Interview Archives Learning Objects
Interview Archives Learning Objects
  • 31
  • 93 300
Roger Ebert Learning to Write Through Experience
Roger Ebert, Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist, talks about his earliest experiences as a writer and how they influenced his later style. This is a learning object for all teachers and students to use free of charge in the study of writing.
มุมมอง: 2 773

วีดีโอ

Roger Ebert Avoiding the Boring Interview
มุมมอง 6K5 ปีที่แล้ว
Roger Ebert, Pulitzer Prize Winning Journalist, talks about the difference between a boring hotel room interview and a live action interview, using his interview with actor Lee Marvin as a specific example. This is a learning object that all teachers and students can use, free of charge, in the study of writing and journalism.
Gene Siskel Covering A Movie Like a Hard News Beat Reporter
มุมมอง 3.3K5 ปีที่แล้ว
Gene Siskel, one half of the legendary film criticism duet of Siskel and Ebert, talks about his approach to writing about movies. This is a learning object that is available for all teachers and students to use free of charge.
Roger Ebert What A Movie Review Should Do
มุมมอง 15K5 ปีที่แล้ว
Roger Ebert, Pultizer-Prize winning movie critic, explains what he things a good movie review should be like. This is a learning object all teachers and students can use free of charge to study film criticism, writing, and journalism.
Siskel & Ebert Advise Young Movie Critics
มุมมอง 58K5 ปีที่แล้ว
Legendary Film Critics Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert give advice to students who are writing their first film review. A learning object available for free to all teachers and students. Contains good advice appropriate for critique of literature and other art forms.
ANDY ROONEY Writing for the Spoken Word
มุมมอง 2835 ปีที่แล้ว
CBS News Icon and humorist Andy Rooney gives advice to students about writing for a speech or for a broadcast news story. This is a learning object for all teachers and students to use free of charge in the study of journalism, writing, and broadcast news writing.
Junot Diaz - Discovering the Denouement As You Write
มุมมอง 2275 ปีที่แล้ว
Junot Diaz, Pulitzer Prize winning novelist, discusses the "Process of Discovery" in finding the ending of a story as you write it.
Junot Diaz -- Knowing the Ending of the Novel Before Writing
มุมมอง 1715 ปีที่แล้ว
Junot Diaz, Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist, discusses one approach to plotting a novel: Knowing the ending, before you start.
Junot Diaz Resources I Needed When Starting
มุมมอง 5955 ปีที่แล้ว
Junot Diaz, Pulitzer Prize-winning author, talks about resources that would have been helpful to him as a young writer.
Charles Johnson The Sea as a Presence In Middle Passage
มุมมอง 5255 ปีที่แล้ว
Novelist Charles R. Johnson discusses the significance of the sea as a presence in his National Book Award Winning Novel "Middle Passage."
Charles Johnson -- Spirit of Place in Fiction
มุมมอง 995 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles R. Johnson, novelist and educator, teaches about the importance of "place" in storytelling.
Charles Johnson Possiblity Probability Necessity In Storytelling
มุมมอง 1185 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Johnson, novelist and Professor Emeritus from University of Washington, explains how a fiction writer goes from rough outline to allowing the fictional character to take over the storytelling.
Charles Johnson Why do We Tell Stories?
มุมมอง 4235 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Johnson, celebrated fiction writer, explores why we tell stories in a learning object free for use by all teachers and students.
Charles Johnson Conflict in Storytelling
มุมมอง 5285 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Johnson, author of many groundbreaking novels, including "Middle Passage," explains how conflict functions in storytelling.
Charles Johnson Publishing a First Novel Advice
มุมมอง 815 ปีที่แล้ว
National Book Award winner Charles R. Johnson gives young writers advice about publishing a first novel. His views are quite provocative.
Charles Johnson Advice for Young Writers
มุมมอง 4605 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Johnson Advice for Young Writers
Charles Johnson Description All Five Senses
มุมมอง 1345 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Johnson Description All Five Senses
Charles Johnson Reading as a Writer
มุมมอง 1.5K5 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Johnson Reading as a Writer
Charles Johnson On Voice in Writing
มุมมอง 2055 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Johnson On Voice in Writing
Charles Johnson Revision Immersing Himself Into A Novel
มุมมอง 2055 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Johnson Revision Immersing Himself Into A Novel
Charles Johnson Responding to Art with Art
มุมมอง 735 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Johnson Responding to Art with Art
Charles Johnson On his story China and John Gardner
มุมมอง 5835 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Johnson On his story China and John Gardner
Charles Johnson on the Short Story Form
มุมมอง 675 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Johnson on the Short Story Form
Charles Osgood Bad Interviews Ethical Interviews
มุมมอง 745 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Osgood Bad Interviews Ethical Interviews
Charles Osgood Ethics in Reporting
มุมมอง 775 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Osgood Ethics in Reporting
Charles Osgood Reporting VS Storytelling
มุมมอง 835 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Osgood Reporting VS Storytelling
Charles Osgood Storytelling Broadcast Journalism ©
มุมมอง 855 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Osgood Storytelling Broadcast Journalism ©
Charles Osgood Writing for Radio VS Writing for Television
มุมมอง 2315 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Osgood Writing for Radio VS Writing for Television
Charles Osgood Radio in Internet Age
มุมมอง 1685 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Osgood Radio in Internet Age
Charles Johnson Theme Oxherding Tale Middle Passage
มุมมอง 5675 ปีที่แล้ว
Charles Johnson Theme Oxherding Tale Middle Passage

ความคิดเห็น

  • @BobbyPeru-l5r
    @BobbyPeru-l5r 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This didn't work well.

  • @pulse4503
    @pulse4503 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very talented guy, a real cinema lover 🙂👌♥️

  • @seangardner7874
    @seangardner7874 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Does anyone know where to find the full interview?

  • @dylspeare
    @dylspeare หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am an English major and I watch this every year as a reminder to stay true to myself in my writing. Two thumbs up!

  • @plisskenetic
    @plisskenetic หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wanna watch this full segment!

  • @zedoctor3724
    @zedoctor3724 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "...(criticism) is not a science. You're not talking about the truth. You're not saying, 'This is what happened.' What you're saying is, 'This is what happened to me. This is how I feel.'" Dude, EVERY TH-cam media critic needs to watch this video at some point. I've seen way too many people post reviews on movies or video games that come across as voiced Wikipedia articles.

  • @RamtroStudios
    @RamtroStudios 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what year is this from?

  • @grimlyfiendish5579
    @grimlyfiendish5579 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These two idiots spoiled half the movies they reviewed for audiences so what the hell does he know? 😂 They both had about 50% decent taste.

  • @kenneld
    @kenneld 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "A man goes to the movies. The critic must be honest enough to admit that he is that man." - Robert Warshow Ebert often said this quote is the foundation of his approach to criticism.

  • @ATMyles
    @ATMyles 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for uploading this, and with such great quality, too. I’d somehow never seen it before.

  • @louishart6725
    @louishart6725 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I honestly used to get excited about films coming out just to read and watch Roger’s review of it.

  • @sha11235
    @sha11235 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonder if anyone was reading the paper, saw Gene's picture and then realized, "Oh, my God, he's right here on the bus! Better read his stuff now!"

    • @sm5574
      @sm5574 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Funny, but he likely only had a byline, not a picture.

  • @sha11235
    @sha11235 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So Gene was a film critic for 30 years and Roger 46.

  • @pedroarana5483
    @pedroarana5483 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is gold

  • @thefinercontent
    @thefinercontent 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it becomes more true by the day now folks can be bought by corpos to write only positive reviews

  • @staxmantim
    @staxmantim 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very insightful. Not that he missed his calling cause there was nothing at the time like Siskel & Ebert, but reviewing is such a totally subjective business. Sometimes you feel they’re on point. Sometimes you feel they’re way off. But, it seems he could’ve been an excellent interviewer & remembered for that

  • @lilianxu8888
    @lilianxu8888 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How I miss them!

  • @henrymockingbird9645
    @henrymockingbird9645 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I feel like more TH-cam reviewers and critics should watch this especially in today age when we have internet toxic discourse

  • @ilovebrandnewcarpets
    @ilovebrandnewcarpets 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gene has been gone 25 years and Roger 10...crazy how fast time has passed...

  • @ilovebrandnewcarpets
    @ilovebrandnewcarpets 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gene and Rog are 1 and 1a the GOAT reviewers. The way they interacted and debated with each other will never be matched.

  • @SLIDESPOT
    @SLIDESPOT 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Since i was s kid i loved watching Siskel and Ebert because they gave a shit, i mean they gave a shit, about film, about thought, about writing and watching their respect for each other grow over the years was beautiful.

  • @kmetcalfe
    @kmetcalfe 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They get knocked so often as being 'TV critics' and simple reviewers, it's wonderful to be reminded that they were at the top of the field of film criticism, with Ebert even having won a Pulitzer Prize for his interviews.

  • @kmetcalfe
    @kmetcalfe 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If he had said this 5 years later, he would have brought up how one step worse than the hotel interviews, are the hotel interviews with the publicist in the room. Who would basically be dictating the talking points. Not many stars were comfortable without them, and many others were not permitted to have the unscripted type of interviews Roger did so well.

  • @AlkisenSuper
    @AlkisenSuper 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does anybody have the full interview? I would love to see the rest!

    • @sha11235
      @sha11235 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's on here.

  • @zachmorley158
    @zachmorley158 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I watched his Friday the 13th reviews - I know he didn’t live by this

  • @phantomfire8228
    @phantomfire8228 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5:15

  • @phantomfire8228
    @phantomfire8228 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3:40

  • @phantomfire8228
    @phantomfire8228 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:11

  • @djvoid1
    @djvoid1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Was anyone else in the room when this was filmed?

    • @ead630
      @ead630 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ebert

  • @magicsinglez
    @magicsinglez 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lol. Utter stupidity. Total. ‘Write what you want. You won’t be destroyed’. That’s the whole point of political correctness! Unless there were consequences, no one would subscribe to what is politically correct. The consequences are what make it something that is politically correct. Speaking of that. Never has anyone seen such a rise of pure hypocrisy.

  • @CCPC-g6k
    @CCPC-g6k 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Briliant! And what a defense of the interrelationship between writing and reading!

  • @lindlr
    @lindlr 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love Professor Johnson's enthusiasm and passion about literary writing and readers. An inspiration.

  • @stevebragg4256
    @stevebragg4256 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For once critics admit it is subjective. Some critics carry on like their opinion is objective fact.

  • @piticfilms
    @piticfilms 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4:50 "Political Correctness is the Fascism of the 90's" -Roger Ebert ... And still is today.

  • @wallygator92
    @wallygator92 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I miss these two. They would have never given in to the manipulation that most of Rotten Tomatoes did.

  • @ElRey_Congo
    @ElRey_Congo ปีที่แล้ว

    I remember when I was a kid Roger Ebert hated every movie that was my favorite. Siskel was my dude

    • @R-Lee-
      @R-Lee- 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah he did the opposite of everything he said in this when he reviewed John Carpenter's The Thing. A movie that I love and most people love.

  • @NeonKC
    @NeonKC ปีที่แล้ว

    3:57 when was this? How is he saying this so long ago?

  • @invisibleray6987
    @invisibleray6987 ปีที่แล้ว

    Siskel wot a daft old fart

  • @claytonshank6871
    @claytonshank6871 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is an incredibly important clip to have in circulation. Not only is it bewilderingly prophetic but it’s just damn good advice from two of the best.

  • @orbyfan
    @orbyfan ปีที่แล้ว

    I miss these guys; not only are the movies less interesting these days, but hearing the reviews is a lot less interesting since they departed the scene. There's one instance I can think of when they didn't take their own advice, and did just follow the crowd of critics, when they gave glowing reviews to "The Last Temptation of Christ" in 1988.

    • @davidlevy4291
      @davidlevy4291 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Woah.. Why are you so convinced they didn't sincerely like that film? I thought it was fantastic.

    • @orbyfan
      @orbyfan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidlevy4291 Michael Medved was one of the few critics to publicly slam that movie, and he claimed to know critics who actually hated it but wrote glowing reviews because they didn't want to be seen as agreeing with Christians. I've seen the movie, and it stinks.

  • @lynnturman8157
    @lynnturman8157 ปีที่แล้ว

    As great and as prescient as these two were, I'm not sure this is good advice for the 2020s. Saying what you honestly think & feel nowadays feels like a recipe for getting yourself cancelled.

  • @Ali-gb7mf
    @Ali-gb7mf ปีที่แล้ว

    I mis these guys.

  • @NealX_Gaming
    @NealX_Gaming ปีที่แล้ว

    All I want to say is that I wish Ebert and Siskel had taught my English writing courses in high school instead of what I got -- insisting on 3rd person, dry bones, "scientific" book reports, instead of encouraging the kind of personal, passionate tone that these pros knew was the true way of the art of criticism.

  • @commanderkeen3787
    @commanderkeen3787 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is really such a wonderful bit of intellectual conversation between two guys I really respected. Shame we never get to see this kind of thing on TV any more

  • @christinekelley7879
    @christinekelley7879 ปีที่แล้ว

    What episode is this?

  • @cl759
    @cl759 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love these little tips from them. Also, he's so right about this topic, Carrie down (that's carpe Diem in autocorrect🤣)

  • @tjofcarolina1776
    @tjofcarolina1776 ปีที่แล้ว

    People watching video essays as entertainment nowadays seems less odd when Ebert put it that way

  • @idjut1080
    @idjut1080 ปีที่แล้ว

    In grade school & high school in California they advise to not make it about you. Credit stealing sons of bitches the system is.

  • @zt1053
    @zt1053 ปีที่แล้ว

    The dirty little secret about Siskel & Ebert is most viewers watched them because of their interactions not really caring about their opinions.

  • @JoeyArmstrong2800
    @JoeyArmstrong2800 ปีที่แล้ว

    The "Status Quo" or P.C is the ultimate death of creativity. Further more, "Representation" is only ego and complete nonsense. Don't ever think you represent anyone other than yourself.