วีดีโอ

Thank you for the comment! I think you played the situation very well, and I enjoyed watching the whole match.

this is awesome. what sword length do you use??

Yeah, weapon based combat sports use blunt training weapons, have time limits and some safety rules. Actually, training equipment has been around since the beginning of fencing - usage of blunt weapons, sticks and protection was rather common. Even in medieval times knights, during meele competition did not use steel weapons but wooden clubs (while wearing armour). Sharp swords can destroy human tissue really easy. Blunt as well, but fortunately, we wear protection. This way we don't die but get only bruises. Here, author of the video even took time to edit some nice exchanges, were modern practitioners use medieval "master strike" not only against uncooperative opponent, but even during competition (higher stakes, higher stress) - what a chad! Unfortunately thou, combat doesn't look like demos or some images we often picture in our heads when thinking about the it. Then, we today we have some hema clubs that like to film a lot of demos. I can recommend you Lukas Zerhart, AdoreaFencingTeam, BladeBrosCrew and šermíři VíMa. You may like them much more than full contact combat.

i can't believe it took you 3 years to notice!

I do love Judo tho it's sick af

Honestly a lot of these really shouldn't be given to the thrower imo, they didn't really protect themselves and/or did the throw after a halt was called (or should've been called).

It is not "... from judo". The rest of the world also knows armbars and throws. Body mechanics are universal

what

@@realhumanbean57 There are already optimized solutions for such actions. In the video, they try to rediscover it..

I just watched the clip after that... hope those 2 were both disqualified

another issue is that not everyone's guaranteed to know how to grapple, and people who can't grapple are both the most likely to get taken down and the most likely to get hurt badly when being taken down

Totally agree, in a longsword tournament people should fence,it ain t no mma

@@Bermuda-e7f I disagree, wrestling is part of longsword fencing, you have it in many manuals across different masters. It should be done in a safe manner though, maybe no throw unless there is no soft ground to do them.

@@sirxarounthefrenchy7773 i ve never seen a longsword tournament on a tatami. For what I see around, nobody knows how to do it safely. I wouldn trust. It is already hard to teach modern people how to fence with a longsword.. to me it would be impossible to start a career in jujitsu, have a tatami and get people to train 6 days a week in all sort of martial arts.. i also don t really see why. You see, there are all sorts of manuals, you need to understand what you want to do. Where you want to develope skills and where is not interesting for you.

´Tatami

Ippon isnt a throw. The word ippon is used to designate a throw that would incapacitate the person being thrown. A knockout essentially. So any throw can be an ippon.

first move is definitely neither an uchi mata nor an ippon seoi nage. i'd say it's kinda like an attempted tai otoshi that ends up turning into an o-goshi. you can see tori trying to step across to trip uke over their far leg, but they miss and end up lifting uke onto their hip and throwing them over (o-goshi). because of the weird position, lack of grips, etc. it looks really weird and hard to tell. for ippon seoi nage, the actual throwing motion comes from the hip and sleeve grip. in the clip, the arm is on the wrong side for ippon seoi nage uchi mata involves tori kicking their thigh backwards to elevate uke's thigh; in the first clip tori's feet are both firmly planted on the ground.

@@kylep.4503there is a throw named ippon seoi nage

Jui Jitsu, judo was created 1882 by Kanō

​@@dyvanna1It's Jujutsu, not "Jiu Jitsu". Gracies didn't know Japanese and called it as such.

The romanisation of the kanji allow both or even more writings, as far as i understand it. The writing jiu jitsu is as korrekt as ju jutsu and ju jitsu. I dont think it has anything to do with the founders of bjj in particular.

You're thinking of jujutsu. Judo is a more modern practice based on Jigoro Kanno's style of jujutsu. Judo also goes beyond being a purely martial art, extending into the fields of pedagogy and philosophy, which is why it is called ju-do ("the soft way") as opposed to ju-jutsu ("the soft art").

@@malte291 Judo isn't based on Kano Jigoro's style of Jujutsu but on multiple styles of Jujutsu including his styles.Judo is essentially watered down Jujutsu.

Stephen Cheney 😉

Thanks for the comment. First I want to emphasize a terminology issue: "grappling" is not the same thing as "takedowns," grappling is still very common in modern tournaments. Takedowns were never common and are objectively becoming less common. One clear reason is simply because more tournaments disallow takedowns than they did before. Other than that, tournaments that allow takedowns and record exchanges show a decrease over time in percentage of total exchanges ending in takedowns. Here is the data for SoCal Sword Fight, the largest HEMA tournament in the world: 2018: 3 takedowns out of 208 exchanges (1.4%) 2019: 3 takedowns out of 297 exchanges (1%) 2020: 5 takedowns out of 1667 exchanges (0.3%) 2022: 1 takedown out of 1689 exchanges (0.06%) 2023: 0 takedowns out of 10339 exchanges (0%) 2024: 1 takedown out of 11245 exchanges (0.009%) The data is available on HEMA scorecard. If you still disagree and think that takedowns are common, please send me some video so I can start putting together part 3, I like to see more.

@buckshistoricallongsword9412 I'm just a jujitsu guy. So for me, grappling is all the grabby parts of a fight. I was just curious cause in a general sense grappling is popping off in the US and even in bjj tournys there's alot more emphasis on takedowns nowadays. Figured alot of people cross train nowadays too. And why do you think they ban the takedowns? Is it for safety? Focus on the sword part? Lol yall do be fighting on hard ass surfaces.

@@justin8865 A little of column A, a little of column B. For our sport, they end up being more trouble than their worth, you need a ton of extra rules and equipment, and in exchange you get something that is admittedly very cool, but only happens a very small percentage of the time. Even though they are rare, when they result in an injury, it's usually a life changing one, like someone's leg gets caught and twisted and then they're out of the sport for the next year.

@@buckshistoricallongsword9412 imo mats should be a requirement if you're going to allow takedowns at your event. ideally there would also be limitations to what takedowns you're allowed to go for the same way there are for grappling sports but then that'd require the competitors and refs to know the names of all the takedowns and that'd be a huge pain in the ass. higher amplitude stuff onto hard floors are pretty much always going to be really painful, and the risk of long term injury is going to be really high, particularly when the person being thrown isn't experienced or isn't expecting a grappling exchange (seems to be the case in most of these clips) and therefore can't breakfall properly. 3:10 is pretty egregious for example, ref calls a stop to the action and then uke gets suplexed onto a hardwood floor. seriously uncool move by the other guy. a lot of these takedowns are happening well after a break is called, and some are extremely egregious and would get you penalized/DQd even in a grappling sport. i think in hema you're also going to run into the same issue as judo newaza, where resets get called before anything can really happen; as i mentioned earlier a lot of these takedowns are happening well after a reset is called and with the opponent clearly not actively resisting.

Watch sport fencing then?

Not all double leg takedowns are morote gari. Morote gari is a reaping of both legs, in the clips above the legs are not reaped, the uke is lifted and dropped. Therefore they are sukui nage, not morote gari.