it's visible. The visual guide is priceless. I don't think this is the final solution , but we are pretty close. Hopefully new evidence will be found in the coming years and will shine a brighter light on this issue.

  • @cyrilgamage6692
    @cyrilgamage6692 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is quite possible

  • @imarchello
    @imarchello ปีที่แล้ว

    how to build the pyramid in 9 months: th-cam.com/video/nlchEBh7RHM/w-d-xo.html Your thoughts on this?

    • @declanpurcell571
      @declanpurcell571 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The guy seems very logical at the start, but when I saw the fractal ramps I was disappointed. The effort to construct such ramps safely is enormous. Zig Zag paths are highly inefficient for hauling stone and increases the ramp length exorbitantly. Even deconstruction time is excessive. And it also requires construction without the casing stones in place. The difficulty of adding casing stones as the final endeavour is not very practical. I've even seen it suggested that they were added from the top down, which is usually necessary when assuming external face ramps were used as they still are needed to elevate these stones, and starting from the base isn't practical with such ramp structures in place. When faced with such a big construction project every small inconvenience adds up to an almost impossible task. A solution that requires the casing stones to be added last needs to ensure they are laid from the base to the top and acknowledge the additional effort to ensure each stone is accurately cut on the back face to ensure to mates with the existing blocks. This requires a lot more stone working as opposed to first laying the casing stones and then butting up against them with the adjoining inner blocks. ie. One method requires the casing stones are accurately cut on the back side as opposed to not having to care about the back side at all... I reckon it would take 9 months of labour just to erect and decommission these fractal ramps. Often KiS philosophy works best.... Keep it Simple.. The more complex the task the more important is KiS.

  • @liamredmill9134
    @liamredmill9134 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mesmerized by the animations,thanks,and also I think it's a sound theory

  • @TopazBadger6550
    @TopazBadger6550 ปีที่แล้ว

    The order of operations seems logical. However, it wasn't a tomb, nor was it built by the Egyptians 4,500 years ago. It dates to the last Ice-Age. Humans have been around for 100,000s of years. Gobekli Tepe and many other sites show megalithic construction 11,000 years ago. There is no reason to think earlier civilizations didn't have the ability to do so. We know the Egyptians did not have the tools.

  • @davidcorbett341
    @davidcorbett341 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jean Pierre Houdin's theory 2011 is the best to date. This video is very good but Houdin shows many signs of proof of the Grand Gallery being a Counterweight pulley work area for the lifting of the Kings Chamber granite stones

    • @Dectron1
      @Dectron1 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jean Pierre Houdin's theory is lased with issues. Unnecessary shallow ramp results in a massively long ramp. Navigating corners is extremely awkward. Corners need to be left open for ventilation, light and block turning apparatus. Enclosing these corners after construction is extremely difficult. The grand gallery only reaches a height of 40 metres. The KC gable stones are approx 80 tonnes at a height of 60 meters. A counterweight requires the elevation of a mass equal or greater than the mass to be lifted. It would be easier to just use manpower to directly raise the blocks as opposed to using manpower to raise the counterweight and then using this to raise the blocks. A counterweight would make sense if manpower was very limited, but manpower was not limited. The apperatus to operate a counterweight is more complex than direct lifting. Houdin's proposal does not facilitate large steps which can facilatate the raising of massive blocks using the leaver and jack technique.

    • @davidcorbett341
      @davidcorbett341 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Dectron1 I'd say this video is closer to the truth than any other. Not 1 scientist or engineer in the field of Construction as said it was impossible. th-cam.com/video/G9OhJAasatM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ZUrtFX0nokGqpizj

    • @daveharden5929
      @daveharden5929 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@Dectron1hmmm.... maybe so. Houdin's theory has its issues and yet his proposal is the only one I'm aware of which takes the anomaly of the grand gallery into account, as well as addressing the findings from the interior radar telemetry. The interior radar telemetry showed interior ramp features. However, he miss interpreted the telemetry. It shows the Great Pryramid started off as a 3 tiered mastaba. Starting off as a mastaba explains the below ground features, such as the grotto/well shafts, etc. Also, where the massive foundation for Kufu's Great Pryramid concept was already proven stable as it started off as a huge mastaba.

    • @davidcorbett341
      @davidcorbett341 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@daveharden5929 I believe the Subterranean Chamber or grotto was once a large open pit in the ground. The civilization at that time who planned the Pyramid construction build carved out the Subterranean Chamber in the Limestone bedrock inside the pit, once they had created a room type area they would started to backfill in the pit using rubble,sand and anything loose they could use, they backfilled the hole and working up creating a shaft working upwards to ground level which is the Accending shaft leading down to the grotto that we see today. They would of filled in that pit untill it was a mound just above ground level. Then the Grand Gallery it's the internal ramp to help build the KC. Also the void above the GG I am thinking it is the area that was used by the crew of men who were controlling the Counterweight ropes the men on ropes could of been controlling the drop & Lift as shown on houdin's video.

  • @rh_BOSS
    @rh_BOSS ปีที่แล้ว

    You might be onto something with your theory. I'm going to bookmark this video and come back a few years later.

  • @marianoguaycochea6652
    @marianoguaycochea6652 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanation, i think they could use a counterweight sistem. Just a box that can be filled with sand at the opposite end of the stone can make the work much easier, so you dont need 1200 men too pull the rope.

  • @charlesferdinand422
    @charlesferdinand422 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still couldn't understand shit tbh (at least how the blockas ate maneuvered into place which is the basic action of ptramid construction).

  • @lq7335
    @lq7335 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think they used wood scaffolding

  • @lutherandross3165
    @lutherandross3165 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a very good theory particularly with what the actual evidence on site suggests. However, there are a few things that still need addressing: 1.) the top 30m of the pyramid is a difficult proposition. The video shows some scaffolding & either tracks or ladders without any explanation for how those blocks would have been hoisted or lifted & placed. I have a hard time imagining 2.5 ton blocks being pulled up a 55 degree slope with so little room for manpower. 2.) the casing stones were not addressed in the video at all. I guess the assumption is that they were placed bottom to top as the main construction was completed. But recent studies of the top 30m of the khafre pyramid show a top down pattern which excludes any external ramps. But also makes it hard to imagine how the blocks were brought up to the very top and then placed moving down. Maybe the top section of the pyramid was constructed in an entirely different pattern than the base and center sections? 3.) the survey marks around the pyramid show nothing other than an 8 acre planned layout. Also, the pre construction leveling of the surface is finite. This indicates that the full construction was planned in advance & the internal structure with an “as needed” size idea may not be viable. I do think the internal ramp with steeper slopes idea is far more likely than anything else. Just a few fine points that still need answering.