วีดีโอ

Shut you down 😊

Better to be either hot or cold the bible says, instead of lukewarm... a part time christian is an obstacle to non believers, a stumbling stone... God will spew such ones out of his mouth. Either all in or not in at all.. Whosoever keepeth the whole law and yet offend in one point He is guilty of all.. u will find most protestants do not keep the fourth commandment. As the Catholic catechism speaks, only true protestants are seventh day Adventists because they do not keep holy the day catechism proclaims papal Rome changed..they say the Catholic churches transferred the solemnity from Saturday to Sunday and all other protestants are not protestants at all as they keep holy the day the church boasts it has the authority to change

Nice job Ralph!

Good job Joy you spoke about everything how to treat each other. proud of you . God USE YOU TO SEND A MESSAGE HOW SISTERS IS TO GROW AND TREAT ONE ANOTHER.

Joy you gave me so much to think about and change in my walk with God to keep growing and becoming more like Christ! Thank you so much! 😘 😍love you❣️

Thank you brother Ralph. At 10:21, you said, "Oxygen is received through the mother from the time of conception." To be exact, oxygen is received through the mother from the time of implantation, about a week after fertilization. So, I would say as Christians we must oppose legalized abortion, but we mustn't go so far as to oppose legalized distribution of anti-nidation drugs. Those who take anti-nidation drugs still need to hear the gospel, because Christians have no reason to take such drugs, except for rape or treatment of acne.

A comparison of evolution and creationism?! Apples and oranges, right off the bat. Creationism offers an explanation for literally everything--where the planets and stars and seahorses and granites and dandelions came from, plus it offers an explanation even for the origin of intangible phenomena like happiness and souls. It also contains a justification for religion and faith. Creationism is also, as a religious dogma, not subject to questioning, revision, or falsification, those all being technically heretical if not outright blasphemous. Darwin's theory of evolution offers a tentative explanation of ONE observed phenomenon--speciation. That's it. That's all it does. It says nothing about where anything came from. It also says nothing at all about God or religion. It's also by definition as a scientific theory tentative, meaning that it can be falsified. And as a theory, it's subject to all the testing anybody cares to do. I am baffled as to why creationists continually conflate these two kinds of statements. Creationism is about everything, and is based in religious dogma; scientific theories are about one thing at a time and are based on empirical evidence. Creationism is by definition immune to inquiry; scientific theories must be tested. Two different kinds of statements, incompatible in every way: why do creationists keep trying to compare them? I really wonder about that.