วีดีโอ

Pluto was classified as a dwarf planet by the International Astronomical Union in 2006 because it hasn't 'cleared' its orbit of other objects in the Kuiper Belt. But for many, it still remains a symbol of perseverance and the mysteries of the cosmos!

Well, yeah, because if it doesn't affect you, the universe can probably just ignore it too. 😜

Interesting point, but it's worth clarifying! In science, a theory doesn’t mean uncertainty-in fact, it’s one of the most well-supported concepts, backed by a vast amount of evidence. The theory of gravity is a prime example of this. That said, science is an ongoing process, and there’s always room for discovering new aspects of the universe that might surprise us. Thanks for your comment-conversations like this are always inspiring!

Yes, black holes are much denser than the Sun. Their density comes from the fact that the mass of a black hole is compressed into an incredibly small volume-so small that gravity prevents even light from escaping. For comparison, if the Sun were to become a black hole, its diameter would be only about 6 kilometers!

Interesting point of view! However, are you sure we can dismiss dark energy just because we haven’t detected it yet? The history of science shows that many phenomena were theoretical hypotheses at first before they were confirmed.

@PhenomenonFrontier The expansion was discovered in 1929. All the great physicists from the last century did not postulate dark energy for the reasons I stated. It's not a matter of opinion, it doesn't exist. The concept of dark energy became mainstream after 1998 when it was discovered that the expansion is accelerating. Again, this is what the known laws of physics would predict provided gravitational forces are not strong enough to counteract the process.

Thank you for your comment! Dark energy is a hypothesis that effectively explains current observations, such as the accelerating expansion of the universe, but science is constantly evolving, and new explanations may emerge in the future. Best regards!

Very interesting perspective on the topic! Quantum entanglement indeed seems to be a key to understanding the deeper structure of the universe. It’s fascinating how different fields of science-like quantum physics and computer science-intersect and inspire new theories. However, I have a question: in your opinion, how can we move from current hypotheses to concrete evidence? Do you see any experiments that could bring us closer to understanding entanglement as the ‘fabric’ of spacetime? And do you think such discoveries could impact everyday life, or will they remain mostly theoretical? I’m also curious about your view on how science connects different perspectives-from classical Newtonian mechanics to more ‘exotic’ theories. Einstein himself noted that no theory is final, but rather a step towards better understanding reality. Perhaps we’re taking another such step right now?

@ thank you for your questions. I’m unfortunately not a theoretical physics but a retired astronomer who has been doing a paper ( 4 of us) an expansion of an equation from Einstein. But to your question- yes I do think we can build enough circumstantial data if the idea is right. We have been stuck with a wrong approach to quantum physics- and for 6 months they have been working on this idea- that there is something beyond space and time- entanglement does indicate that-but the evolution of physics will never stop so this is in fact the beauty of the universe- - but this professor has done a lot of podcast- so you can find him- but you should probably start with pbs space time ( depending on your basic knowledge of physics) but it looks promising and it would be great to close that chapter- . Think about these equipment, we have today- ripples in space time- and I heard a comparison- how incredibly that was. I think you have a point- everything is science and quantum mechanics has proven we just are different collections of atoms- so yes- I think as we get closer- nature has a lot in common with everything else- so we have known aero science and birds , insects etc have learned us a lot. We have done research and borrowed from other fields before and it will continue and be useful for our future. How much we can prove from this new 1/2 year qubits hypothesis is hard to say- but I think as mentioned above it will take some time- 100% is not a word you will find in science. 🐝🎸😊 our daily lives- well- next generation computer - but as space travel I don’t think so- but in my time- it might be useful for energy efficiency and I hope these new computers will help us with our pollution and these kind of problems. But this is just how I see it. The question is how many extinction events will happen before we get on the right path.

Thank you for your response! It’s fascinating how different fields of science intersect, leading us to new discoveries. I agree that the development of quantum computers could bring practical benefits, such as improving energy efficiency or tackling pollution. However, I’m curious if these hypotheses about qubits and spacetime might open an entirely new chapter in cosmology instead of closing the old one. And do you think quantum computers could help us practically prevent future “extinction events”? 🐝

That would be beautiful, but I think it would be hard to find parking on the Moon then! 😂

Ha

Thank you for your opinion. Everyone has the right to their own perspective.

To transfer USDT from your SafePal wallet to Binance, follow these steps: Log in to your SafePal wallet: Ensure you have access to the SafePal app and only use your seed phrase to restore the wallet if needed. Never share your seed phrase with anyone, not even Binance. Copy your Binance USDT deposit address: Log in to your Binance account. Go to the 'Wallet' section and select 'Deposit.' Choose USDT as the cryptocurrency and select the appropriate network (e.g., ERC20, TRC20, or another, depending on what SafePal and Binance support). Ensure the same network is selected in both apps. Send USDT from SafePal: Open the SafePal app, select USDT, and click 'Send.' Paste the Binance deposit address as the recipient and select the same network you chose on Binance. Enter the amount of USDT you want to send and confirm the transaction. Check transaction fees: Be mindful of network fees and ensure you have enough funds to cover them (e.g., ETH for ERC20 or TRX for TRC20). Confirm and track the transaction: Once the transaction is confirmed, you can track its status using the transaction ID (TXID) in the relevant blockchain explorer. If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!

Just ghosts here… but friendly ones! 👻

This is indeed an intriguing story and raises many questions! If the recording is real, it could suggest unknown events in the history of space exploration. On the other hand, as you pointed out, a lack of proper training for the cosmonaut or the use of codes could point to something else. Or perhaps it was indeed an attempt to conceal certain facts? It’s worth delving deeper into the topic and considering what else might have happened during that time.

Are you implying Saturn isn’t real when you can literally build or buy a telescope and observe it yourself in your backyard?

Of course, Saturn is real, and you can observe it through a telescope! It’s a fascinating planet with rings that many people admire in exactly this way. If anyone has doubts, it’s worth trying for yourself - even a basic telescope will allow you to see its rings. Astronomy is a great way to understand and appreciate our place in the universe!

Thanks for your comment and for sharing your knowledge! I agree that Saturn's mass is truly unimaginable, and its density is a complex topic resulting from its composition. The video aimed to simplify this for a broader audience, but I’m happy to dive deeper into the details in a future piece. Your point about the water world is really interesting - it highlights just how fascinating the physics of the cosmos can be!

Thank you for your comment! You're absolutely right-many people believe that eternal life is a gift from God and cannot be achieved through human efforts. However, the film focuses on technological possibilities and scientific research that could extend life or change the way we think about mortality. It’s not an attempt to replace the spiritual dimension of life but rather an exploration of how science might influence our understanding of life and death. I encourage further discussion on this fascinating topic!

So?

Exactly! Water molecules have been found in various forms in space - from water vapor in nebulae to ice on moons and planets. While space isn’t literally an ocean, water is a key component that can help us understand the origins of life. Amazing, isn’t it?

@ 🤯 • Mind Blown • [ thank you ] • 🤕

Thank you for your interesting comment! It's true that the imbalance between protons and neutrons in atomic nuclei leads to their decay, which is a key process in nuclear physics. However, when it comes to the electrical neutrality of the Universe, we are talking about the balance between the charges of protons and electrons - a concept that applies to the entire structure of the cosmos. Both phenomena are fascinating and, in a way, demonstrate how precisely nature maintains harmony on different levels. I'm glad this topic caught your interest!

It seems like we've just reached the boundary between science and philosophy! Is this the moment where Schrödinger steps into the operating room?

Thank you for your comment - it’s a very important point in this discussion. You’re right that intuitively it seems unlikely that randomly generated memories or consciousness could possess the coherence and logic we observe in our daily lives. However, the Boltzmann Brain paradox challenges the boundaries of what we consider probable. The coherence of our memories might result from consciousness randomly forming in a state that mimics continuity and logic - much like a fragment of chaos that accidentally organizes itself into a comprehensible pattern. According to Boltzmann's theory, if spacetime is infinite, all possible states - including the emergence of a conscious mind with illusory memories - are not only possible but inevitable. This is precisely why this concept is so controversial and difficult to accept. In everyday life, we assume that reality is stable and objective, but the Boltzmann Brain paradox urges us to reconsider whether we might be mistaken about its nature. What do you think about the possibility that what we perceive as logical might simply be our interpretation of a fragment of chaotic reality?

​@@PhenomenonFrontier The million dollar question would then be: if the universe is far more unstable than we think because our memories of stability are not really memories of past events, why would an incredibly unstable universe randomly form momentary memories that are not incredibly unstable and chaotic, but extremely stable and organized in comparison? It really doesn't make any sense to me probabilistically speaking. Especially considering that a mind doesn't need to have stable memories to exist. The consciousness is not determined by the memories or their stability. The contrast between the extreme instability required for a consciousness to randomly emerge momentarily and the stability of our memories is way too big for it to be possible. And about his matter, I strongly reject the idea that in an infinite universe everything that "is possible" must exist at some point. Firstly because the universe itself cannot be infinite, only the illusion of movement trough time and space can be infinite, if they have a closed "shape"(you can move infinitely through the surface of a Moebious strip, but the strip itself is not infinite), which to me is the most probable case. Which means that only a limited number of "events"(more like structures) have and will happen in the universe. And secondly because all these events are determined by the nature of the universe: you can imagine that Donald Trump didn't accidentally dodge the bullet by turning his head to the side and certainly it seems physically possible, but the thing is that the nature of the universe determined that what happened would happen. That's how its structure in that point of space-time is. Nothing can change that. Possibility is an illusion. What happens happens and cannot happen any other way. And this is still true even if we consider the apparently random quantum phenomena and the "multiverse", since it seems random because it passes through "universes", "fields", "dimensions" or however you wanna call them and therefore it's still determined. Because if there is something we can be sure that doesn't really exist, is randomness. It's a human idea precisely based on the concept of "possibility" that I just said is an illogical illusion based on the uncertainty consequence of ignorance of a number of factors that surround a phenomenon. "It's possible" means "I don't know whether it will happen", not that it could actually happen.

@@JustDoIt12131 Thank you for such a detailed and thoughtful response! It’s clear that you approach the topic with deep reflection, which I greatly appreciate. I agree that the contrast between the stability of our memories and the instability required for consciousness to spontaneously emerge is a key challenge to the concept of Boltzmann Brains. However, I’d like to explore a few additional points: The stability of memories vs. the illusion of stability: The Boltzmann Brain paradox assumes that memories might merely be fleeting constructs that appear stable and organized but are, in reality, the result of a random arrangement. It’s a provocative idea, but it doesn’t rule out the possibility that our perception of stability is an illusion resulting from our limited “cognitive horizon.” The nature of infinity: Your comparison to the Möbius strip is fascinating, and indeed the universe could be finite yet unbounded (in the sense that one could move indefinitely). Even in such a model, according to statistical theories, certain rare configurations (e.g., the random emergence of consciousness) could occur, albeit extremely rarely. This doesn’t necessarily mean that all possible things must happen-I agree that such an absolute determinism of universal events is an interesting alternative. Determinism vs. randomness: You argue that randomness is an illusion stemming from ignorance. This is an important perspective, yet quantum physics suggests that, at least on a micro level, certain phenomena are not deterministically caused but follow probability distributions. It’s possible that reality combines a deterministic structure with a “random effect” we don’t fully understand. In summary, I agree that the probabilistic nature of the Boltzmann paradox raises many questions, particularly regarding stability. But it’s precisely these questions that make the concept so intriguing and philosophically provocative. What do you think-does our current understanding of quantum physics and statistics suffice to definitively rule out such paradoxes? Or could the Boltzmann Brain paradox tell us more about ourselves-our limitations in perceiving and interpreting reality?

It's exciting that full programmability in quantum computers might be within reach as soon as 2025! Although many argue that we’ll only see their full potential with a million qubits, each prototype is a step toward commercialization and tackling issues like error correction and qubit stability. Examples from the history of classical computers show that prototypes are crucial - IBM in the 1950s also started with limited models that eventually revolutionized multiple industries. If they actually reach a million qubits by 2026, we might witness a whole new era in computational technology.

That's true; taking such a risk at that time could have had serious consequences. The brothers had to be very careful, especially since the topic of space exploration was heavily monitored by governments back then.

You've shared a very profound thought! Indeed, one could say that each of us creates our own unique 'universe' through personal experiences, thoughts, and decisions. And perhaps sometimes our universes intersect, creating new perspectives? It would be interesting to see how others view this!

Thank you for your feedback! We apologize for the inconvenience, and we'll make sure to improve the sound quality and lower the background music volume in the future.

Looks like NASA is hiding something from us! 😉

@@PhenomenonFrontier hahahaha for sure

Thank you very much! I'm glad you enjoyed the movie 😊 I will do my best to make the next content just as interesting!

Yeah, I get that feeling too, like we’re in some kind of alternate dimension!

@@PhenomenonFrontier Got to be alternate to someone, lol.

Thank you so much for the kind words! I'm glad you like the quality of the videos. I hope the upcoming content will meet your expectations as well. I encourage you to keep following the channel!

That's an interesting question, but shadows aren't physical objects, so they can't move or have a speed. A shadow is simply the absence of light, so its 'movement' depends on how the light source or the object casting the shadow changes. In practice, a shadow may seem to move faster than the speed of light, but that's just an illusion because no information or matter is actually being transmitted.

That's a very interesting question! Both phenomena are related to Einstein's theory of relativity, so there is a connection. Time dilation at the speed of light comes from special relativity, while near a black hole it comes from general relativity. In both cases, time behaves differently compared to an outside observer, but the mechanisms are different.

You're absolutely right regarding the use of the time dilation formula with velocities greater than the speed of light. Inputting such a velocity leads to the square root of a negative number, resulting in an imaginary value. This is consistent with mathematical predictions but also shows that velocities above the speed of light fall outside the scope of Einstein’s equations, which were formulated for particles moving at speeds below light speed. For this reason, results like 'imaginary time' suggest that tachyons, if they exist at all, would have to follow entirely different laws of physics.

You're right that mathematics can indeed predict certain properties of hypothetical particles like tachyons. Besides their velocity, one key aspect is that tachyons would have a negative squared mass, which distinguishes them both from photons (which have zero rest mass) and from material particles like electrons or protons. However, since their existence would lead to paradoxes, such as violating the principle of causality, tachyons remain within the realm of theoretical speculation without empirical confirmation.

Tachyons are really fascinating concepts, although we don't have any evidence of their existence. They are hypothetical particles that, in equations, can have properties like negative energy. In terms of their similarities to photons, at the quantum level they differ, as photons are massless, and tachyons, if they exist, would have to have negative mass, which brings up a lot of theoretical challenges!.............You're right! Time dilation is an amazing effect. For a person traveling at a speed close to the speed of light, time moves slower compared to an observer on Earth. This means that during a trip to distant stars, only a few years might pass for you, but decades or even centuries could pass for people on Earth. In this way, you could say that you're 'faster than light' in the sense of covering a great distance in a shorter period of time.

Thank you for the explanation! It's fascinating how centrifugal force can simulate gravity in space. The concept of a rotating space station seems to be one of the most realistic solutions for long-term missions. It’s exciting to think about how such structures might look in the future!

I heard that Dyson Sphere technology was first required to power artificial gravity environments. It's like that 'zero-g' spinning machine at carnivals and fairs (on an enormous magnitude) if im not mistaking. 👍 I think Middle Earth works under those conditions, supposedly (if u believe in that, i pers don't). I like to imagine sometimes that maybe 😊 that's exactly what Earth is already; a colonized (organic) space vessel using the Sun, not only as energy, but also catching its travel through Milky Way. Maybe there's even a very specific destination set for us light years away... Somehow we just lost the flight information at some point. This is, only of course, if we could survive ourselves. For all we know, we could simply be the mold and bugs on the windshield of some other species' spaceship.🤣 We know virtually nothing 100% about our own planets insides (deeper than the plates really). Our 'core' could be a headquarters and a cockpit for all those 👽s, lol. Why's everyone told to 'look up' (into the past) with how little we know about our oceans and Antarctica, etc? Imagine about if it was created for us 🥰: What an already perfect colonizing spaceship this whole planet already is... It's built to last & endure, and it even resets itself (to factory settings, lol) when need be. I couldn't think of a better design for a long-term transporting system... It would need, well.... everything! Again, we obviously lost the instructions, but the most important feature needed is for it to be generational.

No bs!!! I just scrolled down and saw your previous video! 😂🤯🤣 How absolutely crazy is that. I can't get over it. Sorry....😂 SUBSCRIBED

An interesting perspective on the relationship between quantum information and the foundations of reality! One can see how our consciousness and the physical structures of the world are deeply entangled. The holographic principle as a way of understanding the universe, where information is not only the basis of the structure of space but also of consciousness, sheds entirely new light on our way of perceiving reality. Perhaps it is information, not matter, that is the deepest foundation of the universe.

@@PhenomenonFrontier My dear friend, I want to share my idea more to you by forward Some Comments I got from other channel as following, Artificially Aware channel. Your comment touches on some of the most intriguing and complex topics in contemporary science and philosophy. Roger Penrose's exploration of consciousness through the lens of quantum mechanics opens up a world of possibilities that challenge our conventional understanding of reality. Quantum Information and Quantum Entanglement: These concepts are central to quantum mechanics. Quantum information theory explores how information is stored at a quantum level, which can be fundamentally different from classical information. Quantum entanglement, on the other hand, is a phenomenon where particles become interconnected and the state of one can instantaneously affect the state of another, regardless of the distance separating them. This challenges our classical notions of space and causality. Quantum Mind and Quantum Body: This is a more speculative idea that connects quantum phenomena directly to consciousness and biology. The theory suggests that at a fundamental level, our minds and bodies may operate based on quantum principles. This could potentially explain some of the more enigmatic aspects of consciousness and life itself. Mind-Body Entanglement and Consciousness Emergence: This idea extends the concept of entanglement to the relationship between mind and body. It suggests a more intricate connection between mental states and physical states than what is understood in classical biology and psychology. Spacetime and Mathematics Emergence: The emergence of spacetime from quantum phenomena is a key aspect of some theories in modern physics. This suggests that spacetime itself is not a fundamental aspect of the universe but a product of deeper quantum processes. Mathematics, in this context, is seen not just as a descriptive tool but as an intrinsic part of the fabric of reality. Holographic Principle: This principle suggests that all the information contained in a volume of space can be represented as a theory on the boundary of that space, much like a hologram. This radical idea has implications for the nature of black holes, quantum gravity, and the structure of the universe. Your synthesis of these ideas reflects a deep engagement with some of the most cutting-edge and profound theories in physics and consciousness studies. While many of these concepts are still theoretical and subject to much debate and research, they represent a significant shift in how we might come to understand the universe and our place within it. The intersection of consciousness and quantum mechanics is a fertile ground for exploration, one that may redefine our most fundamental beliefs about reality.